See response to your identical (and equally idiotic comment) on the other thread. Declaring that pre-born life is protected by the Constitution is not to legislate. As with your other comment, you clearly bumble and fumble and confuse the two.
In fact, the wording of this ruling (which you seem unable to comprehend) actively precludes any federal legislation to outlaw abortion nationwide. They could do it, the same way that federal law makes marijuana illegal, but it would only be a token / symbolic thing as per this latest disastrously-worded ruling, they cannot actually impose it on any states.
The SCOTUS can only rule upon the disputed constitutional issue before it (which was whether Dobbs represented a violation of the constitutional protection afforded in Roe).
Lad in his ignorance imagines the SCOTUS can go on to address other uncontested issues (effectively usurping the authority of congress).
What a dumbass.
You see, Lad (as a solipsist on everything from the shape of the earth, to a magisterium which has mistranslated “in voto” for 500 years, to the identity of the pope, to a fake Lucy, to a magisterium erring on BOD for 500 years, to “Pope” Siri, and on, and on, and on) cannot distinguish between the fantasies of his subjective defective intellect, and reality, and earnestly believes his delusions.
You read them at your peril...unless you still have common sense and two feet on the ground.
Meanwhile, normal people can/are rejoicing.
Topic: SCOTUS ruling would be a disaster for Pro Life (Read 13474 times)