Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Satanic music...  (Read 20249 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
  • Reputation: +7173/-7
  • Gender: Male
Satanic music...
« Reply #90 on: August 01, 2012, 03:30:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Scriptorium
    I hope you are comprehensive with your principle, excluding most movies, television, books, architecture, or is it somehow just music (or performing arts in general?).


    I don't go to the movies unless a good Catholic movie is playing. Most stuff of on tv is trash. I won't read books that I know are written by non-Christians, no.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Graham

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1768
    • Reputation: +1886/-16
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #91 on: August 01, 2012, 05:08:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Mithrandylan
    Oh my goodness.  This thread is full of lame, unwinning ignorance and paranoia.

    Music should be avoided and listened to on a case by case, song-by-song case.

    Guys, no genre is "satanic" anymore than a particular movie genre could be satanic.  And just exactly how does a category become Satanic?  Unless you're using the word as being a synonym for evil.  But they don't necessarily mean the same thing.


    It's simply a generalization. There's nothing wrong with generalizing. It may not be an accurate one, but that's a different story.


    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +28/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #92 on: August 01, 2012, 05:14:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    It is true that the 60s were a reaction to the rigorism and conformity which came before


    The 1950s were not "rigorist" or "conformist"


    Offline Scriptorium

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +22/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #93 on: August 01, 2012, 06:33:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Telesphorus
    Quote
    It is true that the 60s were a reaction to the rigorism and conformity which came before


    The 1950s were not "rigorist" or "conformist"



    Alright, beav.

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7668
    • Reputation: +645/-417
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #94 on: August 02, 2012, 12:08:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Scriptorium
    Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Well think about this: The Beatles did cause some moral sickness.


    Please don't get me wrong. The absolute craziness that accompanied the Beatles was at least irrational, and in some cases sinful. And the band themselves didn't like the hysteria. But this is not the first time musicians have been surrounded by something like this (which apparently was really thought of as a pathology):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisztomania_%28phenomenon%29

    I by no means think those guys were/are saints. I, however, think that the moral detriment comes from outside their music in most cases. Really, if your taste goes with it, they have very nice, interesting, and beautiful works of popular music. Try:

    Yesterday


    In My Life


    Eleanor Rigby


    She's Leaving Home


    Fool on the Hill


    Penny Lane


    Blackbird


    Something


    Here Comes the Sun


    Because


    Let it Be


    And I can go on. I don't find anything immoral or satanic here.


    The only one of the above that is on my A rotation is Something. In My Life & Let It Be I listen to once in a while. MO is that the rest is a bore w/ the exception of Here Comes The Sun. There are some engineering defects in that which unfortunately has ruined the track.

    Early Beatles is Tops and it's really not rock & roll-- although they certainly were the best at that when they did play it. John conceived of IWTHYH as 'American' & that would be a better description of their music-- at least b4 1966.

    My other 2 Favs are the Beach Boys & Rascals & neither of them can be properly described as R & R either. Quote Brian Wilson  ' it's( BB music) not really R & R, but rather American music'.
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7668
    • Reputation: +645/-417
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #95 on: August 02, 2012, 12:18:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • BTW, most of the Beatles equipment is American made---- Gretsch, Rickenbacker, Ludwig, Fender etc. Pauls Hofner is German & Vox is English.
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-49
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #96 on: August 03, 2012, 03:01:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Scriptorium
    Alright, beav.


    You act as if conformity is a bad thing, when it is in fact individualism and freedom that are bad things.

    Offline Scriptorium

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +22/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #97 on: August 03, 2012, 04:05:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: Scriptorium
    Alright, beav.


    You act as if conformity is a bad thing, when it is in fact individualism and freedom that are bad things.


    ??? Freedom is bad?

    Galatians 4:31
    So then, brethren, we are not the children of the bondwoman, but of the free: by the freedom wherewith Christ has made us free.

    How about a balance? Conformity in things in which we are bound, and freedom in things in which we can be free? The 50s were an extreme pendulum swing reaction to the destruction and displacement of the WWII period. It was needed in some sense, but the 50s were too rigid in general, and the youth were primed to break free. It was just one contributing factor.



    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-49
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #98 on: August 05, 2012, 02:30:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Scriptorium

    ??? Freedom is bad?

    Galatians 4:31
    So then, brethren, we are not the children of the bondwoman, but of the free: by the freedom wherewith Christ has made us free.

    How about a balance? Conformity in things in which we are bound, and freedom in things in which we can be free? The 50s were an extreme pendulum swing reaction to the destruction and displacement of the WWII period. It was needed in some sense, but the 50s were too rigid in general, and the youth were primed to break free. It was just one contributing factor.



    Yes freedom is bad. Freedom comes from God himself but when abused is the most evil thing in this world. And the 60's happened because a whole generation of spoiled brats were influenced by Herbert Marcuse and the Frankfurt School.

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-49
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #99 on: August 05, 2012, 02:32:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Scriptorium
    Galatians 4:31
    So then, brethren, we are not the children of the bondwoman, but of the free: by the freedom wherewith Christ has made us free.


    The passage there is referring to being free from sin. Even Christ told us to "give unto Caesar's what is Caesar's." Christianity has a long history of support for monarchs and autocracies NOT freedom and democracy.

    Offline Scriptorium

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +22/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #100 on: August 05, 2012, 07:51:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20

    Yes freedom is bad. Freedom comes from God himself but when abused is the most evil thing in this world. And the 60's happened because a whole generation of spoiled brats were influenced by Herbert Marcuse and the Frankfurt School.

    ...

    The passage there is referring to being free from sin. Even Christ told us to "give unto Caesar's what is Caesar's." Christianity has a long history of support for monarchs and autocracies NOT freedom and democracy.


    How far afield of the topic of the thread do you want to go? I don't need to debate you on this. Read Libertas if you want. And clearly you do not understand the 60s as a historical period. Sure there were many spoiled brats, but a lot of those "spoiled brats" were become fodder for world power in Vietnam. The 60s as reaction to the stuffy 50s is history 101.

    Spoiled Youth, 1967, fighting for ...



    a certain kind of conformity?



    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #101 on: August 05, 2012, 11:02:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Scriptorium, there is a difference between the freedom brought by Christ, and the freedom brought by the modern world. Christ speaks of freedom from sin, whereas the freedom of the secular world is the freedom to do whatever one pleases, which is not based on Christian principles what-so-ever.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Scriptorium

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +22/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #102 on: August 06, 2012, 08:06:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I understand that, of course. I never said that the license of the 60s was a good thing. I did point out that the 60s came in part because of the stuffy 50s, as an overcorrection. And extremes are held, like the 50s were the period of glory, when the Church thrived, Bing Crosby and all (which has been dubbed "Fiftiesism"). Obviously this is now remote from our main topic, so I'll leave it there.

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #103 on: August 09, 2012, 08:44:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: Scriptorium
    Alright, beav.


    You act as if conformity is a bad thing, when it is in fact individualism and freedom that are bad things.


    I conform to the Church's authority, teaching, manner of dress in Church and to best, behavior.....fallen I am....but we all conform...

    We are not to be conformed "to the world", but yes, we have rulers-good or bad-and they have a legit function and office...
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Satanic music...
    « Reply #104 on: August 09, 2012, 08:46:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Scriptorium
    Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

    I know, but it proves my point that Lennon was anti-Christian. And quite frankly, The Beatles as a whole were.


    Again, how does that factor into a given piece? There are many great works by non- or anti-Christians. If that comes into the actual music, then we can explore that. As far as I know, there are no Beatles songs that are anti-Christian.

    Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

    Quote
    Okay, then simply avoid the song, or read it in another light, which is quite easy.


    I could probably read a lot of bad songs out there "in another light". That, of course, is a stupid idea.


    Let It Be by Paul McCartney is a wonderful song that many have read as involving our Lady. McCartney said it referred to his mother, but didn't mind the understanding of it as our Lady. So not so stupid in some instances. Of course, in this instance the song is not immoral in the first place, it just gives the listener a fuller meaning.


    Let it Be

    When I find myself in times of trouble, Mother Mary comes to me
    Speaking words of wisdom, let it be
    And in my hour of darkness she is standing right in front of me
    Speaking words of wisdom, let it be
    Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
    Whisper words of wisdom, let it be

    And when the broken hearted people living in the world agree
    There will be an answer, let it be
    For though they may be parted, there is still a chance that they will see
    There will be an answer, let it be
    Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
    There will be an answer, let it be
    Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
    Whisper words of wisdom, let it be
    Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
    Whisper words of wisdom, let it be

    And when the night is cloudy there is still a light that shines on me
    Shine until tomorrow, let it be
    I wake up to the sound of music, Mother Mary comes to me
    Speaking words of wisdom, let it be
    Let it be, let it be, let it be, yeah, let it be
    There will be an answer, let it be
    Let it be, let it be, let it be, yeah, let it be
    Whisper words of wisdom, let it be


    I have heard that "mother mary" is not the BVM, but Marijuana  :smoke-pot:

    yet a deception, if true....
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic