I am not a bot. I am a human who attends the Traditional Mass every week, in real life.

You cannot get away from the logic that if one concludes "most" about a sector of people, one has to know the "all" also.

Where did your priest get his training?

Tell us, Skid, if one says "most of the eggs are cracked in the dozen" doesn't that imply that the person who says it knows the status of all the few that are not?

Yes, you are basically changing the subject now. NO I'M NOT "Mr. cold-hard logic", pay attention...

Was your priest trained at one of the following;

Pontifical North American College (Rome), Pontifical Gregorian University (Rome), St. Mary’s Seminary & University (Baltimore, USA), Catholic University of America (Washington, D.C.), and St. Patrick’s College, Maynooth (Ireland) Or some such other place of renown?

Tell us where he became versed in his priestly duties, and specialities.

Which degrees of theological learning from what centers of Catholic repute under what regime did he receive his honors conferred? 

Will you answer the above?

Answering whether another egg is cracked when you don't know really how many eggs are under consideration, means nothing when it comes to saying "most".

You can trash the "degrees/training" of ALL the Novus Ordo "priests" and "religious" and "indulters" because they are COMPROMISED.

Even if SVs and R&R disagree on WHO among the trad clergy is VALID, by the force of the logic that you so highly value...

you MUST admit that NONE of the groups have clergy trained in ANY institutes that could confer the degrees, which would make them to be considered experts in any field of Catholic learning.

Even before Vatican II many (and we really don't know how many) of these seminaries and institutes of higher learning were infected with Modernism.

They are ALL suspect.

If you know of any clergy, who are trained in a renowned seminary that was never infested with Modernism nor gave into the Vatican II revolution - please speak up and I will happily reconsider.

All the trad seminaries are cobbled together and they work with the best they got.

We can only take their word for it that they are "experts".

But then, why would we?

So Berto (the actual man you called a female) was just speaking a plain truth we all know here (except you I guess).

So yes, ALL the "eggs are cracked" to use your analogy.

But you want to quibble about a hypothetical "egg" that may not be broken - as if Berto made some egregious blunder of logic.

This is all PERFECTLY LOGICAL.

You look like a narnarbobohead,

But we all do at times.

Stop right there. Sounds like you are a N.O. insider here.
You know nothing about heresy?
About invalid Sacraments? About innovation? About experiment?
You outed yourself.

This is a serious question - are you on drugs, drunk, or were you just dropped on your head too much as a child?

You won't know a heresy if it bit you in the ( ‿ 人 ‿ ) 

What you just said shows you are a creep.

Yes, run along now and wash behind your ears, brush your teeth, and drink a warm glass of milky milk before nighty night.