The OP title questions start at 1:03:00


to his stance on FE.
to his stance on Heliocentrism.
to his stance on voting for Trump.

His comments upon the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima in 1917 are not exactly reassuring, either.

Does anyone know any of them who would ever touch the Jєωιѕн problem with a 100-foot pole?

Well, we know it isn't +Sanborn based on his answers to that question above.

His take on Trumpenstein was particularly pathetic.  No mention of DJT's insane support of Iz-Ra-Hell, the ongoing Ritual Sacrifice in Gaza, etc., but clearly he was concerned about the fact that he had to pay a $700 tariff on a chalice from Europe.

Yeah, that wasn't a good look.  I recognize that this was a bit of a digresson onto the tariffs, saying Trump's wrong about those, but it leaves a very poor perception, that and when he complained about the cost of groceries ... as if he has to actually pay for them himself.  But no mention of the horrific genocide, and all the other wickedness perpetrated by the Jews and supported / enabled by Trump.  I can't help think that it's reminiscent of Fr. Cekada's horribly scandalous statement on Terri Schiavo, where he was bitching about how much it would cost him to keep Terri alive ... undoubtedly as he's downing one of their typicaly $100 bottles of wine.

Absolutely no mention of the moral depravities of Trump, the Epstein stuff, the Jews, Gaza.

When he does gloss over the Jєωιѕн problem, he says that the Jews obtained disproportionate representation in and influence over various institutions due to their drive and ambition ... as if this was to their credit, not that this happened due to their gross immorality, where they accuмulated wealth through usury and therefore had a tactical advantage over Catholics, who considered it immoral ... and because the Jews lie, cheat, steal, and murder with reckless abandon.

Father Sanborn

So you're back with yoru slanderous nosense.  Bishop Sanborn.

I am not bashing Bp. Sanborn or any clergyman in particular, but "Trads" are naive when they think that their priests and bishops are very wise, knowledgeable and responsible like the clergy of old.

Most of them know only the bare mininum to administer the sacraments and preach sermons.

Yes. Our condition in that regard is quite pathetic. They are often, "blind leaders leading the blind", but we often assume goodwill nonetheless...

They needs data to apply Catholic teaching. The data is secular and not their business most often.

Where do you get that "most" of them only know the bare minimum? Did you take a poll?

I speak from experience. If your experience with them has been different, good for you, because you will have an easier time.