since leftists are statists who view the state as their salvation, and if not salvation, they view it as their guide to the exclusion of all other sources.
The use of the word "statist" suggests you've been reading to much of their literature.
Certainly anarchists are leftists and are not "statists."
libertarianism is just another dehumanizing ideology sprung from poisoned Jєωιѕн brains that has much more in common with socialism than it has with the Social Reign of Christ.
An anarchist leftist is just someone who wants to destroy existing opposition. Once the anarchist has served his purpose, he will cease the attack. A good example of people abandoning a cause is the Democratic party in the U.S. They were rabidly anti-war until they got a democrat elected and then they lost interest. They haven't made a squeak about Guantanamo but it was there "cause celebre" while W was president. They occasionally give lip service against the drone attacks. Other than that, they used the "bush lied, kids died" but they didn't say that their idea of a solution is "vote democrat".
As for Libertarianism, as an ism, it's the most valid secular position to embrace in the current times, although it would not be an advocate of the Social Reign of Christ it would also not be an enemy since libertarian ideas are largely non-aggressive.
Libertarianism is the antithesis of socialism, Tele. An exact opposite. You can hardly be a socialist and anti-state. How would that work?
The libertarian view on abortion is wretched. It does not forbid abortion but it also does not encourage abortion. And it, as an idea, would not require someone else to pay for an abortion.
For the record, I am not a libertarian. I remain entirely aloof. But I would adhere more to libertarian views than either of the political parties in the U.S.