Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Rothbards idiotic defense of libertarianism  (Read 5392 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rothbards idiotic defense of libertarianism
« Reply #25 on: August 01, 2013, 11:59:12 AM »
Quote
And in the bedroom, too, if Ronnie has his way. Although abortion
is not yet illegal, it is not for lack of effort by the Reagan
Administration. The relentless Reaganite drive to conservatize
the judiciary will likely recriminalize abortion soon, making
criminals out of millions of American women each year. George
Bush, for less than twenty-four glorious hours, was moved to take
a consistent position: if abortion is murder, then all women who
engage in abortion are murderers. But it took only a day for his
handlers to pull George back from the abyss of logic, and to advocate
only criminalizing the doctors, the hired hands of the women who
get abortions.



Rothbard is an abortion loving Jєωιѕн rat.

When the Jews ritually murdered gentile children they didn't consider it murder either, because they considered Goyim animals.

Rothbards idiotic defense of libertarianism
« Reply #26 on: August 01, 2013, 12:50:30 PM »
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
Again can we talk like a normal person please? I thought this was going to be a calm discussion about what is wrong with Rothbard's prognosis on "society's ills." I didn't realize we would have some on here try to defend this man, considering the Church has a definite set of economic views which is anti-thetical to libertarianism.


"Talk"? But your own words show that genuine talk holds no interest for you! You plainly state that you expect agreement with your supposed insights. As I put it above, you want your daily quotient of attaboys.

Look for them elsewhere (I see that Telesphorus is cheering you on, for instance). I for one am not here to play the stooge for you, and I see no reason to hold my tongue on a public forum when I see you make comments that manifest a shortage of accurate information and an absence of reflection.


Offline Capt McQuigg

  • Supporter
Rothbards idiotic defense of libertarianism
« Reply #27 on: August 01, 2013, 12:50:42 PM »
Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote from: Capt McQuigg
since leftists are statists who view the state as their salvation, and if not salvation, they view it as their guide to the exclusion of all other sources.


The use of the word "statist" suggests you've been reading to much of their literature.  

Certainly anarchists are leftists and are not "statists."

libertarianism is just another dehumanizing ideology sprung from poisoned Jєωιѕн brains that has much more in common with socialism than it has with the Social Reign of Christ.


An anarchist leftist is just someone who wants to destroy existing opposition.  Once the anarchist has served his purpose, he will cease the attack.  A good example of people abandoning a cause is the Democratic party in the U.S.  They were rabidly anti-war until they got a democrat elected and then they lost interest.  They haven't made a squeak about Guantanamo but it was there "cause celebre" while W was president.  They occasionally give lip service against the drone attacks.  Other than that, they used the "bush lied, kids died" but they didn't say that their idea of a solution is "vote democrat".    

As for Libertarianism, as an ism, it's the most valid secular position to embrace in the current times, although it would not be an advocate of the Social Reign of Christ it would also not be an enemy since libertarian ideas are largely non-aggressive.

Libertarianism is the antithesis of socialism, Tele.  An exact opposite.  You can hardly be a socialist and anti-state.  How would that work?  

The libertarian view on abortion is wretched.  It does not forbid abortion but it also does not encourage abortion.  And it, as an idea, would not require someone else to pay for an abortion.  

For the record, I am not a libertarian.  I remain entirely aloof.  But I would adhere more to libertarian views than either of the political parties in the U.S.  

Offline Capt McQuigg

  • Supporter
Rothbards idiotic defense of libertarianism
« Reply #28 on: August 01, 2013, 12:52:29 PM »
Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote
And in the bedroom, too, if Ronnie has his way. Although abortion
is not yet illegal, it is not for lack of effort by the Reagan
Administration. The relentless Reaganite drive to conservatize
the judiciary will likely recriminalize abortion soon, making
criminals out of millions of American women each year. George
Bush, for less than twenty-four glorious hours, was moved to take
a consistent position: if abortion is murder, then all women who
engage in abortion are murderers. But it took only a day for his
handlers to pull George back from the abyss of logic, and to advocate
only criminalizing the doctors, the hired hands of the women who
get abortions.



Rothbard is an abortion loving Jєωιѕн rat.

When the Jews ritually murdered gentile children they didn't consider it murder either, because they considered Goyim animals.


Jєωιѕн people will always be pro-abortion.  And that goes for those who are "Orthodox" or "Chabad".  

Rothbards idiotic defense of libertarianism
« Reply #29 on: August 01, 2013, 05:31:36 PM »
Quote from: Capt McQuigg
An anarchist leftist is just someone who wants to destroy existing opposition.  Once the anarchist has served his purpose, he will cease the attack.  


I could say a libertarian "rightist" is just someone who wants to destroy opposition until they have accuмulated enough power and wealth, at that point they will organize the state to ensure that they retain their power.

Alan Greenspan was a Rand-cultist then went to run the fed.

A person could also say, once socialists destroy the opposition they want the benefits of capitalism and being rich and so they rebrand themselves as libertarians.

Saying that all leftists are "statists" is absurd.

Quote
Libertarianism is the antithesis of socialism, Tele.  An exact opposite.


That's nonsense.

Quote
 You can hardly be a socialist and anti-state.  How would that work?  


There are huge numbers of leftists that consider themselves to be so.

The ideal of socialism doesn't work at all.  

And neither does the libertarian ideal.  Libertarians and anarchists both tend to support the state, just as socialist in power tend to engage in capitalistic pursuits.