It isn't necessary to ask the devil. The answer is obvious. Though potheads and their supporters will pretend otherwise.
More irrational emoting (which is all you folks have) ... straw-manning everyone who simply applies the principles of Catholic moral theology as "potheads" or "supporters" (thereof). Nobody, not even Jone, ever advocated someone becoming a "pothead" (chronic abuser of marijuana). People have defended medical marijuana and the occasional use of a small amount to relieve anxiety and stress (the same way one might consume wine).
This is no different than if a Prot who believed alcohol use was immoral were characterizing Catholics as "drunks and their supporters", even though Catholics do not condone drunkenness, just the moderate use of alcohol (yes, even for relaxation and recreation/merriment).
I still await an actual RATIONAL response to the question that I have posted about explaining the morally-relevant difference between alcohol and marijuana.
But instead you create strawmen, emote, use derogatory terms, cite "Alasdair" Crowley, etc. etc.
It's utterly ridiculous and absurd.