Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

Should females on CI be restricted to five comments a week?

Yes
4 (9.5%)
No
30 (71.4%)
Restriction to 10 comments a week is more reasonable.
2 (4.8%)
Restriction to 15 comments a week is more reasonable.
2 (4.8%)
Restriction to 1 comment each day is more reasonable.
4 (9.5%)

Total Members Voted: 41

Voting closed: May 23, 2026, 06:46:24 PM

Author Topic: Poll - Restrict Women on CI?  (Read 5544 times)

1 Member and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Poll - Restrict Women on CI?
« Reply #50 on: Today at 09:16:02 AM »
Worse than the women here are the effeminate men like TGK who have nonstop emotional outbursts and who confuse prejudice and loyalty for principle. Not a huge fan of women online but at least you're getting what you pay for with them.

Men still run the world. And they will always run the world.

If anyone has a probem with feminism, let him blame the men who conceived and deployed it, and also the men who submitted to it in oh so manifold ways.

Though I admit that the talk of women is often fatiguing, it is the combine of men that produces the bulk of the insanity, stupidity, degeneracy, nonsense, irrationality, brawling, and cacophony we see online. A woman is, at worst, pestiferous and ungovernable. But the man - he it is who burns down, corrupts, and degrades civilization. He is the principle. He is the agent. Remember the Garden, and who it is that transmits original sin.

Women cannot attain their God-intended perfections without the support and help of men. It is how God created the sexes. If men fail in their duty, women fall low. Women have no potency whatsoever to corrupt the social, religious, and political orders. They can never be more than helpmates to the enterprises of men. It is men, and men alone who have the power to destroy civilization. Evil men do indeed enlist the services of the women they have corrupted. But these women are always "in the power of thy husband." When men destroy good order, women are degraded and corrupted the most.

If we want to see the rehabilitation of the female sex, we must first have the principle of its rejuvenation. That principle is man. Let men restore order; and the rehabilitation of women will follow, just as light invariably follows the recession of darkness.


Re: Poll - Restrict Women on CI?
« Reply #51 on: Today at 09:33:18 AM »
Worse than the women here are the effeminate men like TGK who have nonstop emotional outbursts and who confuse prejudice and loyalty for principle. Not a huge fan of women online but at least you're getting what you pay for with them.

In a world so overpopulated with the stupid and the senseless, I equally appreciate men and women who can think uprightly, who display courage, and who can see through deceptions and illusions.

Both such men and women are rare, and when they appear I give them equal value. I never run what someone says through the prism of their sex. I pay attention only to what truth I can glean in their thought.

Anyone who at this late hour blanket bans women from the internet because they are women, is particpating senselessness, and also a meaningless and inefficacious bias.

Let's not forget that our Catholic history teems with examples of good counsels and worthy deeds in wise, courageous, and holy women - women who spoke and acted in private and in public.

Tomorrow is the Feast of St. Jean d'Arc. 'Nuff said. 


Online Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Poll - Restrict Women on CI?
« Reply #52 on: Today at 10:35:51 AM »
In a world so overpopulated with the stupid and the senseless, I equally appreciate men and women who can think uprightly, who display courage, and who can see through deceptions and illusions.

Both such men and women are rare, and when they appear I give them equal value. I never run what someone says through the prism of their sex. I pay attention only to what truth I can glean in their thought.

Anyone who at this late hour blanket bans women from the internet because they are women, is particpating senselessness, and also a meaningless and inefficacious bias.

Let's not forget that our Catholic history teems with examples of good counsels and worthy deeds in wise, courageous, and holy women - women who spoke and acted in private and in public.

Tomorrow is the Feast of St. Jean d'Arc. 'Nuff said.
The only people who should be banned are those who argue incessantly by posting nonsense and personal attacks with arguments which are devoid of any intelligence.  Like TomScuмmage.  If I want to argue with morons, I'd go to Twitter.

Re: Poll - Restrict Women on CI?
« Reply #53 on: Today at 11:40:58 AM »
Your attempt to write in broken English isn’t working.
You have directly violated the moderator’s instructions. It doesn’t matter who, in the past,  has used a crude word for a feminine hygiene product. Matthew told you to stop it.
Matthew has answer for self. no think he need other mommy do for he.

If want really discuss topic. I say yes. If you want act as schoolmaster chastise naughty child. I say no. I not need nag.

Re: Poll - Restrict Women on CI?
« Reply #54 on: Today at 11:41:51 AM »
I'm glad someone else knows the broken English is schtick. A real Russian would run his posts through a translator. I'd say the guy is posting from somewhere on the Lower East Side. 
Rare I use translator. too much computer is part why is so much not thinking.

I not say I russian. read name again. use mind more than mouth.