"And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed."

I'll take my chances with the promise of Almighty God, . . . made to Abraham, . . . exercised thru Isaac and Jacob and his son Judah, . . . to the present day legitimate heirs of the promised land, . . . the Jєωs.

When the winds blow against them, . . . I'll stand with them, . . . and if we both die in a pile of empty brass, . . . we will have taken many of the enemy with us.

From my home page:
"Please quote the materials here far and wide. Use this material to expose and defeat Satan and his ѕуηαgσgυє. Most importantly, pray the Rosary every day."

If you PM me with a link, I would be happy to join you in the melee!

That is your opinion, . . . full of garbage, trash, innuendo, and outright lies, . . . but you didn't make em up, . . . you just follow em.

I would wish you good luck, . . . but since there is no such word in the Bible, . . . you're on your own pal.

The New Covenant only means that the means of salvation is now through Christ, it does not mean that the Old Testament no longer has any meaning and it is to be disregarded, we are just not to follow the parts that have to do with salvation the old way, sacrifices and ritual, and it should still be known in historical context.

There are still many prophecies yet to unfold from the Old Testament, and ALL will come to pass.

To say we are to disregard God's commands regarding Israel in the Old Testament, would be to say we might as well disregard the Ten Commandments and just kill, worship other gods, lie, steal, screw everyone's wife and not go to church.

In Revelation 21:12–14 the names of the twelve tribes are on the gates of the New Jerusalem, and the names of the twelve apostles are on the foundations. There it signifies the unity of the Old Testament and the New Testament people of God in the New Jerusalem. In that time, the New Jerusalem will be a real place, not just some fantasy.

The nation for the sealing. “Of all the tribes of the children of Israel” (Revelation 7:4). Those sealed were Jєωs. There are many other references to Jєωs and their importance to God in the New Testament.

Ephesians 6:12 says, "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places". That doesn't have to do with Israel or Jєωs but it shows that every attack against them individually or as a nation is the work of Satan, plain and simple.

Not pointing to anyone on here individually, but in regards to the article, I would not want to have any anti-Semetic views when I am in front of God on my judgement day. If it hurts our heart, imagine how God feels about it...

[To the poster previously quoted twice above re: Genesis 12:3], both your posts are well stated. [Bonaventure] started this off with his reference to "Christian Zionists." Today's anti-Zionist movement uses terms like that in a thinly veiled attempt to conceal what is simply garden variety antisemitism, an outright hatred of Jєωs. The philosophy is indistinguishable from the tenets of either the muslim; the humanists; or certain twisted beliefs of some in the Roman church. It was merely a question of which of the three he subscribed too. I eliminated the muslim, since that was obviously not the case, though there is no distinction in the agenda of destruction of the Jєωιѕн race and faith. Since he brought up the SPLC [which I did because this particular poster immediately called me ignorant, bigoted, racist and anti-semtic, straight out of the SLPC's playbook], which is a humanist org of the most vile nature, I didn't really think it was that either. Besides, SPLC is equally antisemitic and supports the muslim's rights over those of both Christians and Jєωs. But now we have it in his own words. Fortunately, the Roman church, as a whole, is not on this kind of path anymore, with the exception of a few remaining branches of that particular ilk that allied even with the nαzιs, because they shared the same goals. [Bonaventure] would have fit right in.

I have encountered his arguments before, and they have their root only in deep seated hatred and the delusions that must accompany in order to justify the need to hate. If there is any monotheistic faith that has proven to rival islam in its cold-hearted butchery and debauchery, it is the Roman church of earlier ages. Even in modern times it has served as a purveyor of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ pedophilia, covering its tracks for decades until the secret could no longer be shielded from daylight. For all the many fine people of that religion, for all the fine priests, nuns and other leadership, the church has had a rotten core almost from its inception. The good it has done has come in spite of that. Thus it is with most institutions of mankind.

And make no mistake, all the Christian denominations are creations of mankind, made for this corporeal world. But inside all of them is the message of the Gospels, the universal truth of salvation through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Christ was of the House of David, as Jєωιѕн as any man could be, who clearly stated that he had come to fulfill the Law and the Prophets. Which were of the Jєωs, by the way. His charge to His disciples and other followers- all Jєωs by the way- was to tell all the world, not to distinguish between any race. None of this changes who were God's chosen people, but the message of salvation is available to all. When we learn to disregard all the trappings of religion- Roman, Episcopalian, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Methodist, what have you- we will see that the labels do not matter, only what is in our hearts and our witness to that.

It is worth noting that the word "catholic" has its roots in Greek, and it merely means "universal." The Roman "Catholic" church has, in some minds, a fallacious notion of exclusivity, which requires a deliberate ignorance of its root meaning.

Quote: