I haven't been posting for a while but a few months back I posted my little docuмentary on the election of Cardinal Siri. For those of you that watched you saw that the movie covered much more than just the evidence that Cardinal Siri was elected.

Anyway, I had 100 DVDs made up for no particular reason. I went and picked up the movie last Friday just in time for the local Artwalk Festival. During the festival several blocks downtown are closed off and anyone with 100 bucks can get a booth to sell their art. I had not planned to sell them there.
 
So I spent two days sitting at a table selling my flic Papal Imposters. I have to admit I felt pretty awkward at first, especially since I had no time to work on my display, but two hours in I made my first sale. Then I sold a few more and also got a bit of a chance to tell people about traditional Catholicism. At the end of the first day I sold 4 movies at $10 a pop, 6 or 7 other folks had taken a summary of the movie and said they would think about it. Some very poor looking people were asking about the film and thinking back now I should have just gave them a copy or sold them at cost about $3. I was there from 11am to 4pm.

The next day I brought along my Father Steadman's Missal and kept it in my pocket. Some older ladies who inquired about the movie where very surprised when I brought out the old missal "I haven't seen one of those in ages" was what I tended to hear. This day I sold 5 copies. Again I was there for about 5 hours.

The town where I was selling them has about 60,000 people, no traditional parishes and I think 5 or 6 NO parishes.

Most of my sales where to males between 35 to 55 however many women inquired. The women tended to say that they would come back but didn't, one of these I offered the film for half and she bought it.

Anyone who wants the film feel free to PM me. You can print up copies and sell them just like I did. I wouldn't do it for the money because you'll be lucky to break even but I met a lot of nice/interesting people, some other independent filmakers introduced themselves to me as well. 3 people tried to convert me, 2 to protestantism and one to the Orthodox Church. Oh, and I got lots of sneers from self-professed atheists.

In case you missed the film here it is on youtube

Part 1 Historical Precedents  
Part 2 October 1958  
Part 3 The Chosen Candidate  
Part 4 The 1958 Conclave  
Part 5 Who was John XXIII?  
Part 6 The 1963 Conclave  
Part 7 Who was Paul VI?  
Part 8 The Destruiction of the Mass  
Part 9 Year of Two Conclaves  
Part 10 Cardinal Siri Confronted  
Part 11 Conclusion  
Part 12 The UndergroundChurch  

Make sure you watch part four, there is rare footage of the famous white smoke coming from the Sistine Chapel 2 days before Roncalli showed up on the balcony.

I think I mentioned it here before but I put him because of his stature, the book was published by a major company and he would have been open to lawsuits if he couldn't back what he was saying.

There could be many reasons why he would not respond to e-mails. I know that just because a docuмent has been declassified doesn't mean just anybody can get access to it. Also the guy is pretty anti-Catholic so I wonder how keen he is on helping us out. Julian Assange is a good example of what people who leak docuмents have to deal with.

But, yes, we do not know for sure if he is telling the truth and it would be nice if would respond to questions.

There was another priest by the name of Fr. Charles-roux who said claimed that Siri was elected and cast aside without actually abdicating. I did fail to mention this.

Wish we lived closer Thursday... I'll sit with you at a booth any day... This is something I need to be doing more of!

You should have included Father Villa's extensive collection on Paul VI as references when they attempted to canonize him. One single book was enough to stop the process completely, "Paul VI beatified?"

Also, Fr. Khoat is very much unbelievable. His credibility is totally shot, and I really don't believe his story at all. There is a lot of monkey business that went on with him. The priest at my Church knew who he was, and looked into the very same things that Khoat looked into, with totally different results.

The guy following Fr. Khoat (Hobson, who has been banned from this website numerous times for being a pathological liar, and a horrible detractor, ) and his so-called "hierarchy in exile" is completely devoid of credibility from the slanderous attacks that have been made by Hobson. He promised two years ago that the "evidence" he supposedly received from the National Archives (thanks to me, by the way) would be disseminated in the "fourth quarter of this year" which was two years ago now, and no one has seen anything. I've received 3 docuмents that reveal things that we've already been aware of, but nothing of any proof or substance regarding the election.

From John Venarri:

"Cardinal Siri participated in the Second Vatican Council, which was called, if the Siri Thesis is correct, by a Holy Father who was neither Holy nor the Church’s Father. Siri accepted the decisions of Vatican II if interpreted in the light of Tradition. He adopted the reforms, celebrated the Novus Ordo Mass, ordained priests in the New Rite, and consecrated bishops in the New Rite. Why would Pope Gregory XVII adopt sacraments and liturgical re-forms enacted by men whom he knew were false Popes? What sort of man does “our last true Pope” turn out to be?"

So, why, if he were such a staunch traditionalist, would he even entertain the idea of "celebrating" the Novus Ordo?

And, the final question, is who is pope now, if Siri was elected and is dead now? Does anyone have the answer to that question? People that claim that Siri was the pope come up saying, "Infallible Church teaching says that every human person needs to be subject to the Roman Pontiff" for salvation, and so, where is this mysterious pope that we must submit to?

Quote from: Thursday

I was thinking of asking this guy about it.

http://sites.google.com/site/ernie124102/foia

Do it.

And perhaps you should make your own movie since you are such an expert.

He would be a good person to contact, in fact I think I tried to contact them at some point but received no reply.

In this docuмent, which was written about Fr. Villa on page 11 there is a picture of Cardinal Siri, under the picture it says that he was elected in 1963 and in 1978.
http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Chi___don_Villa_OK_en.pdf

As far as finding absolute proof as in an FBI docuмent I don't think that is possible or necessary. For one, even if there was an FBI file the usual folks would find reasons to dismiss it.

If there was an FBI file my guess it was Cardinal Spellman, archbishop of New York who was the source. He was very good friends with secretary of state John Foster Dulles and with J Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI. John Foster Dulles if you look into his family background, they have been subverting major religious institutions for the last 200 years.

The circuмstantial evidence is there however, we had a pope and a church up until the death of Pius XII. 3 weeks later we had a pope calling councils, changing masses and inviting communist over to the Vatican. Between these 2 eras we had 5 minutes of white smoke and a no-show on the balcony. IMO you don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out the real pope was elected then.

As to who was elected, all the arrows point to Siri. He was widely expected to become Pope. Several Priest and an intelligence expert claim he was elected. He admitted he was elected pope twice. He called Vatican II the greatest mistake in history, he said it would take the Church 50 years to recover from John xxiiis PONTIFICATE, in the front page of the newspaper the day before the 1978 conclave he said if he became pope he would turn back the clock to before the council.

You or John Vennari are in no position to judge what he should or shouldn't have done after his election, there is no way of knowing for us on the outside what was really going in the inner circles of power or what his options were.

How do you know he wasn't just keeping a low profile until the enemy started to run out of gas, like they are doing now. He said it would take 50 years to recover. There is a pretty good chance he knew what he was doing.

Anyway, sorry for being snotty in my earlier post.

God bless you too.

There's nothing I can personally do about the situation, but pray that this horrible time comes to an expedient end.

Which does not mean that we cannot continue to do research on the matter.