Does anyone know a good book which refutes the errors of the "evolution of species" and most precisely the delusional "evolution of man from monkeys" and the prehistorian cave dwellers?

I don't know of such a book, but here is a snip of something from Fr. Wathen I came across the other day and thought it might be of interest as regards the stupidity of evolution....

"...The following are attributes of God' s creativity: It is abundant and it is various; the Divine Artist loves to make things; and it is His pleasure to make more than enough. We should observe that the good God has made many, many things which apparently have no usefulness, so that we must conclude that the He made them for the sheer delight of making. No one can otherwise explain the wild, superabundance of the flora and the fauna of the earth, nor the great number of heavenly bodies, most of which are nothing but huge rocks whirling through space, catching the light of distant stars, which men consider themselves clever to find and count and catalog.

Besides number, there is a most captivating variety, and, in some animate things, a capacity for endless further variation within the species. Furthermore, amidst this variety, it is to be observed that there is an observable gradation, from things of a very simple composition to things more wonderfully complex, from small to large, from inanimate to intelligent, from physical to spiritual. Evolutionists see in this gradation evidence that the "higher forms" of life developed from the "lower forms." What they ought to see is not that one thing evolved from another, but that all things came from the same Maker, who, like human artists, inclines to repeat and re-apply and develop the same ideas in one thing and another....

...All this is said to remind the reader that thinking of men in terms of superior and inferior is misguided, even though it is
indubitable that in their variety, human beings are unevenly endowed both physically, spiritually, and supernaturally. In all this, the key word is not inequality, but complementariness..."

Does anyone know a good book which refutes the errors of the "evolution of species" and most precisely the delusional "evolution of man from monkeys" and the prehistorian cave dwellers?

www.daylightorigins.com

Be aware Brunitix that evolution is the rotten fruit of the earlier heliocentric theory that was accepted in both Church and science. So do not look to churchmen for any clarity on this subject. Once they gave in to a biblical heliocentrism they had no option but to avoid condemning evolution even that the body of Adam came from 'pre-living matter.' Pope Pius XII in 1952 was telling the Pontifical Academy of Science that the Big Bang was the creative act of God and in Humani Generis he allowed discussion, that is the possibility, that Adam's body could have come from monkeys or whatever. Cardinal Ratzinger in his 1982 book 'IN THE BEGINNING' said Genesis had to be read in the ;'light' of modern science (Big Bang, evolved solar-system, then evolved life on Earth). John Paul II said evolutiomn was more than a hypothesis and Francis said God was not a magician who created all in working order.

The teachings of the Church however, are 100% ex nihilo creation by God.

The absurdity of evolution is an insult to human intelligence. It is not only nonsense but simple nonsense. You cannot have a living creature unless it contains all the parts necessary for life, complete and in working order.

Real science has long established that a cell does not have the ability to do more than it is designed to do. It can fail in some way but cannot add to its function, becoming something more than itself. In other words, it cannot evolve into a more complicated structure as evolution requires it to do. They will allow small changes over time buit never into a new species. Nevertheless, to bypass this impossibility, they proposed failures and mistakes in cells called ‘mutations,’ achieved their ‘miracles,’ anything to keep the theory going. We are asked to believe a living cell mutated and kept on mutating, multiplying useful failures ending up as perfect designed functioning flora and fauna, kinds like trees, flowers, animals, fish, and insects, leaving aside a human being. We now ask how anything can survive unless complete with all its parts. What part of any creature evolved first from an evolved cell? Was it tissue, bone, muscle, blood, skin, hair or what? Which organ evolved first, the brain, the heart, the kidneys, the spleen, the glands, the eyes?  Which system evolved first, the circulatory system, the digestive system, the endocrine system, the respiratory system, the nervous system, the immune system, the lymphatic system, the muscular system, the skeletal system, the urinary system, the reproductive system? Could any creature function with an evolving endocrine system, an evolving digestive system, evolving senses etc.? Can one essential part of a living creature exist without the other? The answer is no and to argue otherwise is to indulge in proposing simple nonsense. So Brunitix you do not need a book to convince you of the absurdity of evolution..

Of the billions of fossils found every one had all the parts, complete. QED.

Does anyone know a good book which refutes the errors of the "evolution of species" and most precisely the delusional "evolution of man from monkeys" and the prehistorian cave dwellers?

Google Amazon for CREATION REDISCOVERED by Gerry Keane (RIP)