I think the gist of the joke is the guy is a pig and so she says you should have little baby pigs. That is not the same as counselling sex with pigs. It's more of a bad taste joke.
I realize movies are evil, believe me, but this seems almost like mockery on Makow's part, like he's making fun of the people who see the evil everywhere in movies. I've never cared for his stuff much.
There is WAY worse stuff than this going on on a daily basis in films. There is some bestiality stuff in the Disney Pirates of the Caribbean 3, there is a famous scene where Johnny Depp looks at a goat with goo-goo eyes as if he's about to proposition it.
But even that isn't really bestiality, the goat is a demonic symbol so it's basically just overt Satanism. Check out how the goat gives a knowing look to the camera, as if to say "Yep, you're watching my film." Those Pirates films are so insanely occult; they are literally incoherent, a barrage of Kabbalistic imagery with no coherent story that is so boring, you wonder how people can sit through it or how these things became popular. But basically the films get you to root for the pirates who are the fallen angels, God and the Catholic Church are portrayed as the oppressive and slave-driving West India Trading Company.
It's funny how whenever the devil portrays God in these films, he does it with a sort of respect, so that people come out thinking "You know, I actually thought the villain was the most noble character!" There was a film called Pan's Labyrinth where the "good guy" was a demon conjured up by some witch-like young girl -- I think the name Pan's Labyrinth says it all, and the director of this film also makes the "Hellboy" films -- and the "bad guy" was a soldier in Franco's army who was clearly portrayed as a disciplined and dignified Catholic. Almost everyone comes away fascinated by the soldier character, even though the movie portrays him as being too harsh. Truth compels even the devil to portray God in this way.
Probably the most occultic film directors, outside of the Disney stable, are Stanley Kubrick, Tim Burton, Terry Gilliam, and Steven Spielberg in his later years ( A. I. Artificial Intelligence, Minority Report, The Terminal, and the more recent, darker Spielberg films ). Now, many others are channeling Satan or send bad messages, but I'm taking about shaman-like occultism here. Yet the biggest of all is Martin Scorsese, who is a major gnostic, almost false-prophet like in his power. This guy is VERY big in the devil's army; clearly he has been given powers by Satan. He is dangerous because he constantly uses and abuses Catholic imagery and his films appear to have strong moral messages, while really being extraordinarily evil ( he is a fallen-away seminarian who became a coke addict, has been married five times, and is most likely perfectly possessed at this point ). And he is guaranteed, after his death, to be considered the Shakespeare of film and to achieve a sort of earthly immortality; so his stuff may be around to influence the anti-Christ later. Gangs of New York is like a giant monolith of a film. It is better than Hamlet, "better" meaning in an artistic sense, but immoral. Why do the Jєωs pour so much money into films like this? Must be because they're so nice and love art, eh?
P.S. Shakespeare is and always will be the king of occult writers, he set the ball rolling, if he was even a real guy and not some kind of Masonic collective project. ( There is a film coming out about how Shakespeare was not really the author of these plays, and this rumor has been around for a while probably for a reason, revelation of the method if you will ). These plays are so sneaky in their sublimal occult messages that apparently even the Church has no problem with them. It should. It doesn't get more Rosicrucian or Satanic than The Tempest. Not to mention the things are chock-full of sɛҳuąƖ innuendo, Troilus and Cressida is almost porno.
Then again, the Church has never bothered itself to ban things that just have sɛҳuąƖ imagery or occult messages. It usually only goes after overt anti-Catholic material. There is probably just too much of the former type of art, and the Church doesn't want to be too restrictive or stifling. It never banned all those pagan-like operas that were playing constantly in Italy, including Rome, in the 17th-18th centuries. Yet holy Christians were probably wary of them. I read somewhere that St. Alphonsus would go to hear the music, but he would take his glasses off so he couldn't see what was going on onstage.
Topic: Puss in Boots" PG-rated Kids Movie has overt bestiality sub-plot (Read 3285 times)