Author Topic: Protocols of Zion - We shall destroy the Clergy (Read 2269 times)

Matthew · « **on:** September 02, 2014, 06:52:12 PM »

CUNNING, TRICKERY, DECEPTION AND MAKE-BELIEVE BEYOND DESCRIPTION

WE SHALL DESTROY THE CLERGY. Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. No.17, Vs. 2, 3, 4, & 5.

WE SHALL DESTROY THE CLERGY

2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF THE "GOYIM," and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.

3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bƖσσdshɛd. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place. (Karl Rothschild acted as "peacemaker" between the Vatican and her enemies, loaning the Vatican five million pounds in a period of difficulty. Gregory XVI conferred a Papal decoration on Kalman Rothschild (1823) since when Rothschilds have been "Guardians of the Vatican Treasury". In other words, Rothschilds have been in secret control of the Vatican since 1823!)

4. THE KING OF THE JєωS WILL BE THE REAL POPE OF THE UNIVERSE, THE PATRIARCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHURCH

5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM . . .

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #1 on:** September 02, 2014, 09:23:53 PM »

See how evil the Jєωs are.
Because they resisted and denied that Jesus Christ is their
promised redeemer. They cause so much hate, tensions in
the world. They destroy everything that is good and
wholesome. They destroy everything that is clean and
decent.
Every place I go, I have to hear rap music, the indecent
fashions and foul mouths.
I was listening to a radio broadcast recorded in the 1950's
and what a different world it was. Even the music was
soothing and made me happy. This is what the majority
of people whom originally heard the broadcast were like.
We have been infiltrated everywhere and there is no escape.
Most sermons I heard in the novus ordo churches concerns
to much about the world, and a very little spiritual. They
want you to be a good comrade in a communist-socialist
state.

JPaul · « **Reply #2 on:** September 03, 2014, 07:48:42 AM »

#17 mission accomplished..................

JPaul · « **Reply #3 on:** September 03, 2014, 07:57:41 AM »

RomanCatholic1953,

Quote

They cause so much hate, tensions in
the world. They destroy everything that is good and
wholesome. They destroy everything that is clean and
decent.
Every place I go, I have to hear rap music, the indecent
fashions and foul mouths.

That is why the Church in Her wisdom and prudence always sought to sequester them away from Christian society to protect the souls and piety of Her children.

# 17 has removed that safeguard which defended us.

The emancipation of the Jєωs in Europe was the beginning of the end.

It is undeniable that we now live in a Jєωιѕн culture and society. Christendom has indeed been suppressed, and we are under the dominion of Judah.

BTNYC · « **Reply #4 on:** September 08, 2014, 08:13:40 AM »

Quote from: Hermenegild

Maybe Hitler wasn't that bad after all. :pc:

Well, he wasn't all that good either... If he'd chosen the Cross or the Chi-Ro or some other Christian symbol for the flag of his party and nation, rather than a Hindu pagan one... And, by extension, if he'd governed more like a Catholic Monarch and less like a Darwinist and a Nietschian with an unhealthy admiration for "Aryan" paganism... then, yes, we could probably remember him as a great leader.

As it is, however, he was certainly no Louis IX or Stephen of Hungary... He was not even on the par of a General Franco...

But, on the flip side, he was also no Joseph Stalin or Vladimir Lenin. It is beyond doubt that we sided with the Greater Evil in that sham of a war.

JPaul · « **Reply #5 on:** September 08, 2014, 09:33:26 AM »

Quote from: Hermenegild

Maybe Hitler wasn't that bad after all. :pc:

He opposed them and unseated them in the lands under his domain.

Look what happened to him and to all the peoples of Europe as a result.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #6 on:** September 08, 2014, 01:07:59 PM »

Here is a prime example of the destruction of the clergy that goes all
the way to the "Bishop of Rome" or what others would like to call the
POPE, Vicar of Christ.

Prepared to be SHOCKED.

http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A590-Nara.htm

Meg · « **Reply #7 on:** September 08, 2014, 04:28:24 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM . . .

All of it is scary stuff, but what is meant by .."criticism calculated to produce schism?" Criticism by whom, and who would it be against? Although I think it might be against anyone who upholds the traditional teachings of the Church. Are the modernists, or some of them, controlled by Jєωs? I'm not trying to be difficult; I really would like to know, since I'm worried that there could be a major schism in the Church in the next few years.

JPaul · « **Reply #8 on:** September 09, 2014, 08:04:14 AM »

Quote from: Meg

Quote from: Matthew

5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM . . .

All of it is scary stuff, but what is meant by .."criticism calculated to produce schism?" Criticism by whom, and who would it be against? Although I think it might be against anyone who upholds the traditional teachings of the Church. Are the modernists, or some of them, controlled by Jєωs? I'm not trying to be difficult; I really would like to know, since I'm worried that there could be a major schism in the Church in the next few years.

Critique of their surrounding culture is their way. Almost all of the criticism of the Christian religion and the Church can be sourced back to them.
And by the social criticism, arises social unrest, and eventually revolution and chaos. Is our culture not one of chaos and decay? The form in which they as a people thrive. At the same time, has not their power and influence reach a level which greater than could be conceived of in past centuries?

Their criticism of the Church was infiltrated into, and about the Church for centuries, and this can be confirmed as a direct instigation and a large influence upon, and within the Second Vatican Council, so called.
There you have had true schism from Catholic truth. It was the wholesale slaughter of the valid priesthood and hierarchy.
There will be more to come as their revolution advances.

Meg · « **Reply #9 on:** September 09, 2014, 02:48:36 PM »

Quote from: J.Paul

Quote from: Meg
Quote from: Matthew

5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM . . .

All of it is scary stuff, but what is meant by .."criticism calculated to produce schism?" Criticism by whom, and who would it be against? Although I think it might be against anyone who upholds the traditional teachings of the Church. Are the modernists, or some of them, controlled by Jєωs? I'm not trying to be difficult; I really would like to know, since I'm worried that there could be a major schism in the Church in the next few years.

Critique of their surrounding culture is their way. Almost all of the criticism of the Christian religion and the Church can be sourced back to them.
And by the social criticism, arises social unrest, and eventually revolution and chaos. Is our culture not one of chaos and decay? The form in which they as a people thrive. At the same time, has not their power and influence reach a level which greater than could be conceived of in past centuries?

Their criticism of the Church was infiltrated into, and about the Church for centuries, and this can be confirmed as a direct instigation and a large influence upon, and within the Second Vatican Council, so called.
There you have had true schism from Catholic truth. It was the wholesale slaughter of the valid priesthood and hierarchy.
There will be more to come as their revolution advances.

So it starts with criticism, which leads to social unrest, and eventually revolution and chaos. That makes sense. Our culture is indeed one of chaos and decay. So the criticism is started by the Jєωs, but then the criticism is further taken up by non-Jєωs, would you say, in order to further their goals (mainly being anit-Christian)? And do Jєωs thrive because they can profit from the ensuing chaos in some way? And yes, their power seems to be greater now more than ever. Banking, government, media, Hollywood film industry (one of the things that has bothered me the most because it influences just about everyone)), and probably education.

I hadn't thought of Vll as a schism, but maybe it was just it was a different kind of schism than what had occurred before. I have a lot more sympathy now for Archbishop Lefebvre than I used to. He knew what was happening and tried to stop it. I recall that the AQ forum did an expose on Malachi Martin a few years ago, about how Martin was complicit with the Jєωs in influencing the council, but I can't remember the details. I used to argue strongly against the Jєωs being the cause of so much trouble, but I was wrong. If there's another schism in the next few years, IMO the laity, clergy, and the rest of the hierarchy are going to have to choose sides. I imagine that it will get pretty ugly.