I agree 100%.
it is kinda like the Democrats and the abortionist are Herod and they are killing the children to try and stop the King (like how Herod killed the new borns to try and kill the King of the Jєωs, Jesus) except the king in this situation is not a singular person but rather the children who represent their potential fall from power. Lower the white population (i only mention white here because traditionally in America they are the leading Christian voice), turn young adults in bad situations into murderers who turn from God because the dems tell them abortion is liberating.
Just popped into my mind because I started watching a movie called “The Gospel of Matthew” and in the beginning of the movie it shows the killing of the Holy Innocents. I think the abortionist and workers of the devil are definitely using abortion to turn souls from God.
Your perspective is interesting and possibly not without some merit, but I have to question whether the Democrats' and abortionists' motivation is to stop children from being born who will then grow up to topple them from power. I doubt that they have this as a "battle plan" --- their thinking doesn't go this deep. People who are pro-choice on abortion (unless they are really "sick pups" who get a kick out of the idea of killing fetuses, and I have heard of this) want to ensure that unwanted and inconvenient pregnancies don't come to term. That's all there is to it. They want total sɛҳuąƖ license to exist without any consequences. When a sɛҳuąƖ encounter goes wrong --- when a baby is conceived by accident --- they want to hurry up and have a discreet, safe, inexpensive (or free) abortion, then get on with life and move on to further sɛҳuąƖ encounters. Lather, rinse, repeat as needed.
I would add to this, that all other things being equal, abortion keeps more pro-choice people from being born, than pro-life people. Think this through. Liberal, licentious, sɛҳuąƖly active women have sex. They either do it in the throes of passion and don't bother with birth control, or they use birth control and it fails. If they don't have an abortion, they have a child. They raise this child to value and disvalue the same things they value and disvalue. Is that child more likely to grow up to be pro-life or pro-choice? What kind of person was their mother, to be willing to seek an abortion in the first place? Now contrast this with a woman who reserves her sɛҳuąƖity to be used in accord with God's plan. She will have children, the more, the better. Will she raise these children to be pro-life or pro-choice? The question answers itself. To be sure, there can be exceptions --- a child born of a mother who wanted an abortion but didn't get one should be happy to be alive, and ensure that other "unwanted" babies get to live as well --- but I don't think the pro-aborts are on a "search and destroy" mission to kill future pro-life voters.