Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pretext for fαℓѕє fℓαg - 1,000 nukes to be shipped insecurely  (Read 532 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31182
  • Reputation: +27095/-494
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pretext for fαℓѕє fℓαg Attack? Military Ships 1,000 Nukes Across County in Unmarked Trucks
    Posted on November 30, 2010 by willyloman

    by Scott Creighton

    Hmmm.

    Apparently, the United States military thinks it’s a good idea to ship a thousand or so nuclear warheads across the country in trucks, without military escort, after publishing their starting point and destination, and after they have released pictures of the trucks that are hauling them. And oh yeah, the drivers are drunks.  Does that sound like a good idea to you guys?

    The following comes from a news agency near the base where the nuclear warheads are from. The information was apparently fed to them by the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

        “Fifty-five to 60 percent of the nation’s W76 warheads, or about 1,600 to 1,800 of them, will be modernized, said Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project for the Federation of American Scientists. Eight of the Navy’s 14 ballistic-missile submarines are based at Bangor, so about 900 to 1,000 warheads would be transported from and returned to Kitsap County in special unmarked tractor trailers.”

        “Officials from the Washington State Patrol, Department of Ecology, Department of Transportation and National Guard said they weren’t notified of the increased shipments and never know when they’re made.” Kitsap Sun

    The articles pretty much tell you exactly where the trucks are coming from and  where they’re going, so it wouldn’t be too hard for them to create a narrative from that about how someone read these articles on the net, hijacked one of these trucks and then used a nuke for a terrorist attack.

    I mean, let’s face it; if your planning a big time fαℓѕє fℓαg, you have to come up with a plausible explanation as to how the terrorists got a hold of a nuke, right?  One truck is reported “missing” and that is pretty much all it takes right?

    Now you guys know me, I don’t jump to silly conclusions usually. But the timing of this bothers me. Plus the article practically drawing a map from point “A” to point “B” featuring actual pictures of the trucks themselves. You would think that the military might try to keep a lid on info like that.

    It also seems to follow right on the heels of a report saying the drivers for the agency involved in moving these warheads have a tendency to get drunk on the job.  Hmmm.  How could that factor in I wonder.

        This is true, but the revelation about transportation follows the release of a report two weeks ago by Department of Energy investigators (Report PDF) announcing that agents within the Office of Secure Transportation had a bad habit of getting drunk while on the job.  Jalopnik

    Now as far as I can tell, these trucks don’t have military escorts. From the photo of the three of them driving down the road, and from the two reports on this I read, it looks like the agents are well-trained and armed, but that is it. I can’t see that as actually being the case, but of course, I don’t think I would ship a thousand nukes down from Washington state in the winter in the back of trucks either. It seems to me that since they are starting off in a naval base in Washington state and ending up in Texas, that a water route might make the most secure transportation option. But that’s just me.

    We can only hold our breath with this government. God only knows what they will do to hold onto power as the sh*t hits it.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    Pretext for fαℓѕє fℓαg - 1,000 nukes to be shipped insecurely
    « Reply #1 on: December 03, 2010, 09:09:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well...

    Unless that thing was armed, there are total failsafes attached to these missiles, so even if a truck or some were to crash, there is no way in heckfire that it's going to go off. I mean, you'd have to have military personnel inside the thing, with the codes, and this and that thing and... yeah. No way this is going to happen.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,