Author Topic: Popular Mechanics propagandist OWNED (Read 605 times)

Matthew · « **on:** September 09, 2007, 03:36:48 PM »

Only 2 minutes -- funny!

The stoolie from Popular Mechanics gets proven wrong, and all he can do is give out a phone number for "all matters relating to the 9/11 book". Can't he answer a simple question?

Matthew · « **Reply #1 on:** September 09, 2007, 03:39:43 PM »

See... THIS is why I'm a "9/11 truther".

It's because I only see dishonesty on the "official 9/11 story" side of things. It would seem that anyone honest and/or looking for the truth would end up a 9/11 truther.

Plain as day, this is what you have: a Popular Mechanics goon, paid to defend the "official conspiracy theory" at all costs, claims that "demolition companies do NOT have a slang term "pull it" to refer to the controlled demolition of a building. Then a smart man calls a few demolition companies, and finds out that they DO have such a term. He calls the Popular Mechanics guy to ask him about it, and all he gets is a phone number.

If the guy was interested in the truth, wouldn't he deign to give him 30 seconds of his time to answer a simple question? How hard is it to tell the truth? There's nothing to hide, right?

Again, why did "They" tell Mr. Popular Mechanics to refer all questions to a voicemail number? What are THEY trying to hide?

Matthew

Vandaler · « **Reply #2 on:** September 09, 2007, 03:55:24 PM »

Quote from: ChantCd

See... THIS is why I'm a "9/11 truther".

It's because I only see dishonesty on the "official 9/11 story" side of things. It would seem that anyone honest and/or looking for the truth would end up a 9/11 truther.

Plain as day, this is what you have: a Popular Mechanics goon, paid to defend the "official conspiracy theory" at all costs, claims that "demolition companies do NOT have a slang term "pull it" to refer to the controlled demolition of a building. Then a smart man calls a few demolition companies, and finds out that they DO have such a term. He calls the Popular Mechanics guy to ask him about it, and all he gets is a phone number.

If the guy was interested in the truth, wouldn't he deign to give him 30 seconds of his time to answer a simple question? How hard is it to tell the truth? There's nothing to hide, right?

Again, why did "They" tell Mr. Popular Mechanics to refer all questions to a voicemail number? What are THEY trying to hide?

Matthew

Yes,

I've heard this bit before. This person is a terrible advocate.

But that's all it is.

It's not because this particular person was not able to articulate himself well that there is no answers to those very simple questions asked.

I've been waltzing around here, tipping boxes and begging for a challenge for a week now. I answered each and every point that was brought up seriously. I also left anyone the chance to give their best pitch with what they view as their best argument

Result; non of my points where met with any counterpoint. Only Ad hominem attacks, much like ChantCD is now doing with this interview. Exception be made with QVP who was honest enough to look at the facts, not the messenger.

You have a long way to go to make a serious point yet.

antyshemanic · « **Reply #3 on:** September 09, 2007, 04:11:42 PM »

Quote from: ChantCd

Plain as day, this is what you have: a Popular Mechanics goon, paid to defend the "official conspiracy theory"

The guy that wrote the "Popular Mechanics" article that sought to disprove some of the "conspiracy theories".He is Michael Chertoff's brother.

antyshemanic · « **Reply #4 on:** September 09, 2007, 04:27:27 PM »

Quote from: antyshemanic

Quote from: ChantCd
Plain as day, this is what you have: a Popular Mechanics goon, paid to defend the "official conspiracy theory"

The guy that wrote the "Popular Mechanics" article that sought to disprove some of the "conspiracy theories".He is Michael Chertoff's brother.

correction: he is a cousin.