CathInfo.com

.......
Here is correctly described a branch of mechanics called kinematics - the study of physical measurement using distance, speed, acceleration....and time. Relative motion in kinematics is as certain as 2+2 = 4.
BUT... Dynamics is the branch of physics that PREDICTS future motion based on kinematics, mass and forces. In dynamics the laws of motion (Newton and Maxwell) only correctly predict future motion if the Earth (lab/ground) is used as a reference frame for an observer! Newton's Bucket anomaly and his 2nd law are examples of the uniqueness of the Earth in applying the laws of natural motion.
It is dynamics that reveals the Earth as the only immovable platform from which trajectories can be foretold...
Although this uniqueness is easily made manifest, the mainstream demagogues of physics ignore the facts in fear of the consequences:
- the Church was right and Galileo/Copernicus were wrong
- the Big Bang and relativity -special and general - are a colossal hoax ...bigger than 9/11
- the centrality and immobility of Earth can mean only one thing... the God denied by the modern atheists EXISTS.  

1- Where on earth are you getting the idea that mass and force aren't included in kinematics? Where do you think the motions are being calculated from?

2- Your statement that the laws of motion are only correct if the Earth is used as a reference frame is patently false. Shifting between frames of reference is trivial. There is nothing in "dynamics" as you call it which requires any given frame of reference.

3- Also, what you call dynamics is encompassed under my original statements.

4- Also, calling relativity a "colossal hoax" is colossally ignorant. There's a reason the theory of relativity is held up as virtually untouchable.

5- It correctly predicted numerous previously unknown phenomena, many of which no one would have even thought to look for if they hadn't been predicted by said theory.

6- The original example is the bending of light around the sun so that stars behind it can be seen "through" it during an eclipse.

7- There are many others like that. When a model correctly predicts complex phenomena, it's a pretty sure sign that the model is working, and so it becomes a scientific "law".  
  ...............

Kinematics is the branch of classical mechanics which describes the motion of points (alternatively "particles"), bodies (objects), and systems of bodies without consideration of the masses of those objects nor the forces that may have caused the motion.

Dynamics is a branch of applied mathematics (specifically classical mechanics) concerned with the study of forces and torques and their effect on motion, as opposed to kinematics, which studies the motion of objects without reference to its causes.

The geovariant law of dynamics solves the rotational paradox of Newton's Bucket , proposed in the 1687 Principia and unsolved....until now.  
For a description of NB....but not a solution, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucket_argument

In the lab frame of Newton the centrifugal force law correctly predicts a curved water surface, since he sees the water moving in a circle.
The core of the NB anomaly is that an observer co-moving with the bucket (the bucket's rest frame of reference) will predict a flat surface , contrary to fact, using the  Centrifugal Force law, since he sees the water at rest!  So the laws of rotational physics  - the CF law, in this case- only are valid in the lab/Earth frame!  
This is GeoVariance, not covariance...and the exposing of relativity as only valid for kinematics...i.e., for measurement of relative motion.

GV also holds for linear dynamics...
A car heading north accelerates past a hitch-hiker.
The driver of the car (accelerating in the lab frame) feels inertial forces pushing him into the seat, as predicted by Newton’s 2nd law..F = ma.
We have all experienced this force.
BUT… the HH feels NO inertial forces, even though the HH is accelerating from the car driver's point of view,  so F = ma applied in the car reference frame would predict – FALSELY – that the HH would feel inertial forces, too.

Newton's 2nd law applies only in the ground/Earth/lab frame, just like the CF law in Newton's Bucket.

The proof of geovariance and geostatism has always been right before our eyes, since Newton and Mach debated the philosophical and physical meaning of the NB test.  The lovers of darkness, the dark energy and dark matter demagogues, have blinded themselves to the truth.

Contrary to the stiff-necked mavens of mainstream physics,  the laws of physical motion ONLY apply for an Earth observer, demolishing relativity's claim as a hypothesis in agreement with testing...as the sci method demands.  The  immobility of the Earth and its primacy in the universe is restored to its original role, as revealed in Holy Scripture.

The two postulates of Special Relativity are
1) Speed of Light(SoL) is constant = c in all reference frames
2) The laws of motion are equivalent in all inertial ref. frames...inertial covariance.
Consider the second logical method ...
#1 is false- from the results of any gas(non-vacuum) interferometer test.
Sol = c +- v, where v is the aether speed
#2 is false from the 2005 Wang Fiber Optic Conveyor test. The results are only valid in the lab/Earth frame ..and aether is dragged along with the conveyor.  Sol = c +- v is only true in the lab frame.
Both SR premises are experimentally proven false, so no further consideration of SR is possible.  Doing so would be worse than just being wrong.