In a recent email discussion with an old trad friend my friend stated: "You must objectively show that geocentrism is a matter of Faith. You have not done that."
The reply was as follows and to this day I would not change one word of it: "The Church has already done so. You need to read the Church’s docuмents on the Galileo case. They stated that Scripture’s statements that the sun revolved around the earth must be taken as the objective word of God and must be taken at face value, literally, unless there is an impossibility in doing so. The Church said the same with every other Scripture – She interpreted them all literally (e.g., “this is my body” was interpreted to be the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, as opposed to just a symbolic or figurative presence of Christ). The Church also said that She was bound by the consensus of the Church Fathers on this issue and could not deviate from it, as stipulated in the Council of Trent. The Church also said that even if someone could argue that geocentrism was not a matter of faith intrinsically, it was still a matter of faith extrinsically (i.e., ex parte dicentis), since it was a matter of the truth of the testimony of Scripture that was at stake. That is, if Scripture could be proved wrong on one of its propositional truths, then Scripture is completely undermined."
At this point the communication with my friend basically broke down. I figured he was throwing in the towel without wanting to admit it -- c'est la vie.