In the French language forum there used to be an emoticon that was holding a sign saying "Je suis Catho!" and he had a scowl on his face like he was mad at somebody. I would hold up the sign that says "Je suis Catho!" and I would have a big smile on my face.Why don’t you answer the questions? Frankly, it seems you have an agenda.
Why don’t you answer the questions? Frankly, it seems you have an agenda.I think he answered them. He is saying that Catholics here have scowls on their faces. He is here to show us that to be Catholic one should have a big smile on one's face.
I think he answered them. He is saying that Catholics here have scowls on their faces. He is here to show us that to be Catholic one should have a big smile on one's face.Sounds like a "Going my Way" Bing Crosby Catholicism. or........
ETA: Of course, he can always correct me if I'm wrong. ;)
I think he answered them. He is saying that Catholics here have scowls on their faces. He is here to show us that to be Catholic one should have a big smile on one's face.😀
ETA: Of course, he can always correct me if I'm wrong. ;)
In the French language forum there used to be an emoticon that was holding a sign saying "Je suis Catho!" and he had a scowl on his face like he was mad at somebody. I would hold up the sign that says "Je suis Catho!" and I would have a big smile on my face.
Perhaps. But for poche to have persevered with 15,000+ posts over 8 years, I suspect that there's something deeper there. So, for instance, Lover of Truth would post tirelessly against Feeneyism, and that was inspired by his "close call" in almost having become a Feeneyite. So I surmise that poche has had some kind of dealings with Traditional Catholicism."If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck" .
So, poche, since you clearly don't see eye-to-eye with any of the other forum members on theological issues, could you please explain why it is that you're so active on the forum?
...
Perhaps. But for poche to have persevered with 15,000+ posts over 8 years, I suspect that there's something deeper there.
There really is only one explanation: Narcissism.
And he's enjoying every minute of the havoc he's causing.
I believe Poche is more than one person. One person has one style of writing. It seems that reading Poche posts
it looks like they are of different styles.
After all, Matthew does get a $4.3 million annual revenue from this site.Say what?
Interesting theory. Could poche be a group of people working together to troll the forum?:laugh2:
Or, alternatively, could poche be a few guys from India that Matthew has hired to drive up traffic on the forum? :laugh1: ... kindof like Gajewski did. After all, Matthew does get a $4.3 million annual revenue from this site.
There really is only one explanation: Narcissism.I think that is part of the problem.
And he's enjoying every minute of the havoc he's causing.
I believe Poche is more than one person. One person has one style of writing. It seems that reading Poche posts
it looks like they are of different styles.
Say what?
I don’t mind if he gets banned but I don’t really see why people can’t just ignore him.Would you ignore porn at a family gathering?
As far as the other proposed explanations, I have autism (aspergers) and I don’t really think I sound like him so I feel like it’s gotta be more than just that
... I don’t really see why people can’t just ignore him.
Poche is the #4 all-time poster on CathInfo ... with over 15,000 posts. ...poche ...averages 5.6 posts per day.
I believe Poche is more than one person. One person has one style of writing. It seems that reading Poche posts
it looks like they are of different styles.
I don’t mind if he gets banned but I don’t really see why people can’t just ignore him.Says the relatively new poster. Most of us have ignored poche for years. We're just done.
Would you ignore porn at a family gathering?
Pooch has only been a problem since the new software was installed about a year ago, IOW-- there used to be a Hide/ Ignore function where one could make him vanish.... :incense:
Says the relatively new poster. Most of us have ignored poche for years. We're just done.Fair enough
It doesn't help that he never responded to Matthew's recent warning (say with an apology/a willingness to do better). Rather than a direct, sincere response in this thread, he chose to be coy in his response.
Would you ignore porn at a family gathering?No, and if he was posting porn I would certainly say he should be banned.
No, and if he was posting porn I would certainly say he should be banned.As if willful blasphemy and lying to subvert the Faith is "lame argumentation"? Did you read Matthew's condemnation?
Mind maybe he should be. And I agree that freedom of speech isn’t absolute in Catholicism.
But I do think porn is more of a threat than just kind of lame argumentation
And I agree that freedom of speech isn’t absolute in Catholicism.
I think he answered them. He is saying that Catholics here have scowls on their faces. He is here to show us that to be Catholic one should have a big smile on one's face.You are right. I am happy to be Catholic. Notice the coboy emoticon is smiling.
ETA: Of course, he can always correct me if I'm wrong. ;)
Perhaps. But for poche to have persevered with 15,000+ posts over 8 years, I suspect that there's something deeper there. So, for instance, Lover of Truth would post tirelessly against Feeneyism, and that was inspired by his "close call" in almost having become a Feeneyite. So I surmise that poche has had some kind of dealings with Traditional Catholicism.I can remember a time when there was no talk of the TLM. That was because there was no Novus Ordo.
I think you’re correct.This is the origin of the name I chose for myself;
I noticed the same deviation with Michael A. Hoffman’s blog.
His writings, newsletters and posts have different styles and it is too prolific to be coming from one guy. It took a long time to figure out that he’s a “Ringer”.
The jew are notorious for their cottage ghostwriters & troll industry. Their revolution is founded on lies, so they must be players in all the media channels.
Mark79’s hunch to trace the origins of Poche’s name to the тαℓмυd nailed a “Ringer”.
Poche is a group of one or more jew-trolls, feigning to be modern Catholics, victimized by traditionalist.
Would you ignore porn at a family gathering?When we have family gatherings at my home we don't watch that nonsense.
There is no such thing as 'freedom of speech' at my house.
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fa57.foxnews.com%2Fmedia2.foxnews.com%2FBrightCove%2F694940094001%2F2019%2F07%2F26%2F931%2F524%2F694940094001_6064317907001_6064317485001-vs.jpg%3Fve%3D1%26tl%3D1&f=1&nofb=1)
"Whoa there Mark... porn is freedom of speech"
When we have family gatherings at my home we don't watch that nonsense.This proves to me poche is on the spectrum. This guy posts what he has for dinner every single day..... Every Single Day. No one who isn’t on the spectrum would reply to the comment by saying “we don’t watch this”. It was an analogy, why would you reply to it as you would an accusation?
This proves to me poche is on the spectrum. This guy posts what he has for dinner every single day..... Every Single Day. No one who isn’t on the spectrum would reply to the comment by saying “we don’t watch this”. It was an analogy, why would you reply to it as you would an accusation?What does it men to be on the spectrum?
What does it men to be on the spectrum?Search Results
Search ResultsOn what do you base this assessment of me?
Featured snippet from the web
(http://)
www.socialworkhelper.com
“On the spectrum” usually refers to the specific set of behavioral and developmental problems and the challenges associated with autism spectrum disorder. A diagnosis of ASD means that your child's communication, social, and play skills are affected in some way.Apr 12, 2016
Includes Diseases: Autism
You have been publicly docuмented as a willful, habitual liar and blasphemer.I went to confession this morning and the priest gave me absolution.
You have not publicly repented your lies and blasphemy.
You have not made public reparation for your lies and blasphemy.
Poche, Nobody here owes you any answers.
I went to confession this morning and the priest gave me absolution.
Then let us all keep a clean slate.Mark79, I give you credit for trying to let it go because poche said he went to confession "this morning" (btw that post at 3AM leads me to believe that he lives in another time zone as well). But how do you know that he mentioned anything that has happened here in that confession?
But how do you know that he mentioned anything that has happened here in that confession? ... Public sins deserve a public confession....
This proves to me poche is on the spectrum. This guy posts what he has for dinner every single day..... Every Single Day. No one who isn’t on the spectrum would reply to the comment by saying “we don’t watch this”. It was an analogy, why would you reply to it as you would an accusation?I have aspergers and even I knew what was intended with the porn comment
I’m starting to think that Poche maybe a NO priest. Has anyone else suggested that?One or two or three or four times!
I’m starting to think that Poche maybe a NO priest. Has anyone else suggested that?He denied it… but then his word means nothing… but that is how it is for liars… never to be believed again.
One or two or three or four times!😂
He denied it… but then his word means nothing… but that is how it is for liars… never to be believed again.True. I never read his posts much even under my past screen name. I mostly just ignored him.
Since he won't explain what his intentions are here, I think that poche needs to be banned.
It would be a good thing if Poche could explain his intentions. But, in the meantime, can you explain what your intentions are here?
He denied it… but then his word means nothing… but that is how it is for liars… never to be believed again.I denied that I am a priest because it is true that I am not a priest. If I had said 'yes I am an ordained priest.' Novus Ordo or not then that would be a lie.
I denied that I am a priest because it is true that I am not a priest. If I had said 'yes I am an ordained priest.' Novus Ordo or not then that would be a lie.
I denied that I am a priest because it is true that I am not a priest. If I had said 'yes I am an ordained priest.' Novus Ordo or not then that would be a lie.
It would be a good thing if Poche could explain his intentions. But, in the meantime, can you explain what your intentions are here?
Another childish response so typical of you. Not only have I completely explained my positions, but I have even given my real name. We have no indication of whether poche is even a Catholic, or is a single person or many, then, if he is a Catholic, whether he's a Traditional Catholic. Does he have some real reason for posting or is he merely trolling the forum?
Positions aren't necessarily the same as intentions, though they may be related. What are your intentions here? Is there a reason why you don't want to answer the question?Hey Meg, why are you constantly running interference for Poche, the guy who just blasphemed Our Blessed Mother?
Hey Meg, why are you constantly running interference for Poche, the guy who just blasphemed Our Blessed Mother?
You seem to be getting closer to becoming, again, obsessed with Poche. It's a little weird.People who expect to talk about Poche in a thread about Poche rather than see you, yet again, enact your personal vendettas, are not obsessed. They merely want logical, orderly forum conduct. There is nothing weird about this at all.
You seem to be getting closer to becoming, again, obsessed with Poche. It's a little weird.
You are a seriously disordered person.
After being condemned and warned by Matthew, Poche just blasphemed Our Blessed Mother and repeated his Judaizing, once again mischaracterized Pope St. Pius X… and you run interference for Poche.
Seriously disordered.
What part of "reported" don't you understand?
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/st-stephen-exposed-the-jew's-occult-star/msg681318/#msg681318
Did you report the post to Matthew? Yes or no. I understand that you have to show a bit of drama for your adoring fans here, who expect and have anxious hope for it, but maybe you can just simply answer the question. Is it really that difficult?
And once again a thread has been derailed by Meg and her arbitrary/capricious insistence that she's the implied moderator of the forum.
Meg, what do you hope to accomplish by antagonizing Mark?
Positions aren't necessarily the same as intentions, though they may be related. What are your intentions here? Is there a reason why you don't want to answer the question?
Are you a sedevacantist?
Matthew said that we are to report Poche's posts if they are a problem. Are you not aware of that?
It is evident to me that Sedevacantsits have taken over the forum, and they rule here, with the blessing of the forum owner. It's unfortunate, because the Resistance cannot really tolerate being attacked continually by the sedes and sedeprivationists.It is really about Poche.
Mark 79 is obviously a narcissist. It's not really about Poche. It's about Mark, and his need for attention and adulation. He has that, in great numbers here.
It is evident to me that Sedevacantists have taken over the forum, and they rule here, with the blessing of the forum owner. It's unfortunate, because the Resistance cannot really tolerate being attacked continually by the sedes and especially the sedeprivationists (who are worse than the sedes).Meg, clear and evident falsehoods like what Poche is doing cannot (emphasis on not) be ignored. If you're ignoring them, then it's safe to assume that you either don't care or you're an idiot.
Mark 79 is obviously a narcissist. It's not really about Poche. It's about Mark, and his need for attention and adulation. He has that, in great numbers here.
Did you report the post to Matthew? Yes or no. I understand that you have to show a bit of drama for your adoring fans here, who expect and have anxious hope for it, but maybe you can just simply answer the question. Is it really that difficult?Defending our blessed Mother from blasphemy is "a bit of drama"?
It is evident to me that Sedevacantists have taken over the forum, and they rule here, with the blessing of the forum owner.…
Mark 79 is obviously a narcissist. It's not really about Poche. It's about Mark, and his need for attention and adulation. He has that, in great numbers here.
The Liturgy Loon. (https://fatherfeeney.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/the-point-october-1952/) Armed with an unabridged missal and a course in Gregorian chant, this migratory species travels from parish to parish in search of a properly said Mass.
When he enters a church, his purpose is not to make a visit, but to go on a tour of inspection. And by a few liturgical scowls at the surplus statuary, he can dismiss the devotion of generations of simple Catholics. For the Liturgy Loon’s concern is not prayer, but performance; not dogma, but rubrics; not the Presence of Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, but the absence of lace on the altar boy’s surplice.
Poche,I am a Catholic.
If you are a jew-troll as the evidence implies... are you a rabbi?
Credible trolls, who infiltrate Catholic forums have rabbinical training.
They understand the Faith, and are adept at advancing lies and myths against it.
You fit this bill.
Actually, in our recent frank exchange of views behind the scenes, Matthew was quite disparaging of the sedevacantist position; he gave no "blessing" at all.I don't believe that I misrepresented anything that Pope St Pius X said. During his audience with Herzl, His Holiness asked, "Does it have to be Gerusalemme?" This implies a willingness to consider as legitimate maybe a homeland somewhere else. He also said, I have always been on good terms with Jews. Only the other evening two Jews were here to see me." And it was He sho also said, "After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jews.
Keep your eye on the ball.
Ignoring Matthew's explicit condemnations and warnings, Poche not only continued his mischaraterization of Pope St. Pius X's position on тαℓмυdic Judaism, but also suggested that the star of the demon Rempham, the explicit topic of the thread, prefigured Our Blessed Mother.
You might consider defending Our Lady.
It really is impressive how you can be wrong such a high percentage of the time. You can't parse a word like "reported," but think you can read my heart, mind, and soul. Impressive. Can you bilocate too?
Has anyone suggested (((poche))) yet?Several have suggested so and, being a habitual liar, his denials are meaningless.
To hell with your unconvincing denials. What you "believe" is precisely the problem. Objectively you have habitually lied. When you have been inescapably caught in your lies, you have piled on other lies (not remembering, don't believe, "paraphrasing," words as "prudential silence," etc.) and ineffectually attempted to deflect into tangents, false piety, and complete non-sequiturs.How? It was the Holy Virgin herself who chose to appear on the site of a temple dedicated to a pagan deity.
Since you have been challenged, your mask has been cracking. Your demons are starting to show and the stench of them is unbearable.
Your defense of your blasphemy against the Mother of God is quite revealing and quite despicable.
Seek a holy exorcist.
You suggested that the devil Rempham's star prefigured the Mother of God.God chose Tepeyac, the site of a pagan temple to be the place for His basilica dedicated to His Mother. He chose Massabielle, a site for throwing garbage, to be the site of another basilica dedicated to His Holy Mother. He can also choose a pagan star to be the prefiguration for the advent of the Holy Virgin, who is the Star of the Sea.
You cannot slither away or explain away such an outrageous blasphemy. You cannot generate enough smoke or excuses to hide that objective fact or to divert me/us into a rabbit hole of your non-sequiturs.
Seek a holy exorcist.
"The star of the Jews [the star of Rempham: Acts 7:43, Amos 5:26] could also be a prefiguration of the Blessed Virgin. "(https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/st-stephen-exposed-the-jew's-occult-star/msg681317/#msg681317)
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/st-stephen-exposed-the-jew's-occult-star/msg681317/#msg681317 (https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/st-stephen-exposed-the-jew's-occult-star/msg681317/#msg681317)
I understand that, having been caught in your blasphemy, that you would like to conceal it with whatever deceit or diversion it takes—that is precisely the pattern you have displayed repeatedly—but here's the bottom line—you said verbatim:The Devil also (against his will) kneels before the Christ.
(https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/st-stephen-exposed-the-jew's-occult-star/msg681317/#msg681317)
prefigure | prēˈfiɡyər |
verb [with object]
1 be an early indication or version of (something)
2 archaic imagine beforehand
A devil or his sign is NOT an "early indication or version" of Mary.
As far as I am concerned, YOU, not Mary, are a devil or guided by one or more devils.
The Devil also (against his will) kneels before the Christ.It is not lost on anyone here (except Meg) that you blasphemed Mary and have "doubled down" variously defending and clumsily attempting to cover up your blasphemy, not expressing any remorse whatsoever.
I am a Catholic.
He can also choose a pagan star to be the prefiguration for the advent of the Holy Virgin, who is the Star of the Sea.Where’s the evidence, Poche? Quit making these heretical and blasphemous assumptions based only on your stupid logic of “Well, God could do this...”