Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 21

Author Topic: poche ... please explain  (Read 15956 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: poche ... please explain
« Reply #30 on: December 28, 2019, 03:24:15 PM »
Quote from: roscoe on December 28, 2019, 02:19:19 PM
Pooch has only been a problem since the new software was installed about a year ago, IOW-- there used to be a Hide/ Ignore function where one could make him vanish.... :incense:

As Matthew has correctly opined, פּוֹקֶר is not a threat to the faith of regulars who would Hide/Ignore him in an instant.

Unfortunately Hide/Ignore does nothing to protect innocents and newbies from פּוֹקֶר.

Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: poche ... please explain
« Reply #31 on: December 28, 2019, 04:34:24 PM »
If he refuses to explain himself and what his intentions are here, then I think he needs to be banned.
Logged

Offline ByzCat3000

Re: poche ... please explain
« Reply #32 on: December 28, 2019, 05:39:36 PM »
Quote from: 2Vermont on December 28, 2019, 01:06:25 PM
Says the relatively new poster.  Most of us have ignored poche for years.  We're just done.  
It doesn't help that he never responded to Matthew's recent warning (say with an apology/a willingness to do better).  Rather than a direct, sincere response in this thread, he chose to be coy in his response.  
Fair enough 
Logged

Offline ByzCat3000

Re: poche ... please explain
« Reply #33 on: December 28, 2019, 05:41:20 PM »
Quote from: Mark 79 on December 28, 2019, 12:33:53 PM
Would you ignore porn at a family gathering?
No, and if he was posting porn I would certainly say he should be banned.
Mind maybe he should be.  And I agree that freedom of speech isn’t absolute in Catholicism.
But I do think porn is more of a threat than just kind of lame argumentation 
Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: poche ... please explain
« Reply #34 on: December 28, 2019, 05:43:30 PM »
Quote from: ByzCat3000 on December 28, 2019, 05:41:20 PM
No, and if he was posting porn I would certainly say he should be banned.
Mind maybe he should be.  And I agree that freedom of speech isn’t absolute in Catholicism.
But I do think porn is more of a threat than just kind of lame argumentation
As if willful blasphemy and lying to subvert the Faith is "lame argumentation"?  Did you read Matthew's condemnation?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 21
« previous next »