Author Topic: Peter Dimond vs Anti-Catholic Calvinist (Read 9613 times)

soulguard · « **Reply #30 on:** January 22, 2014, 02:31:42 PM »

Deliveringit tells it like it is.

Say it preachah :applause:

Deliveringit · « **Reply #31 on:** January 23, 2014, 03:43:12 AM »

Quote from: soulguard

Deliveringit tells it like it is.

Say it preachah :applause:

Thanks for the applause, but the real applause should go to brother Dimond since he did a very good job bringing the truth into that debate against that protestant calvinist. Here again is the link to that debate,,

http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1/videos

crossbro · « **Reply #32 on:** January 23, 2014, 05:35:59 AM »

Deliveringit · « **Reply #33 on:** January 28, 2014, 12:12:35 AM »

Quote from: crossbro

WAKE UP !!!!!!!!!! :whistleblower:

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #34 on:** January 28, 2014, 02:11:41 AM »

Quote from: TheKnightVigilant

I know the Dimond brothers are not popular here

On the contrary, they're a growing trend. Most folks here are big fans, and shape a lot of their thoughts based on their "sermons," even though they're not monks at all.

Whatever! :kick-can:

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #35 on:** January 28, 2014, 06:29:37 AM »

Quote from: LaramieHirsch

Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
I know the Dimond brothers are not popular here

On the contrary, they're a growing trend. Most folks here are big fans, and shape a lot of their thoughts based on their "sermons," even though they're not monks at all.

Whatever! :kick-can:

There is a real love-hate relationship with the Dimond bros here on CathInfo. While I have not seen too many of their videos, the ones highlighting the Michael Voris deception and the video titled "Patrick Madrid's Jaw Dropping Heresy" is a good one to watch.

I am inching toward counting myself as one of their fans although they do sometimes exhibit an over zealousness in making their point and I do find their videos well paced and entertaining.

Deliveringit · « **Reply #36 on:** January 28, 2014, 03:50:00 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

There is a real love-hate relationship with the Dimond bros here on CathInfo. While I have not seen too many of their videos, the ones highlighting the Michael Voris deception and the video titled "Patrick Madrid's Jaw Dropping Heresy" is a good one to watch.

I am inching toward counting myself as one of their fans although they do sometimes exhibit an over zealousness in making their point and I do find their videos well paced and entertaining.

The Dimond's are 100% correct on how the Catholic Church originally understood her own dogmas. They are also correct that the Vatican II heretical council from the 1960s and the last 6 anti-popes have attempted to change and/or re-interpret those dogmas.

I don't agree with all of the Dimond's conspiracy theories though. For example, I don't agree with their theory about an impostor sister Lucia. However, the Dimonds never said their conspiracy theories are binding on any Catholics to believe, but instead that its their own opinions and that others can disagree.

TheKnightVigilant · « **Reply #37 on:** January 28, 2014, 04:09:34 PM »

To be honest I'm starting to come around to their point of view, and I think the upcoming "canonisations" of JPII and John XXIII will only serve to further vindicate their position.

2Vermont · « **Reply #38 on:** January 28, 2014, 05:57:31 PM »

I think the main issue with the DB's is dogmatic sedevacantism.

I will say that whatever you think of them if they debated a protestant they probably cleaned up the floor with them. I listened to a similar debate a couple of years ago. They don't usually get into the SV issue when debating Prots.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #39 on:** January 28, 2014, 06:00:05 PM »

Quote from: LaramieHirsch

Quote from: TheKnightVigilant
I know the Dimond brothers are not popular here

On the contrary, they're a growing trend. Most folks here are big fans, and shape a lot of their thoughts based on their "sermons," even though they're not monks at all.

Whatever! :kick-can:

True, that.

Did you notice the new thread that started hyping the Dimonds got deleted?

It was getting into the upcoming so-called canonizations of JPII and JXXIII.

This new Bergoglio-Blasphemy is going to be a goldmine for the Dimonds.

But it's still possible that God will intervene.

God didn't stop Vat.II or the Newmass or Assisi I, II or III, but this might be just too much, IMHO. Even God has His limits, and He'll only take so much.

.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #40 on:** January 28, 2014, 06:03:45 PM »

Quote from: Deliveringit

Quote from: crossbro

WAKE UP !!!!!!!!!! :whistleblower:

"Wake me up when it's over." (Cowardly Lion in The Wizard of Oz movie)

.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #41 on:** January 28, 2014, 06:16:28 PM »

Quote from: Deliveringit

The Dimond's are 100% correct on how the Catholic Church originally understood her own dogmas.

The Dimonds are 100% WRONG when they try to tackle BoD and BoB.

And the world is worse off for their existence, as a consequence.

With them everything is BLACK or WHITE and they can't imagine that the truth lies somewhere between artificial and contrived extremes.

.

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #42 on:** January 29, 2014, 02:00:32 AM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat

But it's still possible that God will intervene.

God didn't stop Vat.II or the Newmass or Assisi I, II or III, but this might be just too much, IMHO. Even God has His limits, and He'll only take so much.

.

On the contrary, Neil, I think this Pope IS the intervention.

I think God gave us the pope we deserve, and that he is a punishment. Same for our political leaders. God is in complete control, here.

It can get worse. It will get worse. Our children are going to grow up in a cultural wasteland.

This is one of the ways God chastises people.

Deliveringit · « **Reply #43 on:** January 30, 2014, 06:15:47 PM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat

Quote from: Deliveringit

The Dimond's are 100% correct on how the Catholic Church originally understood her own dogmas.

The Dimonds are 100% WRONG when they try to tackle BoD and BoB.

And the world is worse off for their existence, as a consequence.

With them everything is BLACK or WHITE and they can't imagine that the truth lies somewhere between artificial and contrived extremes.

.

If the Dimonds are wrong, then why can't any of you post the "DECLARATION" and "DEFINITION" from the Church on 'Baptism of Desire' and 'Baptism of Blood'. It shouldn't be so difficult to do if what you say is correct, and yet I don't see any of you posting that evidence.

SilkandDungarees6 · « **Reply #44 on:** February 01, 2014, 12:28:44 AM »

Quote from: Deliveringit

If the Dimonds are wrong, then why can't any of you post the "DECLARATION" and "DEFINITION" from the Church on 'Baptism of Desire' and 'Baptism of Blood'. It shouldn't be so difficult to do if what you say is correct, and yet I don't see any of you posting that evidence.

I am also curious as to why nobody is posting it. Seems like they would jump at the opportunity to post it so as to prove their case.