Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: OnlyFans founder dies, receives Judgment  (Read 379 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: OnlyFans founder dies, receives Judgment
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 12:37:24 PM »
The media goes really overboard when some actor or other celebrity dies. There are all sorts of glowing tributes by their industry peers and reminders of all their professional achievements. 
99% of the time these people are non Catholics and were reprobates but in the eyes of the world they were wonderful human beings.
Maybe they were advocates for some woke cause.
But...once in hell they can't hear that praise and if they could they would curse each and every fan of theirs.
Most people achieve no worldly success but have sold their souls for next to nothing, usually some ideology like marxism under its many guises. 
It's kind of how they were offering a free donut to people to take the jab. Imagine the mentality of a person, who rolls up their sleeve and is injected with Lord knows what for a donut!
 

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: OnlyFans founder dies, receives Judgment
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 08:04:10 PM »
OnlyFans, which has convinced a few MILLION women to become online whores (most of whom make less than $150 a month), ruining countless lives of men, women, and children --

The founder of OnlyFans just died, and was judged by Almighty God.

I shudder to think of it.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/health/health-news/leonid-radvinsky-net-worth-how-rich-was-onlyfans-owner/ar-AA1ZdIQn?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Most women are whores either offline or online.

I think this definition is good.
Quote
Pornography" (or "porn") usually refers to representations designed to arouse and give sɛҳuąƖ pleasure to those who read, see, hear, or handle them.
Most definitions refer to online nudity or depictions of impure acts. But really just dressing immodestly is a form of pornography and most modern women post themselves online in bikinis (which is underwear) or other outfits that are designed to entice lust in men.

Now if a women posts images of herself on instragram half naked there is little different between that and only fans, because of advertising monitization and sponserships. The difference is a formality.

Most girls dress like this in public mind you, even literal children dress this way.. it's terrible, these women are 'whores' even if they haven't made 'actual' pornography.

Imagine the judgement of parents...


Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: OnlyFans founder dies, receives Judgment
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 09:03:47 PM »
Might it not be better to replace the name of the site with just "porn site" lest others be tempted to "just see what they're talking about". 
Why advertise that site to some who've never heard of it and who the devil will surely tempt in their curiosity?
Can you imagine how many people now know about the site since Spirit Daily announced his death?


It's the modern equivalent of Playboy. Knowledge of it is quite ubiquitous.
The existence of those filthy sites/magazines/etc are a sad fact of life, and men simply have to develop the virtue to know of their existence, and yet not run straight to their destruction like a desperate, hungry man to a buffet.

Ignorance does not equal virtue, just keep that in mind. Unless your charge is under 10 or 12, you really shouldn't rely on the main strategy of "ignorance" in hopes to keep them pure by default. Eventually you need to address certain things, and hope your Catholic training leads them to make the same right choices you did. The world, the flesh, and the devil are always going to be there -- knowledge OR ignorance. And the more ubiquitous the danger is, the more true that becomes.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: OnlyFans founder dies, receives Judgment
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 09:13:10 PM »
Like your average Ponzi scheme, most women who foolishly sign up for this site do so in hopes of getting a "bag" (lots of money) and living an easy life of luxury. After all, they see the top 5 or 10 OF "models" on TikTok and foolish women look up to them (with envy).
But just like with Ponzi schemes, most participants make $150/month or less -- not even a good side income, much less a living.

But Ponzi schemes don't mark you for life as "for fun only -- not marriage material" like this site does to women. Ponzi schemes don't take permanently take away your reputation or dignity. With a failed Ponzi scheme, you might be out a few hundred or a few thousand dollars, but you completely recover and live a normal life.

Imagine the CHILDREN of these women, for those who end up getting married and having families. Imagine their shame, the emotional damage, when their classmates come to them with pictures or videos of THEIR MOTHER they got from the Internet. Or imagine her future husband at work, after his co-workers show him some interesting pictures/videos of his wife, that they got from the Internet.The Internet is forever.

Deleting your OnlyFans account after you convert or "find God" isn't enough. The Internet is forever. Each woman who lowers herself to this garbage will be marked for life -- it will affect her future spouse(s), children, etc. She will never get her honor or reputation back. It's like rolling around in mud and filth, only this particular mud and filth will never wash off, until you die.

And to do that for $150 a month, which is probably squandered on the stupidest stuff to begin with!

P.S. The men -- if you can call them that, they are losers, betas, and simps -- who pay money to these woman are as bad as the women, and even more foolish. Imagine paying some random woman, and not even getting anything in exchange! Talk about moronic. I mean, I'm against "the world's oldest profession" -- don't get me wrong -- but at least it was straightforward and made some kind of sense. An exchange of money for services. But what kind of men do we have today, to pay money to women just so they'll say your name on their livestream or give you some picture you could get thousands of on the Internet for free, for those who are thus degenerate and carnally inclined. Stuuu-pid.

Re: OnlyFans founder dies, receives Judgment
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 09:49:31 PM »
I would wager that the young women who join OF are likely the byproduct of fractured homes, whether it be from divorce, an unmarried couple, one parent(usually the father) out of the picture entirely.
Their parents failed them. The conciliar church especially failed them. 
They were raised watching the Kardashians and MTV, where exhibitionism equals fame/money.
Then there are the values espoused in of pop/rap music and an avalanche of other toxic, satanic messaging. 
An entire generation of minds warped and serving the devil but the united conference of bishops is more
concerned about stamping out antisemitism.