This is so stupid I'm not sure at first how to respond.
First off, it's not 'equivolance'. That would mean 'equally wished' if it existed as an English word. It doesn't. Equivalence is what you want.
Next, you appear to be conflating different concepts, Catholic monarchist thought with American neoconservative thought. If you take two unrelated things, call them 'old' and 'new' versions of the same thing, you can attempt to show a change in the thing.
Your technique, in point of fact, is exactly what Catholic trads and fundamentalists think Darwinists do. Take two different animals, put them in a timeline as ancestor and progeny, and claim an evolutionary change.
So, yeah, you fail in a huge way. I've been watching some of your ultra-opinionated posts, and I've come to the conclusion you know next to nothing. About anything.
So, I think I'll hector you a bit.