It's an excellent debate though, and Olavo is so insightful at some points that everyone should read it.
He is truly insightful in many points, and, people who for example is getting information from Brother Nathanael and RT News should not avoid in getting the information that he provide in that debate.
Although when it comes to the point to talk about Jҽωs, Israel, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and catholic traditionalism he is quite often very, very evasive. One should not forget that he had strong relation with perennialism people like Frithjof Schoun (http://www.sophia-perennis.com/index_english.htm
) which now he claims that he has no more ties to those people.
It is very hard to catch him in direct contradiction but I do feel that something is fish in there. Anyways, between him and Dugin it is clear for me that he wins the debate in all its aspect.