Hate speech is hate speech.   This is anti Catholicism.  

What's sad is that it wouldn't happen because the *Muslims* wouldn't let it happen. People are afraid of how they would react.

People aren't scared of the (un)manly Catholics, meanwhile.

What is wrong with this picture?

What would St. Ignatius do?*


* Note: He actually got a sign from God that he *wasn't* supposed to kill a Muslim who blasphemed Our Lady. However, it's sad that even the SINS of modern-day Catholics are so...unmanly.

Wouldn't it be better if a Catholic man was so virile and devoted to his Faith that when he let emotion/temptation take over he did something like kill a blasphemer, rather than the prevailing tendency today which is "silence", "human respect", and "denial of the Faith"? Those weaknesses and sins are so much more unmanly.

I know that wrong is wrong, and sin is sin, but which of these sins is more understandable for a man to commit, given his fallen nature (Original Sin):

A) Attacking a man out of zeal for the truth and (rashly) trying to defend the Faith as he emotionally perceives it, or

B) Going along with whatever the crowd believes, staying silent, for fear of being labeled an "extremist", a "troublemaker", "Resistance", or "a CathInfo member".

At least you can understand A). "He has testosterone. He has a male temperament and passions. He let temptation/emotion get the better of him." whereas B) is the shameful behavior of a castrated, emasculated coward.

A) needs to be fixed-up supernaturally.
B) needs to be fixed up supernaturally AND naturally. He's not even a good "man" on the purely natural level.