Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: No-go areas.....  (Read 18739 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

No-go areas.....
« on: April 07, 2012, 07:05:11 AM »
Two white kids, tourists even, were viciously murdered in Florida for no other appearnt reason than the color of their skin.

Where's the outrage? Where's the nationalmedia? Where's Sharpton and Jackson? Any comments from Obama?

No nothing, just two "white boys" in the wrong place at the wrong time.

No "racism" or "hate crime here", just move along now.

Just as always.

The double-standard is outright nauseating.

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/hbd-human-biodiversity/overshot-in-florida/


Overshot in Florida
The no-go area of no-go areas
By Colin Liddell Comments (23)Print ArticleComments

So many beaches, so little time Here in Japan we have had a no-go area since the great earthquake of last year. Such areas are something of a rarity in these parts. This one is rather large stretching across a radius of 20 km. It is centred on the Fukushima nuclear reactor, which was badly damaged by the tsunami caused by the quake, and is meant to protect people from radioactive contamination. In the usual, slightly nannying way common in these parts, it has been marked with all the paraphernalia that one would associate with no-go areas: manned roadblocks, no-entry signs, flashing lights, occasional automated announcements, and a range of gentle fines.

But while no-go zones are extremely uncommon in Japan, where walking about at night is perfectly safe, this is certainly not the case in America, where the trial for the murder of two British tourists shot in the Florida resort town of Sarasota has just ended in the conviction of Shawn Tyson, a Black 17-year-old youth.

No doubt if Obama had a son, he would also look like Tyson.
While Japan makes great efforts to mark its no-go zones, the same cannot be said for America. There it is regarded as something of a social faux pas to put up appropriate signage.

Regarding the case, it seems that the murder victims, James Cooper and James Kouzaris, after an evening spent at a couple of downtown bars, the last of which closed at 2 am, decided to walk to a well-known 24-hour diner, located about one-and-half miles away, for an early hours breakfast. After failing to take the right turning, they continued on their way to what newspapers in their coded way described as a "ghetto," "run-down estate," and "public housing project." The pictures of the murder site, however, showed a pleasant enough row of tree-shaded bungalows, each with its own spacious yard, and a car, SUV, or pickup truck in every driveway.

Certainly this is not the kind of obvious no-go area that innocent, liquored-up tourists could be expected to recognize, but no-go area it certainly was as quotes from the local police captain Paul Sutton to the press made clear. He admitted that detectives had ignored "lifestyle differences" between Britons and Americans and assumed the tourists would never have dreamed of trying to get around on foot. Sutton also talked about the men "losing their bearings" and "overshooting" the "correct turning." In other words, there are certain places it isn't safe to walk and no signs to let people know they have taken the wrong turning or wandered too far.

Sutton wanted to make it sound as if what happened to the two men was some kind of accident; as if they had haphazardly walked off a cliff or gone scuba diving without the correct equipment. In a sense this is true. There is an almost impersonal quality and predictability about Whites wandering into America’s no-go zones at night without the requisite number of guns, mace, bullet-proof vests, and police back up.

Cooper and Kouzaris were clearly targeted because they were White. One of the witnesses at the trial Jermaine Bane said he had a phone call from Tyson in which he heard him say: "Who are those crackers walking past the park?" When Tyson found out they had no money he decided to kill them for pleasure. The court heard that Tyson had boasted to a female friend, Latrece Washington, that one of the men had begged for his life but he shot him anyway.

In the press that followed the killings, it was routinely referred to a "botched robbery." Remember that term for future reference, as it occurs every time Blacks rob Whites and then shoot the victims for a racial buzz. Other notions floated during the initial period of the investigation included the suggestion that Cooper and Kouzaris were trying to buy drugs, were the victims of a "honey-trap" operation, or were even "ghetto tourists."

The cuмulative effect of all this speculation was to make the victims seem like they were the problem, not the killer. In the days that followed their murder, with Sarasota baking in the media spotlight, Cooper and Kouzaris were effectively presented as bar-crawling drunks with poor orienting skills. They were also depicted as womanizing dope fiends with a thrill-seeking death wish. The clear message was: "Don't worry, tourists, you have to be a really sick fuck to get blown away in Sarasota." Just the reassuring message the local holiday trade needed!

While most American Whites, especially White Liberals, have mastered enough doublethink to successfully avoid America's honky-shooting no-go areas without being too overtly conscious of the racial dimension, it is unfair to expect this sort of advanced Orwellian thinking from foreign tourists whose picture of America has been shaped by a Hollywood where Morgan Freeman is God, Dennis Haysbert President, and all the crooks Whites (often with Southern, German, or English accents).

On its website, Sarasota looks like a lovely place. Back at the time of the killing its beaches were advertised with the disturbingly elitist slogan "All beaches are not created equal." This has now been changed to "So many beaches so little time." Echoing these slogans we could also say that not all the neighbourhoods of Sarasota have been created equally safe—for obvious reasons—and that wandering into some of them will give you a lot less time on this planet.

Given that Sarasota is a holiday destination that attracts naïve foreigners and then tries to get them drunk and high, it might be a good idea to fence off certain parts of the town with barbed wire and put up warning signs exactly as you would if there were dangerous cliffs or a stretch of water with a deadly undertow or sharks. As some of the tourists may not be fluent in English, these should also be very visual, with appropriate images of trigger-happy racist Black thugs.

In Japan they try not to have any no-go areas, but when they do they at least make strenuous efforts to clearly delineate them. America by contrast is riddled with dangerous no-go areas, but instead of this being openly admitted and measures taken to keep out potential victims, any mention is suppressed. In America it seems that the most obvious no-go area is the subject of no-go areas itself.

http://www.alternativeright.com/main...ot-in-florida/

No-go areas.....
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2012, 07:12:26 AM »
hush crime: white 13-year-old boy set on fire by (non-whites) (Kansas City, Missouri)

Police said the two suspects are male [but they don't identify the race! attacks on whites, literally murderous attacks on whites, matter less than 'racism,' which is mere wordplay, indeed a smear for whites invented by a communist jew] and have facial hair. Police said one was wearing a blue hat, blue jacket, and shoes with the number 23 on the side. The other wore a blue hat, a black jacket, and wore glasses.

Melissa Coon said her son turned from the school's stadium onto Quincy Avenue and noticed two teenagers following him. She said the teens followed her son home and attacked him outside his front door.

"And they rushed him on the porch as he tried to get the door open," she said. "(One of them) poured the gasoline, then flicked the Bic, and said, 'This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy'."





http://www.kmbc.com/news/30572405/detail.html#ixzz1qSuPlxwp


No-go areas.....
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2012, 07:33:39 AM »
I was reminded of the comments of David Starkey.He certainly isn't on "our page" on other issues but correct in his analysis about England.When you had white liberals wearing "Looters are scuм" T-Shirts when doing the clear up after the riots, it showed that even these race mixing supporters knew something is wrong in 'Broken Britain'.Councils struggled to find black people willing to assist in the clean up. It's too simplistic to hold the view of anti- Catholic John Tyndall when he said all that came out of Africa is witch craft, voodoo and Aids.Each African Nation has a rich tradition and culture but these Africans belong in Africa and not Britain. Humane repatriation is vital. Them and their families. They are not English. They are English when it comes to the benefits and using the system.

Britain will see more blood and fire before things get better.That is for certain.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/13/david-starkey-claims-whites-black

Quote
David Starkey claims 'the whites have become black'
Historian provokes storm of criticism after remarks during a televised discussion about the riots on BBC2's Newsnight

The historian and broadcaster David Starkey has provoked a storm of criticism after claiming during a televised discussion about the riots that "the problem is that the whites have become black".

In an appearance on BBC2's Newsnight, Starkey spoke of "a profound cultural change" and said he had been re-reading Enoch Powell's rivers of blood speech.

"His prophesy was absolutely right in one sense. The Tiber did not foam with blood but flames lambent, they wrapped around Tottenham and wrapped around Clapham," he said.

"But it wasn't inter-community violence. This is where he was absolutely wrong." Gesturing towards one of the other guests, Owen Jones, who wrote Chavs: the Demonisation of the Working Classes, Starkey said: "What has happened is that a substantial section of the chavs that you wrote about have become black."

An outcry on Twitter began with the Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn asking the BBC: "Why was racist analysis of Starkey unchallenged? What exactly are you trying to prove?" A spokesman for Newsnight said: "I think that [presenter] Emily Maitlis very robustly challenged David Starkey.

"The two guests [Jones and the writer and education adviser Dreda Say Mitchell] that we had also quite clearly took issue with his comments."

Jones told the Guardian he believed Starkey's comments were "a career-ending moment". He said: "He tapped into racial prejudice at a time of national crisis. At other times, those comments would be inflammatory but they are downright dangerous in the current climate.

"I fear that some people will now say that David Starkey is right, and you could already see some of them on Twitter. I am worried about a backlash from the right and he will give legitimacy to those views in the minds of some." On the programme, Starkey said: "The whites have become black. A particular sort of violent destructive, nihilistic gangster culture has become the fashion and black and white boys and girls operate in this language together.

"This language which is wholly false, which is this Jamaican patois that has been intruded in England and that is why so many of us have this sense of literally of a foreign country."

The historian and broadcaster, whose historical docuмentaries on Channel 4 about the Tudors established him as a household name, went on to name-check Tottenham's Labour MP: "Listen to David Lammy, an archetypal successful black man. If you turn the screen off so that you are listening to him on radio you would think he was white."

He was challenged by Mitchell, who ridiculed his theories about the speech patterns of young people.

"You keep talking David about black culture. Black communities are not homogenous. So there are black cultures. Lots of different black cultures. What we need to be doing is ... thinking about ourselves not as individual communities ... as one community. We need to stop talking about them and us."

No-go areas.....
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2012, 07:48:56 AM »
Quote from: alaric
hush crime: white 13-year-old boy set on fire by (non-whites) (Kansas City, Missouri)

Police said the two suspects are male [but they don't identify the race! attacks on whites, literally murderous attacks on whites, matter less than 'racism,' which is mere wordplay, indeed a smear for whites invented by a communist jew] and have facial hair. Police said one was wearing a blue hat, blue jacket, and shoes with the number 23 on the side. The other wore a blue hat, a black jacket, and wore glasses.

Melissa Coon said her son turned from the school's stadium onto Quincy Avenue and noticed two teenagers following him. She said the teens followed her son home and attacked him outside his front door.

"And they rushed him on the porch as he tried to get the door open," she said. "(One of them) poured the gasoline, then flicked the Bic, and said, 'This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy'."





http://www.kmbc.com/news/30572405/detail.html#ixzz1qSuPlxwp


All you need to do is compare the case of Richard Everitt and Stephen Lawrence in England.

No-go areas.....
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2012, 10:01:01 AM »
I've followed several such stories, like the boy being set on fire. There is the pattern a poster above said, if it is white on black, it is described as a hate crime.

If it's black on white it is a 'botched robbery' or the suspect is described as 'male' (with no race, this is always code for blacks).

It is inherently racist, since the reportage suggests the writers think that if they report the race there will be a race riot.

It's funny these media types insist you must separate a person's action from their race, then they *do not* do so when they refuse to report the race.