This is a brilliant video. It shows us how the Earthmovers used Albert Einstein to find a way out of the M&M test that showed the Earth is not orbiting the sun. Einstein's theories were based on frauds and have been falsified many times. I especially liked the moving illustrations that show without any doubt that stellar aberration and parallax can be attributed to either heliocentrism or geocentrism so were never proofs for heliocentrism as claimed up to this day..
Now it is over 100 years since science itself admitted geocentrism was never proven wrong. We know why science and scientists will never acknowledge geocentrism as a probability, but why didn't the Catholic Church takle on board these findings also? For centuries the Church has been ridiculed over its defence of biblical geocentrism, so why didn't churchmen respond when science had to admit the evidence was more for geocentrism than heliocentrism?
Well I will tell you why, for hadn't Pope Pius VII with his imprimatur for heliocentric books in 1820, put the Catholic Church behind heliocentrism 'as understood by modern astronomers' as a truth. Indeed this same pope decreed that anyone trying to stop heliocentrism as understood by modern astronomers would be PUNISHED. In other words, to admit the 1616 decree of Pope Paul V was never falsified, that would have shown the Church contradicted a true teaching of previous popes at the highest level.
Now we are talking about the Church of Pope Saint Pius X, a pope fighting the effects of that U-turn as it created Modernism in different spheres. He had his man appointed to the Vatican Observatory, yet the Jesuits in that observatory never said a word except confirm all the heliocentric cosmology. This was a time when Monsignor Abbe Georges Lemaitre the cosmologist was pals with Einstein who was the one who admitted Geo is a viable as helio. So, why did Fr Lemaitre ignore what would have stopped so many centuries of criticism of the Catholic Church and science?
That is what is at stake here in this video. I would love to have tied JP2, admirer of Einstein and his Relativity, to a chair and made him watch it.
Great points. Also a great response to King W's comment that "Lets promote conspiracy theories so by this means we will convert the world to Catholicism."
The very term "conspiracy theory" is a psy op created to discredit those who shine the light of truth into places of darkness. True Catholics love the truth, regardless of how unpopular it may make us. Carrying King W's thought to its logical conclusion, Francis is doing a great job converting the world by making it easy for them to accept.
See, for example:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-23/1967-he-cia-created-phrase-conspiracy-theorists-and-ways-attack-anyone-who-challengeThe CIA Coined the Term Conspiracy Theorist In 1967That all changed in the 1960s.
Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA
wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories. The dispatch was marked “psych” – short for “psychological operations” or disinformation – and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.
The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.
The dispatch states:
2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization.
The aim of this dispatch is to provide material
countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.
3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active addresses are requested:
a. To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation of the relevant event] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by … propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.
b. To
employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I)
wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II)
politically interested, (III)
financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V)
infatuated with their own theories.