CathInfo.com

Here's the entire content of the post, where I lay out all the details.  Explain where the slander / calumny comes in.  So, had said something along the lines of "Prevost was involved in adultery" and left it that, yes, that would have been slander akin to what you did to Dr. Coomaraswamy.  I actually rescued your ass by immediately providing the necessary followon clarification to your post, so you owe me one.

I was listening to Brother Bugnolo and he spilled some good info regarding Prevost, and so I dug into this story and found out to be true

Prevost's grandather was actuallly one Salvatore Giovanni Riggitano, a Sicilian immigrant.  So why did this Rigatoni change his name?  Simple.  He was in fact having an adulterous affair, and his wife brought legal charges against him, which led to his arrest.  So Rigatoni here fled and tried to evade justice by changing his name, to John (from Giovanni) Prevost.  Prevost was actually the maiden name of the mother of the woman with who he was committing adultery and whom he later "married", this Suzanne Fontaine (Fontaine was her name, that of her father, whiel her mother's maiden name was Prevost).

Consequently, the very name Prevost was conceived in adultery, and then the subsequent Prevost line derives from adultery.

How interesting it is that one of Bergoglio's first "Magisterial" heresies was in fact Amoris Laetitia, the justification of adultery.

Brother Bugnolo also explained that Prevosts were tied to Chicago mafia, including Marcinkus.  Prevost also has publicly praised Bernardin even while actual Catholics avoid mention of his name due to his sordid predations on young seminarians (in Satanic contexts) ... and then went into Prevost's extensive record of having covered up sɛҳuąƖ predation throughout his career.

Bugnolo predicted an American, likely Prevost, before the Nonclave ... because it's actually American Catholics who are trying to keep the Vatican afloat financially (their finances are evidently a total disaster) ... so the hope was that they get some money from America if they put Prevost out there.

Bugnolo also says that Prevost was chosen right after Alex Soros visited Bergoglio ... suggesting that Soros told him who the next pope would be.

While not all of it can be verified, it does sound rather plausible, and the whole Riggitano -> Prevost (adultery) angle can be and has been verified.

No, there is evidence that Rama clung to his father's Traditionalism (see above).

Still waiting for the evidence that Rama is linked to Crowley.  There's stuff up there about Hinduism, UFOs, etc. -- as well as some suggestions of not believing in EENS and religious indifferentism, something that plagues the vast majority of Trad Catholics in general.

I haven't listened to this, but here's an interview of Fr(?) Dr Coomaraswamy on Art Bell, specifically regarding his relationship with Fr. Martin, that sounds like it might be interesting.

Welp ... within the first few minutes we have a direct contradiction.

Fr(?) Coomaraswamy says that Fr. Martin told him the story of how he read the Third Secret.  He said he was riding in a car with "Pope" [sic] John XXIII when Roncalli just out of nowhere apparently handed him the Third Secret and made him swear never to reveal it.

But now we have this Marro guy relating an entirely different story, where it was Bea that gave him the Third Secret to read after leaving a meeting where he could overhear some shouting and yelling, and then Bea swore him to secrecy.

So ... which one was it?

Either Fr(?) Coomaraswamy was lying (I'd say not, as he would have better character than to do this ... and he could make up all kinds of stuff if he wanted to, to spice it up, and yet his stories about Fr. Martin are pretty ho-hum), or else Marro is making it up (to sell a book) or else Fr. Martin was lying, having in fact related both stories but unable to keep the lies straight.