Please explain "strange things" keeping in mind that the tactics of the enemy include creating falsehoods about a person, attacking their character and muddying the water so people throw their hands in the air and give up on learning the truth. This is only done to those who are in their way.

I have even read an article that showed that he received money from some Jєωιѕн organizations. It was on this board, if I am not mistaken.

Oh please. "Veritable career"? Malachi Martin wrote one book which, for health reasons no doubt, he choose to label as fiction as high Vatican hierarchy were called out. It is well-known that Malachi Martin had circulated a paper with a list of the real enemy hierarchy along with their fictionalized names.

That is not a "veritalbe career out of mixing fact with fiction."

Please stop engaging in calumny and if you just can't help yourself, at least tone down accusing others of what you are doing.

You are borderline delusional when you have become emotionally attached to someone or something, like you did and continue to be with Trump.

Martin himself characterized the style of his own novels as "faction", which by definition is mixing fact with fiction ...

We are talking about real events and real people masked in the form of a novel; nowadays it is called faction …

As for a "veritable career", that's absolutely true as Martin made most of his money and got most of his notoriety from writing his faction novels, and there were close to a dozen of them, not just ONE.  You're the one who's a liar and there's nothing of calumny in anything I said.

Every single one of the following was written in that faction style, where you had fake names, but the various individuals bore striking resemblances at times to some real historical figures.  When you see the disclaimers nowadays in movies that "any resemblance to real people was not intentional" ... well, Martin's resemblances were absolutely intentional.

Windswept House
Hostage to the Devil
The Jesuits
The Keys of this Blood
The Final Conclave
The Vatican

But the problem there is that because there's a blend, that gives him plausible deniability, but at the same time it makes anything he wrote to be entirely useless ... since you can never know if ANY GIVEN POINT is fact or fiction.  Martin almost NEVER spoke plainly, but he always spun around in generalities, rarely giving direct answers to questions ... and regularly contradicting himself.

In any case, however ... this latest book by Marro shows all the signs of just being sheer fabrication on his part.  We've pointed out a couple places already where he claims Fr. Martin told him something completely different than what Fr(?) Coomaraswamy told him about some things.  But Fr(?) Coomaraswamy appeared to be a man of good character who was not known for lying, and that, combined with the question of ... why are all these dramatic revelations coming out ONLY 26 years or so after Fr. Martin's death?  Really?  So of all the people who were known to actually have been close to Fr. Martin, such as Fr(?) Coomaraswamy, he only told all this stuff to Marro, whom almost nobody's actually heard of?  And then he sat on all that information for 26 years?  I think that an investigation of his personal financial situation might be in order, to see if something happened where he suddenly became desperate for a financial windfall.

Other posters above have found other egregious factual errors committed by Marro, who I guess was too lazy to do even a small amount of research so that he wouldn't discredit the entire book.

Malachi Martin was a peritus at Vatican II of judaizing Cdl. Bea, supposedly he worked with (sedeprivationist) Bishop Robert Mckenna, O.P. (✝2015) on exorcisms (source: Slaves of Satan ch. 6), and praised Hans Urs von Balthasar!

Hans Urs von Balthasar was probably the biggest theological thinker emerging from the Society of Jesus in the 20th century. [!!!] […]
[…]
The dominant school of theology in the Roman Catholic Church today holds that the supernatural is received in the human soul connaturally; the human soul is in potency to be supernaturalized. For, the clever modernist [sic! This is a Thomistic axiom!] argument runs: quidquid recipitur, ad modum recipientis recipitur. If I can receive supernatural grace, that “can” implies a potency in me for the supernatural. But if I have a natural potency for the supernatural, I have—in my human nature—some supernatural element. QED. That is why a phenomenologic-ontological analysis of the religious sense by John Paul II concludes that every human being, by the very fact of being conceived—yes, even as a zygote clinging to the endometrial wall of its mother—is already united with Christ, is already living a supernatural life [cf. Redemptor Hominis].

source: In Quest of Catholicity: Malachi Martin Responds to Wolfgang Smith

I was under the impression that Martin matured and moved away from the Judaized aspects of the Jesuits, abandoning them, and then he wrote The Keys of this Blood. Am I wrong in this?

I do not think that people are static, unchanging, developing creatures. I do not think that "old" Malachi Martin is the same as was the "young" Malachi Martin.

Maybe, maybe not.  That's precisely the problem with someone who blends fact with fiction, change stories, and contradicts himself, no?

If he was some evil guy working for Bea who by his own admission got a rush out of blackmailing Cardinals ... does a person like that truly see the light unless he has an almost literaly "Road to Damascus" episode ... except that Fr. Martin recounts no such incident.

If someone was a deliberate agent of the Jews and Masons blackmailing Cardinals, how does anyone  simply take his word for it that he had changed?  He could be lying and that what he was doing now was part of his operation, to sow confusion and doubt.

So ... I almost forgot about that one, but Gary Giuffre is a very honest man and he would not make something like this up.  There are one or two details about the story where it may have been his interpreation, such as where he claims Fr. Martin wrote something in one of his books to deliberately cast doubt on the Siri Theory by subtly changing it.  That one detail I'm not sure about, since Fr. Martin could have just included a version of the story in his just because he thought it would heighten interest and sell more copies ... and if he changed it slightly, he constantly did that as a matter of course.  But the phone call thing, and there was some death related to docuмent that he was going to receive from someone in France, if I recall.

But, overall, if Gary Giuffre said that something happened, then he's a very honest man, would not lie ... so long as you keep in mind what he's relating as fact and what he might be putting an interpretatio on.  I can't quite recall the details of the phone call and the death ... but it was in fact striking.

This is my favorite version of Lad: thoughtful, balanced, open. Thank you!