Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: New Malachi Martin Book  (Read 350665 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: New Malachi Martin Book
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2025, 10:21:55 AM »
So, having watched part of the interview, I don't have a great deal of confidence in this Marro fellow, i.e. not sure he really knows what he's talking about ... and am beginning to wonder how much of this HE is making up in order to sell a book.

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: New Malachi Martin Book
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2025, 10:24:21 AM »
I think that overall Martin might have been just a bit more credible had he not kept being evasive, shifty, changing details ... and constantly engaged in "factional" writing, where it's a blend of fact/fiction and you don't know where the line is between the two.

If he had just come out with plain speech, been direct, instead of always being behind this fog of uncertainty.


Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: New Malachi Martin Book
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2025, 10:25:53 AM »
There is a link between Rama Coomaraswamy, Martin, and "The Nine".

There is a link between Coomaraswamy and "The Beast".

Do you have any evidence to substantiate that second charge?  Otherwise, it would constitute calumny.  I've seen no evidence that Dr. Rama had any link whatsoever, and the fact that you don't distinguish here with this comment between him and his father slanders him.

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: New Malachi Martin Book
« Reply #13 on: December 05, 2025, 10:36:30 AM »
No.

Saying there is a link between them is not calumny.

The link between "the Beast" and Coomaraswamy is his father Ananda who was a founding father of Tradtionalism.

Yeah, it really is.  Unless you can substantiate that Rama himself has some connection, then the vague statement constitutes calumny.  If you specified that his Father had, that would be one thing, but without that clarification, a reader would be left with the impression that he himself had been involved.  Lots of people have had parents engaged in bad things that they should not be smeared with.  If someone's parent committed adultery, you can's say stuff like "he's linked with adultery", since that would leave a reader wondering about the individual's virtue.  You can perhaps say that if you immediately followed with the details, i.e. that it was his parent, not him.

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: New Malachi Martin Book
« Reply #14 on: December 05, 2025, 11:00:13 AM »
How ironic that you condemn yourself out of your own mouth :laugh1:

https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/prevost-thy-name-is-adultery/

So, either you're such a moron that you don't see where I specifically laid out all the details, or just so desperate to justify your calumny and slander, ignoring the fact that I substantiated my charge that his NAME (his last name is fake) and was invented to cover up the adulter of his grandparent, not that he committed adultery himself.  Comparing apples to oranges.  Had you said that Rama Coomaraswamy's FATHER had ties to Crowley, that would have been fine.  You calumny lay in the implication that he had some direct link, since you failed to specify or give any details.