As I critically reviewed the activities of the Jєωιѕн people throughout long periods of history I became perplexed and asked myself whether, for inscrutable reasons beyond the comprehension of poor mortals such as ourselves, Destiny might not have irrevocably decreed that the final victory should go to this small people?
May it not be that this people which lives only for the things of this earth has been promised the earth as a reward? Have we, from the objective point of view, a right to fight for self-preservation, or is this right subjective? Fate answered the question for me inasmuch as it led me to make a detached and exhaustive inquiry into the Marxist teaching and the activities of the Jєωιѕн people in connection with it.
The Jєωιѕн doctrine of Marxism repudiates the aristocratic principle of Nature and substitutes for the eternal right of might and strength, the dead weight of sheer numbers. Thus it denies the individual worth of the human personality, disputes the teaching that nationality and race are of primary significance, and by doing this deprives Man of the very foundations of his existence and civilisation.
If the Marxist teaching were to be accepted as the foundation of the life of the universe, it would lead to the disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind, and thus the adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest organism that we know, with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would finally disappear.
Should the Jєω, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the peoples of this world, his crown will be the funeral, wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through ether, devoid of human life, as it did millions of years ago.
Nature, the eternal, takes merciless vengeance on those who defy her laws. Therefore, I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In resisting the Jєω I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.
Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf: The Stalag Edition (pp. 239-242). Ostara Publications. Kindle Edition.Pope Pius said;
CHAPTER XI: NATION AND RACE
continued
This surrounding world then grows perverse and will not believe that what had seemed so like itself is really of that different quality so suddenly displayed. This is a process which is repeated probably every time a man of outstanding significance appears. Though an inventor, for example, does not establish his fame until the very day on which he completes his invention, it would be a mistake to believe that the creative genius did not become alive in him until that moment. From the very hour of his birth the spark of genius is alive within the man who has been endowed with the real creative faculty. True genius is an innate quality. It can never be the result of education or training. As I have stated already, this holds good not merely of the individual, but also of the race. Those peoples who manifest creative ability in certain periods of their history have always been fundamentally creative. It belongs to their very nature, even though this fact may escape the eyes of the superficial observer. Here also, recognition from outside is only the consequence of practical achievement. Since the rest of the world is incapable of recognising genius as such, it can only see the visible manifestations of genius in the form of inventions, discoveries, buildings, painting, etc., but even here a long time passes before recognition is given. Just as the individual person who has been endowed with the gift of genius, or at least talent of a very high order, cannot develop that gift to the full, until he comes under the urge of special circuмstances, so in the life of the nations their creative capacities and powers frequently have to wait until certain conditions stimulate them to action. The most obvious example of this truth is furnished by that race which has been, and still is, the champion of human progress; I mean the Aryan race.
As soon as Fate brings them face to face with special circuмstances their powers begin to develop progressively and to be manifested in tangible form. The characteristic cultures which they create in such circuмstances are almost always conditioned by the soil, the climate and the people they subjugate. The last factor—that of the character of the people—is the most decisive one. The more primitive the technical condition under which the civilizing process takes place, the more necessary the existence of manual labour which can be organised and employed so as to take the place of mechanical power. Had it not been possible for them to employ members of the inferior race which they conquered, the Aryans would never have been in a position to take the first steps on the road which led them to their culture of a later era; just as, without the help of certain suitable animals, which they were able to tame, they would never have come to the invention of mechanical power, which has subsequently enabled them to do without these animals. The remark that the Moor, having done his duty, could now go, can, unfortunately, be applied more or less universally.
For thousands of years the horse has been the faithful servant of man and has helped him to lay the foundations of human progress; but now, motor power has rendered the horse superfluous. In a few years’ time the use of the horse will cease entirely; and yet without its collaboration man could scarcely have reached the stage of development at which he now is. For the establishment of superior types of civilisation the members of inferior races formed one of the most essential prerequisites. They alone could supply the lack of mechanical means, without which no progress is possible.
It is certain that the first stages of human civilisation were not based so much on the use of tame animals as on the employment of human beings who were members of an inferior race. Only after subjugated races were employed as slaves was a similar fate allotted to animals, and not vice versa, as some people would have us believe. At first it was the conquered enemy who had to draw the plough and only afterwards did the ox and horse take his place. Nobody but puling pacifists can consider this fact a sign of human degradation. Such people fail to recognise that this evolution had to take place in order that man might reach that degree of civilisation which these apostles now exploit in an attempt to make the world pay attention to their rigmarole.
The progress of mankind may be compared to the process of ascending an infinite ladder. One does not reach the higher level without first having climbed the lower rungs. The Aryan, therefore, had to take that road which his sense of reality pointed out to him, and not that of which the modern pacifist dreams. The path of reality is, however, difficult and hard to tread; yet it is the only one which finally leads to the goal where the others envisage mankind in their dreams. The real truth is that those dreamers help to lead man away from his goal rather than towards it. It was not by mere chance that the first forms of civilisation arose where the Aryan came into contact with inferior races, subjugated them and forced them to obey his command. The members of the inferior race became the first mechanical tools in the service of a growing civilisation. Thereby the way was clearly indicated which the Aryan had to follow.
As a conqueror, he subjugated inferior races and turned their physical powers into organised channels under his own leadership, forcing them to follow his will and purpose. By imposing on them a useful, though hard, manner of employing their powers, he not only spared the lives of those whom he had conquered, but probably made their lives easier than they had been in the former state of so-called ‘freedom.’ While he ruthlessly maintained his, position as their master, he not only remained master, but he also preserved and advanced civilisation, for this depended exclusively on his inborn abilities and, therefore, on the preservation of the Aryan race as such.
As soon, however, as his subjects began to rise and approach the level of their conqueror, a phase of which ascension was probably the use of his language, the barriers that had distinguished master from servant broke down. The Aryan neglected to maintain his own racial stock unmixed and thereby lost the right to live in the paradise which he himself had created. He became submerged in the racial mixture and gradually lost his cultural creativeness, until he finally grew, not only mentally but also physically, more like the aborigines whom he had subjected, rather than his own ancestors. For some time he could continue to live on the capital of that culture which still remained; but a condition of fossilisation soon set in and he sank into oblivion.
That is how cultures and empires decline and yield their places to new structures.
The adulteration of the blood and racial deterioration conditioned thereby are the only causes that account for the decline of ancient civilisations, for it is never by war that nations are ruined, but by the loss of their powers of resistance, which are exclusively a characteristic of pure racial blood.
In this world everything that is not of sound racial stock is like chaff.
Every historical event in the world is nothing more nor less than a manifestation of the instinct of racial self-preservation, whether for weal or woe.
CHAPTER III: VIENNA DAYS—GENERAL REFLECTIONS
(. . .)
Political parties have no right to meddle in religious questions except when these relate to something that is alien to the nation and thus calculated to undermine racial customs and morals. In the same way, religion must not be mixed up with party politics. If some ecclesiastical dignitaries should misuse religious institutions or religious teachings to injure their own ration, their opponents ought never to take the same road and fight them with the same weapons. To a political leader, the religious teachings and institutions of his people should be sacred and inviolable; otherwise, he should not be a statesman, but a reformer, if he has the necessary qualities for such a mission. Any other line of conduct will lead to disaster, especially in Germany.
In studying the Pan-German movement and its conflict with Rome I was firmly persuaded, then and especially in later years, that by their failure to understand the importance of the social problem, the Pan-Germanists lost the support of the broad masses, who are the indispensable combatants in such a movement. By entering parliament the Pan-German leaders deprived themselves of their clan, and at the same time burdened themselves with all the defects of the parliamentary institution. Their struggle against the Catholic Church made their position impossible in numerous circles among the lower and middle classes, while at the same time it robbed them of innumerable high-class elements some of the best indeed that the nation possessed. The practical outcome of the Austrian Kulturkamp was negative.
Although they succeeded in wresting one hundred thousand members from the Church, that did not do much harm to the latter. The Church did not need to shed tears over these lost sheep, for it lost only those who had for a long time ceased to belong to it in their inner hearts. The difference between this new reformation and the great Reformation was that, at that time, some of the best members left the Church because of religious convictions, whereas in this new reformation only those left who had been indifferent before and who were now influenced by political considerations. From the political point of view alone, the result was a ridiculous as it was deplorable. Once again a political movement which had promised so much for the German nation collapsed, because it was not conducted in a spirit of unflinching adherence to naked reality, but lost itself in spheres in which it was bound to be broken up. The Pan-German movement would never have made this mistake if it had properly understood the psyche of the broad masses. If the leaders had known that, for psychological reasons alone, it is not expedient to place two or more adversaries before the masses—since that leads to a complete splitting up of their fighting strength—they would have concentrated the full and undivided force of their attack against a single adversary.
CHAPTER IV: MUNICH
(. . .)
Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf: The Stalag Edition (p. 103). Ostara Publications. Kindle Edition. One of the most ingenious tricks ever devised has been that of sailing the Jєωιѕн ship of state under the flag of religion and thus securing that tolerance which Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious faiths. The Mosaic Law is really nothing else than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jєωιѕн race and, therefore, includes all spheres of sociological, political and economic science which have a bearing on the main end in view.
CHAPTER X: THE COLLAPSE OF THE SECOND REICH
(. . .)
The great masses of a nation are not composed of philosophers. For the masses of the people especially, faith is absolutely the only basis of a moral Weltanschauung. The various substitutes that have been offered have not shown any results that might warrant us in thinking that they might usefully replace the existing denominations, but if religious teaching and religious faith are to be accepted by the broad masses as active forces in their lives, then the absolute authority of the doctrines of faith must be the foundation of all reality. There may be a few hundreds of thousands of superior men who can live wisely and intelligently without depending on the general standards that prevail in everyday life, but the millions of others cannot do so. Now, the place which general custom fills in everyday life, corresponds to that of general laws in the State and dogma in religion.
The purely spiritual idea is of itself a changeable thing that may be subjected to endless interpretations. It is only through dogma that it is given a precise and concrete form without which it could not become a living faith. Otherwise, the spiritual idea would never become anything more than a mere metaphysical concept, or rather a philosophical opinion. Accordingly, the attack on dogma is comparable to an attack on the general laws on which the State is founded, and so this attack would finally lead to complete political anarchy if it were successful, just as the attack on religion would lead to a worthless religious nihilism.
The political leader should not estimate the worth of a religion by taking some of its shortcomings into account, but should ask himself whether there be any practical substitute which is obviously better. Until such a substitute is available only fools and criminals would think of abolishing the existing religion. Undoubtedly, no small amount of blame for the present unsatisfactory religious situation must be attributed to those who have encuмbered the ideal of religion with purely material accessories and have thus given rise to an utterly futile conflict between religion and science. In this conflict, victory will nearly always be on the side of science, although after a bitter struggle, while religion will suffer heavily in the eyes of those who cannot penetrate beneath mere superficial learning.
CHAPTER V: WELTANSCHAUUNG AND ORGANISATION
(. . .)
If the idea of the völkisch State, which is at present an obscure ideal, is one day to attain a clear and definite success, from its vague and vast mass of thought it will have to put forward certain definite principles which of their very nature and content are calculated to attract a broad mass of adherents. In other words, such a group of people as can guarantee that these principles will be fought for. That group of people is the German working-class. That is why the programme of the new Movement was condensed into a few fundamental postulates, twenty-five in all. They are meant first of all to give the ordinary man a rough idea of what the Movement is aiming at. They are, so to speak, a profession of faith which, on the one hand, is meant to win adherents for the Movement and, on the other, they are meant to unite such adherents together in a covenant to which all have subscribed.
In this connection we must never lose sight of the following fact: What we call the programme of the Movement is absolutely right as far as its ultimate aims are concerned, but as regards the manner in which that programme is formulated certain psychological considerations had to be taken into account. Hence, in the course of time, the opinion may well arise that certain principles should be expressed differently and might be better formulated, but any attempt at a different formulation has a fatal effect in most cases, for something that ought to be fixed and unshakable thereby becomes the subject of discussion. As soon as one single point is removed from the sphere of dogmatic certainly, the discussion will not simply result in a new and better formulation which will have greater consistency, but may easily lead to endless debates and general confusion. In such cases, the question must always be carefully considered as to whether a new and more adequate formulation is to be preferred, though it may cause a controversy within the Movement, or whether it may not be better to retain the old formula which, though probably not the best, represents an organism enclosed in itself, solid and internally homogeneous. Every test shows that the second of these alternatives is preferable, for, since in these changes one is dealing only with external forms, such corrections will always appear desirable and possible, but the deciding factor is that people in general think superficially, and therefore the great danger is that in what is merely an external formulation of the programme people will see an essential aim of the movement. In that way the will and the combative force at the service of the ideal are weakened and the energies that ought to be directed towards the outer world are dissipated in programmatic discussions within the ranks of the Movement.
For a doctrine that is actually right in its main features it is less dangerous to retain a formulation which may no longer be quite adequate, instead of trying to improve it and thereby allowing a fundamental principle of the Movement, which had hitherto been considered as solid as granite, to become the subject of a general discussion which may have unfortunate consequences. This is particularly to be avoided as long as a Movement is still fighting for victory, for would it be possible to inspire people with blind faith in the truth of a doctrine if doubt and uncertainty are encouraged by continual alterations in its external formulation? The essentials of a doctrine must never be looked for in its external formulas, but always in its inner meaning, and this is unchangeable. One could only wish that for the sake of this inner meaning a movement could exclude everything that tends towards disintegration and uncertainty in order to preserve the unified force that is necessary for its triumph.
Here again the Catholic Church has a lesson to teach us. Though sometimes, and often quite unnecessarily, its dogmatic system is in conflict with the exact sciences and with scientific discoveries, it is not disposed to sacrifice one syllable of its teachings. It has rightly recognised that its powers of resistance would be weakened by introducing greater or lesser doctrinal adaptations to cope with temporary scientific discoveries, which are in reality always vacillating, but that they gain strength from the fact that it holds fast to its fixed and established dogmas which alone can give to the whole system the character of a faith. That is the reason why it stands firmer to-day than ever before. We may prophesy that, as a fixed star amid fleeting phenomena, it will continue to attract increasing numbers of people who will be the more blindly attached to it the more rapid the rhythm of changing phenomena around it. Therefore, whoever really and seriously desires that the völkisch Weltanschauung should triumph must realise that this triumph can be assured only through a militant movement and that this movement must found its strength only on the granite firmness of an impregnable and well-defined programme.
Franco stated that Hitler died a loyal son of the Catholic Church.
What is this, the telephone game?So you're against Franco?
Committing ѕυιcιdє is a mortal sin.
What's your point with all the quotations from Hitler's book Trad?Methinks the Adolf Hitler worship that seems to happen a lot here. There were Catholics on the Axis side, but Adolf Hitler was not one of them. He was a monster who shaped the Church to fit his gross pagan ideals. He was also probably the greatest public speaker that the world has ever seen, and that's how he convinced people that the Aryan race was better than Christ.
Methinks the Adolf Hitler worship that seems to happen a lot here. There were Catholics on the Axis side, but Adolf Hitler was not one of them. He was a monster who shaped the Church to fit his gross pagan ideals.He was condemned by Pope Pius XI.
...and that's how he convinced people that the Aryan race was better than Christ.
Methinks the Adolf Hitler worship that seems to happen a lot here. There were Catholics on the Axis side, but Adolf Hitler was not one of them. He was a monster who shaped the Church to fit his gross pagan ideals. He was also probably the greatest public speaker that the world has ever seen, and that's how he convinced people that the Aryan race was better than Christ.Load of BS....
EPILOGUE
On November 9, 1923, in the fourth year of its existence, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party was dissolved and prohibited in the whole Reich territory. Today, in November, 1926, it stands again free before us, stronger and inwardly firmer than ever before. All the persecutions of the movement and its individual leaders, all vilifications and slanders, were powerless to harm it. The correctness of its ideas, the purity of its will, its supporters’ spirit of self-sacrifice, have caused it to issue from all repressions strong than ever.
If, in the world of our present parliamentary corruption, it becomes more and more aware of the profoundest essence of its struggle, feels itself to be the purest embodiment of the value of race and personality and conducts itself accordingly, it will with almost mathematical certainty some day emerge victorious from its struggle.
Just as Germany must inevitably win her rightful position on this earth if she is led and organized according to the same principles.
A state which in this age of racial poisoning dedicates itself to the care of its best racial elements must some day become lord of the earth.
May the adherents of our movement never forget this if ever the magnitude of the sacrifices should beguile them to an anxious comparison with the possible results.
He (Hitler) was condemned by Pope Pius XI.Pius XI also ordered the Cristero's to accept the peace treaty of the Masonic enemies, just when the Cristero's were on the verge of victory.
So after the publication of Mein Kampf, Pius XI then hauls off and.......backs Hitler and the NSDAP so they could come into power in 1933, despite there being a supposed "Catholic" party that the Vatican had been backing up till then. Not only that, the Vatican has in place the Concordant prior the election which is why it came out to the public just weeks after the election.Looks like it's time you give another history lesson... Looks like some have forgotten quickly the evidence you, and a few others, put forth not to long ago.
Nah, nothing not jiving there.....
That bad 'ol Fuehrer was so evil that the Vatican never could get around to excommunicating him for his countless transgressions, but it wasted no time in excommunicating Goebbels for marrying a divorced Protestant. And to top it off, the Church in Germany ordered masses to be said for him after his death.
"But, but, but....", crikey, you folks are as ignorant of the war as a neo-con Catholic of the post Vatican II "church".........
Franco stated that Hitler died a loyal son of the Catholic Church.
El dos de mayo de 1945, conocido ya el suicidio de Adolf Hitler en su búnker de Berlín, Víctor de la Serna publicaba en Informaciones y bajo el pseudónimo de Unus un espectacular articulo en recuerdo del Fuhrer aleman, al que pertenecen estos fragmentos:
Un enorme !Presente! se extiende por el ámbito de Europa, porque Adolfo Hitler, hijo de la Iglesia Católica, ha muerto defendiendo la Cristiandad [...]. Ya se comprenderá que nuestra pluma, contenida, no encuentra palabras para llorar su muerte cuando tantas encontró para exaltar su vida [...]. La Historia, esta gran Señora justiciera, dobla una página y aparece una nueva era, que empieza con esta referencia: «1 de mayo de 1945. Muere Adolfo Hitler por la libertad de Europa» [...]. El arma secreta de Alemania, la bomba colosal que había de dar la victoria a una ideología estaba en el corazón de Adolfo Hitler. Ya ha estallado. La guerra contra el bolchevismo entra en la fase de la victoria. Dios está con los paladines. Y en el cielo hay fiesta mayor.
On May 2, 1945, already known the ѕυιcιdє of Adolf Hitler in his bunker in Berlin, Víctor de la Serna published in Informations and under the pseudonym of Unus a spectacular article in memory of the German Fuhrer, to which these fragments belong:
A huge! Present! it extends throughout Europe, because Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic Church, has died defending Christianity [...]. It will be understood that our pen, contained, can not find words to mourn his death when so many found to exalt his life [...]. History, this great justice lady, turns a page and a new era appears, beginning with this reference: "May 1, 1945. Adolph Hitler dies for the freedom of Europe" [...]. The secret weapon of Germany, the colossal bomb that was to give victory to an ideology was in the heart of Adolf Hitler. It has already exploded. The war against Bolshevism enters the phase of victory. God is with the paladins. And in heaven there is a greater festival.
Víctor de la Serna and Espina (Valparaíso, January 15, 1896-Madrid, November 25, 1958.) was a Spanish writer and journalist of Falangist militancy. Throughout his career he directed several newspapers, and also authored several books. He was the most prominent representative in Spain of a propaganda travel literature, characterized by his exaltation of the Franco regime and its social and cultural model. He would also stand out as director of the newspaper Informaciones, which under his direction became the newspaper "most pro axis of all newspapers in Madrid."
Links to ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic publications trad123?
Yes, I understand that international and domestic situation for Germany at the time. How does this justify the fact that the Germans under Hitler and the official ideology of the National Socialist party practiced racialist eugenics through abortion and sterilisations and wanted to subject the Church, in its jurisdiction, to the "interests of the German people" (as if these could be separate from the interests of the Church) ?
So, your conclusion is that, because an eye was taken out, it was just to take out an eye in return ? Because Germany truly suffered, it gets a pass on its disgusting violations of the natural law and its neo-pagan idolatry of its "racial and cultural purity," which, by the way, never existed ?
It was a secular state that forbade homeschooling and forced all children to attend public schools where they learned to worship themselves via fabricated Aryan mythology. In affairs of state, they officially did not recognise the rights of God and the Church except as it seemed to benefit them. The ideology of the party did not allow it.
So we're back to that -- Hitler was okay because the Communists were so bad. Yes, they were bad, but the enemy of our enemy is not our friend. Yes, they actively persecuted religion as such, though I would say that Hitler himself was a punishment upon the stiff-necked Germans in addition to the punishments that followed. The point is that both régimes were evil, each according to its kind, and that their being enemies does not mean that Catholics must take sides with one or the other.
What about the Lebensraum plan, where Wehrbauern would colonise the East and make the Slavs German slaves for a thousand years ?
If a people want to survive, yes, they must be independent of international money powers and other private interests, securely under a sovereign power that is their own, and living according to the natural order. This, naturally, I admit. But must they likewise adopt a strange and idolatrous ideology that serves to make them loyal to an all-powerful centralised state that disrespects the sovereign rights of the Pope and the Church ? No, of course not. This endangers the survival of a people because it places them outside of the reign of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, without which there is no lasting peace in this world.
Pius XI wrote Mit Brennender Sorge to deal with the problems of the German ideology, which themselves were the outgrowth of centuries of German pride and self-love to the prejudice of the true religion (as evidenced by lay investiture, the Hohenstaufens, the Habsburgs sacking Rome, Protestantism, and then German nationalism). This is what he wrote : "Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds." I suppose it was just a coincidence that he wrote the encyclical in German and ordered it to be read from every Catholic pulpit in Germany ? He could have been talking about anything, most likely in the abstract ! :laugh1:
I am saying the same thing, that such a State was objectively a monster that needed to be slain. I do not think the Red Army and the US, who replaced the monster with an even greater and more duplicitous one, were the ones to do that slaying. That being said, clearly men did not become less sinful and less forgetful of God, and reaped what their pride had sown. Let us imagine that international Jєωιѕн finance and Communism and Masonry did not exist, though. Even then, the monster of the German nationalist state and its idolatrous ideology would be worthy of destruction -- for the sake of the common good of Christendom first, of course, and then, secondly, for the sake of the Germans themselves.
Traditional Guy does me the service of making my points for me. Here he clearly shows that his ideas are not Catholic in the least, that he worships race, that he believes that the true preservation of the natural order derives not from the Faith but from one's racial descent, and furthermore that he is very comfortable around Protestants as opposed to Catholics who come from a different race.
I have been saying, precisely, that this is the logical conclusion of all the White Nationalist rhetoric -- all of which derives from the Renaissance, the Liberalism of the Enlightenment, paganism, and New Age spiritualism. These White Nationalists are either not Catholics or they are too stupid to realise or proud to admit that their febrile insecurities are a window for the devil to creep into their souls. We should not hesitate to call their rhetoric evil, since such people ultimately cannot help the restoration of Christendom. They show such disrespect for the rights of Our Lord now; if they are successful, we should not then expect them to humiliate themselves and set aside their prideful contempt for the Sacred Royalty of the Heart of Jesus and the dignity of His Church.
Of course, I am not speaking of everybody who has argued against me on the racial question, only a certain caste, of which Traditional Guy is obviously a good representative.
So “Catholics” are now citing a notorious white nationalist, racialist and virulently anti-Christian creator of an atheistic religion based is a patchwork of Nieztsceanism, Darwinism and pagan pantheism? Really?
Stop making me laugh, Croix de Fer. You wouldn’t know Jesus Christ if he came knocking on your door.
The novel depicts a violent revolutionary struggle in the United States that begins with gun confiscation and then escalates into global depopulation, leading to the extermination of all Jєωs and non-whites.
White nationalists appear to have completely bought into the alt right bait, with personalities like David Duke and Professor Kevin MacDonald riding the Trump, alt right bandwagon; although, MacDonald has demonstrated his awareness of the Jєωιѕн involvement in the alt right and is supporting it anyways likely for strategic reasons. White nationalist opposition to ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry has proven itself a failure (National Socialism) and is based in racialism. Only the Church has adequately addressed and dealt with the question. Any notion of the “true” alt right being hijacked from the supposed rightful heir white nationalists by Milo types is ridiculous. Neither of the two groups are the rightful heirs.
I think that is not quite accurate. What he thought was that Christ himself was Aryan. He found reason to believe so.Jesus was a Jєω.
Jesus was a Jєω.Jesus was Hebrew. Judaism is тαℓмυdic.
Jesus was a Jєω.
I think that is what Jєωs want us to believe...Agreed.
And that He was brown....
And that He was ugly.
****Picture of the modern Jesus:
(https://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/richard-neave-jesus.jpg)
Jesus was Hebrew. Judaism is тαℓмυdic.Jesus observed the mosaic law.
Pius XI also ordered the Cristero's to accept the peace treaty of the Masonic enemies, just when the Cristero's were on the verge of victory.
Pius XI rightly totally condemned communism, and a few years later Pius XII sophistically changed the condemnation to just enough acceptance of communism so the USA could go to war with Germany.
The Vatican was compromised after the death of Pius X.
Archbishop Cassulo's 1941 protest in Romania was in answer to a state ruling that a change of religious status by a Jєω did not alter his legal status as a member of that persecuted "race". For the authorities had become suspicious, as did those in the Balkans, Hungary, and elsewhere later, of the number of Jєωιѕн "converts" to Catholicism. Until such a ruling was made in a nαzι-controlled country, however, a Jєω who could prove himself a member of the Catholic Church could usually use the evidence of that membership-a baptismal certificate as a safe-conduct paper to leave the country. No records have been published regarding who conceived the idea or how it was implemented, but the existence of the false baptismal certificates, and they number in the thousands, is a fact. It is also a fact that the Vatican was well aware of the plan, and that members of resistance groups, apostolic nuncios, nuns, representatives of Jєωιѕн aid groups based in the Allied countries, and untold numbers of ordinary citizens risked their welfare if not their lives to promote the ingenious scheme. By mid-1944, when only the Jєωs of Budapest had been temporarily spared in blood-soaked Hungary, another beloved Catholic figure had thrown his weight to the wheel, increasing the distribution of the baptismal certificates many times over; this was Pius XII's close friend and successor, Archbishop Roncalli, the late Pope John XXIII.51
source:http://www.Jєωιѕнvirtuallibrary.org/a-question-of-judgment-pius-xii-and-the-Jєωs
From my readings this seems right. And fully agree with the bolded.Pius XII helped the Jєωs because he was a follower of Christ, who said, "That which you did for the least of one of these, you did it to me."
Pope Pius XII was scurrying to help Jєωs during WWII, but he didn't think any h0Ɩ0cαųst was happening, just that Jєωs would be placed in cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs until war's end. So why help them? It's not like he thought they were going to be slaughtered. Pope John XXIII, when he was archbishop, was giving Jєωs baptisms of convenience.
Why didn't Churchmen in the United States give baptisms of convenience to German, Italian, and Japanese Americans placed in cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs?
It just doesn't add up.
Pius XII helped the Jєωs because he was a follower of Christ, who said, "That which you did for the least of one of these, you did it to me."Stop misquoting scripture.
Stop misquoting scripture.All of the children of God are our brothers.
Douay Rheims
"And the king answering, shall say to them: Amen I say to you, as long as you did it to one of these my least brethren, you did it to me."They are not our brothers for they do not have the Church as their mother. They are enemies of Christ.
All of the children of God are our brothers."In NO way can men be counted among the children of God unless they take the Church for their Mother."- Pope Leo XIII
"In NO way can men be counted among the children of God unless they take the Church for their Mother."- Pope Leo XIIIFrom Pope Pius XI;
"For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own coutrymen, even as they have from the Jєωs, [15] (http://drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=59&ch=2&l=15-#x) Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;"-1 Thess. 2:14-16
You're a damn heretic, poche. Recant and admit the truth.
From Pope Pius XI;Sounds like Pius XI is condemning Francis here. And JPII for that matter.
8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.
http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html
Sounds like Pius XI is condemning Francis here. And JPII for that matter.He was condemning Hitler and and his regime. He knew it. Pope Pius XI ordered that it be read in every church on Palm Sunday. The next day anyone who was caught with a copy of that encyclical was arrested.
From Pope Pius XI;What the hell does this have to do with your heretical statement?
8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.
http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html
All of the children of God are our brothers.They are the children of wrath, sons of the devil in whom there is no truth to be found. Our Lord was clear in identifying them as such.
And that's what people like Varg Vikernes want us to believe. Beginning to think that he's a shill.
All of the children of God are our brothers.
Franco stated that Hitler died a loyal son of the Catholic Church.Did Hitler receive the last rites when he died in Argentina long after WWII ended?
34. Among the many errors which derive from the poisoned source of religious and moral agnosticism, We would draw your attention, Venerable Brethren, to two in particular, as being those which more than others render almost impossible or at least precarious and uncertain, the peaceful intercourse of peoples.
35. The first of these pernicious errors, widespread today, is the forgetfulness of that law of human solidarity and charity which is dictated and imposed by our common origin and by the equality of rational nature in all men, to whatever people they belong, and by the redeeming Sacrifice offered by Jesus Christ on the Altar of the Cross to His Heavenly Father on behalf of sinful mankind.
36. In fact, the first page of the Scripture, with magnificent simplicity, tells us how God, as a culmination to His creative work, made man to His Own image and likeness (cf. Genesis i. 26, 27); and the same Scripture tells us that He enriched man with supernatural gifts and privileges, and destined him to an eternal and ineffable happiness. It shows us besides how other men took their origin from the first couple, and then goes on, in unsurpassed vividness of language, to recount their division into different groups and their dispersion to various parts of the world. Even when they abandoned their Creator, God did not cease to regard them as His children, who, according to His merciful plan, should one day be reunited once more in His friendship (cf. Genesis xii. 3).
37. The Apostle of the Gentiles later on makes himself the herald of this truth which associates men as brothers in one great family, when he proclaims to the Greek world that God “hath made of one, all mankind, to dwell upon the whole face of the earth, determining appointed times, and the limits of their habitation, that they should seek God” (Acts xvii. 26, 27).
38. A marvelous vision, which makes us see the human race in the unity of one common origin in God “one God and Father of all, Who is above all, and through all, and in us all” (Ephesians iv. 6); in the unity of nature which in every man is equally composed of material body and spiritual, immortal soul; in the unity of the immediate end and mission in the world; in the unity of dwelling place, the earth, of whose resources all men can by natural right avail themselves, to sustain and develop life; in the unity of the supernatural end, God Himself, to Whom all should tend; in the unity of means to secure that end.
39. It is the same Apostle who portrays for us mankind in the unity of its relations with the Son of God, image of the invisible God, in Whom all things have been created: “In Him were all things created” (Colossians i. 16); in the unity of its ransom, effected for all by Christ, Who, through His Holy and most bitter passion, restored the original friendship with God which had been broken, making Himself the Mediator between God and men: “For there is one God, and one Mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (I Timothy ii. 5).
40. And to render such friendship between God and mankind more intimate, this same Divine and universal Mediator of salvation and of peace, in the sacred silence of the Supper Room, before He consummated the Supreme Sacrifice, let fall from His divine Lips the words which reverberate mightily down the centuries, inspiring heroic charity in a world devoid of love and torn by hate: “This is my commandment that you love one another, as I have loved you” (Saint John xv. 12).
41. These are supernatural truths which form a solid basis and the strongest possible bond of a union, that is reinforced by the love of God and of our Divine Redeemer, from Whom all receive salvation “for the edifying of the Body of Christ: until we all meet into the unity of faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the age of the fullness of Christ” (Ephesians iv. 12, 13).
42. In the light of this unity of all mankind, which exists in law and in fact, individuals do not feel themselves isolated units, like grains of sand, but united by the very force of their nature and by their internal destiny, into an organic, harmonious mutual relationship which varies with the changing of times.
43. And the nations, despite a difference of development due to diverse conditions of life and of culture, are not destined to break the unity of the human race, but rather to enrich and embellish it by the sharing of their own peculiar gifts and by that reciprocal interchange of goods which can be possible and efficacious only when a mutual love and a lively sense of charity unite all the sons of the same Father and all those redeemed by the same Divine Blood.
44. The Church of Christ, the faithful depository of the teaching of Divine Wisdom, cannot and does not think of deprecating or disdaining the particular characteristics which each people, with jealous and intelligible pride, cherishes and retains as a precious heritage. Her aim is a supernatural union in all-embracing love, deeply felt and practiced, and not the unity which is exclusively external and superficial and by that very fact weak.
45. The Church hails with joy and follows with her maternal blessing every method of guidance and care which aims at a wise and orderly evolution of particular forces and tendencies having their origin in the individual character of each race, provided that they are not opposed to the duties incuмbent on men from their unity of origin and common destiny.
46. She has repeatedly shown in her missionary enterprises that such a principle of action is the guiding star of her universal apostolate. Pioneer research and investigation, involving sacrifice, devotedness and love on the part of her missionaries of every age, have been undertaken in order to facilitate the deeper appreciative insight into the most varied civilizations and to put their spiritual values to account for a living and vital preaching of the Gospel of Christ. All that in such usages and customs is not inseparably bound up with religious errors will always be subject to kindly consideration and, when it is found possible, will be sponsored and developed.
47. Our immediate predecessor, of holy and venerated memory, applying such norms to a particularly delicate question, took some generous decisions which are a monument to his insight and to the intensity of his apostolic spirit. Nor need We tell you, Venerable Brethren, that We intend to proceed without hesitation along this way. Those who enter the Church, whatever be their origin or their speech, must know that they have equal rights as children in the House of the Lord, where the law of Christ and the peace of Christ prevail.
48. In accordance with these principles of equality, the Church devotes her care to forming cultured native clergy and gradually increasing the number of native Bishops. And in order to give external expression to these, Our intentions, We have chosen the forthcoming Feast of Christ the King to raise to the Episcopal dignity at the Tomb of the Apostles twelve representatives of widely different peoples and races. In the midst of the disruptive contrasts which divide the human family, may this solemn act proclaim to all Our sons, scattered over the world, that the spirit, the teaching and the work of the Church can never be other than that which the Apostle of the Gentiles preached: “putting on the new, (man) him who is renewed unto knowledge, according to the image of him that created him. Where there is neither Gentile nor Jєω, circuмcision nor uncircuмcision, barbarian nor Scythian, bond nor free. But Christ is all and in all” (Colossians iii. 10, 11).
49. Nor is there any fear lest the consciousness of universal brotherhood aroused by the teaching of Christianity, and the spirit which it inspires, be in contrast with love of traditions or the glories of one’s fatherland, or impede the progress of prosperity or legitimate interests. For that same Christianity teaches that in the exercise of charity we must follow a God-given order, yielding the place of honor in our affections and good works to those who are bound to us by special ties. Nay, the Divine Master Himself gave an example of this preference for His Own country and fatherland, as He wept over the coming destruction of the Holy City. But legitimate and well-ordered love of our native country should not make us close our eyes to the all-embracing nature of Christian Charity, which calls for consideration of others and of their interests in the pacifying light of love.
50. Such is the marvelous doctrine of love and peace which has been such an ennobling factor in the civil and religious progress of mankind. And the heralds who proclaimed it, moved by supernatural charity, not only tilled the land and cared for the sick, but above all they reclaimed, moulded and raised life to divine heights, directing it toward the summit of sanctity in which everything is seen in the light of God. They have raised mansions and temples which show to what lofty and kindly heights the Christian ideal urges man; but above all they have made of men, wise or ignorant, strong or weak, living temples of God and branches of the very vine which is Christ. They have handed on to future generations the treasures of ancient art and wisdom and have secured for them that inestimable gift of eternal wisdom which links men as brothers by the common recognition of a supernatural ownership.
51. Venerable Brethren, forgetfulness of the law of universal charity — of that charity which alone can consolidate peace by extinguishing hatred and softening envies and dissensions — is the source of very grave evils for peaceful relations between nations.
11.
(. . .)
But see, even now, it is said, we love one another. For one man has two friends, and another three. But this is not to love for God's sake, but for the sake of being beloved. But to love for God's sake has not this as its principle of Love; but such an one will be disposed towards all men as towards brethren; loving those that are of the same faith as being true brothers; heretics and Heathen and Jєωs, brothers indeed by nature, but vile and unprofitable — pitying and wearing himself out and weeping for them. Herein we shall be like God if we love all men, even our enemies; not, if we work miracles. For we regard even God with admiration when He works wonders, yet much more, when He shows love towards man, when He is long-suffering. If then even in God this is worthy of much admiration, much more in men is it evident that this renders us admirable.
Chapter 134. The marriages of Jacob are a figure of the Church.
Justin:
If, then, the teaching of the prophets and of Himself moves you, it is better for you to follow God than your imprudent and blind masters, who even till this time permit each man to have four or five wives; and if any one see a beautiful woman and desire to have her, they quote the doings of Jacob [called] Israel, and of the other patriarchs, and maintain that it is not wrong to do such things; for they are miserably ignorant in this matter. For, as I before said, certain dispensations of weighty mysteries were accomplished in each act of this sort. For in the marriages of Jacob I shall mention what dispensation and prophecy were accomplished, in order that you may thereby know that your teachers never looked at the divine motive which prompted each act, but only at the grovelling and corrupting passions. Attend therefore to what I say. The marriages of Jacob were types of that which Christ was about to accomplish. For it was not lawful for Jacob to marry two sisters at once. And he serves Laban for [one of] the daughters; and being deceived in [the obtaining of] the younger, he again served seven years. Now Leah is your people and ѕуηαgσgυє; but Rachel is our Church. And for these, and for the servants in both, Christ even now serves. For while Noah gave to the two sons the seed of the third as servants, now on the other hand Christ has come to restore both the free sons and the servants among them, conferring the same honour on all of them who keep His commandments; even as the children of the free women and the children of the bond women born to Jacob were all sons, and equal in dignity. And it was foretold what each should be according to rank and according to fore-knowledge. Jacob served Laban for speckled and many-spotted sheep; and Christ served, even to the slavery of the cross, for the various and many-formed races of mankind, acquiring them by the blood and mystery of the cross. Leah was weak-eyed; for the eyes of your souls are excessively weak. Rachel stole the gods of Laban, and has hid them to this day; and we have lost our paternal and material gods. Jacob was hated for all time by his brother; and we now, and our Lord Himself, are hated by you and by all men, though we are brothers by nature. Jacob was called Israel; and Israel has been demonstrated to be the Christ, who is, and is called, Jesus.
5. The natural tendency of man to association has never been stronger, or more earnestly and generally followed, than in our own age. This is not at all to be reprehended, unless when so excellent a natural tendency is perverted to evil purposes, and wicked men, banding together in various forms of societies, conspire “against the Lord and against His Christ” (Ps ii., 2). It is, however, most gratifying to observe that pious associations are becoming more and more popular among Catholics also. They are frequently formed; indeed, all Catholics are so closely drawn together and united by the bonds of charity, as members of one household, that they both may be and are truly styled brethren. But if the charity of Christ be absent, none may glory in the name and fellowship of brethren. So wrote Tertullian long ago in pungent words: “We are your brethren by right of a common mother, nature, yet are ye less than men, because unnatural brothers. How much more justly are they called and esteemed as brethren who acknowledge one and the same Father, God; who have drunk in one and the same spirit of charity; who have been borne from one and the same womb of ignorance into the one light of truth?” (Apolog. c. xxxix.)
True, but Jєωs are not the children of God, just as the rest of the unbaptized.
25. And the charity which has been weakened and cooled in many, how can it fail to be rekindled into love in the souls of those who recall with a full heart the tortures and death of our Redeemer and the afflictions of His Sorrowful Mother? From this charity towards God, then, there cannot but rise a more intense love of one’s neighbor if one dwells on the labors and sorrows that Our Lord suffered for all, reinstating the lost inheritance of the children of God.
6. The greater part of humanity were toiling in this abyss of misery, and were the more to be pitied because they were sunk in the darkness of superstition, when in the fullness of time and by the designs of God, light shone down upon the world, and the merits of Christ the Redeemer were poured out upon mankind. By that means they were lifted out of the slough and the distress of slavery, and recalled and brought back from the terrible bondage of sin to their high dignity as the sons of God. Thus, the Apostles, in the early days of the Church, among other precepts for a devout life taught and laid down the doctrine which more than once occurs in the Epistles of St. Paul addressed to those newly baptized: “For you are all the children of God by faith, in Jesus Christ. For as many of you as have been baptized in Christ, have put on Christ. There is neither Jєω, nor Greek; there is neither bond, nor free; there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.”[7] “Where there is neither Gentile nor Jєω, circuмcision nor uncircuмcision, barbarian nor Scythian, bond nor free. But Christ is all and in all.”[8] “For in one Spirit were we all baptized into one body, whether Jєωs or Gentiles, whether bond or free; and in one Spirit we have all been made to drink.”[9] Golden words, indeed, noble and wholesome lessons, whereby its old dignity is given back and with increase to the human race, and men of whatever land or tongue of class are bound together and joined in the strong bonds of brotherly kinship. Those things St. Paul, with that Christian charity with which he was filled, learned from the very heart of Him who, with much surpassing goodness, gave Himself to be the brother of us all, and in His own person, without omitting or excepting any one, so ennobled men that they might become participators in the divine nature. Through this Christian charity the various races of men were drawn together under the divine guidance in such a wonderful way that they blossomed into a new state of hope and public happiness; as with the progress of time and events and the constant labor of the Church the various nations were able to gather together, Christian and free, organized anew after the manner of a family.
What the hell does this have to do with your heretical statement?Pope Pius XI was no heretic.
True, but Jєωs are not the children of God, just as the rest of the unbaptized.They have the potentiality of being baptized.
(http://i64.tinypic.com/9rpo2v.jpg)Remember the Anglo-Masonic powers fought on the side of the red star of ʝʊdɛօ-Bolshevism. And we've been paying for it ever since!
Poche stated: All of the children of God are our brothers.The unbaptized are creatures of God (creations of God, like a tree, fish, or wolf) but not sons of God. We, the baptized, are sons of God, and thus we are brothers to each other.
True, but Jєωs are not the children of God, just as the rest of the unbaptized.
The unbaptized are creatures of God (creations of God, like a tree, fish, or wolf) but not sons of God. We, the baptized, are sons of God, and thus we are brothers to each other.They have the human dignity that requires respect.
"THE THIRD REICH IS THE FIRST POWER WHICH NOTYep this is worthy of being banned from this forum. Down vote.
ONLY RECOGNIZES, BUT PUTS INTO PRACTICE, THE HIGH
PRINCIPLES OF THE PAPACY."
Franz von Papen
Yep this is worthy of being banned from this forum. Down vote.Banned for posting a quote? :confused:
"THE THIRD REICH IS THE FIRST POWER WHICH NOTNot according to Pope Pius XI.
ONLY RECOGNIZES, BUT PUTS INTO PRACTICE, THE HIGH
PRINCIPLES OF THE PAPACY."
Franz von Papen
Pope Pius XI was no heretic.I said you were. And your posts prove it you charlatan.
Not according to Pope Pius XI.Thankfully, he wasn't infallible in this case. He backed Hitler and the NSDAP, so what does that say about him?
Banned for posting a quote? :confused:Agreed. People would rather censor than deal with facts.
Thankfully, he wasn't infallible in this case. He backed Hitler and the NSDAP, so what does that say about him?If you think that Pope Pius XI backed Hitler and his policies then I would suggest that you take another look at Mit Brennender Sorge.
If you think that Pope Pius XI backed Hitler and his policies then I would suggest that you take another look at Mit Brennender Sorge.It should be avoided like the New Mass.
If you think that Pope Pius XI backed Hitler and his policies then I would suggest that you take another look at Mit Brennender Sorge.He conscientiously helped him get elected in 1933. It was Vatican policy, hence the concordant.
It should be avoided like the New Mass.Pope Pius XI never imagined that there would be a New Mass.
Pope Pius XI never imagined that there would be a New Mass.What does that have to do with anything?
He conscientiously helped him get elected in 1933. It was Vatican policy, hence the concordant.Hitler was supported by the Protestant people of Germany not the Catholics.
Hitler was supported by the Protestant people of Germany not the Catholics.Wrong, he was held in high esteem by the many of the Catholic citizens,many of whom died in their basements, incinerated,hiding in their basements with melted Rosaries in their hands through the deliberate allied bombing of innocent civilians. Catholics were primary targets in the Jєωιѕн Holy war against Christian Europe. Can you guess who won?
Wait, World War 2 was a Jєωιѕн Holy War against Christian Europe? Never heard that before.On March 24, 1933, The Daily Express (London) published an article announcing that the Jєωs had already launched their boycott against Germany and threatened a forthcoming "holy war".
Hitler was supported by the Protestant people of Germany not the Catholics.Your idiotic remarks are consistent, if not amusing.
Wait, World War 2 was a Jєωιѕн Holy War against Christian Europe? Never heard that before.
Wrong, he was held in high esteem by the many of the Catholic citizens,many of whom died in their basements, incinerated,hiding in their basements with melted Rosaries in their hands through the deliberate allied bombing of innocent civilians. Catholics were primary targets in the Jєωιѕн Holy war against Christian Europe. Can you guess who won?There were also a number of Catholics who died with their rosaries in their hands as they were incinerated in their homes in London while it was being bombed by the Germans. There were also many Catholics who were put to death in various cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs in various parts of the nαzι held territories. The largest cemetery for priests is at Dachau.
This quote (https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/pope-pius-xii-on-heredity/) from Pope Pius XII on heredity, somewhat related to some of the things discussed on this thread.In her Way of Perfection, Theresa of Avila said that she titles of nobility, bloodlines, and things like that were obstacles to holiness.
If you think that Pope Pius XI backed Hitler and his policies then I would suggest that you take another look at Mit Brennender Sorge.Thanks Poche. I went to the lazy readers tool, wikipedia for info on Mit Brennender Sorge and found this:
It quickly became clear that [Hitler] intended to imprison the Catholics, as it were, in their own churches. They could celebrate mass and retain their rituals as much as they liked, but they could have nothing at all to do with German society otherwise. Catholic schools and newspapers were closed, and a propaganda campaign against the Catholics was launched.Following the signing of the docuмent, the formerly outspoken nature of opposition by German Catholic leaders towards the nαzι movement weakened considerably.[23] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-23) But violations of the Concordat by the nαzιs began almost immediately and were to continue such that Falconi described the Concordat with Germany as "a complete failure".[24] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-24) The Concordat, wrote William Shirer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shirer), "was hardly put to paper before it was being broken by the nαzι Government". The nαzιs had promulgated their sterilization law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_for_the_Prevention_of_Hereditarily_Diseased_Offspring), an offensive policy in the eyes of the Catholic Church, on 14 July. On 30 July, moves began to dissolve the Catholic Youth League. Clergy, nuns and lay leaders were to be targeted, leading to thousands of arrests over the ensuing years, often on trumped-up charges of currency smuggling or "immorality".[25] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-William_L._Shirer_p234-5-25) Historian of the German Resistance Peter Hoffmann wrote that, following the nαzι takeover:[26] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-26)
—
[The Catholic Church] could not silently accept the general persecution, regimentation or oppression, nor in particular the sterilization law of summer 1933. Over the years until the outbreak of war Catholic resistance stiffened until finally its most eminent spokesman was the Pope himself with his encyclical Mit brennender Sorge ... of 14 March 1937, read from all German Catholic pulpits... In general terms, therefore, the churches were the only major organisations to offer comparatively early and open resistance: they remained so in later years.
—
In her Way of Perfection, Theresa of Avila said that she titles of nobility, bloodlines, and things like that were obstacles to holiness.I am interested in finding that part of Way of Perfection, do you know what chapter discusses this? I ask because TFP and TIA seem to be obsessed with the elite, nobility, The Black Nobility and the Knights Templar.
This quote (https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/pope-pius-xii-on-heredity/) from Pope Pius XII on heredity, somewhat related to some of the things discussed on this thread.Pope Pius XII is often taken out of historical context by those who have an ax to grind. The Pope was desperate for funds and was writing to the Italian wealthy who considered themselves to be "nobility." He did engage in some flattery of them. This is sometimes wrongly used (for example by Mr. Plinio of TFP) to pretend that his papacy supported bloodlines, nobility and the elite.
Pope Pius XII is often taken out of historical context by those who have an ax to grind. The Pope was desperate for funds and was writing to the Italian wealthy who considered themselves to be "nobility." He did engage in some flattery of them. This is sometimes wrongly used (for example by Mr. Plinio of TFP) to pretend that his papacy supported bloodlines, nobility and the elite.My intention in linking to the quote was to highlight the fact that race is not unimportant, in light of the constant referencing (often by poche) to Mit Brennender Sorge.
The nature of this great and mysterious thing that is heredity - the passing on through a bloodline, perpetuated from generation to generation, of a rich ensemble of material and spiritual assets, the continuity of a single physical and moral type from father to son, the tradition that unites members of one same family across the centuries - the true nature of this heredity can undoubtedly be distorted by materialistic theories. But one can, and must also, consider this reality enormously important in the fullness of its human and supernatural truthPope Piux XII could have been addressing a group of Italian peasants with that. It's not important in the context I'm using it that he's speaking to Italian nobles.
Thanks Poche. I went to the lazy readers tool, wikipedia for info on Mit Brennender Sorge and found this:And this is the man some posters here think was preserving Catholic civilization?
Hitler then proceeded to take a mile where he had been given an inch" and closed all Catholic institutions whose functions weren't strictly religious:[22] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-22)Following the signing of the docuмent, the formerly outspoken nature of opposition by German Catholic leaders towards the nαzι movement weakened considerably.[23] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-23) But violations of the Concordat by the nαzιs began almost immediately and were to continue such that Falconi described the Concordat with Germany as "a complete failure".[24] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-24) The Concordat, wrote William Shirer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shirer), "was hardly put to paper before it was being broken by the nαzι Government". The nαzιs had promulgated their sterilization law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_for_the_Prevention_of_Hereditarily_Diseased_Offspring), an offensive policy in the eyes of the Catholic Church, on 14 July. On 30 July, moves began to dissolve the Catholic Youth League. Clergy, nuns and lay leaders were to be targeted, leading to thousands of arrests over the ensuing years, often on trumped-up charges of currency smuggling or "immorality".[25] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-William_L._Shirer_p234-5-25) Historian of the German Resistance Peter Hoffmann wrote that, following the nαzι takeover:[26] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge#cite_note-26)
Historian of the German Resistance Peter HoffmannSeriously? German Resistance = Communists.
Seriously? German Resistance = Communists.German resistance also = Pope Pius XII
My intention in linking to the quote was to highlight the fact that race is not unimportant, in light of the constant referencing (often by poche) to Mit Brennender Sorge.Thanks, Rum. I was just going off on a tangent.
The specific line I'm thinking of is this one:
Pope Piux XII could have been addressing a group of Italian peasants with that. It's not important in the context I'm using it that he's speaking to Italian nobles.
German resistance also = Pope Pius XIISo by that line of reasoning.....Pius XII=Marxist......
And this is the man some posters here think was preserving Catholic civilization?William Shirer was a Jєω and knowingly admitted to omitting facts from his work, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. His work has long fallen out of favor by historians as new info has been discovered.
So by that line of reasoning.....Pius XII=Marxist......No, by that line of reasoning nαzιsm is so evil that its malevolence is recognized by every one.
No, by that line of reasoning nαzιsm is so evil that its malevolence is recognized by every one.Says who. And please quote
William Shirer was a Jєω and knowingly admitted to omitting facts from his work, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. His work has long fallen out of favor by historians as new info has been discovered.If Hitler was trying to preserve Catholic civilization then why is it that so many Catholic bishops and priests of teh time were against what he stood for? Why is it that many priests and religious went to jail rather than to allow the Catholic Church to associate itself with him and his philosophy?
Yes, I do think this man was trying to preserve Catholic civilization. Unlike the Commie clerics in the Church's ranks that eventually triumphed at Vatican II.
Your absurd inanities make me question your soundness of mind.
If Hitler was trying to preserve Catholic civilization then why is it that so many Catholic bishops and priests of teh time were against what he stood for? Why is it that many priests and religious went to jail rather than to allow the Catholic Church to associate itself with him and his philosophy?He already told you. They were Leftist clerics already in ascendancy just prior to Vatican II.
He already told you. They were Leftist clerics already in ascendancy just prior to Vatican II.All this happened before Vatican II.
All this happened before Vatican II.So every bishop/priest was 100% orthodox prior to Vatican II?? What time and date exactly??
He already told you. They were Leftist clerics already in ascendancy just prior to Vatican II.Um, yeah. Like St. Maximillian Kolbe?
Um, yeah. Like St. Maximillian Kolbe?Cera, what point are you making?
Um, yeah. Like St. Maximillian Kolbe?Canonized (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonized) by "Saint" John Paul II (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_John_Paul_II) :facepalm:
So every bishop/priest was 100% orthodox prior to Vatican II?? What time and date exactly??Pope Pius XI was orthodox when he wrote Mit Brennender Sorge.
Pope Pius XI was orthodox when he wrote Mit Brennender Sorge.That doesn't answer the questions
Pope Pius XI was orthodox when he wrote Mit Brennender Sorge.Please do the whole forum a huge favor and never say the words Mit Brennender Sorge ever again. Stop talking about it.
Please do the whole forum a huge favor and never say the words Mit Brennender Sorge ever again. Stop talking about it.I will stop saying Mit Brennender Sorge when you stop praising the nαzι philosophy. By the way it is not just a docuмent on race, it is a docuмent on the nαzι philosophy and an authentic Catholic response.
The mayor of New York City in the weeks after 9/11 was Rudy Giuliani. Obviously, he had a big stage within the national and international purview because quite literally, the entire world watched the Twin Towers fall.
With that exposure, he tried several times to run for national office like his mayoral successor, Michael Bloomberg.
When he ran for president in 2008, he participated in one of many debates, and his only talking point was that he was mayor of NYC during 9/11.
Yes, it was a valiant effort and a good job in a broken and beaten city that was reeling from possibly the biggest act of Islamic terrorism the world has ever seen. That's not disputed. However, he made his only talking point that ad nauseam, or in the words of Joe Biden, a noun, a verb, and 9/11. (https://coub.com/view/dvtxd)
You are the exact same way, Poche. This entire thread has you mentioning the Holy Father's docuмent on race in the context of the Catholic faith ad nauseam. And not in a constructive way, either.
It's a noun, a verb and Mit Brennender Sorge.
I will stop saying Mit Brennender Sorge when you stop praising the nαzι philosophy. By the way it is not just a docuмent on race, it is a docuмent on the nαzι philosophy and an authentic Catholic response.What!?
nαzιsm is tribalistic paganism
I am not sure about this. It looks like they were actually against old germanic Paganism (such as the tribal "Heathen").Indeed! Finally an analysis which contains an accurate picture of the situation without the obligatory tipping of the hat to the propaganda of the west and the Jєωs.
They were against Liberalism also, attacks on Christianity (Evangelical & Roman Catholicism for being the core in Germany), and new substitutes for religion (as in creating a brand new religion). They were avidly against separation of Church and State.
Antagonism to Christianity was more seen in accord with the spirit of Jєωιѕн materialism, and Bolshevism. The Party's deadly foes, so I see a lots of common grounds, actually. Perhaps not in the way they went on and carry their actions; but in the ideology itself. They believed that the German peoples were the strongest nation capable of fighting the global powers of darkness threatening the complete overthrow of Christian culture (as we witness it today).
Cera, what point are you making?Read the entire thread. The point is that nαzιs hated the Catholic Church.
By the way it is not just a docuмent on race, it is a docuмent on the nαzι philosophy and an authentic Catholic response.Please quote where it says this.
Read the entire thread. The point is that nαzιs hated the Catholic Church.(https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/73717421.jpg)
Pope Pius XI was orthodox when he wrote Mit Brennender Sorge.Was he "Orthodox" when he supported his election and the helping of the NSDAP's rise to power?
Read the entire thread. The point is that nαzιs hated the Catholic Church.BS. Prove it. I can prove the exact opposite.
Indeed! Finally an analysis which contains an accurate picture of the situation without the obligatory tipping of the hat to the propaganda of the west and the Jєωs.Agreed. Asinine comments by Jezus.
When he ran for president in 2008, he participated in one of many debates, and his only talking point was that he was mayor of NYC during 9/11.
Yes, it was a valiant effort and a good job in a broken and beaten city that was reeling from possibly the biggest act of Islamic terrorism the world has ever seen. That's not disputed.
What!?So why are you complaining when I bring up what Pope Pius XI, a contemporary of Hitler and the nαzιs, had to say about them to their face?
Praising the nαzι ideology? Poche, nαzιsm is tribalistic paganism that extols race and distorts the Catholic faith for evil motives. It's about as Catholic as a Buddhist temple.
The only thing to praise Adolf Hitler for is that he died, and not naturally.
If we're going to start praising every non-Catholic hoohah in the room simply because of its perceived anti-Judaism, then what's the next thread?
"Allah is God and Muhammad is his messenger"?
Was he "Orthodox" when he supported his election and the helping of the NSDAP's rise to power?Pope Pius XI didn't support the NSDAP. The people who supported them were the Protestant people of Germany.
Pope Pius XI didn't support the NSDAP. The people who supported them were the Protestant people of Germany.
Wow, did I hear you right?! After 17 years of exposure are you actually going on record here to claim that 9-11 was carried out by Islamic terrorists?!No, I'm just saying how Poche regurgitating MBS and Rudy Giuliani regurgitating the "I was mayor during 9/11" are the exact same; vomiting out the same series of words whenever convenient.
The original docuмents supported both churches of Germany: 2 thirds Evangelical Christian and 1 third Roman Catholics.They didn't just arrest Jєωιѕн Bolsheviks. They also arrested Jєωιѕн converts and Catholics of Jєωιѕн descent.
The common enemy was Jєωιѕн Bolshevism (Marxism, Materialism, Liberalism, Free-Thinkers, etc).
I don't see anything remotely anti-Christian, at least in the party's official docuмents. If anything, it was pro-Christian. It was not pagan in any way, but defended the interest of Christianity. Hitler himself referred to those enthusiasts of old German paganism as "men in bear-skins".
Pope Pius XI didn't support the NSDAP. The people who supported them were the Protestant people of Germany.Do you have some reference that Pius XI opposed Hitler's appointment as Chancellor on 30 January 1933?
It should be avoided like the New Mass.
https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/nαzι-ideology/msg614700/#msg614700Can't think of any - but if there was one could surely reject it if one rejects the New Mass...
Is there any other pre-Vatican II encyclical you equate to the level of the New Mass?
Do you have some reference that Pius XI opposed Hitler's appointment as Chancellor on 30 January 1933?
How about a reference against the NSDAP when they went from 12 to 107 seats in the Reichstag in the 1930 German federal election?
Or the majority of seats in both elections in 1932?
Can't think of any - but if there was one could surely reject it if one rejects the New Mass...If you reject the pre Vatican II docuмents then how can you call yourself Catholic?
Know Your Enemy
https://archive.org/details/KnowYourEnemy_201604
Volume 2, Chapter 14
. . . an alliance which is not for the purpose of waging war has no meaning and no value. The object of forming an alliance is to wage war.
(. . .)
It must not be forgotten that the international Jєω, who is to-day absolute master in Russia, does not look upon Germany as an ally, but as a State condemned to the same doom as Russia itself.
One does not form an alliance with a partner whose only aim is the destruction of his co-partner.
Above all, one does not enter into alliances with people to whom no treaty is sacred, because they do not exist as the upholders of truth and honour, but as the protagonists of lying and deception, thievery, plunder and robbery.
What Hitler Wants
https://archive.org/details/LorimerE.O.WhatHitlerWants1939
They didn't just arrest Jєωιѕн Bolsheviks. They also arrested Jєωιѕн converts and Catholics of Jєωιѕн descent.As we know with Jєωs, you cannot be sure of their conversions and as a subversive group, most were suspected of anti-government activities. Besides which most of those arrested, had been arrested for actual anti government activities.
As we know with Jєωs, you cannot be sure of their conversions and as a subversive group, most were suspected of anti-government activities. Besides which most of those arrested, had been arrested for actual anti government activities.When we have people who go regularly to mass and bring their children up as Catholics then I think you can be more sure than some other people who don't practice their faith.
The Jєωs had previously, as a nation, declared war upon the Germans and as such were considered enemy agents. The Jєωs were involved in an international boycott of Germany which hurt all of its citizens. This began years before war was declared, and by further intrigues and deceptions, they actively sought, and accomplished the involvement of the U.S. in the war, just as they had done in the war before this, at a cost of millions of lives. And you think that they could be trusted to behave?
No, but I have reference that Pope Pius XI opposed the nαzι ideology.Which is?
Which is?Mit Brennender Sorge
Mit Brennender SorgeRubbish. Says nothing about "nαzιs", National Socialists, NSDAP.
http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html
When we have people who go regularly to mass and bring their children up as Catholics then I think you can be more sure than some other people who don't practice their faith.You are wrong again. The Jєωs are an international nation, they have no borders and they act as one throughout the world. The Jєωιѕн people and the Jєωιѕн nation are one and the same. And the current day Jєωs, have nothing in common with the religion of, or the Israelites of the old testament. Ask Queen Isabella about the fidelity of Jєωιѕн conversions. True conversions are very few.
As far as Jєωs declaring 'war' on the German nation the last time the Israelites were a nation was in 70AD and there is no contigous border between Israel and Germany for them to declare war upon.
Mit Brennender SorgeHave you listened to anyone in your entire life other than yourself and the menu of the nearest black soul food restaurant?
http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html
T.H. Tetens was a Jєω. Nice try.....
CHAPTER VI
WOTAN VERSUS CHRIST
There is no doubt that a world dominated by Germany would suppress the Christian religion and introduce in its place the pagan German Wotan cult. The Christian moral principles and the doctrine of the German Master Race are irreconcilable. They cannot live side by side in the same world. In their attitude toward Christianity, as in so many fields, the nαzιs merely follow in the footsteps of the Pan- German movement of the last century. We shall illustrate this similarity by comparing quotations from the Pan-Germans with similar utterances of the nαzιs.
The Cross must fall
1898
"We have no place for a symbol of gentleness (the Christian Cross), but only for a symbol calling us to war, to defense; and I know of no better symbol than that of our Teutonic divinity Thor: the Hammer!" (Pan-German Magazine "Heimdall," 1898, page 123.)
1934
"We must never relax our efforts until Germany has been liberated from the Christian Cross." (Official nαzι publication "Nordland" 1934, No. 13.)
1936
"The Cross must fall if Germany is to live!" ("Durchbruch" (Break-Through) 1936, No. 31.)
1937
"Our task will not be completed until the day when we have triumphed over Christianity.” ("Durchbruch,” 1937, No. 6)
Christianity is Weakness
1910
"This idea of neighbourly love, developed in the bosom of the Church, has acted like poison on the German national consciousness.” ("Volkserzieher,” (The Educator of the People), 1910, No. 1.)
1924
"I think our decline has come because we have followed Christ and because we have lost our German soul, while trying to gain a Christian one.” (Ernst Wiechert, "Totenwolf,” 1924.)
1932
"Our entire German education must be based on the recognition of the fact that we do not owe our moral code to Christianity, but that Christianity owes its enduring values to the German character.” (Alfred Rosenberg, the principal theorist of the nαzι Party, "Der My thus des XX. Jahrhunderts,” (The Myth of the Twentieth Century, 4th ed., 1932, page 623.)'
"But today a new faith is awakening: the concept of the blood, the faith . . . that Nordic blood represents the mystery that has replaced and overcome the old sacraments.” (Alfred Rosenberg, ibid., page 129.)
1937
"Christianity no longer can help us; its aim is to make us gentle and meek again, so that we will drop our sword . . .” (Dr. Jankow Janeff, "Heroismus und Weltangst,” (Heroism and Cosmic Fear), 1937.)
The nαzιs — even as the Pan-Germans before them — have tried to deal with Christianity in two different ways. They either attack it outright, or they endeavour to adulterate it into a Germanic religion. The new German mysticism thus falls into the wiliest confusion: at times Christ is reviled and rejected as the Son of the Jєωιѕн God, while on other occasions He is claimed as an Aryan and as the Germanic hero of an exclusively German religious mysticism.
The German “Krist”
1913
... the Krist (the orthography is ’racially pure’) and Father Wotan get on well together! . . . The Krist is Father Wotan’s heart.” ("Volkserzieher,” (The Educator of the People), 1913, page 47 — quoted in “Thus Speaks Germany,” page 7.)
Reich-Bishop Mueller and Valhalla
1935
"Holy Writ, as a human and typical period docuмent, is so relative that, instead of Heaven, you may sometimes just as well say Valhalla.” (Reich-Bishop Mueller in a lecture at the Lessing Academy, Berlin, February 13, 1935.)
Der Deutsche Gott — The German God
"Either a German God, or none at all! The international God of Christendom is a patron of the Treaty of Versailles.” (Ernst Niekisch, Independent Socialist in Bavaria, 1923, quoted by Aurel Kolnai, "The War,, Against the West,” London, 1938, page 233.)
1939
"I am tempted to believe rather in a Germanic God than a Christian one.” (Dr. Goebbels, Reich- 50 Minister of Propaganda and Enlightenment, speech in Cologne, May 19, 1939.)
The German Spirit of Christ
1914
"It is true that our soldiers in France and Belgium have shot all the brigands, men, women, and children, and that they have destroyed their homes. But to see in that anything contrary to Christian teaching is to show that one has not the least understanding of the spirit of Christ.” (From an article in the leading liberal newspaper of Berlin, “Vossische Zeitung,” 1914, quoted in ’’Paroles allemandes,” Paris, page 134.)
God in the German Army
1915
’’Just as God has revealed himself in the German people, so He now reveals himself in the German Army.” (’’Volkserzieher,” (The Educator of the People), 1915, No. 10.)
1915
”Jesus of Nazareth would be right in front, in the first ranks of the sword-bearers who are fighting with implacable hatred. That is where he would be, and he would bless the bleeding hands and the death-dealing weapons, would perhaps himself grasp a sword of judgment and drive the enemies of the Germans farther and farther from the frontiers . . (Volkserzieher, (The Educator of the People), 1915, No. 10 .)
1940
“God Almighty stands and falls with Germany’s mighty armies . . (“Deutscher Weckruf,” official organ of the nαzι Bund in New York, October 10, 1940.)
Germany needs a new God!
"We want no God except Germany itself.” (Adolf Hitler, as quoted by the Catholic newspaper "Bay- rischer Kurier,” (Bavarian Courier) for May 25, 1923.)
"In the eyes of its believers, National-Socialism is a religion. The National-Socialist movement is today the political church of the German nation.” (Dr. Goebbels, in a speech given in Danzig on May 9, 1937.)
"We call ourselves German pagans . . . We no longer believe in the Holy Ghost — we believe in our holy blood.” (From the Articles of Faith of the Hitler Youth Organization, quoted in "Kieler Hochschulblaetter der Christlichen Welt,” (Academic News of the Christian World), Kiel, for March 26, 1935.)
"In National Socialism the Movement of the German Liberation has revealed itself to us. We stand ready to proclaim our faith in it, even were it to be led in the name of the Devil.” (Pastor Mattias of Kerstlingerode, quoted by Edgar A. Mowrer in "Germany Puts the Clock Back,” London, 1933, 10th ed., page 158.)
“God has revealed Himself in Adolf Hitler"
"Not in Jesus Christ, but in Adolf Hitler has God revealed Himself.” (Reich-Vicar Engelke, assistant of Reich-Bishop Mueller, in an address in March, 1937, reported in "Deutscher Weg,” (The German Way), May 30, 1937.)
"The German teacher must firmly believe in the permanence and holiness of our Reich ... In Adolf Hitler, God has revealed Himself to us.” (nαzι-Educator Niemeyer, in a speech before the National-Socialist Teachers’ Organization in July, 1937.)
"We believe that the Lord God has sent us Adolf Hitler, so that Germany may be established for all eternity.” ("Schulungsbrief,” (Instruction Letters), April, 1937.)
"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. The way has been shown us by the Fuehrer.” (Deacon Eckert, Sermon at Berlin-Tegel, February 10, 1935.)
God sent us Hitler! "Hitler was sent to us by God so that Germany may endure through all eternity ... We believe in Adolf Hitler alone on this earth, we know that National-Socialism is the only faith that can lead our people to salvation.” (Radio address of Labor Leader Dr. Robert Ley, reported in the newspaper "Duesseldorfer Nachrichten,” February 11, 1937.)
"Hitler has revealed to use the true meaning of religion. He has come to us to renew the faith of our fathers and to make new men of us.” (Hans Kerri, Reich-Minister of Churches, in an address reported in the newspaper "Frankfurter Zeitung,” November 20, 1935.)
A systematic campaign is being conducted to make Germany’s youth regard Christianity as worthless and uproot the last remnants of Christian thinking from their hearts. A concerted effort is made to befoul every Christian idea, make it the butt of ridicule and to debase everything that Christians hold sacred.
The “Satanic Bible"
1921
Tear up that lewd Satanic Bible, the Old Testament!" ("Voelkischer Beobachter," August 11, 1921.)
1935
"The Bible is the trashiest of literature." (Reich- Governor Roewer, in a speech at a meeting in Oldenburg, April 9, 1935.)
nαzι “Historical Research produces Blasphemy
"According to the nαzι magazine ‘Heimdall,’ the father of Christ was a Germanic official of the Roman Empire. Transferred to Palestine for a short time, he won the love of Mary. Their brief relationship was not without its consequences. Mary’s parents were delighted to find an elderly man, by the name of Joseph, who was ready to marry the pregnant maiden. Thus Jesus was only the foster son of Joseph. He had inherited the outward appearance of His Germanic father, but innerly His characteristics were those of a crossbreed: His nature was restless, brooding, self- tormenting, idealistic and overwrought. Jesus admired the Aryans as the race which exemplifies a chosen people to a greater degree than do the Jєωs.” (Re- ported in the independent Swiss newspaper, "National Zeitung," Basle, July 21, 1935.)
"The field-grey soldier throwing the last hand grenade, the dying Storm-Trooper whose last word is a call to the Fuehrer, are for us presentations of the divine, much more genuine than is the crucified Jєω." (From the German newspaper "Coburger Beobachter," May 13, 1935.)
The Gospel is fulfilled . . .
"The idea that Jesus Christ is the Son of God can no longer be maintained ... We must preach in our sermons that the gospel has found its fulfillment in Hitler ... In any case National Socialism is the fulfillment of the Christian message." (Reich-Minister of Churches Hans Kerri, in an address to the delegates of Confessional Churches, February 12, 1937.)
"He rose long ago from the old Jєωιѕн hordes
And was crucified by Roman Aryan (!) lords.
Today, as our Savior Hitler commands
We now to our swastika nail Jesus’ hands."
(From a song-book of the Hitler Youth, quoted in the French periodical, "Revue des Deux Mondes," June 16, 1933.)
“Hitler is greater than Christ"
In centuries to come, if our word today is judged by the proper criteria, it will be said, in retrospect: Christ was great, but Adolf Hitler was greater." (From an address of District Leader Willi Becker, reported in the newspaper, "Frankfurter Zeitung," October 20, 1935.)
"It is only on one or two exceptional points that Christ and Hitler stand comparison, for Hitler is far too big a man to be compared with one so petty." (District Governor Julius Streicher, in a speech be- fore the German Academy of Education in Munich, July, 1935.)
“We must smash Christianity!"
"Who was greater, Christ or Hitler? At the time of His death Christ had twelve disciples who did not even remain loyal to Him. Hitler, however, has a nation of seventy million behind him today. We cannot permit another organization, one filled with a different spirit, to exist side by side with us. We must smash it. National-Socialism commands in all seriousness: I am the Lord thy God — thou shalt have no other gods beside me!” (SS Division Leader Schulz, 55 in an instruction course given for theological students at Croessinsee, Pomerania, August, 1936.)
"Hitler is lonely. So is God. Hitler is like God.” (Reich-Minister Hans Frank, quoted by Professor Frederick L. Schuman, in his book: "Hitler and the nαzι Dictatorship," London, 1936, page 365.)
"20,000 storm troopers addressed their prayers to the Fuehrer." (From a report in the official organ of the Storm Troopers: "Der SA-Mann," (The Storm Trooper), August 21, 1937.)
It is hardly necessary to comment specifically on these hate-filled and blasphemous utterances against the Christian doctrine. Special emphasis should be given, however, to the systematic persecution of Christians. Soon after they came to power, the nαzιs set out to destroy Christianity by closing churches, staging mass-arrests of priests and nuns and ministers on morals charges, assaulting clergymen and churchgoers, prohibiting church newspapers, agitating for mass-resignations from the church, and forcing or persuading the youth to stay away from the church services. In a number of cases the nαzιs did not stop at the assassination of ministers and the burning of churches. The fury of the nαzιs against the Christian Church represents, in addition to the horrors in the cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs and the regime of terror in the occupied countries, a particularly shameful chapter of German history under nαzι rule. Since 1934 the persecution of the Christian faiths in Germany has been the subject of numerous books with a wealth of facts and docuмents, from the hands of Protestant and Catholic authors.
Today it is a fact that on account of the systematic anti-Christian propaganda, considerable portions of the German people, among them the overwhelming majority of the German youth, have been alienated from the Christian Churches.
You are wrong again. The Jєωs are an international nation, they have no borders and they act as one throughout the world. The Jєωιѕн people and the Jєωιѕн nation are one and the same. And the current day Jєωs, have nothing in common with the religion of, or the Israelites of the old testament. Ask Queen Isabella about the fidelity of Jєωιѕн conversions. True conversions are very few.Precisely. The war the Jєωs were intent on waging was 3 fold. Economic, the genocide of the white European race through the final step, getting to traitorous goy to do their bidding through paying them off to start and fight the war.
Read the newspaper headlines from that period, international Jєωry declared war on Germany in 1933.
They didn't just arrest Jєωιѕн Bolsheviks. They also arrested Jєωιѕн converts and Catholics of Jєωιѕн descent.The Church did the same thing in Spain. Hmmm......something to do with something called crypto Jєωs.....
The Church did the same thing in Spain. Hmmm......something to do with something called crypto Jєωs.....Maybe he hasn't heard of the Inquisition...
There is no doubt that a world dominated by Germany would suppress the Christian religion and introduce in its place the pagan German Wotan cult.
24. We demand freedom of religion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion) for all religious denominations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_denominations) within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral) senses of the Germanic race (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_race). The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity) without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jєωιѕн-materialistic spirit within and around us and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: "The good of the community before the good of the individual".[10] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#cite_note-10)
Could it actually be that Hitler saved more Jєωs than anyone in recorded history? I think that proposition is quite plausible.
Times gone by have ignored the obvious unlikeness of men, or have consciously acted contrary to better knowledge. During the colonization of Paraguay by the Jesuits early in the 19th century, for example, a marriage law was promulgated, according to which the white settlers might marry only natives, Indian women. Perhaps it was thought that in this way natives could be raised to the level of the whites. In reality, this mixing produced unfortunate hybrids, which were to be counted neither as whites nor as natives. They inherited in most cases, the worst characteristics of the groups, being uncertain and unstable both in spirit and in soul. Even in our day, the fact is shown many times that certain men have no feeling for race honor or race shame. The many hybrids resulting from unions with Germans of black troops occupying the Rhineland and of Jєωs are tragic witnesses of the fact. Even those occupying the highest places in governmentduring the "System Time" 1 consciously closed their eyes to the facts of race. They refused, for example, to allow the well-known student of races, Ludwig Schemann, to continue his studies regarding the nature of races and deprived him of the means for his researches.
1 The phrase "System Time" refers to the period from 1918 to 1933 when Germany was governed by a "system" of coalition parties.
Even today, the racial ideas of National Socialism have implacable opponents. Free Masons, Marxists, and the Christian Church join hands in brotherly accord on this point. The worldwide order of Free Masons conceals its Jєωιѕн plans for ruling the world behind the catchword "Mankind" or "Humanity." Masonry can take much as credit for its effort to bring Jєωs and Turks into the fold, as does Christianity itself. Marxism has the same goal as Free Masonry. In this case, to disguise its real intentions the slogan "Equality, Liberty, and Fraternity" is preached. Under Jєωιѕн leadership, Marxism intends to bring together everyone "who bears the face of man."
The Christians, above all the Roman Church, reject the race idea with the citation 'before God all men are equal." All who have the Christian belief, whether Jєωs, bush niggers, or whites are dearer to them and more worthwhile than a German who does not confess Christianity. The one binding bond, above and beyond all restrictions, is the Belief which alone brings salvation. One proof that the Roman Church rejects the race idea against its own better judgment is shown by the following facts. At one time, there existed the danger that the aims of the Jesuit order would be jeopardized or perverted by its Jєωιѕн members. A rule forbidding admission of Jєωs into the Jesuit order was issued. Today, since the danger is long since past, the church disregards it. Now why do we find in Free Masonry, Marxism, and the Christian church this mistaken teaching of the equality of all men? All three are striving more or less for power over the whole earth. Therefore, they must necessarily be "international." They can never acknowledge the human ties of race, community, or nation if they do not wish to give up their own aims.
Formerly it was assumed that there were only as many species on the earth as God had created in the beginning. This belief was also the conviction of scientists for a long time. Yet one finds today petrifactions of living beings that died out centuries ago. At first, they were regarded as triflings of nature. Nevertheless, when people began to deal with them seriously they made an important discovery. It showed that these petrifactions form a series, which, from the oldest strata to the most recent, show an ever-closer approach to the living types of today. The conclusion has been drawn that the types today have developed gradually out of the older forms. This assumption is in fact generally accepted today after experiments have demonstrated that race and consequently species transformation occur on the earth. The study, which has to do with this question, is called the study of evolution. Closely associated with it is the name of the Englishman Charles Darwin (1809-1882).
You are wrong again. The Jєωs are an international nation, they have no borders and they act as one throughout the world. The Jєωιѕн people and the Jєωιѕн nation are one and the same. And the current day Jєωs, have nothing in common with the religion of, or the Israelites of the old testament. Ask Queen Isabella about the fidelity of Jєωιѕн conversions. True conversions are very few.That was after Hitleer won and started to mistreat the Jєωs of Germany.
Read the newspaper headlines from that period, international Jєωry declared war on Germany in 1933.
Rubbish. Says nothing about "nαzιs", National Socialists, NSDAP.It describes their behavior and condemns it.
You are wrong again. The Jєωs are an international nation, they have no borders and they act as one throughout the world. The Jєωιѕн people and the Jєωιѕн nation are one and the same. And the current day Jєωs, have nothing in common with the religion of, or the Israelites of the old testament. Ask Queen Isabella about the fidelity of Jєωιѕн conversions. True conversions are very few.Sr.Benedicita of the Cross was a convert a Discalced Carmelite and a canonized saint. There are other people who I know of who are converts and the descendants of converts who are practicing Catholics. St Teresa of Avila was the descendant of a converso.
Read the newspaper headlines from that period, international Jєωry declared war on Germany in 1933.
Sr.Benedicita of the Cross was a convert a Discalced Carmelite and a canonized saint. There are other people who I know of who are converts and the descendants of converts who are practicing Catholics. St Teresa of Avila was the descendant of a converso.
What do you think about this, (repetitively uninteresting troll) poche?I was unable to access that link.
http://www.cwporter.com/letter15.htm
I was unable to access that link.Do you live in the United States, or in some country Jєωs have made h0Ɩ0h0αx denial illegal?
We must free ourselves from many passed own views and perceptions. Even if they are still often in print in textbooks of the old period, they have not thereby become more correct. They have, on the other hand, caused a lot of ill and put weapons in the hand of our world-view opponents, which they still use against us today. We can beat them, if we have the necessary knowledge. It is not about individual, historical dates, rather the view of the great connections.We must especially refute two false perceptions: first, that Germanic-German history only started when Germanic man came into contact with the mediterranean culture of the Romans. Second, that most of the Germanic tribes voluntarily converted to Christianity, and that this faith was quite suited to their nature!Regarding the first, earlier educational material has taught us that there was Germanic history long before they had contact with the Romans and later with Christianity. We can trace back the cultural history of our ancestors more than four thousand years before Christ, hence more than six thousand years before our own time. That we know less about the actual history, is only because we lack the earlier, written accounts, and we are hence solely dependent on finds and excavations and what other folks report about Germanic man. But that alone suffices for the proof, that they were, for example, at least equal to the Romans in terms of real culture, but were superior to them especially in terms of concepts of honor and morals. We truly do not have to be ashamed of our ancestors – they were not “wild men”! They also did not adopt Christianity for the sake of allegedly higher “moral values”.We thus come to the second point. Many Germanic tribes did indeed voluntarily convert to Christianity. But why did they adopt the new teachings, if they did not completely correspond to their views? The correct answer was in the past prudently not given.More or less always, the leaders and high ranking were the first to convert! For them there were many reasons, which had little to do with the faith. Only so did they, alone or with their followers, enter the Roman Reich and its service. It was simply a step of political cleverness to then adopt the state religion, especially since it was presented to Germanic man in a significantly modified form, adapted to their nature. These reasons became more important when Germanic man no longer entered Roman service individually or in small groups, rather formed his own states on the basis of Roman law and hence come into close contact with the Christian-Roman populace. The followers, however, were obligated to the leaders by unconditional loyalty – for them it was self-evidence, to accept baptism at the same time as the leader. The rest of the people then followed them; the church then had the opportunity to step-to-step take back the concessions to German folk-feeling and to take up the struggle against the remnants of “pagan superstition”.In the previous issue, we learned of the Germanic treks and their first collisions with the mighty, organized state of the Roman world empire. In order to survive against this power, they had to give themselves a firm, state organization. However, alien institutions and views were thereby brought into the Germanic tribes, which indeed enabled them to create states too, but at the cost of the folk substance. That meant that the folk that had to bear the state was weakened and soon the state, too, collapsed as a consequence. We already learn this from the example of the Roman world empire, which was composed of a mixture of folks, infiltrated by Germanic man, and soon had to capitulate as a state. We then learn it as well from the example of the Germanic states of the so-called folk-wandering period, which collapsed from the same causes. We see it especially in the Frankish state, which could nonetheless, before its fall, perform educational work on the Germanic tribes of today’s Germany, that later enabled the formation of a German state. The struggle for the preservation of a healthy folk and at the same time a strong state, which can secure the life foundations of the folk, is something we will be able to follow through the whole subsequent course of German history.
Here we will see how the Germanic states, and especially the Frankish state, used foreign, Roman-Christian concepts in order to above all strengthen their own power, but later fell victim to precisely these forces. More than from the successes, we learn from the mistakes of the past!
The priest portrayed the blessedness of the baptised and painted the hell torments of the damned who did not want to listen to the word of the high priest in Rome. Now Wulfram of Sens turned to Ratbod himself:“So take then, king, the water of baptism, so that you, freed from all sin, one day enter heaven with the flocks of the faithful, to sit at the right of all-knowing God from eternity to eternity, while all those go to hell who died without baptism!”Ratbod’s voice interrupted the talking bishop.He asked in the language of his ancestors: “You have said, priest, I shall come into heaven, if I have myself baptised? Now tell me, priest, where are my parents, who are all dead and were not baptised?”Horror swept through the ranks of the band of priests, because the sacred act had unexpectedly been interrupted. The bishop, completely in the fervor of the conversion, uttered the words:“All of them are with the devil in hell, because they died as heathens!”Then Radbod smashed the earthen pan basin with the sacred water, so that the pieces fell to the ground crashing. And he hurled his free word into the cleric’s face:“Then I wish to tell you, priest, I go rather to my parents to the devil in hell than with you priests to heaven!”
“Just as the discovery of the earth’s revolution around the sun led to a revolutionary change of the general view of the world, so will the blood and race teachings of the National Socialist movement produce a transformation of the knowledge and hence of the view of the history of the human past and its future.”– Adolf HitlerThis realization of the fateful significance of the laws of nature of blood and race form the basic idea of the SS. It is an order of Nordic-determined men and their clans.Helped by the laws it chooses itself, the SS wishes to make a living contribution to the victory of the blood idea in Europe. It wishes to preserve and practice the highest virtues such as loyalty, bravery, comradeship and noble attitude. It is a team in which the following’s Germanic loyalty is unconditionally given to the Führer.The SS is the protector of the inner security of the Reich and the toughest battle troop against the external enemy. The present struggle is against the anti-life forces of international Jєωry, against the world bolshevism allied with him and with the Jєω-dependent, greedy, English money rule and Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.The goal of the present, turbulent conflict is the formation of a natural and hence enduring New Order of Europe. This task of new ordering has been assumed by the Reich founded on the Greater Germanic development in close cooperation with brave allies.Europe should find the lasting foundation for a splendid future, however, in the active community of fate of the Germanic folks. The SS fights for this noble goal. And so in the Führer’s SS – next to the Reich Germans – ethnic Germans from all parts of the world, especially from Romania and the rest of southeast Europe, are also assembled for battle.
Furthermore, for the first time volunteers from Flanders, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, Finland and Sweden also find alongside the Reich German SS-men.
A decade ago people of our folk as well still even believed in a necessary decline. Oswald Spengler’s prophecy that the occident had to decline due to fate, was held to be true by the weaklings and cowards, who no longer possessed any faith in life. They did not see the mistake and the errors in Spengler’s line of thought, which spoke loudly and urgently of the fateful decline of all Europe’s folks. Spengler claimed: According to an inner law every folk and its culture must one day die, after it has lived through its youth and its peak time. Like a tree or a person ages in order to then necessarily perish, so must a folk also age and finally die.The comparison of a folk with the coming and passing of an individual tree or an individual person, however, is false. For each organism receives with birth new, young life and fresh life energy. This is, after all, the miracle of life, the sacred secret in procreation and birth, that through the continued procreation eternal youth and the renewal of life is possible. The life of the individual is limited, the individual ages and must die. The individual tree comes and passes away, but the forests are eternal. The individual person as well comes and must pass away, but the folks live eternally!Folks need not die like the individual person or the tree, but folks can die.There are three natural causes for the death of a folk. History teaches that as well as the present. The culture folks of antiquity did not die in accordance with a fate which cannot be proven, rather because they violated the divine laws of life.The Führer once said: “Man should never make the mistake of believing that he has advanced to master over nature, rather he must understand the fundamental necessity of nature’s rule and comprehend how his existence as well is subservient to these laws of eternal struggle upward. He will then feel that – in a world where planets and suns orbit, moons orbit around planets, in which strength is always master over weakness and forces it to be an obedient servant or destroys it – there can be no special laws for man. The eternal principles of this wisdom apply to him as well. He can try to grasp them, but he can never separate himself from them.”Life wants the eternal triumph of the strong and healthy over the weak and sick. The wisdom of nature hence created three principles:First: The living must always profusely breed new life.Second: In the struggle of life, only the capable preserves himself. Through constant selection of the strong, the weak and inferior perishes.Third: In all of nature the breeds remain loyal to themselves. Breed belongs to breed.The folks who perished in history violated the wisdom and causality of nature. The natural causes of their decline and extinction are thus:First: Violation against the duty to numerous profuse self-preservation.Second: Violation against the law of natural selection.
Third: Violation of the demand for keeping pure of the breed, the keeping healthy of the blood.
This is the personal diary of one of the most prominent figures in the stirring events that occurred in Germany from the beginning of 1932 to the middle of 1933, and resulted in Hitler’s accession to power.The diary grips the reader owing to the fact that it enables him to follow the struggle between the nαzιs and the Communists. Street fights, virulent speeches and press-campaign, daylight murders, fiercely-fought election battles, the organization against the Jєωs and the plan adopted by the nαzιs to counter adverse propaganda in foreign countries, are some of the myriad facets of Hitlerite activity that are set before us vividly.The story is dramatically told and cannot fail to hold the attention of every reader.PrefaceThe historical revolution which, beginning on January 30th, 1933, wrought itself out thenceforth in the public life of the Reich before the eyes of the world, has a significance and bearing not immediately to be plumbed and measured. This event rightly bears the name of the German Revolution, for it has to do, indeed, with a revolution in values, with the overthrow of an entire world of thought which up to that date had been accepted as a matter of course by the German people.The revolution was achieved with a clarity hitherto unknown, at least in political matters, in German public life. Its effects have placed the economical, cultural, and political life of the nation on an entirely new basis. Not only has the mental outlook of 1918, one quite alien to German nature, been given up, but those who had it, both individuals and parties, have had to abandon public life in favour of new men and new ideas.The sheer speed by which the revolution was carried out, and the self-evidence with which it was accepted by the broad masses of the German people, have caused its effects to penetrate deeply into the national consciousness. No one in Germany today dreams they are irrevocable. They have come to stay.Once more the government stands at the head of the country as the strong source of its will. Currents of fresh energy and resolution flow thence throughout the mass of the people, to the very last village and the very last man.On account of the great rate at which the German Revolution went through, the contemporary onlooker may have lost, somewhat, clear perception as to how these historical events are brought about. What which yesterday was paradox, has become a triviality today. Things unthinkable, chimerical but a few months ago, are become today mere matters of course, about which no one makes any further ado.The idea of this book is to offer a summary of the historical happenings in Germany during 1932 and the beginning of 1933, in the form of a diary. The author had neither the wish nor the power to write a comprehensive objective history of so significant a period for Germany. He stood back then, and still stands, in the midst of events. He was called upon to take an active part in them. It was neither his temperament nor his wish to watch their sequence from out the quiet of the professional study, or to treat them in an impersonal and neutral manner. From the very outset he actively espoused them, and furthered them with all his might and main, so that they might be brought about.Whoever takes up this book looking for a history, in the ordinary acceptance of the word, will seek it there in vain. All inscribed in these pages was jotted down in the hurry and flurry of the day, and often by night. It bears evidence of the shocks and fierce emotions aroused by the events recorded, which carried away everyone who actively took part in them. It is strongly coloured by the passions of the moment, and deeply impressed by them.God’s hand has been upon it all. He has visibly directed the Leader and his Movement. Only the faithless affirm that it has been luck that has favoured us. In reality, General von Moltke’s saying, “In the long run only the clever man is lucky,” applies to the Leader and his Party. That which had long been preparing, and which had grown organically, broke forth like a torrent on January 3oth, 1933, onwards, and swept over the whole country.The German Revolution has imposed personal and material sacrifices on leaders and men, of which the public up to now has no idea. The peaceful unrolling of events often leads those who took no part in them to suppose that power fell into our laps like fruit, without us doing anything about it. This supposition is unfortunate, in that it ignores the wealth of sacrifice which the Movement, following its own compulsion, was bound to exact, and might even lead to the idea that we had not really deserved to come to power.The express purpose of this book is to dispose of such errors once and for all. The unprejudiced reader will come to the conclusion that if anyone, we National Socialists, and none others, had a just claim to power, and that everything that took place was a natural consequence of the unalterable laws of higher historical development.The adversaries of the National Socialist Movement never wearied, when opposed to us, of trying to drive a wedge between the Leader and his original colleagues. From their point of view this was easily to be understood. They were not so foolish as not to know that their only chance of deflecting the Movement from its objects, and of ruining it at length, lay in breaking up the community of National Socialist leadership.It was seldom that the men round Adolf Hitler elected to fight the adversary with his own weapons. They knew only too well that they could not put a stop to the campaign of lies in the press. However deep they might have to wade in the mud themselves there was one thing so sacred nobody dared impugn it, but which they would or1ly openly profess under strong inducement, i.e. their unshakable love, fidelity, and devotion to the Leader.They felt themselves one with the political troops entrusted to their guidance. They shared their sacrifices, and shared their blind devotion for the man to whom they had given themselves, and to whose hands they hoped to confide the German Nation.This book is a monument to the Party in its great struggle, and to the “Sturm Abteilung” (S.A., Storm Troops). It offers more to the world than could be gathered from any erection of stone or marble.Dr. Joseph Goebbels
…The false doctrine that all human beings are the equal still haunts heads and resists the fundamental truth of the inequality of human beings according to their appearance, their genes and their accomplishments. The valuation of human beings that results from this is portrayed as arrogance of the more valuable, yes, as injustice.
One scorns our desire as racial arrogance, without noting that we do not judge the individual according to race, rather according to accomplishment. But in regard to the folk whole, we are concerned about the race, because the Nordic race alone has over the course world history passed a performance test that is so mighty that it obligates us to also employ this race for the new, even far greater accomplishments that matter now…
…Or one says: Culture must grow, one cannot manufacture it artificially. Just what previously proliferated among us were the weeds, and we want to exterminate them so that the beautiful and noble plants, which up until now often withered or even died, can better thrive.
Cultures need their care like forest, field and garden, and indeed a reasonable one that accounts for the laws of nature and increases them to greater beauty and order.
Forester, farmer and gardener must love nature, must understand it intimately, but must also know and have learned much about it so that the growth entrusted to them does to grow wild or become desolate…
…We speak of race, if a larger group of individual beings within their species agree in the special and balanced constitution of many and precisely the most important genes, and hence in the characteristics and traits in which the genes show themselves. Corresponding to the unity of body and soul, it is about the physical and psychological characterizes, and in man, whose soul produces spiritual and moral forces, also about the spiritual and moral and about the genes that determine this. Race is hence so comprehensive that may sciences are involved in researching and portraying the various sides of its essence, its physical and its psychological, spiritual, moral, its meaning in the present and its working in the past…
…The genes in which the members of a race must agree so that the race exists at all determine through the characters and accomplishments that grow from them the value of this race. These characteristics and accomplishments can hence be designated as racial properties…
…The valuable, cultural-creative characteristics of the culture-bearers are the foundation; the inherited goods, their products, build upon them. So it is justified to designate the respective supply of gene-based characteristics as racial properties of the first order and the tradition values as racial properties of higher order…
…Third, an effeminacy of cultured man through his cultural institutions, which enrich his life of feeling, broaden his knowledge, beautify his existence, but all too easily paralyze his decisiveness down to the bone.
It is as if the creations of culture had become independent, as if the culture-bearers had lost their mastery over them, even though they are still able to ever increase and perfect the accomplishment itself, and as if the cultural institutions rebelled against their creators…
…Genes are fate. Their application and development, however, elevates itself above fate and juts into the realm of freedom. The products finally, which the racial properties of the first order bring into the racial properties of the higher and highest order, make us really free, if we apply them correctly and make sure that they continue to work according to the law from which they have been breed, according to the law of the spirit of our own nationality and the culture-bearing race determining it.
For the freedom for which we strive does not consist of us renouncing our own folk’s essence, rather of fulfilling it. We want to finally be, and be allowed to become, those who we actually already always were, and we want the freedom to act accordingly.
The insights according to which the dangers of high culture are banished, and being able to move the forces that work in the wrong direction into the right one, demand that we develop a conscious cultural technology…
…The educators of the old school believed that all people are equal and education can achieve its goal with everybody. If one encounters difficulties, then one only needs to employ more and better educators and teachers.
Insight into the processes of hereditary and the fatefulness of the genes has destroyed this delusion. There are limits to rearing, even education. They can be broadened under favorable conditions and through suitable means, but not overcome. Much that the individual educator does not achieve can be performed by the educating force of a well delineated community. If the necessary traits are lacking or if they are too weak, than all effect is ultimately in vain, however.
On the other hand, if the traits are especially valuable and decisively effect in a certain direction, they triumph even if rearing and education have been lacking for long stretches. The young mind seizes at the decisive moment with natural force what is necessary for its thriving and growth and constructs for it its inner and outer life. It triumphs even against an oppressive environment or at least can do it, in the event the outer conditions are not all too unfavorable.
But this it not true for the average person; he needs rearing and education, and even the extraordinary talents are endangered without it.
The teachers of the old school believed that it depends on knowledge. Knowledge was supposed to encompass everything worth knowing. And what would not be worth knowing? So the subject matter burst the school, but one did not take that too seriously. The pupils learned for test and diploma and thereby earned their right to advancement and employment. Certainly, if he wanted to achieve more, he had to sit longer. The ability to devote oneself to a cause, even an intellectual one, was killed in favor of flat practicality considerations. Nobody portrayed the moral damage of this system of justification better than Lagarde…
…The statements by Lagarde characterized the situation already back then. The first: We cannot educate in our schools as long as the parents of the children who sit in front of us are not educated. The second: The pupil sits in school, gaze fixed on the door and not at the object of instruction. The third: One cannot educate generally, rather only for something…
In all millennia, serious people have researched and pondered about the meaning of this life. Some found their life goal in enjoying the pleasures of this life as much as possible. They became superficial materialists. Others figured this life is only a brief, but difficult, test, a bridge to a better afterlife or eternal damnation. The most diverse religions portrayed this afterlife each according to the racial nature of its promotors and spreaders. The diverse priest castes did more or less good business with this afterlife. Each claimed sole and absolute knowledge about this afterlife. They sold – following diverse cult ceremonies – to living and dead places, advantages, honorary offices and mercy-gifts. It was the simplest and most primitive business, because no person returned from the afterlife and held the priest accountable. The witchdoctor of the Negro Bushmen ran as little risk as the oriental magician, if he sold the afterlife to the believers as a business.In all periods there have also been people who opposed this afterlife materialism. A medieval story relates: Two monks portray the afterlife to each other again and again in their conversations. They imagine all the individual choruses and departments of angels and holy-men, the rank differences of the individual heavenly places, the otherworldly music, the heavenly hallelujah songs, God’s throne etc.. They promise each other that the one who dies first will appear to the other the first night in a dream and tell him what it looks like in the afterlife. If it is as they imagined it, he will simply say “totally”. If it is different, he will say “different”. When one of the monks died, he actually did appear to the other the first night. But he did not say “totally” or “different”, rather “totally different”.That is the old wisdom of Nordic man: The Almighty has put in curtain in front of life after death. It is a secret to us. No person may presume to possess any privileged knowledge about life after death. And yet, our faith and our knowledge go beyond our earthly life. We know that each of us is a link in an endless chain that stretches from the oldest ancestors to the most distant descendants, that our river of blood comes from distant times and flows across our earthly life into the distant future. And this knowledge broadens our view and leads it across hundreds of thousands of years. And this knowledge gives us the strength of millennia and lets us surmise eternity. It places us into the endless cycle of creation.We know that even the person who is the last link of his clan can secure an eternal future through his works and deeds. The unknown worker who chisels, transports, and puts together the building blocks for the great protective wall of the German folk or for the splendid buildings of the Third Reich, will live on in these works just like the great intellectual creators of these works. The soldier and the policeman who were the guarantors for the safe return of lost German territories to the Reich, and the quiet fighters for the freedom of the German folk, will live on forever in the Greater German Reich just like its great shapers.Our reverence for the Almighty, however, is so great that we reject portraying the afterlife materialistically. We openly affirm here: About an afterlife we know nothing and will never know anything.This affirmation leads us with doubled energy to this side, to earthly life. The creator put us in the life cycle of our folk. The meaning of our life is to fulfill the task given us in the organism of this folk.
We fulfill the meaning of our life, when we do everything possible to manifest and shape, to train and perfect the energies and abilities the Lord has given us. We are on earth so that we continue God’s work of creation in our blood and body, in our intellect and our soul.
Whoever has experienced war in its reality, knows the terrors of blood and wounds, of destruction, annihilation, desperation, of deprivation, of sacrifice and renunciation.Whoever has suffered it, unlearns praising it in the fanciful mood of a romantic.War has in no way become more “humane” through the “progress” of a mankind pledged to unconditional civilization.Quite the opposite, the more war was elevated from the plane of the power thought of ambitious and particularistic princes and unscrupulous power groups into the sphere of mighty and passionate struggles of ideas of whole folks and races, all the more ruthless became the clash of the troops filled with these ideas, and the more “total” became war itself.Is war then a fate, a judgement, that folks in history hold over each other? Enthusiasts and utopians, dreamers and ideologues have tried through an allegedly “ennoblement”, which, in reality, lead to a psychological and blood, character and will weakening, to divert from the conduct of war, yes, even of warlike bearing. The bourgeois decadent pacifism of the most recent period was just as little able to fundamentally change the warrior instincts of the folks as already previously also the Christian pacifist teaching, despite the most unscrupulous application of all means of power, was not able to create a peaceful world of “little children”.War is a reality, which can be covered over with neither slogans nor theories. Warlike bearing, the having-to-defend-oneself for reasons of self-preservation, is a security measure, dictated by instinct, of a healthy folk based on its life right and its life duty.It is also not acceptable that war is presented as just an unavoidable evil. Whoever is not able to see in war an idea and in the conduct of war a hypothetical necessity, must at some time fail mentally or psychologically due to the distress caused by the conduct of war.No “justification” of war is required. It is much more about that a correct position, a just standpoint on war is found.The reality of war is harsh and brutal. Its state is for the soldier who has overcome Russia’s ice fields, the swamps of impenetrable forests, the scorching heat breeze of the sand-storm whipped deserts, who in rain and cold, day in and day out, must wait for countless nights for an ever looming enemy, for an unknown fate, which can fulfill itself destroying at any moment, sometimes hardly bearable. The state of constant threat can have such a burdening, such a hopelessly crushing effect that the soldier forced to live in this state can be driven by the desperate idea of having to be smashed by the pressure of this state.The moment of war conduct shows only the destructive side of war, it sometimes requires the thought of an entire generation until war itself is recognized and experienced as rejuvenating and testifying power.The soldier acting in war requires less an “intelligence” esteemed in bourgeois life than instead precisely the character often enough despised in eras of bourgeois imperturbability.If the great soldier Boyen posited the demand that the soldier should look forward to war, then precisely this teacher of war means by this not, say, a vain patriotism, which wants to acquire cheap laurels in the often enough quoted happy-go-lucky wars, rather that bearing of the soldier, determined and ready for action, who wants to experience in war the great test of his ability in order to know himself and his warrior essence confirmed.
Our faith is carried by two ideas: God and folk. They are the holiest and highest ideas that we know. As old as the human species is the question about the deepest sources of our life. As long as human beings exist, they have pondered and searched: Who is God? Where is God? Some found him in light, in nature, in life. Their religions have been young and strong, because they derive from the eternal. And only healthy and strong folks could be bearers of this healthy faith.Others have not penetrated so deep. Because their hearts no longer pulsed pure and powerful, because their blood was poisoned. Or because their nature demanded a Biblical God. How could a folk in whose land “milk and honey flowed”, to whom heaven brought the harvest with arms spread wide, achieve that serious faith of fate [Schickalsglaube] of Nordic man, who struggled with the earth and with his fate. The oriental, from whose homeland Christianity came to us, has only remained an observer of God. His soul has never been able to soar into those pure heights in which Nordic man strides powerful and devout. Since he never had to win his God over doubting and seeking, rather just saw how he bestowed and punished, his last question went: Who is God? So he created for himself an image of that power that we dare only to surmise. He gave him the shape and language and the weaknesses and strengths of human spirit. He forced the divinity into letters and formulas. And a Christian church finally set them into chains. God just was no longer a clever, powerful being in human form, who sat on his throne up there in heaven as a kind father or punishing master, with whom one could talk and trade, yes, whom one could deceive and trick. The “Holy Scriptures” are full of such blasphemy. The Christian God is derived from this Jєωιѕн God of imperfection. The dear, all-knowing father, who also sits in heaven and gave his commandments to us sinful earth worms.
Providence rules over the fate of people and folks.
This affirmation of a higher power should stand at the beginning of this book.
Countless Germans – laymen, priests and monks – have waged the most difficult inner and outer struggles for their simple belief in a God since natural German faith has been supplanted by foreign missionaries.
Millions of people struggle today for the Almighty and his laws. “God’s Law” reports of this.
This account has grown from my own personal experience and the same experiences of more than a dozen friends – former Catholic priests and monks – which correspond to reality in their overall result and in their individual features. My wife, who stood at my side in building a new world, also participated in the composition of this publication.
Natural faith incorporates the highest moral responsible within it.
From that arose the obligation to publish this book.
Anton Holzner
The ship of the church danced on the waves, and the storm whipped into the rotten sails. It cracked and crackled in the beams and the old ship had more than one leak. One still tried to plug a leak here and there, and by appearances it seemed to work. But for how long? The ship would have probably held its own in calm times, but it is no longer up to the storm of the new time. It may be hard for the captain and the officers to see their ship’s end coming, and we can laugh with understanding, when they like to emphasis their soul-seller is seaworthy.Today we do not want to talk at all about the situation in Germany. The memory of the church-political fighting is still too clear to have to refresh it. The most severe debates in the Evangelic camp as well have shown that the church definitely wishes to remain a spiritual reservation within – and, if necessary, against – the state. It is only a small step from spiritual to political struggle. Here as well, details are superfluous.The spiritual power that we designate as the church – individual denominations do not count now – summons all its power, all its allies, in order to construct out of the daily struggle a struggle of ideas. Already audible are the voices of evil spirits beyond the border, those spirits that quickly fled upon the awakening of German spirit, and they speak of confederacy.One seeks to lead the credulous church folk into the fight under the pretext as if dear God was personally at stake. And many a sheep in the pious herd emits a pitiful bah, because this or that bell-wether cut loose a cry of terror.The struggle for the German soul must be waged with all determination. What is at stake is leading Germans out of the discord between blood and alien doctrine. What is at stake is eliminating the material of conflict in precisely the spiritual sphere that has cost the blood and soul of countless thousands of Germans.Not by force! For the churches have in every era only gained from martyrdom,Rather with knowledge! Through the clear seeing and researching of historical connections, through the presentation of secret cross-connections that intentionally sought to drive wedges into the folk.In times when the life and honor of the folk are at stake, no considerations may be taken. Where freedom and honor compel action, the truth may no longer remain unspoken.The treasonous activities of certain centralist circles in Germany are known. Too little known are the facts that led to the lost of German territory in the east and west! Too little known are the tricks of that Erzberger whom the folk judged.Much of the background of separatist activity still awaits investigation.In Austria, Christian cliques are at work to prevent and slay German freedom. Reflection and gathering of freedom-loving and nation-conscious circles on the one side, intensification of agitation, clouding of spiritual fronts, defamation and slander against everything conscious of its own kind on the other.It is no longer about a struggle for the spirit, for the spirit has long since triumphed over the obscurantists. It is solely about power. Where the obscurantists cannot rule and pull strings unhindered, they scream about supression of freedom. Where they are in power and suppress freedom, they speak ingratiatingly about pacification in the name of God!Germany’s spirit calls us to step forward in order to testify for the truth of the nation. We must administer the legacy of Walther von Vogelweide and Hutten, we must push forward in their spirit for the freedom of the folk.We do not want a German to still suffer pains of conscience, whether he should obey the voice of his blood or the commands of whatever priests who serve an Asiatic god.We want the great German unity, the genuine community of all German wanting, feeling and thinking.The front of the church and of Christianity have been shaken, shot up and melted in the experience of the war.Christians have wielded weapons against “Christians”. Christians have fetched “heathens” in order to kill ChristiansThe folk awakening followed the Christian disenchantment. Ask the assault soldiers, whether they went into the horror the battles of material with a Christian conception. Ask them, if you have the courage, ask those who sacrificed themselves again and again to speak of the cross!Go to the young and old workers whose yearning is louder and stronger than the pulsating and hammering of motors and ask them, if they want to have the sweet comfort of the beyond!Go to the young Germans whose yearning for folk and expanse, for struggle and heroism, is awake and admonishing, and ask them, if they want to renounce the struggle of this world for the sake of heaven!The voice of the blood has cried out from the thousand-fold rape of everything German, which was carried out by agents of a foreign power, who claimed its kingdom was not of this earth, but which nonetheless took everything of this world, even the most primitive things, so seriously that no concordat emerges that does not deal with the question of money and possessions in the very earthly sense. One had indeed been able to silence Germans at the funeral pile, but not their souls. Stronger than the fanatical hatred of the weak against the strong; stronger than the drivel of morality puffed up decadence has remained the healthy sense of the folk, which only turned its back to the raging of men of the beyond with sublime contempt – unfortunately, sometimes as well when a fist-blow would have been more appropriate.The German heart that undaunted overcame the horror of black barbarism is hated by the obscurantists. Germany has always dared to confront the cross of humiliation with the sun-symbol of victory, and hence those obsessed with the cross began a systematic war of extermination against the strong and life-centered people of the north. That is why one never wanted Germany to become a Reich. That is why one mocked that Germany would tear itself to pieces under Rome’s clever leadership!This book about the culture battle that the champion of a strong, great, warrior-like Germany – Bismarck – had to endure, should show how Rome as well as certain circles of the “Evangelic center” spun a web in order to shackle and subjugate the young nation before it had really awakened to freedom.Perhaps the book also contributes to proving as lie the claim of certain interested circles that Bismarck had been a Christian statesman.And may then things be learned from the past for the present and for the future!
Summary of Our DemandsFirst, safeguard your health and, as long as you are at the age of development, be above all abstinent in regards to pleasure poisons (alcohol, nicotine) and sɛҳuąƖ activity. (In this regard it should be remembered that precisely the Nordic person in general only reaches full maturity late.)Second, marry as early as possible. Only then will you and your wife fully enjoy family joy.Third, do not marry a breed-alien wife. You are responsible to your folk and your offspring for the purity of the blood.Fourth, do not marry a genetically ill woman. You otherwise bear guilt for the suffering of your own children and grandchildren.Fifth, choose a completely healthy woman for yourself. The true picture of the health condition and of the characteristics of your future wife are shown you by her clan.Sixth, your wife should be racially at least as valuable as you.Seventh, strive to get yourself and your children back to the land.Eighth, avoid marriage with a relative, for unfavorable genetic traits almost always remain hidden to you and then manifest themselves twice as strong in your children.Ninth, you must preserve your gene pool for your folk in the largest possible number of children. In your children you live on.
We do not presume to rule the world, to tell Indians how they should arrange their existence, or to tell Americans how to better organize their continent. Our opinion that East Asia belongs to the East Asians comes from our most sincere heart. We only want to establish ourselves where we can also maintain ourselves in the long-run. Our living space should not be larger than our life can really fill with the strength of our hearts, with the might of our swords and the fertility of our clans.The plutocrats, however, indeed traders, shopkeepers and speculators, live in a world of unrealities. Only during the short apparent bloom of mercantilism did they appear to be the great realists, whose “sense of reality” dominated the world. On what is their claim based and on what is their power based?In Australia, the descendants of a handful of adventurers occupy a continent. Their land acquisition met no resistance from the infinitely primitive natives. Literally taken, they moved into an empty house. But does an empty house always belong to whoever moves in? The Australians were only happy with their property so long as nobody showed up to contest it. They have nothing to show except right of custom. No folk energy, no weapons, not even a colonial achievement. But Japan knocks at the gate of their still empty house with its overwhelming folk energy, with the might of its weapons and with its mission to creatively shape Greater East Asia, which is assigned to it by fate. The 100 million Japanese must live in this space. The 6 million Australians do not have to.The 100 million Japanese are a reality. The 6 million Australians are just the victims of a false world-view that confuses the transitory power of money with history-forming forces.Because the many millennia old Chinese Empire has in the last centuries experienced a political-spiritual depression, the British and American traders, missionaries and their armed guards have been able to established themselves in its life centers and strangle. Their legal rights were only to be read by the rates of a few East Asian stock shares. They held as long as East Asia was weak and disunited. Their days are numbered since Japan sets out to fulfill its “Prussian” task in Greater East Asia.
As long as there are men on the earth, the struggle between man and subhuman with be the historical rule; this Jєωιѕн-led struggle against the folks, as far back as we can look, belongs to the natural course of life on our planet. One can safely be convinced that this struggle for life and death is just as much a law of nature as the struggle of an infection against a healthy body.”Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler 1935Just like night rises against day, just like light and shadow are eternally hostile – so is the greatest enemy of world-dominating man, man himself.The subhuman – that biologically apparently same shaped creation of nature with hands, feet and a kind of brain, with eyes and mouth, is nonetheless a totally different, a terrible creature, is only an approximation of man, with human-like facial features – spiritually, psychologically, however, standing lower than any animal. Inside this being a chaos of wild, uninhibited passions: nameless will to destruction, most primitive desires, most undisguised baseness.Subhuman – nothing else!For not everything with a human face is equal.Woe to whomever forgets that!Whatever this earth possesses in great works, ideas and arts – man has conceived, created and perfected it; he reflected and invented, for him there was only one goal: to work his way upward into a higher existence, to shape the inadequate, to replace the insufficient with something better.So developed culture.So developed the plough, the tool, the house.So did man become social, so developed family, so developed folk, so developed state. So did man become good and great. So did he rise far above all living beings.So did he become second to God!But the subhuman also lived. He hated the work of the other. He raged against it, secretly as thief, openly as slanderer – as murderer. He associated with his own kind.The beast called the beast.Never did the subhuman give peace, never did he give rest. For he needed the half-dark, chaos.He shunned the light of cultural progress.He needed for self-preservation the swamp, hell, but not the sun.And this underworld of subhumans found its leader: the eternal Jєω!He understood them, he knew what they wanted. He fed their most base lusts and desires, he let the terror come over humanity.It began in the historical time of the annihilation of the Persians, the Purim Fest, the first glorification of organized mass murder. 75,000 Aryan Persians fell victim to Jєωιѕн hatred. Even today, Jєωry celebrates this deed of horror as its greatest “religious” holiday.Eternal is the hatred of the subhuman against the light figures, the carriers of light. Eternally does the decline of the west threaten from the deserts.Eternally do the powers of destruction gather together in the distant steppe, do Attila and Jenghiz Khan mass their hun hordes and race across Europe, leaving behind a living apocalypse, fire and death, rape, murder and terror, so that the world of light and thousand-fold knowledge, the powers of progress and human greatness, sink back into the abyss of primeval condition.Eternal is the subhuman’s desire:That it again becomes desert, where the light of sublime knowledge creatively illuminates the darkness, then his final goal would be achieved, chaos.So does the struggle of both opposites happen for millennia in accordance to terrible, incalculable laws; again and again there is an Attila, a Jenghiz Khan, who rips open Europe’s gate, who knows only one thing: the total destruction of everything beautiful!The embodiment of this will for destruction is today called Bolshevism! But this Bolshevism is not a manifestation of our time. It is not a product of our days! It is also nothing new in the framework of human history. Rather it is as old as the Jєω himself. His pioneers are named Lenin – Stalin.“The leading minds in a folk are butchered, and then it comes into governmental, economical, cultural, spiritual, psychological and bodily slavery. The rest of the folk, robbed of its own value through countless blood mixtures – becomes deformed – and in the historically short course of centuries one knows at best that such a folk had once existed.”Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler 1935
Germanic Life WillOur National Socialist worldview replaces the liberal concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity with the folk, which is based on blood and soil. A very simple statement, yet with huge ramifications.For perhaps the first time in human history, in our land we realize that of all the tasks we face, the most noble and hence the most holy for men is the preservation of our Godgiven, blood based kind.It is not for men to judge why Providence created races, rather just to realize that it punishes those who mistreat its creation. Just as the knowledge that the earth revolves around the sun led to a great change in the general worldview, so will the blood and race teachings of the National Socialist movement produce a major change in the view of human history and the future.This will not lead to an alienation of the folks – quite the contrary, it will lead for the first time to genuine understanding.If the first time in its history the German folk has achieved greater unity, this is due to the influence of this inner experience.Countless prejudices will be destroyed, many barriers will be brushed aside as inconsequential, bad traditions will fade, old symbols will lose their value, out of the impotence of regional, dynastic, ideological, religious and political division arises the German folk carrying its banner of unity, which symbolically does not docuмent the victory of a state, rather of a racial principle.Adolf HitlerReichstag Speech of January 30, 1937
Today much is said about BOLSHEVISM. Most people think Bolshevism is phenomenon that emerged during the present time. Many even believe that Bolshevism – this Jєωιѕн ORGANIZED and led struggle of sub-humanity – is totally new in world history.
We believe it is important to establish that as long as there have been men on earth, the STRUGGLE BETWEEN HUMANS AND SUB-HUMANS HAS BEEN THE HISTORICAL RULE. This Jєωιѕн led war against the folks has belonged to the natural course of life on our planet as long back as we can see. One can comfortably say this struggle for life and death is as much a law of nature as man’s fight against pestilence and the attack by pestilence against the healthy body.
It is hence necessary to study a few very clear EXAMPLES of the METHODS OF THEIR STRUGGLE FROM THE PAST TO OUR PRESENT TIME in order to recognize the TACTICS OF THE Jєωιѕн-BOLSHEVIK ENEMY.
We are Germans. As Germans we also want to step before our God. We want to step before him upright as that, which we are, as soldiers.Soldiers know their law. They have sworn to a leader and a flag. They await the call, they heed the order, they obey it.Who has sworn to a leader, no longer doubts. He was gained a firm faith.This faith gives him his security, his proud straightness, his silent readiness. Who is always so on the march to a great goal, who is so ready, to risk his life as well, has already won eternity in the earthly. When he then steps before his God, before the God of his folk, he will not ask him for what men can give and present him, he will not ask for what he is always ready to risk in this great struggle; God is not a trader, God is not a kind old man who is smilingly inclined to childish wishes.We feel him as the strength that allows us to give ourselves strength.Lord, do not let me become cowardly, called the unknown soldier of the World War when he demanded the hardest from himself.That we do not lose our courage, that we not over-esteem all joy, that we gain new strength from suffering, that is what we ask for.The peasant’s harvest may be destroyed by hail, his hard labour may be annihilated by drought, can be just go there and complain and want to do nothing more? No, he should step before his God and ask for what alone can help him to overcome this blow, he should ask for the strength that pulls him up again, that again gives him light in the eyes, defiance in the fists and the courage to try it again.One may have given everything to people whom he valued and whom he loved, and now one disappoints and deceives him; should his heart be allowed to turn to stone, to mock loyalty and disavow the noble? No, he should step before his God and has him for what alone can still help him, he should ask for the strength that shows him that loyalty is stronger than betrayal, that faith conquers doubt, that courage is more compelling than distress. Has he not recognized everything that threatens him? Has he not nonetheless dared the path and the struggle?We have sought comrades who can still laugh in distress, who in death still believe in victory. And so many died, and they believed in victory, because they believed in us. Because we remember them, we are already stronger; because we remember them, the path has already been shown to us.So for all of us the order is valid to anew look for people, who believe in us, for their sake and for our sake.As the peasant again draws his plough, so must our love again be active and our loyalty.Not according to those should we orient, who are smaller than we, rather according to those who provide us with an example.We are Germans, and if we ask for help, he directs us to those who once stood great in our folk.They are not dead, we feel that in such an hour. They are not dead, because their faith, their courage, their will was greater than everything that stood against them, even greater than dying.And so they today still speak to us, and God speaks through them. For as he had us awaken to this life as Germans, so do we feel his command when we strive to think and to act as the best Germans managed.Although we cannot make for ourselves a picture or image of God, so nonetheless sense his presence in everything, and we sense it most deeply where we approach the high and noble. In the great Germans he has spoken to us. There will probably come hours when we sl
Why would anyone want to promote this ideology on a Catholic forum?To make the SPLC look good?
Mit Brennender SorgeThank you for posting this Poche; it helped me tremendously.
http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html
Why the Jєωs let themselves be baptised
Baptism didn't make a Gentile out of him.
Anne says:
Do you know our Girls' Leader once told us: Just as little as a Negro can be made into a German by baptism, can a Jєω be made into a non Jєω.
Grete stamps her feet angrily on the ground:
I do not understand these priests who go on baptising Jєωs even today. By doing so they admit a criminal mob into the churches.
Anne concludes: I believe a time will come when the Christians will curse the clergy who once allowed Jєωs to enter the Christian Church. For the Jєωs only want to destroy the Christian Church. And they will destroy it if our clergy go on allowing Jєωs to enter.
There is a saying:
If a Jєω comes along
Wanting a priest to baptise him,
Be on your guard and beware:
Jєω remains always Jєω! Baptismal water helps not a jot.
That does not make the Jєω any better!
He is a Devil in time
And remains so through eternity!
In 1923, after the failed Beer Hall Putsch, Hitler, who had been imprisoned for treason, appointed Rosenberg as a leader of the National Socialist movement, a position he held until Hitler's release. He continued to play a leading role in party affairs, founding in 1929 the Militant League for German Culture and several organizations devoted to the study and promotion of Nordic affairs.
He also formed the "Institute for the Study of the Jєωιѕн Question," dedicated to identifying Jєωιѕн influence in German culture and to recording the history of Judaism. He was elected to the Reichstag for the NSDAP in the 1930 elections, the same year he published the book for which he is best known, Der Mythus des Jahrhunderts (The Myth of the 20th Century). While dealing with a large number of issues, it was the remarks on Christianity in that book which drew the greatest opprobrium.
The Sanctum Officium of the Catholic Church in Rome recommended that The Myth of the 20th Century be put on its Index Librorum Prohibitorum (“ forbidden books list”) for “scorning and rejecting all dogmas of the Catholic Church, indeed the very fundamentals of the Christian religion."
When the Mythus was published in October, 1930, it was greeted with enthusiastic applause on the one hand, and by extraordinary attacks on the other.
In Catholic regions doubts arose even in the ranks of the party. I told everyone that freedom of the spirit embraced not only the Catholic and Protestant confessions, but also such confessions as I had made, and pointed out in the personal, and thus non-party, aspects of the book.
The situation was particularly difficult for some of the Catholic clergymen who were in accord with quite a few of the social demands of the party. This was especially true for good old Abbot Schachleitner. He called the attention of several party functionaries to the fact that, in his opinion, I was endangering our entire movement.
Thereupon I wrote Hitler a letter asking him to ignore my person completely, and to dismiss me from the service of the party if this seemed desirable. He replied— if memory serves me correctly, on the same sheet of paper— that he wouldn’t think of it. Thus the book made its way through edition after edition. By 1944, a million copies had been distributed.
Streicher, Julius. Poisonous Mushroom (Jєωs!) (Kindle Locations 100-107). Kindle Edition.This contradicts what the Catholic Church teaches about the Sacrament of Baptism.
Rosenberg, Alfred. Memoirs . Introduction. Ostara Publications. Kindle Edition.
Rosenberg, Alfred. Memoirs (p. 61-62). Ostara Publications. Kindle Edition.
Not to put a damper on Patton's views on the Jєωs, but the editor of that piece is a freak: https://www.flickr.com/photos/666_is_money/sets/72157609827150409/.This ideology of Hitler is a contradiction to what it is to being Catholic.
Looks like a man in drag.
As far as Hitler is concerned he's a bit of a mystery to me. But a devout Catholic would not have committed ѕυιcιdє. There's the claim that he didn't kill himself, and died in Argentina in the late-60s under an assumed identity.
Another thing about Hitler that I find unusual is that, if we assume he wasn't a believing Catholic, I see no reason why he wouldn't have wanted to genocide Jєωs. An abhorrence to genociding Jєωs is native to Christianity (and maybe to Islam). It shouldn't be abhorrent to other groups. A big question mark is why Hitler didn't attempt to genocide them, assuming he wasn't Christian.
Perhaps because he knew that many Christians were aligned with him and they would not get on board with such an endeavor. He would put it on the back burner and leave it to a later date.
It was a bitter disappointment, and to it was added the sorrow of his beloved mother’s death. Lonely and baffled, with only fifty crowns to his name, he went to Vienna early in 1909 to get along as best he could. He was then almost twenty.
(. . .)
A Roman Catholic, but never a good one, he soon ceased going to Mass and to confession.
We were cut short by the arrival of wine, coffee, sandwiches, ‘and cakes, and we all settled down round Hitler, who had ‘stretched himself in a chair near the window, obviously enjoying ‘his role of host and master, with disciples at his feet. Our talk ran on at random for a while, until I was able to tug it round to a subject I was much interested in. Something gave me occasion to remark that it was fortunate for the nαzι movement that it had been born in Catholic Bavaria, which was more Church-ridden than Protestant Prussia; it would have been harder to bring Bavaria into a racial movement which hadn’t originated there.
I was thinking of an article in which I had said that religious and social energy must be developed in equal strength in the German liberator, and I wanted to see how clearly Hitler was foreseeing the religious controversy that must inevitably come, and also to know what role he was going to play in it. The Fuehrer took my bait and began to lecture rather professorially. “Yes, it was indeed good fortune that National Socialism started in Black Bavaria, and that’s why Munich will always remain the capital of the movement. Naturally, practical politics demands that, for the time being at least, we must avoid any appearance of a campaign against the Church.” He was careful to emphasize again that he was a Politiker, with no ambition to become a prophet. But National Socialism, he said, was a weltanschauung and in fact a religion which was now building itself up and disseminating itself, except that its forms of activity and of propaganda were different.
In ancient Rome, for example, Christianity had been able to mobilize masses in a way that the old polytheistic religions never could. “And now in turn,” he added, “National Socialism is able to influence greater masses at once than the Church possibly can.” By this time he was talking entirely to me; it is his habit to centre himself on one person when he gets warmed up. The others were listening intently enough except the good Hoffmann, who seemed slightly bored and had concentrated on the wine with such good effect that just about here he dumped the bottle over, and the precious liquid spilled over the priceless little table at his side and on to the priceless rug. Hitler stopped. He looked up frowning, lifting his shoulders in annoyance, but said nothing. There was an awkward silence, in which Hoffmann blushed like a child, mumbled something, and disappeared. Hitler spoke at last. “Na-ach-where was I?” he said, snapping his fingers. “Oh, yes, Ludecke, if you want to see my meaning illustrated, you need only go to the funeral of a fallen nαzι and watch the Storm Troopers ranked about the grave. Watch their faces, blank while the priest is reading the service”-and here he stopped long enough to imitate a priest mumbling the litany, fingering an imaginary rosary, and spreading hands in blessing (an excellent performance, as always)-“and then see them light up when the nαzι leader lifts the flag and begins to speak words of flame over the dead.
“Yes, National Socialism is a form of conversion, a new faith, but we don’t need to raise that issue-it will come of itself. Just as I insist on the mathematical certainty of our coming to power, because might always attracts might, and the traditional wings, whether they be Right or Left, constructive or destructive, will always attract all the activist elements, leaving only a juiceless pulp in the middle-just so do I insist on the certainty that sooner or later, once we hold the power, Christianity will be overcome and the ‘Deutsche Kirehe’ established. Yes, the German Church, without a Pope and without the Bible-and Luther, if he could be with us, would give us his blessing.” Hitler was ablaze now, and I could see the ideas of Rosenberg’s Mythus working in him. When he shouted with passionate energy: “Of course, I myself am a heathen to the core!” it seemed to me that the form this church might take was implicit in the words. “No, Ludecke, we don’t need to declare this fight openly. It would be political stupidity to show the masses too many enemies at once. The political victory can only follow if the fight is concentrated against the fewest possible number of enemies-for the time being, the Marxists and the Jєωs. Then will come the turn of the Reaktion, and the end of that will mean the end of the Christian church-and the opening of our own temples, our own shrines.
The French Revolution, Bolshevism, all of Marxism, in fact, our whole deformity and atrophy of spirit and soul would never have come into being except for this oriental mummery, this abominable levelling mania, this cursed universalism of Christianity, which denies racialism and preaches suicidal tolerance.” Someone remarked here that the Jєωs were pointing to Christ as the first Communist. “Quite so,” Hitler nodded. “Jesus Christus,” he said thoughtfully, in a quieter, almost solemn voice. “It is the tragedy of the Germanic world that no German ‘Heiland’ was born among us; that our organic, spiritual evolution was suddenly violently interrupted; that Jesus was judaized, distorted, falsified, and an alien Asiatic spirit was forced upon us. That is a crime we must repair.”
There was much more talk that night, but none so portentous as that I have reported here. I thought of Hitler’s words months later when, as Chancellor, he put on the great show in Potsdam that he had foretold in our talk at the Kaiserhof--a tremendous, solemn celebration to proclaim the epochal nature of the great change in Germany. It was done in full harmony with tradition; the ceremonies were opened with both Lutheran and Catholic services, attended as a matter of course by all the potentates - Hindenburg and all the dignitaries of Church and State. But while these preliminaries were in progress, Hitler went with Goebbels to lay a wreath on the grave of Horst Wessel in a Berlin cemetery. As the act not only of a party leader but of the Chancellor of a Christian country, it was an intended affront to the Christian nature of that country and a challenge to the Catholic Church, of which the Fuehrer was nominally a member. The story went about that Hitler did it because he had been refused communion by the Church -sheer nonsense in view of the fact that for years he had not set foot in a church to confess and pray, probably never since the war. He was plainly throwing down his glove to the Church that had refused church funerals to dead SA heroes and had threatened Catholic nαzιs with excommunication. And the Catholic Church evidently weighed the gesture and realized its own situation, for it adopted a more conciliatory attitude.
This demonstrates that the nαzι ideology is a contradiction to the Catholic Church.http://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/adolf-wagner1.htmBackground: Adolf Wagner was the Gauleiter for Munich. In this article from Der Schulungsbrief, the party monthly for political education, he goes after the Church for failing to grant total power to National Socialism. This was published during a general public assault on the Church and its institutions alleging sɛҳuąƖ improprieties, among other things. This article is apparently exerpted from a speech, although the details are not given..The source: “Männer der Bewegung sprechen,” Der Schulungsbrief, 3 ( August 1936), 293-294.Men of the Movement SpeakGood fortune probably determined that Adolf Hitler began his battle against the destruction of our German people in Munich. Here in Munich he found the concentrated strength that wanted to restore the roots of the German nation. And when the Red Internationale was replaced by the Black Internationale [a reference to religious opponents of nαzιsm] it did not change the battlefront for the young National Socialist movement since the enemy remained the same, even if its color changed.Through tough and bitter fighting, the National Socialist movement threw these destructive forces to the ground. Finally the National Socialist revolution triumphed in the entire Reich; here in Bavaria the old leaders were tossed out on 9 March [1933]. There are not many Red Internationalists left in Bavaria. The most dangerous are in Dachau.We do not need to bother with those noble and bourgeois elements that look with hopeful but nervous hearts to plans to restore the Hapsburgs in Austria and something similar in Bavaria. These elements are old and insignificant.Things are entirely different in the churches, particularly with the Catholic Church. We must unfortunately recognize that although the great majority of the lower-level clergy have come to loyally support the state, the higher-level clergy, most prominently several bishops, have taken nearly every opportunity to oppose the National Socialist state and our movement.I say this today not only because I have the opportunity to speak to you gathered in this room. I mention it because of a report of a sermon at the end of May by the Bishop of Eichstätt, Dr. Michael Nackl at confirmation in Ingolstadt. The Bishop of Eichstätt said in a subtle, but unmistakable way that the Church had sole claim to the worldview education of baptized Catholic youth. He proclaimed the same right with regards to Catholic organizations. He was just as subtle but unmistakable in objecting to a ban of political activity on the part of priests. He said that the party’s slogan of the previous year, that the political revolution was over and that ‘the National Socialist movement’s worldview battle for people’s minds’ was an attack on the Church, on Catholic bishops, priests, indeed on Catholicism in general. He said that he had to speak the truth openly since he was German, loyal and honest.I want to reply to the Bishop of Eichstätt in just as German a manner, just as loyally and honestly: If a worldview claims political power, that worldview must demonstrate its right to claim political power by its achievements. During its three years of total power in Germany, the National Socialist worldview has proven in Germany that its demand for total power was justified, and that it also has the right in the future to maintain this total demand for power. 99% of the German people approved of this [in the referendum] on 29 March. And the National Socialist worldview’s economic achievements of the past three years have proven that it was, and will remain worthy, to claim that total economic power. National Socialism’s total power in political and economic matters has lifted an oppressed, defeated, economically ruined people into a free, proud, and hard-working people.If the National Socialist worldview further demands the totality of youth education, it is equally as justified, since the German youth has left behind the fragmentation under which it once suffered and is on the way to becoming a healthy, productive youth. We know that our youth is better off in the hands of the HJ and the BDM than in the hands of some sort of monastic institution which is today the subject of criminal investigation, the findings of which are a disgrace not only for the Church, but for the entire German people.The laws of National Socialism are unalterable. The laws of the National Socialist worldview are the laws of the Third Reich. We require and demand that everyone respect these laws, even bishops. All the questions that the Bishop of Eichstätt mentions are clearly regulated. It is senseless to object.We recommend putting the time to better use: keeping order, cleanliness, fear of God, and honesty in the ancient body of the Church and its institutions. The National Socialist worldview will follow its path, not resting until the German nation is once again great and splendid.Our daily worship is go to our workplaces to build the German nation. And our daily prayer is work for the nation.
This demonstrates that the nαzι ideology is a contradiction to the Catholic Church.It demonstrates that Bishops involved themselves in political matters, and thus came into conflict with the government of their country. The Germans were preoccupied with the Bolsheviks both in and out of their country.
It demonstrates that Bishops involved themselves in political matters, and thus came into conflict with the government of their country. The Germans were preoccupied with the Bolsheviks both in and out of their country.When a political issue involves morality then the bishops have the obligation to speak up. Abortion for example,
They were harsh to those who impeded this end. They were right. Thanks to the allies, the communists won the war and now the whole of Europe and most of the world is a contradiction to the Catholic Church.
When a political issue involves morality then the bishops have the obligation to speak up. Abortion for example,Wrong again. That would've been a breach of the Reichskonkordat.
Wrong again. That would've been a breach of the Reichskonkordat.Jesus told the apostles to preach the Gospel to all nations. He didn't say preach the Gospel to all the nations except Germany. When an issue involves faith and morals the bishops have the obligation to speak out. There is no "deal" or concordat that can do away with that obligation.
Jesus told the apostles to preach the Gospel to all nations. He didn't say preach the Gospel to all the nations except Germany. When an issue involves faith and morals the bishops have the obligation to speak out. There is no "deal" or concordat that can do away with that obligation.You sound like a protestant. The clergy were not to involve themselves in politics as the Holy See agreed to.
You sound like a protestant. The clergy were not to involve themselves in politics as the Holy See agreed to.I join you in our joint opposition to the Church being involved in partisan politics. However it is the obligation of the Church to address issues relating to faith and morality.
This is a timely podcast and confirms what I've been saying.The encyclical was authentic. The National Socialist philosophy is a contradiction to what the Catholic Church teaches. Marxism is evil but it is not the only evil philosophy. National Socialism is also evil. It is not they themselves that are evilbut their philosophy that is evil. What Pope Pius XI had to say is true then and it is true today.
Pius XI was addressing in his encyclical those that were self claimed National Socialist's that were imposing individual ideals that were never officially endorsed by the party or government. I suspect Pius XI knew this, hence not mentioning the NSDAP by name because he knew it was not official policy. This would also solve the issue on why he endorsed Hitler and the NSDAP and told the Catholic Center party to stand down after the NSDAP won the election and agreed to the concordant. We still don't know the authenticity of the encyclical, but that still leaves the issue of enemies within the clergy who were flat out aiding and abetting the Communists, as they were ones themselves, that people like Poche just flat out refuse to address.
https://www.radioaryan.com/search/label/Dennis%20Wise
So, this senseless back and forth with Poche is defused by simply understanding the mechanics of what was going on leading up to the war. The outbreak of the war forced Hitler to prioritized winning a war against anti Christian Masonic hordes and then deal with the dissent of those that were pushing ideals that he himself never promulgated later when the war was won. You have to understand, Hitler was juggling Catholics and Protestants, trying to defeat the Marxist's who were hell bent on destroying Europe. It's easy to call make pot shots from the "citadel" of the Church.
Hitler did not create the religious dissent between Catholic and Protestants, nor the diverging opinions of the German people on how the Church should function within the nation. That was something he inherited that was in part the doings of the Church itself.
The encyclical was authentic. The National Socialist philosophy is a contradiction to what the Catholic Church teaches. Marxism is evil but it is not the only evil philosophy. National Socialism is also evil. It is not they themselves that are evilbut their philosophy that is evil. What Pope Pius XI had to say is true then and it is true today.The encyclical never mentions National Socialism you clueless fool.
The encyclical never mentions National Socialism you clueless fool.It describes their behavior.
Fantastic explanation of what seems to be eluding some on this thread.They are all still a contradiction to the Catholic Faith.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7cY9ZyrtWc&t=195s
They are all still a contradiction to the Catholic Faith.So is conciliarism, yet that does not bother you. Most of its teaching has been the object of condemnation by the true Church but you are not here defending the Catholic faith against the interloper.
So is conciliarism, yet that does not bother you. Most of its teaching has been the object of condemnation by the true Church but you are not here defending the Catholic faith against the interloper.I am defending the Catholic Faith against those interlopers who seem to think that Hitler was some kind of defender of Catholic civilization when in fact he was not.
I am defending the Catholic Faith against those interlopers who seem to think that Hitler was some kind of defender of Catholic civilization when in fact he was not.Hitler lost the cause that he was fighting for, and now look at what formerly Christian Europe looks like, A degenerate Jєωιѕн multicultural sewer where the Church has been thoroughly emasculated and reduced to an object of ridicule and scorn, with more than half of the clergy either homo or worldly SJW. The actual history is dead set against you, as it is provable that National Socialism contained a great deal that was based upon Christian principles, and like it or not they fought to preserve Christian Europe against the Freemasons, the Jєωs, and the Jєωιѕн communists who are now our rulers and dictate to the Catholic Church. Hitler and the National socialists were right!
Hitler lost the cause that he was fighting for, and now look at what formerly Christian Europe looks like, A degenerate Jєωιѕн multicultural sewer where the Church has been thoroughly emasculated and reduced to an object of ridicule and scorn, with more than half of the clergy either homo or worldly SJW. The actual history is dead set against you, as it is provable that National Socialism contained a great deal that was based upon Christian principles, and like it or not they fought to preserve Christian Europe against the Freemasons, the Jєωs, and the Jєωιѕн communists who are now our rulers and dictate to the Catholic Church. Hitler and the National socialists were right!
I am defending the Catholic Faith against those interlopers who seem to think that Hitler was some kind of defender of Catholic civilization when in fact he was not.God bless you Poche! :applause:
God bless you Poche! :applause:Poche is actually right for once.
Poche is actually right for once.At least the Western half of the allied powers did not persecute the Church.
National Socialism is not a good ideology, but neither were the Allied Powers good in the War.
Poche is actually right for once.Poche was wrong as soon as he got out of bed this morning....
National Socialism is not a good ideology, but neither were the Allied Powers good in the War.
It describes their behavior.It doesn't work that way. In order for Pius XI to be precise, he has to mention who he is talking about officially, not some charlatan like yourself.
At least the Western half of the allied powers did not persecute the Church.Are you joking?!?
Hitler lost the cause that he was fighting for, and now look at what formerly Christian Europe looks like, A degenerate Jєωιѕн multicultural sewer where the Church has been thoroughly emasculated and reduced to an object of ridicule and scorn, with more than half of the clergy either homo or worldly SJW. The actual history is dead set against you, as it is provable that National Socialism contained a great deal that was based upon Christian principles, and like it or not they fought to preserve Christian Europe against the Freemasons, the Jєωs, and the Jєωιѕн communists who are now our rulers and dictate to the Catholic Church. Hitler and the National socialists were right!Quite right.
They are all still a contradiction to the Catholic Faith.Did you actually watch it?
At least the Western half of the allied powers did not persecute the Church.Tell that to the hundreds of Church's, monasteries, convents, and religious houses that were bombed by the allies in all countries during the war many times the first things that they bombed and were considered targets of opportunity.
It doesn't work that way. In order for Pius XI to be precise, he has to mention who he is talking about officially, not some charlatan like yourself.That is not true. When the Pope writes an encyclical he doesn't necessarily have to name names. That way the timelessness of what hes says comes through. When he condemned the racial policies of the nαzι government what he said about the issue doesn't just apply to them. It also applies to us also.
Are you joking?!?I am speaking the truth.
You are myopic.
Tell that to the hundreds of Church's, monasteries, convents, and religious houses that were bombed by the allies in all countries during the war many times the first things that they bombed and were considered targets of opportunity.If Hitler hadn't started this war by invading Poland then there would have been no allied bombings.
And the half of the German populace that was captured, starved, incinerated or otherwise murdered by them.
If Hitler hadn't started this war by invading Poland then there would have been no allied bombings.Are we back here again with the falsehoods about Poland? Hitler tried repeatedly to settle with the Poles to address the Jєωιѕн directed inequities of Versailles. He was refused time after time and the mistreatment of Germans living in the Poland of the treaty was increased to an intolerable level. He therefore did what he had to do, but he was unfortunately manuvered into invading by the Poles and the British so the could go to war against Germany whom Britain saw as their main competitor in the world. Get your facts straight.
That is not true. When the Pope writes an encyclical he doesn't necessarily have to name names. That way the timelessness of what hes says comes through. When he condemned the racial policies of the nαzι government what he said about the issue doesn't just apply to them. It also applies to us also.In this case, you're wrong. Pius XI did not describe official NSDAP policy, but those within it that attempted to go a direction that the government policy never endorsed. Nothing more.
I am speaking the truth.The hell you are. You are spewing falsities.
If Hitler hadn't started this war by invading Poland then there would have been no allied bombings.Hitler started this?!?! My goodness, have you lost your mind? I and others have provided mountains of evidence of what triggered the war. Hint: it's the same ones that infiltrated the Church.
In this case, you're wrong. Pius XI did not describe official NSDAP policy, but those within it that attempted to go a direction that the government policy never endorsed. Nothing more.He described their behavior and in this case everybody understood who and what he was talking about. Pope Pius XI ordered that this encyclical be read in every parish at the same time on Palm Sunday 1938. The very next da possession of this encyclical in Germany was a crime.
Think about it. The NSDAP policy was spelled out by 1933 when the Vatican backed there rise to power. Nothing changed between then and 1938. Just like there were those that were amongst the clergy prior to Vatican II that claimed to be Catholic that the Church warned about that was never Church policy, such as what Pius XI wrote about in Mortalium Animos.
You are just flat out wrong about this Poche.
What!?LOL
Praising the nαzι ideology? Poche, nαzιsm is tribalistic paganism that extols race and distorts the Catholic faith for evil motives. It's about as Catholic as a Buddhist temple.
The only thing to praise Adolf Hitler for is that he died, and not naturally.
If we're going to start praising every non-Catholic hoohah in the room simply because of its perceived anti-Judaism, then what's the next thread?
"Allah is God and Muhammad is his messenger"?
LOLIndeed!
Liberal Poche & Neo-Con JezusDeKoning
A pair of zionist NWO tools infighting over the best way to perpetuate h0Ɩ0h0αxery.
Hitler started this?!?! My goodness, have you lost your mind? I and others have provided mountains of evidence of what triggered the war. Hint: it's the same ones that infiltrated the Church.Evidence means absolutely nothing to Poche. He just keeps repeating his mushy flower-child brand of liberalism supporting Jєωry, race-mixing, new church, etc. :barf:
The PM's I receive about your obstinance have proven to be accurate.....
OHCA, good to see posting again to slap around poche, HE'S out of control... as usual... :fryingpan:They say a broken clock is right twice a day... Poche's been right maybe twice ever. Seriously, he'll have that one moment of clarity once a millennium. But other than that, he's obnoxiously liberal.
They say a broken clock is right twice a day... Poche's been right maybe twice ever. Seriously, he'll have that one moment of clarity once a millennium. But other than that, he's obnoxiously liberal.:confused:
:confused:
I missed something... when was he right?
Poche: "I think we should focus our attention on Jesus, who is truly present in the Blessed Sacrament.
(https://www.cathinfo.com/Smileys/classic/incense.gif) (https://www.cathinfo.com/Smileys/classic/incense.gif) (https://www.cathinfo.com/Smileys/classic/incense.gif)"
I just want to point out to you that all of this applause of the nαzι ideology and regime is a contradiction to the thinking of Pope St Pius X. It was condemned by Pope Pius XI. And the late Archbishop Lefebvre's father was a prisoner of the Germans curing the German occupation.You repeat the same point about either Pope Pius XI or Mit Brennender Sorge every three days. Come on, be original.
You repeat the same point about either Pope Pius XI or Mit Brennender Sorge every three days. Come on, be original.I also included Pope St Pius X and Archbishop Lefebvre.
If Hitler hadn't started this war by invading Poland then there would have been no allied bombings.I want to further address the totally asinine and idiotic comment made here.
I will post more when time permits, but this shows the total buffoonery of Poche.Thank you for the time that you do invest on this forum on this important issue... I don't believe that it'll persuade poche one iota, but there are others who don't quite grasp the truth and find themselves easily agreeing with poche with his nonsensical lies!
I want to further address the totally asinine and idiotic comment made here.If the countries pledged to solve their differences by negotiations rather than by armed conflict then obviously Hitler was lying or he changed his mind. In any event it was Germany that invaded Poland.
Polish leader Marshal Jozef Pilsudski had been on good terms with Hitler. Pilsudski had actually congratulated Hitler on winning the 1933 elections, and the German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact was signed just 10 months afterwards. Not surprisingly, the Polish Communist Party denounced Pilsudski as a “fascist and a capitalist”.
According to the Non-Aggression Pact, both countries pledge to resolve their problems through negotiations, not armed conflict.
Just before his death, Pilsudski re-emphasized that Poland should maintain neutral relations with Germany.
The popular Marshal will eventually be succeeded by the pompous warmonger, Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly. Pilsudski’s death, and Smigly’s rise, will prove to be great setbacks for Germany - facts which Hitler will reiterate during the closing weeks of World War II.
Here is Hitler attending Pilsudski's funeral.
(http://i63.tinypic.com/25sophs.jpg)
In March of 1938, Poland’s Marshal Rydz-Smigly issues an ultimatum to the tiny Baltic State of Lithuania. Lithuania had refused to have diplomatic relations with Poland after 1920, protesting the annexation of the Vilnius Region by the new Polish state. The ultimatum demands that Lithuania unconditionally agree to establish diplomatic ties with Poland within 48 hours. The establishment of diplomatic relations would mean a renunciation of Lithuanian claims to the region containing its historic capital, Vilnius.
Tiny Lithuania, preferring peace to war, accepts bully-boy Smigly's ultimatum and conditions. Had Lithuania stood firm, it's quite possible that Stalin would have used the ensuing war as pretext to take the Baltic States (which he eventually will in 1940) and start the 2nd Polish-Soviet war. Such is the recklessness of Marshal Rydz-Smigly of Poland. Many in the "democratic" West, including the New York Times, express dismay over Poland's militaristic bullying of Lithuania; a development deemed so dangerous that it causes jitters among Wall Street investors.
In October of 1938, the Polish regime continues its aggressive foreign policy by taking advantage of the Sudetenland Crisis and demanding a portion of Zaolzie and some other smaller Czech areas. The Czechs are powerless to stop the forced annexations.
The Polish Army annexes areas with a population of 227,399 people. Again, the "democratic" West shakes its head in dismay, but has to hold its nose and bite its tongue because it was understood that the fool Rydz-Smigly and his gang would be needed for bigger things; namely, picking a fight with Hitler’s Germany.
In 1939, the “free city” of Danzig is 95% German. Along with its surrounding German area of East Prussia, Danzig was isolated from the German mainland by the Versailles Treaty. Formerly German territory now belongs to Poland, cutting right through the Prussian/Pomeranian region of Germany. As had been the case with Germans stranded in Czechoslovakia, the Germans in Poland (those not brutally expelled in 1919) are a persecuted minority.
Throughout all of 1939, Hitler tries to solve the problem of the "Polish Corridor” peacefully. He proposes that the people living in Danzig and the “corridor” be permitted to vote in a referendum to decide their status. If the region returns to German sovereignty, Poland will be given a 1 mile wide path, running through Germany to the Baltic Sea so that it would not be landlocked.
The Polish military dictatorship of Edward Rydz-Smigly and friends is urged by Britain and, from behind the scenes and across the ocean, Roosevelt, to not make any deals with Germany. (20) When it becomes apparent to Hitler that Poland will not allow a referendum, he then proposes another solution – international control of the formerly German regions. This sensible offer is also ignored. The Globalists intend to use foolish Poland as the match which ignites World War II.
Side bar: In May 1939, the warmongering faction of Great Britain continues to press for war with Germany. The hawks are openly threatening to dump Neville Chamberlain if he refuses to deliver. (21) Having failed to ignite the war in Czechoslovakia, the warmonger’s “Plan B’ is to draw Stalin into a war alliance with Britain and France; and to then use Poland to start a war with Germany. After Poland picks the fight, the western allies will attack Germany from the west as the Soviets advance from the east; an exact replay of how they imposed a two-front war on Germany 25 years ago.
Britain assures Stalin that in case of war, the USSR would not be expected to join until the British and French are in it first. But Stalin is hesitant to join the alliance at this time because he has plans of his own. Hitler is well aware of the plots being cooked up against Germany. While the British openly court Stalin, Germany reaches out to Pope Pius XII – quite a contrast! The Vatican offers to mediate an international conference between Germany, Poland and the western powers. Germany and Italy are all in, but Britain refuses the Vatican’s offer.
I continue. On August 25th, 1939, the Polish-British Common Defense Pact contains promises of British military assistance in the event that Poland is attacked by another European country. This builds upon a previous agreement (March 1939) between the two countries, and also France, by specifically committing to military action in the event of an attack.
With this agreement, Zionist-Globalist forces in the UK have trapped the reluctant Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, as well as France. All that is left to do now is for Polish-Jєωιѕн border thugs, under the protection of Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly, to deliberately provoke Germany into action and get the war started. On the nights of August 25 to August 31 inclusive, there occur many violent attacks on German civilians as well as German officials and property.
"German men and women were hunted like wild beasts through the streets of Bromberg. When they were caught, they were mutilated and torn to pieces by the Polish mob. . . . Every day the butchery increased. . . . Thousands of Germans fled from their homes in Poland with nothing more than the clothes that they wore.. On the nights of August 25 to August 31 inclusive, there occurred, besides innumerable attacks on civilians of German blood, 44 perfectly authenticated acts of armed violence against German official persons and property."-William Joyce, Irish defector to Germany
On August 31st, 1939, overestimating their strength, underestimating German strength, and believing that France and the UK would now back him, Marshal Smigly allows Polish-Jєωιѕн partisan terrorists to cross the border and attack a German radio station in Germany. It is actually the latest in a string of deliberate border instigations against Germany.
The "Poles" then broadcast a message (in Polish) urging others to take up arms and start killing Germans. German police quickly arrive and retake the station, killing one of the Red terrorists. Jєωιѕн Red terrorists, their Polish government protectors, and their Globalist-Zionist masters have picked a fight with Germany!
Modern fake historians claim that the Gleiwitz incident was staged by Germans dressed as Polish terrorists. But as is the case with the Reichstag Fire conspiracy theory, they offer no evidence to support this oft-repeated lie, (beyond a forced “confession” obtained after the war) to support this theory – a theory that ignores the outrageous and repeated pattern of provocations directed at Hitler's Germany ever since 1933, the numerous border incidents, and also Hitler’s sincere attempts to negotiate a fair resolution to the Corridor and Danzig controversies.
"I lived in Germany during the 1980's when many people who lived during the war were still alive. I sought out anyone who lived near Poland in 1939 and was lucky enough to meet several people. One was a customs official who said it was so bad on the border they were armed and also had grenades in their office ready for attacks. Another told me his farm animals were often stolen by Polish (Jєωιѕн?) terrorists. Another told of his niece being raped by a Pole (Jєω?) who crossed the border. He told me in 1940 they caught the man and showed me a copy of the death order signed by Heydrich, in which he ordered the man be put to death.
This is just one of many stories told to me by German civilians who witnessed these border incursions just like had happened in 1919-1928. One thing many people fail to see is that Poland openly attacked Germany right after World War I, which led to many border battles. Once Germany started pressing Poland to work out a solution to the corridor, the attacks started again. And one thing that is clear to me is that Germany did not make up these attacks." - George H. Ohio, USA
I will post more when time permits, but this shows the total buffoonery of Poche.
Thank you for the time that you do invest on this forum on this important issue... I don't believe that it'll persuade poche one iota, but there are others who don't quite grasp the truth and find themselves easily agreeing with poche with his nonsensical lies!My intent is not persuade Poche. He is beyond reason. It's for the benefit of those looking in and see the lack of substance in his responses.
If the countries pledged to solve their differences by negotiations rather than by armed conflict then obviously Hitler was lying or he changed his mind. In any event it was Germany that invaded Poland.Again with the idiocy. Hitler is supposed to wait until all the Germans behind the Polish border are murdered under a new Communistic regime that took over AFTER the agreement?
Again with the idiocy. Hitler is supposed to wait until all the Germans behind the Polish border are murdered under a new Communistic regime that took over AFTER the agreement?If the Polish regime was such a Communistic regime then how was it that Hitler invaded in collusion with the Communist Soviet Union?
Thank God that morons like you weren't calling the shots when the Holy Crusades were declared to rescue the dying Catholics in the Holy Lands.....
If the Polish regime was such a Communistic regime then how was it that Hitler invaded in collusion with the Communist Soviet Union?Poche, you know nothing about actual history, you have simply absorbed a lot of false Jєωιѕн narratives.
Poche, you know nothing about actual history, you have simply absorbed a lot of false Jєωιѕн narratives.It wasn't a false Jєωιѕн narrative. The Soviet Union invaded in the east and Germany invaded from the west. The Soviet Union also absorbed Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.
It wasn't a false Jєωιѕн narrative. The Soviet Union invaded in the east and Germany invaded from the west. The Soviet Union also absorbed Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.Germany was interested in giving relief to ethnic German who were being abused and murdered by Poles. There were numerous efforts to negotiate a settlement with the Poles but they outright refused because they had British guarantees if the got into trouble. The British wanted war, and they got it by using the Poles, and they said nothing about the Soviet bolsheviks invasion.
If the Polish regime was such a Communistic regime then how was it that Hitler invaded in collusion with the Communist Soviet Union?At the risk of having another denial of what I've posted, or ignoring it, and getting in return the comment of blah, blah, blah, Mit Brennender Sorge, I will ask that you first address the murder of Germans by the Poles in the former German land that Poland was given in the aftermath of WWI.
It wasn't a false Jєωιѕн narrative. The Soviet Union invaded in the east and Germany invaded from the west. The Soviet Union also absorbed Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.Who cares what they did. We are not speaking of them. Everyone knows the vile actions of the Soviets. What does that have to do with Germany?
Who cares what they did. We are not speaking of them. Everyone knows the vile actions of the Soviets. What does that have to do with Germany?In the interest of truth it should be noted that Germany and the communist Soviet Union were allied in their invasion. Germany invaded Poland from the west while the communist Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east. They also invaded Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania.
The Germans only took back what was theirs before Versailles. It was wrongfully taken from them and cost many Germans their lives at the hands of the Poles. Address that.
In the interest of truth it should be noted that Germany and the communist Soviet Union were allied in their invasion. Germany invaded Poland from the west while the communist Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east. They also invaded Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania.In the interest of truth, answer the damn question.
In the interest of truth, answer the damn question.He and many other liberals will not answer coherent questions objectively. Why? Because when it comes to facts, they cannot compute. Just change the subject.
He and many other liberals will not answer coherent questions objectively. Why? Because when it comes to facts, they cannot compute. Just change the subject.I understand. The purpose was to further demonstrate the contemptible and diseased state of the liberal mind for others to see.
In the interest of truth, answer the damn question.49 years of persecution of the Catholic Church in Lithuania because of the unholy alliance between Stalin (aka communist big shot) and Hitler
49 years of persecution of the Catholic Church in Lithuania because of the unholy alliance between Stalin (aka communist big shot) and Hitler
Poche's Heroes:The Twentieth Century Triumpharate of Mass Murderer
(https://img00.deviantart.net/c114/i/2014/268/3/1/yalta_conference_1945_digital_painting_by_mwlucyo-d6767b7.jpg)
49 years of persecution of the Catholic Church in Lithuania because of the unholy alliance between Stalin (aka communist big shot) and HitlerSTALIN AND HITLER ALLIANCE?!
STALIN AND HITLER ALLIANCE?!Precisely. A non aggression pact is not the same as an alliance. And we have the benefit of historical hindsight through discovery that Hitler made the pact to keep the Soviets at bay while he dealt with the issue on the Western front. It was a brilliant move. Stalin wanted Germany, France and Britain to wipe each other out or least weaken each other so he could then invade from the East and take all of Europe. We know now from Russian archives that Stalin was approx 10 days away from invading from the East when Operation Barbarossa was launched. It proved that Hitler was right all along about Stalin's intentions and Hitler made the right move. Keep in mind that the USA was supplying the Soviets for the invasion in the East as early as 1939 before the USA was ever in the war, unbeknownst to the American people. It was a clear violation of US law and a betrayal of the promises FDR made to Americans and congress.
What fan fiction do you live in where Stalin and Hitler had an alliance?! The USSR had a non-aggression pact signed in 1939 to avoid them getting the piss beaten out of them by nαzι Germany, and that still happened.
STALIN AND HITLER ALLIANCE?!A non-aggression pact which involved them jointly invading Poland, and the Soviet Union also invading Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland. The invasion of Finland failed because the Finns fought back and the Soviet Union had overextended itself. The Soviet Union continued with its occupation of Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania for over 40 years.
What fan fiction do you live in where Stalin and Hitler had an alliance?! The USSR had a non-aggression pact signed in 1939 to avoid them getting the piss beaten out of them by nαzι Germany, and that still happened.
Precisely. A non aggression pact is not the same as an alliance. And we have the benefit of historical hindsight through discovery that Hitler made the pact to keep the Soviets at bay while he dealt with the issue on the Western front. It was a brilliant move. Stalin wanted Germany, France and Britain to wipe each other out or least weaken each other so he could then invade from the East and take all of Europe. We know now from Russian archives that Stalin was approx 10 days away from invading from the East when Operation Barbarossa was launched. It proved that Hitler was right all along about Stalin's intentions and Hitler made the right move. Keep in mind that the USA was supplying the Soviets for the invasion in the East as early as 1939 before the USA was ever in the war, unbeknownst to the American people. It was a clear violation of US law and a betrayal of the promises FDR made to Americans and congress.They acted in concert. Call it what you like it was an unholy alliance.
As is usually the case, Poche will not address the issue of Germans being murdered by Poles behind the border before the war and Poland invading Czechoslovakia, in clear violation of the international law at the time.
At the this point, I am fairly certain that Poche is either Polish himself or hails from some other Eastern European country and therefore lets his emotions and the tripe that has been served up as truth cloud his ability to grasp the realities of what really happened. In fairness, he is no different from all the other brain washed effeminate gits out there that will not allow truth to get in the way of the narrative that they want to believe.
A non-aggression pact which involved them jointly invading Poland, and the Soviet Union also invading Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland. The invasion of Finland failed because the Finns fought back and the Soviet Union had overextended itself. The Soviet Union continued with its occupation of Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania for over 40 years.They did not jointly scheme to invade Poland. Stalin took advantage of what Hitler did in taking back what belonged to Germany.
They acted in concert. Call it what you like it was an unholy alliance.By that idiotic line of reasoning, the Poles had an unholy alliance with the Allies. The Poles invaded Czechoslovakia while the Germans came into the Sudetenland without notifying the Allies. Are we to assume that Germany and Poland acted in concert?
What I would like to discuss is the barbaric manner in which the National Socialist regime treated the Church. The largest cemetery for priests is Dachau.
The largest cemetery for priests is Dachau.
What I would like to discuss is the barbaric manner in which the National Socialist regime treated the Church. The largest cemetery for priests is Dachau.
There were quite some priests which engaged in political action against the regime. Against the well known rule "give the emperor what belongs to the emperor".The priests were engaged in teaching Catholic Truth as it applies in our lives. They gave to the emperor what belonged to the emperor, but tehy also gave to God what belongs to God and for doing so they were put to death. It is no lie.
Did you invent or did you copy this lie?
Were any priests sentenced to death by the National Socialists because they were priests?Obvioiusly that is why they were sentenced to death.
Obvioiusly that is why they were sentenced to death.No sorry, wrong again. That's what actually happened under Communism.
No sorry, wrong again. That's what actually happened under Communism.It happened under both regimes.
The priests were engaged in teaching Catholic Truth as it applies in our lives. They gave to the emperor what belonged to the emperor, but tehy also gave to God what belongs to God and for doing so they were put to death. It is no lie.
Look, poche. KL Dachau was a cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρ with a so-called Pfarrerblock (block of barracks for parish priests) . Allied propaganda on wikipedia says that there were 2720 priests (2579 of which were catholic). Most of them (>1700) were polish (i.e. enemy). For details see allied propaganda on wikipedia:Somebody already did a survey. The largest is Dachau.
Priest Barracks of Dachau cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priest_Barracks_of_Dachau_Concentration_Camp)
Looking at the statistics section: no priest was killed.
Here is a picture of some polish priests in what you call "the largest cemetery for priests" Dachau:
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/Toasting_Polish_Dachau.jpg/800px-Toasting_Polish_Dachau.jpg)
Cheers!
I recommend to study about martyr priests in Spain or Mexico to look for "large priest cemeteries".
Somebody already did a survey. The largest is Dachau.Killed by the Allies from their carpet bombing cutting off supplies, so no, it wasn't the Germans. Poche won't address the subversive priests operating as communist agents as well as the fαɢɢօt "priests" who were molesting boys. Poche is myopic as usual.
Somebody already did a survey. The largest [priest cemetery] is Dachau.
His ashes were sent in an urn to his parents and the urn was interred in a Dresden cemetery on 15 April 1943.
Killed by the Allies from their carpet bombing cutting off supplies, so no, it wasn't the Germans. Poche won't address the subversive priests operating as communist agents as well as the fαɢɢօt "priests" who were molesting boys. Poche is myopic as usual.I join you in your condemnation of murders of Germans by Poles in the time immediately before World War II. However governments have to weigh the overall situation and act proportionately. There are other channels other than launching a major invasion to address this type of criminal activity.
Poche still won't address Poland's murdering of Germans before the war, but will keep pointing to Germany invading. So he is of bad will.
Poche won't explain why Poland invaded Czechoslovakia "in concert" with the Germans. Again, showing he is of bad will.
Every time you dodge these issues, you prove my case to others watching. So thank you, you are a great witness to the truth of what I have been saying.
I join you in your condemnation of murders of Germans by Poles in the time immediately before World War II. However governments have to weigh the overall situation and act proportionately. There are other channels other than launching a major invasion to address this type of criminal activity.This proves that you never read any of what has been posted all these months in regards to this exact point and have acted in bad will.
If you will review the history, you will see that all and every attempt was made by Germany to secure the welfare of the ethnic German people as well as a narrow corridor for the free movement of Germans to and from Germany. All were thwarted or downright refused. In fact the Poles were armed and encouraged by the British to invade Germany, and they were preparing for that. The overconfident Poles believed that they could defeat Germany and take BerlinYou have it backward. It was Germany that invaded Poland.
This proves that you never read any of what has been posted all these months in regards to this exact point and have acted in bad will.In diplomatic endeavors what is important is to remember the big picture. What was the result of Germany's invasion gain for Germany? The end result was the almost total destruction of the nation. In diplomacy many times we have to set the priorities in proportion so that the long term goals can reasonably be met. In this case Hitler made a huge mistake.
As JPaul stated, they exhausted every avenue with the Poles all the while Germans were being slaughtered by Poles. At what point does the German government have a responsibility to the German people who begged for help from them? When they are all dead?!?
In diplomatic endeavors what is important is to remember the big picture. What was the result of Germany's invasion gain for Germany? The end result was the almost total destruction of the nation. In diplomacy many times we have to set the priorities in proportion so that the long term goals can reasonably be met. In this case Hitler made a huge mistake.Big picture? The saving of German lives was and should have been the big picture. What was Poland's responsibility in this? They did not trigger the war by their own actions?
In any event the National Socialist policy was a contradiction to what the Catholic Church teaches.
Big picture? The saving of German lives was and should have been the big picture. What was Poland's responsibility in this? They did not trigger the war by their own actions?At what cost. In the end Hitler's response destroyed the nation.
Again, would you apply your same line of reasoning to the Holy Crusades? Christians were being slaughtered by Muslims and their lands being taken.
If you had bothered to read any of the evidence, Poland wanted to invade Germany and felt comfortable that they could engage in their crimes and still have France and England watching their backs. Beautifully, Poland got hung out to dry by France and England and got their asses handed to them for their treachery. Serves them right.
Why do you think there were so many Germans being murdered in "Poland" at time? Hint: these lands were illegally taken from Germany at Versailles. East Prussia was theirs, not Poland's. Poland connived with the Allies to land grab from the Germans and had blood on their hands. You would sit here and tell us about what is "proportional" when the Allies, Poland included, were conspiring to once again cut Germany down and then tell us that it was Hitler's fault for acting as he should have?
You are outside your mind and are trying to protect an false image that is exists only in your imagination and many other mindless sheep out there.
At what cost. In the end Hitler's response destroyed the nation.The German nation was destroyed by the Jєωs, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, and the communists and there use of the proxy allies
The German nation was destroyed by the Jєωs, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, and the communists and there use of the proxy alliesThe German nation was destroyed by Hitler and his insane desire to control the greater part of central Europe. His invasion of Poland caused the destruction of Germany. If he had not invaded Poland then the National Socialists might still be in power.
Did you know that the average German city or town was on average bombed close to 200 times each. This is not the act of a moral enemy by any measure.
And now it is occupied and controlled by Jєωs.
The German nation was destroyed by Hitler and his insane desire to control the greater part of central Europe. His invasion of Poland caused the destruction of Germany. If he had not invaded Poland then the National Socialists might still be in power.Poche, you cannot be that obtuse?
Poche, you cannot be that obtuse?In 1933 there was no Jєωιѕн nation to speak of. The state of Israel did not come into being until after World War II. this 'state of war' was obviously some form of hostile rhetoric that comes out from time to time. Smart statesmen know how to differentiate between priorities and see the larger picture and not to respond every time somebody says 'boo.'
Headline 1933 Judea declares war on Germany! It was inevitable that Germany would go to war. The Jєωs were deposed under Hitler and they wanted their priviledge and their power back. The Communists were preparing to invade and they were infesting all of the European nations.
The Poles were deliberately abusing the ethnic Germans, and England refused all, and every effort to settle, and all peace proposals of Germany. Stop repeating propaganda.
International Jєωry holds that they are a nation based upon race and ethnic cohesion, in whichever country they reside they see themselves as members of a supranational organization, and their loyalty is never to their host country but first to Jєωry.Of course the hostile rhetoric of the National Socialists had nothing to do with it.
The illegal formation of the terrorist state is but one work of this group.
It was not just hostile rhetoric, there was a worldwide boycott of Germany as well as a lot of manipulations by international banking to hurt the German people. The Jєωs by their malicious behind the scenes manipulation managed to have the world declare war upon the German nation. This happened in both the first and second war, a truly diabolical group of people.
You can see the Jєωιѕн hand in almost every war or the twentieth and twenty first century. Their parasitism survives and profits upon the chaos that they create in the world.
Were the National Socialists correct/justified in deporting the Jєωιѕн population during the War?Absolutely!
Were the National Socialists correct/justified in deporting the Jєωιѕн population during the War?no
You have it backward. It was Germany that invaded Poland.Only because Germany correctly, acted first to defend innocent ethnic Germans.
Were the National Socialists correct/justified in deporting the Jєωιѕн population during the War?This is a loaded question, akin to the wife beater gotcha question.