Me again.  I've been researching NASA conspiracy theories but I keep running into dead ends because the internet is so saturated with Flat Earth disinformation.  My question is, is my opinion correct (in your opinion) that the (Jєωιѕн) rulers of the world accept heliocentrism yet know and participate in the fraud of space travel, the moon landing, etc.?

Of course I don't mean to force the moon landing conspiracy theory, or any other like it, in the face of people who don't believe in it.  I'm looking for honest discussion and research, that's all.  It's difficult to find that anywhere else except here!

My train of thought goes like this.

NASA was established by the Jєω Eisenhower in 1958.  So that suggests it's part of the Jєωιѕн plot.  

NASA's first Administrator was T. Keith Glennan, who "became associated with the newly developed sound motion picture industry, and later ... was studio manager of Paramount Pictures, Inc., and Samuel Goldwyn Studios ..."  :scratchchin:  So that suggests NASA is a movie-magic propaganda agency ... as if it couldn't be ascertained from its Jєωιѕнness and other things.

Glennen also "served as a member of the Atomic Energy Commission."  Only incidentally related to NASA, I just wanted to throw that in here as a jump-off point for people interested in whether atomic bombs were just movie-magic as well.

If you look at the list of NASA Administrators you will come across faces like these:







And names like Daniel Goldin.

So definitely Jєωιѕн hands all over NASA.  Even their current Administrator is an Eastern looking brown-skinned guy.

So are NASA missions frauds, and if so, do they still believe in heliocentrism?  I ask because it's a bit odd that NASA, and by extension their Jєωιѕн masters, would know that Geocentrism is correct yet still continue in their atheism or Spinozism or whatever they call it.  

But of course, Darwin has been experimentally falsified too yet they continue believing in Darwinism.

Thoughts?

The Earth is round.

Scripture teaches that the earth is a fixed plane with a dome over the sky with water above that.  How is there water above the ball earth and how can such a water encompassed ball be described in scripture as a tent? But if you have proof earth is round, please show it to me.  I've searched long and hard for this proof and not found it.  

Isn't it enough proof that one can either travel directly to Asia from North America across the Pacific, or, alternatively across the Atalntic and crossing through Europe?  Do you not believe that is possible?  If possible, how is it explained if the earth is flat?

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: aryzia

Scripture teaches that the earth is a fixed plane with a dome over the sky with water above that.  How is there water above the ball earth and how can such a water encompassed ball be described in scripture as a tent? But if you have proof earth is round, please show it to me.  I've searched long and hard for this proof and not found it.  

Isn't it enough proof that one can either travel directly to Asia from North America across the Pacific, or, alternatively across the Atalntic and crossing through Europe?  Do you not believe that is possible?  If possible, how is it explained if the earth is flat?

Of course, one can circuмnavigate the flat earth.

 

Earth is a globe.

Isn't it enough proof that one can either travel directly to Asia from North America across the Pacific, or, alternatively across the Atalntic and crossing through Europe?  Do you not believe that is possible?  If possible, how is it explained if the earth is flat?

.
The fact that there are aircraft flight plans that traverse the area of the south pole by flying over or very close to Antarctica is extremely problematic for flat-earthers and their pet theory of flat-earthism. Here are some examples:
.
Flight path from Perth to Johannesburg
The diagram below shows the shortest flight path from Perth PER to Johannesburg O.R. Tambo International Airport JNB (ignoring winds, restricted flight zones and air traffic). To fly the shortest flight path, leave Perth Airport on an initial heading of 248° west (initial bearing), and travel 8325km until you arrive at Johannesburg Airport.

.
Note: the initial bearing (forward azimuth) of 248° west out of Perth Airport can be calculated using the Law of Cosines for a Spherical Earth. BTW if it were directly west that you depart Perth, the heading would not be 248° but 270° west, and Johannesburg is latitude north of Perth, therefore 270 would be insufficient on a "flat" earth where 275° would be necessary. But in fact, if you depart Perth with a heading of 275° west you will have to eventually turn rudder Portside quite a bit if you want to land in Johannesburg, and the distance traveled will be considerably greater than by using the 248° west heading, because 248° west   directs you to the SHORTEST FLIGHT PATH possible.
Law of Cosines This formula is for the initial bearing (sometimes referred to as forward azimuth) which if followed in a straight line along a great-circle arc will take you from the start point to the end point: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/55417.html

Formula:

θ =

atan2(

sin(Δlong).cos(lat2), cos(lat1).sin(lat2) − sin(lat1).cos(lat2).cos(Δlong) )

.
The West Australian reports that Norwegian intends to connect South America and Asia with one-stop service. The planned route? Buenos Aires to Perth to Singapore. Norwegian Air Argentina has been given approval to launch the route between Buenos Aires and Perth, and is now working on getting approval between Perth and Singapore.
.
If this route comes to fruition, it would spend hours flying over Antarctica, at least if it were to take a route similar to the direct air distance. While the entire journey would cover a distance of ~10,200 miles, the flight from Buenos Aires to Perth would cover a distance of ~7,800 miles, while the flight from Perth to Singapore would cover a distance of ~2,400 miles.

.
As it stands, the two most southerly long haul routes are Buenos Aires to Auckland and Santiago to Sydney. As you can see, the direct air distance for those flights has you flying near Antarctica, but not over land.