Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Myth that Church should let priests get married  (Read 4244 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31168
  • Reputation: +27088/-494
  • Gender: Male
Myth that Church should let priests get married
« on: May 24, 2022, 05:20:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm sure we've all heard the cry from ignorant, worldly people neck-deep in the impure modern world,

    Awwww, the Church should let their priests get married. With such an outlet for "release", they wouldn't have to prey on altar boys.

    Except the facts do NOT bear out this simplistic idea. Virtually no protestant pastors practice celibacy (singleness) or perfect chastity -- and yet, the statistics show that Protestant pastors have JUST AS MUCH PROBLEM WITH SINS OF THE SIXTH AND NINTH as Catholic priests. That includes child abuse. Bet you didn't know that!

    Here is one case, out of thousands. Many such cases.

    https://orangebeanindiana.com/2022/05/22/pastor-of-indiana-church-admits-to-adultery-with-16-year-old/

    I've heard people talk online about how they were fixing a pastor's phone or laptop, and what they found on it. Let's just say it wasn't just porn, but surprisingly depraved porn. 9 times out of 10, protestant pastors are complete hypocrites.

    How could it be any other way? They preach and believe in "one and done" salvation -- accept Jesus as your savior, and nothing you do for the rest of your life, however evil, can prevent your salvation. They also believe that anyone can worship God in their own way, and anyone is competent to interpret Scripture. So if you add up their teachings, the logical conclusion is that THEY THEMSELVES KNOW AND ADMIT they bring little-to-nothing to the table, in exchange for all the donations their congregation gives them. They aren't ordained. They don't offer sacrifice on an altar. They don't give up their earthly life for Christ and the Gospel -- they get married and have a family like everyone else. They just get up there and give a "sermon" if you call it that. They give their worthless opinion on the Bible, which they themselves teach is no better than anyone else's opinion! Why do protestants even pay their pastors? What do they really bring to the table?

    My point, and the moral of the story: However imperfect, bad, divided, etc. you think Catholics or Trad Catholics are -- protestants are that and worse. They have less of the truth and much less grace, so they fall even MORE often and even HARDER.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41843
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #1 on: May 24, 2022, 05:48:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yeah, that's ridiculous.  NORMAL men are not attracted to children or to boys.  Period.  So, what?, they can't find adult women to break their vows of chastity with?  It's not uncommon for a priest to run off with some woman (happened with a couple Traditional priests I knew).  There's a claim that some men become sodomites when they go to prison due to lack of women around, and you occasionally hear of some sick individuals doing perverse things with farm animals (where there are no women around) ... but priests are SURROUNDED by women, many of whom don't like their husbands, and seek them out for consolation, and would latch onto a priest who gave them attention.

    No, the problem is that sodomites are attracted to the priesthood because it gives the access to boys.  So it's completely the opposite of what they claim.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41843
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #2 on: May 24, 2022, 05:53:04 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • With that said, given the current state of Crisis in the world, if I were a bishop, I would be right now looking to establish an underground church by seeking worthy candidates to ordain as "simplex" priests.  We are very close to times when they're going to shut down the churches and deprive people of access to the Sacraments, perhaps even arresting the "known" priests.  Serious Catholic men who have had some seminary formation ... like Matthew ... would be at the top of my list.  There are probably former semnarians in every metropolitan area.  I believe that's why Bishop Slupski, for instance, reportedly ordained a married man.  He grew up behind the Iron Curtain, and so he clearly sees where we're headed.  I know that people excoriated Bishop Slupski for this (someone started a thread here saying that Bishop Slupski offered to ordained him a priest even though he was married), but I see where he's coming from.  We got a foretaste of this with the COVID lockdowns where the churches were closed.  People were dying without access to priests.  I know that people don't really believe that, but 10 years ago I would not have believed that the COVID lockdowns were possible.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31168
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #3 on: May 24, 2022, 06:29:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Serious Catholic men who have had some seminary formation ... like Matthew ... would be at the top of my list.  There are probably former semnarians in every metropolitan area.  I believe that's why Bishop Slupski, for instance, reportedly ordained a married man.  He grew up behind the Iron Curtain, and so he clearly sees where we're headed.  I know that people excoriated Bishop Slupski for this (someone started a thread here saying that Bishop Slupski offered to ordained him a priest even though he was married), but I see where he's coming from.  We got a foretaste of this with the COVID lockdowns where the churches were closed.  People were dying without access to priests.  I know that people don't really believe that, but 10 years ago I would not have believed that the COVID lockdowns were possible.

    Just to clarify --

    It was me that started that thread.

    I would stop well short of condemning Bp. Slupski. He certainly did what he did "for the Church" from what I can tell. Other than some objectively poor judgments (going by how the situation played out, in hindsight) with particular men he ordained, that's all I can point to for criticism. The fact is, he was a faithful priest/bishop to the end, preaching the true Faith and criticized the Novus Ordo/new religion, JP2 (a fellow Pole, of about the same generation), the Indult, Communism, and other modern errors. He was never involved in any scandals. He lived a VERY simple life, driving constantly, going on low sleep. He told Tom Nelson he couldn't sit down or close his eyes, or he'd fall asleep. If he kept going, and stayed on his feet, he was OK.

    How many Trad priests even today are willing to do the "missionary" thing, being on the road *most* of Sunday? Bp. Slupski would go to 4-5 locations on Sunday. He labored hard, and I never saw him take any luxuries (wine, food, money) or other earthly consolations. He was a true religious missionary priest.

    He served my area from about 1979 until the early 2000's. At some point he retired, but he was very old. He was ordained in 1961.

    I would say that even if he had the right idea, he just de-facto didn't happen to have any suitable candidates.

    There are many good things that clearly aren't God's will without a suitable candidate. Marriage, for example. Marriage is good. But if God sends you no one even *close* to suitable, that's one sign you're not meant to be married, at least not yet.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline EWPJ

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 452
    • Reputation: +264/-47
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #4 on: May 24, 2022, 10:34:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Agree 100% with the OP.  I would thumb up if I could but I think I read you need 100 posts first. 

    In my neck of the woods there was a pretty dark story about a Prot "Pastor" who did very nasty things with young boys and young girls in the basement. 

    We also know The Church was infiltrated by "them" and we know how "they" like kids so it's more the infiltrators doing these things and not the sincere ones.


    Offline Christo Rege

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 95
    • Reputation: +46/-7
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #5 on: May 24, 2022, 05:01:30 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • That is quite true. However, it is an unfortunate thing for women, whether married or single, that genuinely need actual spiritual direction. This can even lead good women to be their own “director” in spirituality that to approach a good priest and ask for some advice. But to become one’s own “director”… it could be said puts a danger to our soul. I prefer speaking to a priest who is at least fifteen years into his life as a priest, if not twenty…thirty years in. As women, we’re not here to seduce anyone. We have souls, too. 

    What a sorrow it is to be a woman. Even St. Teresa of Avila searched and searched for a confessor when she lost the last one. Some priests couldn’t even handle being her confessor due to her advancement. 
    “The good God does not need years to accomplish His work of Love in a soul; one ray from His Heart can, in an instant, make His flower bloom for eternity.” 
    ~ St. Therese of Lisieux

    Offline Christo Rege

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 95
    • Reputation: +46/-7
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #6 on: May 24, 2022, 05:06:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So, what?, they can't find adult women to break their vows of chastity with?  It's not uncommon for a priest to run off with some woman (happened with a couple Traditional priests I knew).  There's a claim that some men become sodomites when they go to prison due to lack of women around, and you occasionally hear of some sick individuals doing perverse things with farm animals (where there are no women around) ... but priests are SURROUNDED by women, many of whom don't like their husbands, and seek them out for consolation, and would latch onto a priest who gave them attention.
    “The good God does not need years to accomplish His work of Love in a soul; one ray from His Heart can, in an instant, make His flower bloom for eternity.” 
    ~ St. Therese of Lisieux

    Offline Emile

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2166
    • Reputation: +1511/-85
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #7 on: May 24, 2022, 05:11:58 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Let them get married, that'll solve everything! :facepalm:

    https://apnews.com/article/baptist-religion-sɛҳuąƖ-abuse-by-clergy-southern-convention-bfdbe64389790630488f854c3dae3fd5


    Report: Top Southern Baptists stonewalled sex abuse victims
    By DEEPA BHARATH, HOLLY MEYER and DAVID CRARYMay 23, 2022


    FILE - This Wednesday, Dec. 7, 2011 file photo shows the headquarters of the Southern Baptist Convention in Nashville, Tenn. Leaders of the SBC, America's largest Protestant denomination, stonewalled and denigrated survivors of clergy sex abuse over almost two decades while seeking to protect their own reputations, according to a scathing 288-page investigative report issued Sunday, May 22, 2022. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File)

    1 of 2
    FILE - This Wednesday, Dec. 7, 2011 file photo shows the headquarters of the Southern Baptist Convention in Nashville, Tenn. Leaders of the SBC, America's largest Protestant denomination, stonewalled and denigrated survivors of clergy sex abuse over almost two decades while seeking to protect their own reputations, according to a scathing 288-page investigative report issued Sunday, May 22, 2022. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File)

    The Southern Baptist Convention’s Executive Committee — and thousands of its rank-and-file members — now have opportunities to address a scathing investigative report that says top SBC leaders stonewalled and denigrated survivors of clergy sex abuse over two decades while seeking to protect their own reputations.
    The report, issued Sunday, says these survivors, and other concerned Southern Baptists, repeatedly shared allegations with the Executive Committee, “only to be met, time and time again, with resistance, stonewalling, and even outright hostility from some within the EC.”
    The seven-month investigation was conducted by Guidepost Solutions, an independent firm contracted by the Executive Committee after delegates to last year’s national meeting pressed for a probe by outsiders.
    Since then, several top Executive Committee leaders have resigned, and the body — under interim leadership — will meet Tuesday to discuss the report. Three weeks later, the SBC will convene its 2022 national meeting in Anaheim, California, and the report will be discussed there as well.

    “Our investigation revealed that, for many years, a few senior EC leaders, along with outside counsel, largely controlled the EC’s response to these reports of abuse ... and were singularly focused on avoiding liability for the SBC,” the report said.
    Business

    “In service of this goal, survivors and others who reported abuse were ignored, disbelieved, or met with the constant refrain that the SBC could take no action due to its polity regarding church autonomy – even if it meant that convicted molesters continued in ministry with no notice or warning to their current church or congregation,” the report added.
    The report asserts that an Executive Committee staffer maintained a list of Baptist ministers accused of abuse, but there is no indication anyone “took any action to ensure that the accused ministers were no longer in positions of power at SBC churches.”
    The most recent list includes the names of hundreds of abusers thought to be affiliated at some point with the SBC. Survivors and advocates have long called for a public database of abusers.
    SBC President Ed Litton, in a statement Sunday, said he is “grieved to my core” for the victims and thanked God for their work propelling the SBC to this moment. He called on Southern Baptists to lament and prepare to change the denomination’s culture and implement reforms.
    “I pray Southern Baptists will begin preparing today to take deliberate action to address these failures and chart a new course when we meet together in Anaheim,” Litton said.
    Among the report’s key recommendations:
    — Form an independent commission and later establish a permanent administrative entity to oversee comprehensive long-term reforms concerning sɛҳuąƖ abuse and related misconduct within the SBC.
    —Create and maintain an Offender Information System to alert the community to known offenders.
    — Provide a comprehensive Resource Toolbox including protocols, training, education, and practical information.
    —Restrict the use of nondisclosure agreements and civil settlements which bind survivors to confidentiality in sɛҳuąƖ abuse matters, unless requested by the survivor.
    The interim leaders of the Executive Committee, Willie McLaurin and Rolland Slade, welcomed the recommendations, and pledged an all-out effort to eliminate sex abuse within the SBC.
    “We recognize there are no shortcuts,” they said. “We must all meet this challenge through prudent and prayerful application, and we must do so with Christ-like compassion.”
    The sex abuse scandal was thrust into the spotlight in 2019 by a landmark report from the Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express-News docuмenting hundreds of cases in Southern Baptist churches, including several in which alleged perpetrators remained in ministry.
    Last year, thousands of delegates at the national SBC gathering made clear they did not want the Executive Committee to oversee an investigation of its own actions. Instead they voted overwhelmingly to create the task force charged with overseeing the third-party review. Litton, pastor of Redemption Church in Saraland, Alabama, appointed the panel.
    The task force had a week to review the report before it was publicly released. The task force’s recommendations based on Guidepost’s findings will be presented at the SBC’s meeting in Anaheim.

    The report offers shocking details on how Johnny Hunt, a Georgia-based pastor and past SBC president, sɛҳuąƖly assaulted another pastor’s wife during a beach vacation in 2010. In an interview with investigators, Hunt denied any physical contact with the woman, but did admit he had interactions with her.
    On May 13, Hunt, who was the senior vice president of evangelism and leadership at the North American Mission Board, the SBC’s domestic missions agency, resigned from that post, said Kevin Ezell, the organization’s president and CEO. Ezell said, before May 13, he was “not aware of any alleged misconduct” on Hunt’s part.
    The report details a meeting Hunt arranged a few days after the alleged assault between the woman, her husband, Hunt and a counseling pastor. According to the report, Hunt admitted to touching the victim inappropriately, but said “thank God I didn’t consummate the relationship.”
    In a statement Sunday, Hunt disputed the report.
    “I vigorously deny the circuмstances and characterizations set forth in the Guidepost report,” he said. “I have never abused anybody.”
    Among those reacting strongly to the Guidepost report was Russell Moore, who formerly headed the SBC’s public policy wing but left the denomination after accusing top Executive Committee leaders of stalling efforts to address the sex abuse crisis.
    “Crisis is too small a word. It is an apocalypse,” Moore wrote for Christianity Today after reading the report. ”As dark a view as I had of the SBC Executive Committee, the investigation uncovers a reality far more evil and systemic than I imagined it could be.”
    According to the report, Guidepost’s investigators, who spoke with survivors of varying ages including children, said the survivors were equally traumatized by the way in which churches responded to their reports of sɛҳuąƖ abuse.
    Survivors “spoke of trauma from the initial abuse, but also told us of the debilitating effects that come from the response of the churches and institutions like the SBC that did not believe them, ignored them, mistreated them, and failed to help them,” the report said.
    It cited the case of Dave Pittman, who from 2006 to 2011 made phone calls and sent letters and emails to the SBC and Georgia Baptist Convention Board reporting that he had been abused by Frankie Wiley, a youth pastor at Rehoboth Baptist Church when he was 12 to 15 years old.
    Pittman and several others have come forward publicly to report that Wiley molested and raped them and Wiley has admitted to abusing “numerous victims” at several Georgia Southern Baptist churches.

    According to the report, a Georgia Baptist Convention official told Pittman that the churches were autonomous and there was nothing he could do but pray.
    The report also tells the story of Christa Brown, who says she was sɛҳuąƖly abused as a teen by the youth and education minister at her SBC church.
    When she disclosed the abuse to the music minister after months of abuse, she was told not to talk about it, according to the report, which said her abuser also went on to serve in Southern Baptist churches in multiple states.
    Brown, who has been one of the most outspoken survivors, told investigators that during the past 15 years she has received “volumes of hate mail, awful blog comments, and vitriolic phone calls.”
    After reading through the report, Brown told The Associated Press that it “fundamentally confirms what Southern Baptist clergy sex abuse survivors have been saying for decades.”
    “I view this investigative report as a beginning, not an end. The work will continue,” Brown said. “But no one should ever forget the human cost of what it has taken to even get the SBC to approach this starting line of beginning to deal with clergy sex abuse.”
    ___
    Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.


    Patience is a conquering virtue. The learned say that, if it not desert you, It vanquishes what force can never reach; Why answer back at every angry speech? No, learn forbearance or, I'll tell you what, You will be taught it, whether you will or not.
    -Geoffrey Chaucer


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41843
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #8 on: May 24, 2022, 05:31:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just to clarify --

    It was me that started that thread.

    I figured it was, but didn't want to guess, given that it was posted Anonymously.  Perhaps you "came out" later in the thread.  :laugh1:

    Bishop Vida Elmer was the same way.  This was before I was married, but he offered to ordained me to the priesthood, which I declined.  Nevertheless, he was an extremely orthodox and yet kind and gentle and humble man.  When I first went to his chapel, he came to me after Mass and invited me over for breakfast, and he insisted that I sit down while he personally cooked a bit of breakfast.  I was a bit uneasy sitting there while a bishop was making me breakfast.  Then we talked for a long time, and I told him my story and my past at STAS, and he mentioned that he had read some of the articles I had written for Bishop Sanborn's periodical, and at one point offered me ordination.

    Given how you describe Bishop Slupski, as a devoted and orthodox Traditional Catholic, he probably has some very solid reasons for offering to ordain a married man, and it sounded as if it had to do with ensuring the availability of the Sacraments in this time of Crisis.  I think that too few people truly understand the gravity of what's taken place.  Sister Lucia became physically ill when attempting to write down the Third Secret under obedience, so horrible was it, and I'm sure the greatest part of the horror had to do with the Conciliar Church and these V2 "popes".  I'm sure that had St. Pius X seen a vision of today's Conciliar Church, he would have died on the spot.  And it's only going to get worse, and the church will end up under ground here in the not too distant future.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41843
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #9 on: May 24, 2022, 05:38:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Report: Top Southern Baptists stonewalled sex abuse victims
    By DEEPA BHARATH, HOLLY MEYER and DAVID CRARYMay 23, 2022

    Stats demonstrate that there's every bit as much of this stuff among Prots, Jєωs, and Muslims.  But there's a deliberate smear campaign against the reputation of the Catholic Church by the Satanic media, which could hardly care less about the Prots (since they are already Satan's and doing Satan's work).  They focus on only the Catholic Church.  Satanists don't steal communion bread from Prot churches for their black rituals.  Satanists have more faith that the Catholic Church is the true Church founded by Christ than 99% of Novus Ordites.  They are hell bent on reviling, blaspheming, and destroying the Catholic Church.  Prots glom onto the bandwagon of equating the Catholic priesthood with pedophilia ... because they hate the Church and take pleasure in being able to use some propaganda to make themselves feel justified about their heresy.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41843
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #10 on: May 24, 2022, 05:41:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That is quite true. However, it is an unfortunate thing for women, whether married or single, that genuinely need actual spiritual direction. This can even lead good women to be their own “director” in spirituality that to approach a good priest and ask for some advice. But to become one’s own “director”… it could be said puts a danger to our soul. I prefer speaking to a priest who is at least fifteen years into his life as a priest, if not twenty…thirty years in. As women, we’re not here to seduce anyone. We have souls, too.

    What a sorrow it is to be a woman. Even St. Teresa of Avila searched and searched for a confessor when she lost the last one. Some priests couldn’t even handle being her confessor due to her advancement.

    There's no reason being a woman should bar you from spiritual direction, but it should be conducted in a confessional or similar setting, not in a casual environment like over at the rectory where there can develop excessive natural familiarity.  Priest should only know you as a soul.  At the same time, even men struggle to find good spiritual directors.  Many (if not most) Traditional Catholic priests are not particularly skilled at it, and for most, they're pretty much stuck with the one priest (or sometimes) two who happened to be stationed near them or on their Mass circuit.  In addition, when you have a mission priest, they generally fly in, hear Confessions, offer Mass, and fly out (to the next place) ... so they don't have the opportunity to provide true spiritual direction even if they were quite capable of it.


    Offline Emile

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2166
    • Reputation: +1511/-85
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #11 on: May 24, 2022, 05:58:55 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Stats demonstrate that there's every bit as much of this stuff among Prots, Jєωs, and Muslims.  But there's a deliberate smear campaign against the reputation of the Catholic Church by the Satanic media, which could hardly care less about the Prots (since they are already Satan's and doing Satan's work).  They focus on only the Catholic Church.  Satanists don't steal communion bread from Prot churches for their black rituals.  Satanists have more faith that the Catholic Church is the true Church founded by Christ than 99% of Novus Ordites.  They are hell bent on reviling, blaspheming, and destroying the Catholic Church.  Prots glom onto the bandwagon of equating the Catholic priesthood with pedophilia ... because they hate the Church and take pleasure in being able to use some propaganda to make themselves feel justified about their heresy.
    Something I like to bring up when I hear people harping about pedophile priests:

    Public School Teachers 100 Times More Likely To Abuse Kids Than Catholic Priests
    By Jessica Marie Baumgartner | 2 months ago

    abuse
    As sɛҳuąƖ abuse by teachers continues to rise, parents and students grow more concerned about the health and well-being of their families. The public education system has embraced grooming techniques that normalize sɛҳuąƖ behavior and sɛҳuąƖity in children as young as pre-school. Middle schoolers are now avidly taught about masturbation in class, while pornographic books remain in some public schools for the sake of “diversity & inclusion.” It’s enough to make anyone wonder if this material is truly appropriate for children, and whether public schools are working to educate based on the best interests of the children. And now, it has been confirmed that public school teachers are 100 times more likely to abuse kids than Catholic priests. 

    Quote
    According to the Dept. of Ed, public school teachers sɛҳuąƖly abuse children at a scale more than 100 times greater than Catholic priests. Parents are concerned that predators—of any sɛҳuąƖ orientation—could use classroom sɛҳuąƖization as a method of recruiting victims.
    — Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) March 23, 2022
    In truth, this comparison is based on an aged 2004 report from the Department of Education, and as child sɛҳuąƖ abuse in schools has reportedly increased since these findings were released, one may conclude that the incidence is even more likely. In 2011 Texas recorded that teacher sɛҳuąƖ misconduct cases went up 27%. In Alabama complaints and investigations tripled. By 2019 the Arizona Department of Education’s investigative unit chief pleaded with the Governor’s Victims of Child Sex Abuse task force claiming that his team is “drowning” in cases
    Many have noted that easy access to students’ personal lives has perpetuated this, thanks to social media and constant internet use. In 2020 The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children reported the highest number of suspected child sɛҳuąƖ exploitation tips through their CyberTipline. The debate over whether minors should be allowed on social media at all has continued on for years, but despite these dangers, many individuals — students and parents included — often vilify Catholic priests when discussing the sensitive subject of pedophilia and child sɛҳuąƖ abuse while completely ignoring the ongoing child sɛҳuąƖ abuse convictions against public school staff. 
    The Catholic church has suffered for its lack of transparency and refusal to take full action against priests who harm children. It is common rhetoric to declare that Catholicism is full of pedophiles, and it is true that there have been some shockingly horrific cases, but if parents are going to protect their children they must guide them to beware all dangers, and they are far more likely to experience sɛҳuąƖ abuse from a teacher or other school staff member than by a Catholic priest. So why is the public not decrying teachers as pedophiles
    abuse
    Considering this, 10% (roughly 4.5 million children) of public school students have experienced some form of sɛҳuąƖ misconduct by the time they graduate high school, yet of the 77.4 million Catholics in the United States, .01% reported claims of child sɛҳuąƖ abuse (10,667 children). It has also been studied and concluded that about 4.4% of all clerics were known to sɛҳuąƖly abuse children between 1946 and 2014, yet it is estimated that roughly 5% of men are pedophiles and those numbers do not even take into account the incidence of female sɛҳuąƖ predators at all. These numbers make a harsh case against public school employees.
    In truth, child sɛҳuąƖ abuse is a serious issue no matter who commits it, but as many admit, “prevention is key.” The best way to prevent child sɛҳuąƖ abuse is by protecting children from predators and teaching them to protect themselves. Knowing that public school teachers are far more likely to sɛҳuąƖly abuse students, parents must ask themselves, once again, is the public education system is really worth the risk? 


    Patience is a conquering virtue. The learned say that, if it not desert you, It vanquishes what force can never reach; Why answer back at every angry speech? No, learn forbearance or, I'll tell you what, You will be taught it, whether you will or not.
    -Geoffrey Chaucer

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8316
    • Reputation: +4706/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #12 on: May 24, 2022, 06:30:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Something I like to bring up when I hear people harping about pedophile priests:

    Public School Teachers 100 Times More Likely To Abuse Kids Than Catholic Priests
    By Jessica Marie Baumgartner | 2 months ago

    Not to mention among Protestants, or, any other profession/position that involves being close to children. These demons will literally weasel their way into any of these kinds of positions to feed their vice, it's not just one institution.

    The son of one of my High School teachers, who himself became a public school teacher, was accused of being an abominable pedophile recently. I really feel for that teacher of mine, he was a great guy, and the shame and embarrassment he and his family must have over his son.
    https://www.wearegreenbay.com/news/local-news/former-gb-band-teacher-accused-of-touching-fifth-graders-facing-multiple-charges/
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Online TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5767
    • Reputation: +4620/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #13 on: May 24, 2022, 06:32:19 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • When, not if, the Conciliar sect begins letting priests marry--most of the ones who do are going to marry each other.

    Women's ordination will probably come around the same time.

    Offline ByzCat3000

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1889
    • Reputation: +500/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Myth that Church should let priests get married
    « Reply #14 on: May 26, 2022, 07:17:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yeah, that's ridiculous.  NORMAL men are not attracted to children or to boys.  Period.  So, what?, they can't find adult women to break their vows of chastity with?  It's not uncommon for a priest to run off with some woman (happened with a couple Traditional priests I knew).  There's a claim that some men become sodomites when they go to prison due to lack of women around, and you occasionally hear of some sick individuals doing perverse things with farm animals (where there are no women around) ... but priests are SURROUNDED by women, many of whom don't like their husbands, and seek them out for consolation, and would latch onto a priest who gave them attention.

    No, the problem is that sodomites are attracted to the priesthood because it gives the access to boys.  So it's completely the opposite of what they claim.
    Devils advocating for a position that I don’t necesaarily hold

    what if the real issue is that too many normal men (ie: who are interested in women) simply don’t want to become priests because they don’t want to be celibate for life.  You could criticize them and say they should be more willing to sacrifice, but it is what it is.
    then those who are LEFT are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs and worse who think “ok, I don’t have a lawful outlet for my sɛҳuąƖity so I’ll do this instead” and then they fall or worse, they use the position to gain access to children etc

    i think a comparison between the Latin and eastern rites would be more helpful than comparison to Protestantism here.  If the eastern rites have less of a problem with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and child abuse in the priesthood that might be something to consider.  I don’t know if that’s the case tho