Perhaps you could also take it up with Our Blessed Mother for using the term "errors of Russia" without any mention of the Jєωs behind it. She mentions or alludes to "Russia" many times without once using the word "Jєω".
Sure, +Vigano would persuade many people toward Traditional Catholicism by going off on a 5-paragraph rant about Jєωs in every speech and letter of his. Those who are aware of the Jєω conspiracy don't need more than an oblique allusion to it. Those who are not aware of it would be turned off by a "raving lunatic" spouting off about Jєωs.
Just wondering. Have you guys every heard about this mysterious virtue called "prudence"? Look it up. It's generally considered the "mother" of all virtues, the one which weighs the pros and cons, and the consequences of each exercise of the other virtues. Yet I'm sure that some of you clowns would consider it a virtue to get in some ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ's face and berate them constantly, "You filthy sodomite." ... as if that kind of behavior will cause you to win their conversion. No, it only makes you feel superior in your own tiny minds.
One example comes from St. Thomas. While it's a virtue to rebuke the sinner, St. Thomas holds that not only is it not obligatory IF someone in prudence judges that it would do no good, but it could even be a vice to rebuke someone IF prudence suggests that the rebuke would only cause them to become more hardened in their sin. That is because the END or the GOAL of rebuking the sinner is to win their conversion. So in some cases, the material act of rebuking the sinner actually militates against the true formal end of the act, thereby making it a vice against charity rather than a virtue, by accomplishing the exact opposite of the rationale for its being a virtue.
You guys are really terrible and won't accept any correction on this matter whatsover. Take 5 seconds to think what would happen (clearly +Vigano did) if +Vigano was constantly spoutinig off about the "Jєωs". Sure, you clowns would fist-bump each other and celebrate, but you already are "convinced" and it would be just preaching to the choir. Now imagine you're a conservative Novus Ordite programmed by Jєω conditioning so that you would consider this Anti-Semitic. You would be much less receptive to what he has to say about Vatican II, Modernist, Bergoglio, etc. Is it more important for someone's salvation to believe that V2 and the NOM are bad (Traditional Catholicism good) or to believe that the Jєωs run the world?
Also, take 5 seconds to think what would have happened had +Vigano written a 10-paragraph condemation of Trump. +Vigano is a good judge of character, and he realizes that Trump has a yuge (yet fragile) ego and that any such criticism would simply cause Trump to lash out and dig his heels in, whereas the flattery (with carefully-chosen words that did not endorse or justify the bad things he's done) would elicit a positive reaction. Trump ended up proudly re-tweeting the latter. In it, +Vigano said that he "dared hope" that Trump was on the side of good, admitting that he wasn't certain of it, but attempting to elicit whatever good might lurk somewhere inside that (dark, evil) heart of his.
You guys think it's a major virtue on your part as you thump your chest acting like bigshots (while condemning those who do not follow suit and do likewise) and excoriate the Jєωs anonymously on a relatively-minor website.
This is both arrogant and idiotic.
Lads, you’ve become the forum’s Golem monster 👹
We have to suffer your endless, posts and none may give you a down-vote for being such a bore.
You function as Cathinfo’s de facto chat monitor.
Beware, for as with Ignis Ardens, the first sign of a forum’s demise is when the bully monitors arise.
Topic: Msgr. Vigano's Shotgun Blast (Read 5951 times)