It’s all over the news: The war on terror must be revived.

That’s the shriek from the Jєωιѕн-owned press following the Paris attacks allegedly carried out by ISIS.

Just overnight, Israeli spy services are oh so indispensable to French intelligence.

We’re in for a beefed up security state now and that means TSA agents at stadiums and concert halls. Chertoff and Lieberman and their shills at DHS will have a ball.

But what’s really disturbing is what the press is not telling us.

Bet you didn’t know that the Pentagon knew about the existence of ISIS all the way back in 2012, and used them to destroy Assad.

[Clip: “Many people would argue that the US actually saw the rise of ISIL coming and turned a blind eye or even encouraged it as a counterpoint to Assad. In a secret analysis by the agency you ran, the Defense Intelligence Agency, in August 2012 said, I quote, ‘There is a possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist…’”

“That’s a secret.”

“It’s not secret anymore. It was released under FOI. The quote is: ‘There is a possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in Eastern Syria, and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want in order to isolate the Syrian regime.’ The US saw the ISIL Caliphate coming and did nothing. Did you see this docuмent in 2012? Did this come across your table?”

“Oh, yeah, yeah, I paid very close attention.”

“Okay, so when you saw this, did you not pick up a phone and say, ‘what on earth are we doing supporting Syrian rebels.’”

“Sure. That kind of information is presented. Those become, those become, I argued about it.”

“Did you say we shouldn’t be supporting these groups?”

“I did. I mean, we argued about the different groups that were there and we said who is it that’s involved here.”

“In 2012, your agency was saying, quote: ‘The Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood, and al-Qaeda in Iraq are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.”

“Hmm, hmm.”

“In 2012, the US was helping coordinate arms transfers to those same groups.— Nods head yes.— Why did you not stop that? If you’re worried about the rise of quote unquote Islamic Extremism.”

“I hate to say it but that was not my job.”]

But it was Obama’s AND Hollande’s ‘job’ to make policy on the covert arms transfers.

Hollande even admitted to arming the Syrian rebels in breach of the EU arms embargo, knowing full well that the weapons would fall into the hands of hard-line jihadists.

And why doesn’t the press mention that ISIS is terrorizing only Western interests abroad but not laying a hand on Israel and its interests.

Is it because ISIS is enabled by the Mossad, Israel’s CIA?

It’s a known fact that Israel’s been treating wounded al-Nusra jihadists in its hospitals and sending them back to Syria to terrorize Assad.

France has turned a blind eye to this. For after all, Hollande and Bibzy are bosom buddies.

Intelligence experts say that the ‘Islamic terror network’ has been infiltrated by Mossad whose assets pose as imams and members of terrorist cells who plan and fund terrorist attacks that benefit the Jєωιѕн State.

For in the post-Paris attacks, it’s looking like a Mossad-orchestrated ‘fαℓѕє fℓαg.’

Take the “Syrian Passport” dropped by one of the terrorists before dying.

I mean what terrorist carries his passport on a ѕυιcιdє mission?

And what about the terrorist whose last words were: “Syria! Syria!”

It’s all kind of suspicious, don’t you think?

For Jєωry’s plan is to turn Western guns on Syria—NOT to wipe out ISIS—but to wipe out Assad and the legitimate Syrian government who stand in the way of Zionist hegemony in the Middle East.

I have received a report from European security that there was a massive cyber attack on French systems 48 hours prior to and during the Paris attacks. Among other things, the attack took down the French mobile data network and blinded police surveillance The attack was not a straightforward DDOS attack but a sophisticated attack that targeted a weakness in infrastructure hardware.

Such an attack is beyond the capability of most organizations and requires capability that is unlikely to be in ISIL’s arsenal. An attack on this scale is difficult to pull off without authorities getting wind of it. The coordination required suggests state involvement.

It is common for people with no experience in government to believe that fαℓѕє fℓαg attacks are not possible, because they think the entire government would have to be involved and not everyone would go along with it. Someone would talk. However, if the report I have received is correct, hardly anyone has to be involved, and security forces are simply disabled.

Remember the reports that during 9/11, a simulation of the actual events that were occuring was being conducted, thus confusing responsible parties about the reality.

I am unable to reveal any further information. If security experts find the information credible, they should direct their inquiries to the French authorities.