I'm legitimately curious as to why you think we shouldn't believe in the moon landings. At least in your next post take a moment to answer that question for me.
I am focused more on why I don’t believe the moon landing than why others shouldn’t. Let others believe as they will.
As for a number of reasons, basically off the top of my head, why I believe the moon landings never occurred, they are listed below, in no particular order.
>Video footage seems clearly to show that the US flag is waving in the breeze. No amount of explanation for this from NASA has ever satisfied me.
>We see a supposed moon landscape, rugged moutains and hills in the background, a lunar landing module in the foreground. That exact same landscape is superimposed, feature for feature, on another photo. But in this photo there is no vehicle. We know that they couldn’t move the vehicle. So how did this happen?
> No sign of a blast crater from the alleged descent of a LEM on the moon’s surface does not encourage belief, especially in light of the reported fact that the surface is covered with thick powdery dust, and we are told that the LEM engine produced at least 10,000 lbs of thrust. There should be a crater, not to mention a layer of dust over at least the bottom portion of the LEM, including the landing pads. But we see nothing
>In that regard, the supposed footprints of astronauts on a surface bereft of the tiniest amount of moisture. How do clear footprints survive? Try creating a clear visible footprint on a dry sandy beach.
>How does an astronaut snap clearly framed pictures in a bulky space suit with a Hasselblad camara mounted on his chest? Even the inventor of that camera was scratching his head over that one.
>Back to the LEM: Neil Armstrong almost got killed testing one in California a year before Apollo 11. Raw footage of that event is readily available, showing the craft crashing and bursting into flame. Yet we are to believe a year later that all the problems were ironed out, and that 6 successful landings occurred on the moon’s surface thereafter.
>There is only one light source on the moon’s surface, viz. The sun. Yet many alleged photos on the moon show multiple light sources, whose shadows to off at various angles from the objects casting them. Impossible.
>How can an astronaut descending to the moon’s surface from a LEM be so perfectly lit up and photographed when the his surroundings are plunged in the shadows of the very LEM he is exiting?
> How do astronauts survive the 250 degree heat during moon-day, and minus 250 degree cold during moon-night, in relatively flimsy suits with inadequate cooling and equally inadequate warming features?
> What is more, how do astronauts survive on a surface being constantly bombarded by micro meteorites. The earth is protected from this bombardment, because we have an atmosphere in which they burn up before reaching the earth’s surface. No so on the moon.
>How do astronauts survive passing through the Van Allen belt unscathed by dense, lethal radiation in that region? Not just once but a collective total of 12 time. Not one of them suffered from any kind of radiation sickness, much less cancer thereafter. This in light of the fact that numbers of scientists and astrophysicists have expressed grave doubt that such a positive outcome might occur. Even current NASA astonauts like Terry Virsts admit that we do not have the ability presently to pass above earth’s orbit. The Orion project, he says, will do it one day in the future, but not now.
>Why is the moon’s alleged horizon so black. It should be blanketed with myriads of stars and galaxies, not to mention to clear views of planets in our solar system.
> How could astronauts have communicated so clearly and noiselessly with ground control, when the noise level of the propulsion engine, a few feet away, directly below them, was reported to have been totally deafening?
>Gus Grissom complained that they couldn’t even communicate between bldgs. on the ground of the space center. How, he wondered, could they ever do it successfully from deep space?
Grissom was highly critical of the whole Apollo, program. He hung a lemon on the front of his test module just to illustrate his misgivings. He met an untimely death, as we know. Was it just an accident? His widow and family didn’t think so.
>At least 10 astronauts have died in their early sixties from causes ranging from heart attacks to cancer. I thought these guys were the most fit men among us. Strange
>Commander James Irwin had a sudden heart attack just after he had decided, (apparently), to come clean with his own story. He contacted moon landing denier, Bill Kaysing, in 1961, and asked the former to call him at his home, because, he felt his phone line might be bugged. Kaysing did contact him and arranged for a meeting. Irwin, alas, died suddenly a few days later before ever meeting Kaysing. He was 61.
>A NASA inspector named Tom Baron compiled a 500 page report on the Apollo Project. It was highly critical of the way the project was being run. He detailed facts about employee incompetence, drunkenness, poor workmanship, carelessness, lack of proper safety, etc. Baron was called to testify before a Congressional Committee in 1966(?). A week later he was dead, along with his wife and step-daughter. They were hit in their car by a train, it is reported. No autopsy was conducted. The bodies were immediately cremated in violation of Florida law. The 500 page report went missing and has never been recovered.
>An commercial airline pilot calls Bill Kaysing just about the time one of the returning landing modules set down in the ocean in 1970(?) He reports seeing a C5 cargo plane dropping what looked like an Apollo space capsule into the ocean. This was during a routine flight to Japan. The pilot did not identify himself, because he feared the loss of his job.
I could go on, but that should be enough for the time being. We really just scratched the surface.I repeat, the supposed moon landings were fake,IMO The entities who want to keep the facts from coming out are sinister liars. But they occupy very high places in our government, and maybe others. This ruthless power elite doesn’t hesitate to get people out of the way who threaten to expose their lies. They don’t want the Americans to know that 30 to 40 billion of taxpayer dollars was spent wastefully and fraudulently just to prove that the US could go ahead of the Soviets in the space race of the sixties and 70s.
Topic: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge (Read 30218 times)