Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 44

Author Topic: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge  (Read 30436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #160 on: June 10, 2018, 03:05:53 PM »
Quote from: Smedley Butler on June 10, 2018, 01:51:53 PM
Kubrick has a lot of offshore money revealed in the Panama Papers of the Fonseca Firm.

Where do you suppose all that money came from and why would he need to hide it?
This doesn't really have much to do with the thread. I read he was worth about $20 million. That shocks me, as I thought he would be worth much more than that.  It's not like Bill Gates-level wealth. Tons of rich people keep money offshore.

Logged

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #161 on: June 10, 2018, 08:06:29 PM »
I had a look at this debunking video:



One of the claims in Shining Code 2.0 which I found intriguing is that room 217 in the book was changed by Kubrick to room 237 to represent the 237,000 miles distance between the Earth to the moon, even through the distance changes due to the elliptical orbit. But this guy looked at old textbooks to find earlier references that generalize the distance and hasn't found any reference to the moon being 237,000 miles from the Earth.
Logged

Offline Neil Obstat

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #162 on: June 14, 2018, 12:50:17 PM »
.
237 - 217 = 20 
This means it's going to take another 20 years to make it to the moon -- or else Kubrick won't be allowed to live that long.
Logged

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #163 on: June 22, 2018, 08:58:39 AM »
Germar Rudolf wrote The Moon Landing: Fact or Fiction? for The Revisionist in 2003, disputing some of the major moon hoax claims.

I'd think his view would carry more weight, as he's a scientist and he also doesn't lack the backbone to attack a historical claim (the h0Ɩ0h0αx) that is genuinely dangerous to attack, unlike the moon hoax stuff.

Logged

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #164 on: July 01, 2018, 09:04:30 AM »
In re-reviewing this thread it's clear to me that moon hoaxers should admit that they're speculating. I don't see any information they have that should lead them to know the moon landings didn't happen.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 44
« previous next »