Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge  (Read 30438 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #155 on: June 09, 2018, 02:47:10 PM »
Here's Rodney Ascher's 2012 docuмentary film "Room 237" about Stanley Kubrick's telling of the moon landings story in the film "The Shining."


This actually looks very interesting. Thank you. I am not saying the conclusions will necessarily be true but I am fascinated with the interaction between culture and society. 

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #156 on: June 09, 2018, 06:43:14 PM »
Here's the link to part 2 of Weidner's "Kubrick's Odyssey":



Some might not find Part II of Weidner's "Kubrick's Odyssey" interesting since it focuses deeply on the film 2001 and its esoteric mesage given by Kubrick who was an initiate of Kabbalah and a Jew.
Weidner also speculates on Kubrick's sudden death, only days after showing Eyes Wide Shut to Warner Bros. execs, as punishment for revealing too much about child sex trafficking and occult rituals. Weidner says Kubrick planned a one-two punch with Eyes Wide Shut and "A.I." for pulling the veil off the elites' pedophilia practices.


Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #157 on: June 09, 2018, 08:41:05 PM »
.
This is the reason there won't be any lunar landings until after it has become common knowledge that the Apollo missions were fake.
.
When a real mission goes to the moon it will become obvious how staged the Apollo videos and photographs were.
.
They were only competing against motion picture sophistication like that of this movie from 1950, 18 years old.
.
This is the "staged drama" that everyone was accustomed to for nearly 2 decades:
.


Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #158 on: June 10, 2018, 12:24:13 PM »
Here's Rodney Ascher's 2012 docuмentary film "Room 237" about Stanley Kubrick's telling of the moon landings story in the film "The Shining."

I've been watching this and it's compelling. If it isn't a matter of Kubrick leaving all sorts of references to Apollo 11 then there are lots of coincidences. Not being skilled with numerology and symbol-finding, I don't know that lots of other messages, totally unrelated to NASA and Apollo, couldn't be found in the film if one were to look hard. It's possible to count the cars in the Overlook parking lot in such a way that they make up the date of the first step on the moon 7-21-69. But couldn't you rearrange 43 cars to represent anything? D.B Caulfield is a stretch, as representing Kubrick selling out. If anything his claimed involvement with NASA boosts his profile and makes him seem a genius. His movies are overrated.

The eagle statues in the office, the Indian totems do look like rockets. Adler is German for eagle. Danny with the Apollo sweater. Room 217 in the book changed to 237. Interesting stuff.

In the beginning of the movie Kubrick's meeting with Mueller and Slayton is mentioned. If his meeting with them was for ulterior motives I don't see why it would have been publicized, with photos taken, unless they needed a cover story. Kubrick hired Marshall Space Flight Center personnel Fred Orway and Harry Lange, and they relocated to England to help with pre-production. This source says that the purpose of all this was to ensure the scientific accuracy of his 2001 project.

I'd think NASA would employ a team of special-effects people, but I don't see any use for employing Kubrick. I don't even think Kubrick is a very good storyteller, so the claim that he was hired to write the scripts for Apollo 11, 12, and 13 sounds fishy. Better to hire some very skilled screenwriter who has a vested interest in the conspiracy.

The Oleg Olleynik article referenced is above my head. For those interested the people here claim that it's bunk.






Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #159 on: June 10, 2018, 01:51:53 PM »
Kubrick has a lot of offshore money revealed in the Panama Papers of the Fonseca Firm.

Where do you suppose all that money came from and why would he need to hide it?