Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge  (Read 30460 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #135 on: June 07, 2018, 09:23:13 PM »
There's plenty of evidence that at least the videos they show us of the astronauts on the moon are fraudulent.
Well let's go one by one. You give me a link to a piece of video to analyze. I'll view it and see if I agree as to its fishiness. I'll also check up on what debunkers say about it.

Again, I don't have a hard science background (hence the thread title), so I can only go by what is more reasonable, equally reasonable, and less reasonable.

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #136 on: June 07, 2018, 09:30:17 PM »
Did not read the previous threads on this subject but I happened to discuss this lately with a friend who believes it was all faked.

For myself I do not believe it was faked for this reason. Having lived through the time I remember there was great competition between the USA and the SOVIET UNION in the 'space race.' Now does anybody think that the Soviets went along with a fraud that put them out of the space race and gave all glory to the USA? The Soviet Union's NASA, whatever it was called, must have been well able to trace the rockets, satellites and moon attempts, so they would have been able to track the  rocket said to be the one that landed men on the moon. Now if there was no such rocket, and they had proof of that, I have no doubt this fraud would have been used by the Russians to HUMILIATE the USA at the time and even today.

But no, there was no such revelation, leading me at any rate to believe men did get to the moon and back.
I'm intrigued with the idea I've read about that the Cold War was a fraud, which, if true, would make this argument less persuasive. There are some moon hoax proponents who also claim nuclear weapons are a hoax as well. The Jews who ran the USSR and the United States were on the same page, but gave underlings a different script to follow, so that lower-level elites thought that the top elites of the two nations were playing for different teams and in a real moral stuggle. Fantastic, I know. Not the claim that Jews were elites of both the USSR and the USA, but the other stuff.



Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #137 on: June 07, 2018, 09:33:02 PM »
There's lots of evidence.
You should watch Jay Weidner's film, "Kubrick's Odyssey."
Kubrick had a very intimate relationship with NASA.
Weidner even explains the camera and the Scotchlite front-screen projection technology used to create the "moon" sets.
I'll take a look at this in the near future.


Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #138 on: June 08, 2018, 11:26:21 AM »
I'll take a look at this in the near future.
.
Has "the near future" happened yet?

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #139 on: June 08, 2018, 11:52:48 AM »
.
Has "the near future" happened yet?

Still smarting from my thorough dismantling of Kaysing? Or was it my linking to that great evisceration of you by claudel?

AFAIK I have to shell out $3 to watch the Kubrick video. Hey Smedley, could you just relate to me the points made in the video?