Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 44

Author Topic: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge  (Read 32427 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rum

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #130 on: June 06, 2018, 04:22:45 PM »
Just as something to add to the thread, not that I consider her refutation of her father's involvement in the moon landings to be worth much:


Logged

Offline cassini

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #131 on: June 07, 2018, 05:34:38 AM »

Did not read the previous threads on this subject but I happened to discuss this lately with a friend who believes it was all faked.

For myself I do not believe it was faked for this reason. Having lived through the time I remember there was great competition between the USA and the SOVIET UNION in the 'space race.' Now does anybody think that the Soviets went along with a fraud that put them out of the space race and gave all glory to the USA? The Soviet Union's NASA, whatever it was called, must have been well able to trace the rockets, satellites and moon attempts, so they would have been able to track the  rocket said to be the one that landed men on the moon. Now if there was no such rocket, and they had proof of that, I have no doubt this fraud would have been used by the Russians to HUMILIATE the USA at the time and even today.

But no, there was no such revelation, leading me at any rate to believe men did get to the moon and back. 
Logged

Offline stgobnait

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #132 on: June 07, 2018, 08:52:57 AM »
Maybe they were both pretending, and there was no little boy to shout, 'The King is in the altogether'!
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #133 on: June 07, 2018, 10:19:04 AM »
Quote from: rum on June 05, 2018, 06:14:50 PM
My advice would be to not be cavalier and say the moon landings didn't happen. Instead people should admit that they are speculating that the moon landings didn't happen and really don't know for sure.

There's plenty of evidence that at least the videos they show us of the astronauts on the moon are fraudulent.
Logged

Offline Smedley Butler

Re: Moon Landings - No Hard Science Knowledge
« Reply #134 on: June 07, 2018, 01:14:22 PM »
Quote from: rum on June 05, 2018, 07:55:37 AM
I've long thought a good argument in favor of the moon landings having happened, in this case of Apollo 11, is all the seemingly unpredictable happenings, such as no pictures of Neil Armstrong being taken by Aldrin. There's one of Neil reflected in Aldrin's visor and a few with Neil's back turned, but which are focused on something else. The account from James R. Hansen's First Man The Life of Neil A. Armstrong (which was authorized by Armstrong) has some wondering if Aldrin didn't take the pictures of Neil on purpose, out of spite for not getting to be the first man to step on the moon. Aldrin's father was furious that he wasn't picked over Neil, and lobbied NASA to switch the order. One of the claims of Kaysing and other moon hoax proponents, with zero evidence, is that Stanley Kubrick was hired by NASA to write scripts for Apollo 11, 12 and 13.
There's lots of evidence.
You should watch Jay Weidner's film, "Kubrick's Odyssey."
Kubrick had a very intimate relationship with NASA.
Weidner even explains the camera and the Scotchlite front-screen projection technology used to create the "moon" sets.

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 44
« previous next »