Author Topic: Matthew Anger (Read 702 times)

Quo Vadis Petre · « **on:** December 20, 2006, 10:06:06 PM »

I can't believe many people support Mr. Anger in his attacks on other people as "anti-Semitic" such as Michael E. Jones and Fr. Denis Fahey. Any other thoughts about him and his "Fringe Watcher" website?

Matthew · « **Reply #1 on:** December 20, 2006, 10:27:28 PM »

He is obviously biased in some way -- because anyone who has READ Fr. Fahey (as I have) can hardly call him "anti-semitic" (unless you mean anti-semitic as the Jєωs often use it today -- meaning saying ANYTHING about the Jєωs, even charitable, honest criticism)

Fr. Fahey is actually the Catholic model for how we should deal with the Jєωs. He was perfectly charitable, without inserting hate or compromising the truth. He held the correct position.

In Christ,

Matthew

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #2 on:** December 21, 2006, 01:17:48 AM »

I can't believe that he, claiming to be a traditional Catholic, has launched unsubstantiated assaults against very good Catholics, like Michael E. Jones and Bishop Williamson of the SSPX. Now I understand about being skeptical about Jєωιѕн conspiracy theories and the such, but to link it with "fringeism" is at the least naive. I expected this from neocons, but not from traditional Catholics (at least those claiming to be so).

Matthew · « **Reply #3 on:** December 21, 2006, 08:46:11 AM »

If only he realized he was helping the bad guys by villifying the few heroes/truth tellers we have alive today...

But God's will is being done, be sure of that. It is never easy to stand up for the truth. Men like "Mr. Anger" are simply weaving the crown that some future saints will be wearing forever...

Matthew

clare · « **Reply #4 on:** December 27, 2006, 07:04:05 AM »

Is E Michael Jones being accused of anti-semitism?

I've not been keeping up! Last I heard he was rightly debunking Medjugorje, and wrongly arguing with Michael Davies about the SSPX!

Clare.