Author Topic: Mass murderer was a closet gαy (Read 4014 times)

Charlemagne · « **Reply #15 on:** June 14, 2016, 03:15:44 PM »

Quote from: ihsv

Quote from: JezusDeKoning
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.

Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.

And even if it were relevant, who are you to determine what I need and don't need? Do you really want to go down the road of restricting things based on perceived "need"?

If some idiot is going to shoot at me with an AR-15, you can bet your caboose that I NEED an AR-15 to shoot back.

Did you see all those cops and SWAT officers? Were they carrying double barreled shotguns? What were they carrying? AR-15s.

Why should THEY be sufficiently equipped to defend themselves against a crazy guy and I shouldn't?

I always laugh when I hear someone say, "You can't possibly round up all the illegals in this country and deport them," yet they'll argue to their death that all guns could be confiscated, including from criminals.

qeddeq · « **Reply #16 on:** June 14, 2016, 03:23:04 PM »

if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.

Prayerful · « **Reply #17 on:** June 14, 2016, 03:49:45 PM »

We can see a convergence of sodomy, Islam and a strange sociopathy. The result was this crime. Islam itself should be a crime. It is no religion, but an anti-civilisation totalitarian ideology. Remove kebab as they say.

ihsv · « **Reply #18 on:** June 14, 2016, 04:05:07 PM »

The error among many of our non-American friends is that they view the OBJECT (in this case, a Sigsauer MCX - NOT an AR-15), as being the problem. The reality is that SIN is the problem, and that is what should be focused on.

Cantarella · « **Reply #19 on:** June 14, 2016, 04:46:02 PM »

Disney Donates $1 Million To Orlando Shooting Victims

http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/disney-donates-dollar1-million-to-orlando-shooting-victims/ar-AAh3cCh?ocid=spartandhp

Why am I not surprised?

More sodomite propaganda.

I doubt it that devil -run Disney would donate anything if the victims had been Christians.

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #20 on:** June 14, 2016, 08:07:19 PM »

Quote from: ihsv

Quote from: JezusDeKoning
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.

Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.

Clear hypocrisy among Traditional Catholics, as usual.

First Amendment: Seen as promoting an anti-Catholic government through ideas condemned by past popes.

Second Amendment: Seen as a higher dogma in the Trad Catholic purview than belief in the Trinity.

Don't be a Protestant, boy, and stop cherrypicking - it makes you look terrible.

clarkaim · « **Reply #21 on:** June 14, 2016, 08:45:22 PM »

Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #22 on:** June 14, 2016, 08:51:17 PM »

Quote from: clarkaim

Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.

I'll second that!

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #23 on:** June 14, 2016, 09:04:06 PM »

Quote from: clarkaim

Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.

I'm not a troll. I'm pointing out some of the holes in yours and many others' arguments. I respect everyone's right to have guns. I'm actually fairly center-right on the issue of guns.

Actually, let me revise my stance: if civilians want to have their guns and this includes all guns knowing the gravity of what they're going into, then fine.

ihsv · « **Reply #24 on:** June 14, 2016, 09:13:32 PM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

Quote from: ihsv
Quote from: JezusDeKoning
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.

Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.

Clear hypocrisy among Traditional Catholics, as usual.

First Amendment: Seen as promoting an anti-Catholic government through ideas condemned by past popes.

Second Amendment: Seen as a higher dogma in the Trad Catholic purview than belief in the Trinity.

Don't be a Protestant, boy, and stop cherrypicking - it makes you look terrible.

Who said anything about the first amendment? The Trinity? Dogma?

You conveniently ignored everything else I've said, but decided to make an issue of something I didn't say.

Talk about cherrypicking.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #25 on:** June 14, 2016, 09:14:53 PM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

Quote from: clarkaim
Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.

I'm not a troll. I'm pointing out some of the holes in yours and many others' arguments. I respect everyone's right to have guns. I'm actually fairly center-right on the issue of guns. I'll actually change my stance on it: I'll support civilians having them. If it's truly necessary for defense and in good hands, whatever.

Holes? Holes are for moles... As I have mentioned earlier, you don't seem to understand the true Nature of Man You seem to believe that government supersedes the the True Nature of man.

Quote

I'm actually fairly center-right on the issue of guns. I'll actually change my stance on it: I'll support civilians having them. If it's truly necessary for defense and in good hands, whatever.

Spoken like a good "Liberal. "

St Ignatius · « **Reply #26 on:** June 14, 2016, 09:27:11 PM »

Quote from: ihsv

Quote from: JezusDeKoning
Quote from: ihsv
Quote from: JezusDeKoning
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.

Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.

Clear hypocrisy among Traditional Catholics, as usual.

First Amendment: Seen as promoting an anti-Catholic government through ideas condemned by past popes.

Second Amendment: Seen as a higher dogma in the Trad Catholic purview than belief in the Trinity.

Don't be a Protestant, boy, and stop cherrypicking - it makes you look terrible.

Who said anything about the first amendment? The Trinity? Dogma?

You conveniently ignored everything else I've said, but decided to make an issue of something I didn't say.

Talk about cherrypicking.

The modern Conservative Liberal says today that the "Second Amendment" was to protect the "First Amendment, " but it is because of the first that the second is now under assault. Ironic, isn't it?

qeddeq · « **Reply #27 on:** June 14, 2016, 10:51:04 PM »

the real question is whether you like NASCAR. If you like that, you probably like guns, you don't like science, you believe in conspiracy theories because liberals don't, and you hate liberals. If liberals believed in cօռspιʀαcιҽs, you would not believe in them. If liberals denied global warming, nascar people would accept global warming. A juvenile, adolescent mentality explains the thinking of certain types of conservatives. They are also extremely jealous of educated people, absolutely hate them. Unfortunately, they also vote. Wisely, the roman catholic church is a hierarchy, because otherwise it would be driven into the ground by the lowest common asshole.

OHCA · « **Reply #28 on:** June 15, 2016, 12:07:19 AM »

Quote from: qeddeq

if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.

You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.

qeddeq · « **Reply #29 on:** June 15, 2016, 12:45:39 AM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: qeddeq
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.

You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.

you see, that's just it. I AM educated so I don't need to compensate for any feelings of inferiority that nascar people have. They compensate for very painful feelings of inadequacy by trying to do what they THINK educated people do. So for example, fastidiousness in grammar use and punctuation on an internet forum is something they imagine is required. Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials. Sux being you though. While you were doing stupid shit in high school, I was actually studying.