Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Fighting Errors in the Modern World => Topic started by: Miseremini on June 14, 2016, 10:47:19 AM
-
ALso in my morning paper, drag queens reported he had been visiting the club for 3 years
http://blog.spiritdaily.com/news-links/ex-wife-says-terrorist-was-gαy
-
Ha, liberals will lose their minds over this one!
-
God have mercy on us.
-
Automatic weapon brandishing, queer, drag queen, Muslim mass murderer terrorist????
Is this an SNL skit? You can't write this stuff. :applause:
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
-
realmccoy - the situation is "fluid". And, they are writing this stuff. Many people are saying that this is another fαℓѕє fℓαg. In which case, it was probably a hoax as well. And, I agree with them. There was a lot of fake sniffles with zero tears by the victims being interviewed. I haven't invested enough time investigating it, but I think that the ones I saw were acting. One is in fact by profession an actor. It is that main hispanic looking guy with a goatee beard. I saw three to four interviewed victims.
As far as writing this stuff goes. It was also "hispanic night" at that gαy club. So, the whole script is there: homophobic muslim killing minorities, gαys, and trannies with AR15 in the name of ISIS during an election year. They made it up. I don't think anyone died. There is no footage of the ambulances rushing all of those people to the hospital. There is no civilian video inside or outside of the club. And, there are no tears. Tthe victims climax in pleading for gun control and banning the ar15. They are not fooling me.
-
"A recent graduate of West Catholic Preparatory High School in Philadelphia has been identified as one of the people killed in the Orlando nightclub massacre.
The death of 18-year-old Akyra Murray was announced in a post on the school's website Monday afternoon.
She graduated third in her class just last week, and had just signed a letter of intent to play basketball for Mercyhurst University back on May 9th."
Don't you have to be 21 to even enter the bar?
Was the emergency exits locked?
-
viva christo rey - don't be so gullible. They make up names and identities all the time. If anyone cared to investigate, they would probably find that nobody at that school ever heard of this gal. fαɢs are so emotional and carnal. If gαys really died at this club, gαys would be the very last people you would see faking it. They would be crying, and would be upset. But, no they are faking it, and getting paid.
-
realmccoy - the situation is "fluid". And, they are writing this stuff. Many people are saying that this is another fαℓѕє fℓαg. In which case, it was probably a hoax as well. And, I agree with them. There was a lot of fake sniffles with zero tears by the victims being interviewed. I haven't invested enough time investigating it, but I think that the ones I saw were acting. One is in fact by profession an actor. It is that main hispanic looking guy with a goatee beard. I saw three to four interviewed victims.
As far as writing this stuff goes. It was also "hispanic night" at that gαy club. So, the whole script is there: homophobic muslim killing minorities, gαys, and trannies with AR15 in the name of ISIS during an election year. They made it up. I don't think anyone died. There is no footage of the ambulances rushing all of those people to the hospital. There is no civilian video inside or outside of the club. And, there are no tears. Tthe victims climax in pleading for gun control and banning the ar15. They are not fooling me.
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Assuming you desire living in an effeminate society (police state). Hence the wording of the second amendment of the Constitution....
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Assuming you desire living in an effeminate society (police state). Hence the wording of the second amendment of the Constitution....
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
It's too much for civilians to have semi-automatic rifles, IMO. They're military weapons.
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Assuming you desire living in an effeminate society (police state). Hence the wording of the second amendment of the Constitution....
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
It's too much for civilians to have semi-automatic rifles, IMO. They're military weapons.
With all due respect, you obviously don't have any idea of the relation of the nature of weaponry to the Nature of Man.
I don't know if you're an American, but the second amendment agrees totally with Natural Law. There were no regulations on types of weapons that one could posses. Much like the Swiss civilians enjoyed until very recently. They were pretty much ammuned from threats, foreign and domestic.
-
It's too much for civilians to have semi-automatic rifles, IMO. They're military weapons.
Besides handguns, grenade launchers and other specialized weapons, would you mind telling me which "military weapons" our army uses that are semi-automatic and not tri-burst/full-auto capable?
-
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Assuming you desire living in an effeminate society (police state). Hence the wording of the second amendment of the Constitution....
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
It's too much for civilians to have semi-automatic rifles, IMO. They're military weapons.
Yes, so when that military turns against the citizenry, said citizenry has nothing other than baseball bats, knives, and rocks with which to fight back. Makes perfect sense. One of the reasons a foreign army doesn't dare invade the U.S. is because we're armed. Ask the Brits what happened when they tangled with well-armed citizens.
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.
And even if it were relevant, who are you to determine what I need and don't need? Do you really want to go down the road of restricting things based on perceived "need"?
If some idiot is going to shoot at me with an AR-15, you can bet your caboose that I NEED an AR-15 to shoot back.
Did you see all those cops and SWAT officers? Were they carrying double barreled shotguns? What were they carrying? AR-15s.
Why should THEY be sufficiently equipped to defend themselves against a crazy guy and I shouldn't?
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.
And even if it were relevant, who are you to determine what I need and don't need? Do you really want to go down the road of restricting things based on perceived "need"?
If some idiot is going to shoot at me with an AR-15, you can bet your caboose that I NEED an AR-15 to shoot back.
Did you see all those cops and SWAT officers? Were they carrying double barreled shotguns? What were they carrying? AR-15s.
Why should THEY be sufficiently equipped to defend themselves against a crazy guy and I shouldn't?
I always laugh when I hear someone say, "You can't possibly round up all the illegals in this country and deport them," yet they'll argue to their death that all guns could be confiscated, including from criminals.
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
-
We can see a convergence of sodomy, Islam and a strange sociopathy. The result was this crime. Islam itself should be a crime. It is no religion, but an anti-civilisation totalitarian ideology. Remove kebab as they say.
-
The error among many of our non-American friends is that they view the OBJECT (in this case, a Sigsauer MCX - NOT an AR-15), as being the problem. The reality is that SIN is the problem, and that is what should be focused on.
-
Disney Donates $1 Million To Orlando Shooting Victims
http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/disney-donates-dollar1-million-to-orlando-shooting-victims/ar-AAh3cCh?ocid=spartandhp
Why am I not surprised? :facepalm: More sodomite propaganda.
I doubt it that devil -run Disney would donate anything if the victims had been Christians.
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.
Clear hypocrisy among Traditional Catholics, as usual.
First Amendment: Seen as promoting an anti-Catholic government through ideas condemned by past popes.
Second Amendment: Seen as a higher dogma in the Trad Catholic purview than belief in the Trinity.
Don't be a Protestant, boy, and stop cherrypicking - it makes you look terrible.
-
Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.
-
Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.
I'll second that!
-
Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.
I'm not a troll. I'm pointing out some of the holes in yours and many others' arguments. I respect everyone's right to have guns. I'm actually fairly center-right on the issue of guns.
Actually, let me revise my stance: if civilians want to have their guns and this includes all guns knowing the gravity of what they're going into, then fine.
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.
Clear hypocrisy among Traditional Catholics, as usual.
First Amendment: Seen as promoting an anti-Catholic government through ideas condemned by past popes.
Second Amendment: Seen as a higher dogma in the Trad Catholic purview than belief in the Trinity.
Don't be a Protestant, boy, and stop cherrypicking - it makes you look terrible.
Who said anything about the first amendment? The Trinity? Dogma?
You conveniently ignored everything else I've said, but decided to make an issue of something I didn't say.
Talk about cherrypicking.
-
Hey Troll !!! you're an IDIOT. 'nuf said.
I'm not a troll. I'm pointing out some of the holes in yours and many others' arguments. I respect everyone's right to have guns. I'm actually fairly center-right on the issue of guns. I'll actually change my stance on it: I'll support civilians having them. If it's truly necessary for defense and in good hands, whatever.
Holes? Holes are for moles... As I have mentioned earlier, you don't seem to understand the true Nature of Man You seem to believe that government supersedes the the True Nature of man.
I'm actually fairly center-right on the issue of guns. I'll actually change my stance on it: I'll support civilians having them. If it's truly necessary for defense and in good hands, whatever.
Spoken like a good "Liberal. "
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.
Clear hypocrisy among Traditional Catholics, as usual.
First Amendment: Seen as promoting an anti-Catholic government through ideas condemned by past popes.
Second Amendment: Seen as a higher dogma in the Trad Catholic purview than belief in the Trinity.
Don't be a Protestant, boy, and stop cherrypicking - it makes you look terrible.
Who said anything about the first amendment? The Trinity? Dogma?
You conveniently ignored everything else I've said, but decided to make an issue of something I didn't say.
Talk about cherrypicking.
The modern Conservative Liberal says today that the "Second Amendment" was to protect the "First Amendment, " but it is because of the first that the second is now under assault. Ironic, isn't it?
-
the real question is whether you like NASCAR. If you like that, you probably like guns, you don't like science, you believe in conspiracy theories because liberals don't, and you hate liberals. If liberals believed in cօռspιʀαcιҽs, you would not believe in them. If liberals denied global warming, nascar people would accept global warming. A juvenile, adolescent mentality explains the thinking of certain types of conservatives. They are also extremely jealous of educated people, absolutely hate them. Unfortunately, they also vote. Wisely, the roman catholic church is a hierarchy, because otherwise it would be driven into the ground by the lowest common asshole.
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.
you see, that's just it. I AM educated so I don't need to compensate for any feelings of inferiority that nascar people have. They compensate for very painful feelings of inadequacy by trying to do what they THINK educated people do. So for example, fastidiousness in grammar use and punctuation on an internet forum is something they imagine is required. Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials. Sux being you though. While you were doing stupid shit in high school, I was actually studying.
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.
you see, that's just it. I AM educated so I don't need to compensate for any feelings of inferiority that nascar people have. They compensate for very painful feelings of inadequacy by trying to do what they THINK educated people do. So for example, fastidiousness in grammar use and punctuation on an internet forum is something they imagine is required. Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials. Sux being you though. While you were doing stupid shit in high school, I was actually studying.
It would be more difficult for me to write like a retard than to write correctly, you arrogant sack of $#!+.
-
Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials.
Oh, please. Educated people use correct grammar as a matter of lifelong habit, respect for the language, respect for standards in general, and to ensure accurate communication. (Punctuation, a misplaced modifier, or a different conjunction or preposition can change the meaning of a sentence.)
-
I'm not one to say anything in regards to proper grammar and writing skills, I admit that I wasn't the most studious pupil in my younger days. I do regret that now.
However, I do understand that proper communication skills are very important in a good cultural society. Of what use is the highest faculty of our being, our minds, if we are not able to express it properly and with clarity?
As G. K. Chesterton said, "You can tell a Catholic by the way he climbs a tree." In other words, everything should be done well and with purpose. We shouldn't slide into bad habits just because it may be the norm of the day.
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.
you see, that's just it. I AM educated so I don't need to compensate for any feelings of inferiority that nascar people have. They compensate for very painful feelings of inadequacy by trying to do what they THINK educated people do. So for example, fastidiousness in grammar use and punctuation on an internet forum is something they imagine is required. Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials. Sux being you though. While you were doing stupid shit in high school, I was actually studying.
Qeddeq, with all due respect - shut up. Nothing personal.
-
They're saying he was a pervert homo to prevent any copycat incidents against perverts by heterosɛҳuąƖs disgruntled by the promoted and protected iniquity that's now so pervasive. They know normal, decent people are getting sick of the perversions touted as "heroic" and "good", while their own beliefs and lifestyles are under attack, and they don't want these same people to be inspired to "take out the trash".
-
I'm not one to say anything in regards to proper grammar and writing skills, I admit that I wasn't the most studious pupil in my younger days. I do regret that now.
However, I do understand that proper communication skills are very important in a good cultural society. Of what use is the highest faculty of our being, our minds, if we are not able to express it properly and with clarity?
As G. K. Chesterton said, "You can tell a Catholic by the way he climbs a tree." In other words, everything should be done well and with purpose. We shouldn't slide into bad habits just because it may be the norm of the day.
I guarantee you that you cannot tell a catholic by the way he climbs a tree. I was unable to find that quote that you attributed to Chesterton. Where did you get it?
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.
you see, that's just it. I AM educated so I don't need to compensate for any feelings of inferiority that nascar people have. They compensate for very painful feelings of inadequacy by trying to do what they THINK educated people do. So for example, fastidiousness in grammar use and punctuation on an internet forum is something they imagine is required. Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials. Sux being you though. While you were doing stupid shit in high school, I was actually studying.
Qeddeq, with all due respect - shut up. Nothing personal.
with all due respect Jezus, if you don't like my posts then put me on ignore, or don't read them. Do not tell people to "shut up". You get to make the rules around here about who is allowed to post and who is not? Note, "shut up" is a pretty juvenile response to any statement, so in a way I'm glad you made it as it displays your immaturity. Nothing personal.
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.
you see, that's just it. I AM educated so I don't need to compensate for any feelings of inferiority that nascar people have. They compensate for very painful feelings of inadequacy by trying to do what they THINK educated people do. So for example, fastidiousness in grammar use and punctuation on an internet forum is something they imagine is required. Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials. Sux being you though. While you were doing stupid shit in high school, I was actually studying.
Qeddeq, with all due respect - shut up. Nothing personal.
with all due respect Jezus, if you don't like my posts then put me on ignore, or don't read them. Do not tell people to "shut up". You get to make the rules around here about who is allowed to post and who is not? Note, "shut up" is a pretty juvenile response to any statement, so in a way I'm glad you made it as it displays your immaturity. Nothing personal.
Your smug arrogance is juvenile, you little prick. I bet you spent your fair share of the early days of your lofty education blowing bubbles in the toilet bowl.
-
Back to the topic of the thread, they say this guy was a closet queer. He visited the club a couple times, interacted with people, and used an app to communicate with queers.
His dad was also a Mohamedan. Looking only superficially at this, it's possible that he was just gathering info about how to carry out this attack. I mean, it seems like the most likely. The mdeia spinning him off as a closet queer is suspect to me.
-
They're saying he was a pervert homo to prevent any copycat incidents against perverts by heterosɛҳuąƖs disgruntled by the promoted and protected iniquity that's now so pervasive. They know normal, decent people are getting sick of the perversions touted as "heroic" and "good", while their own beliefs and lifestyles are under attack, and they don't want these same people to be inspired to "take out the trash".
I think so, too.
-
I was unable to find that quote that you attributed to Chesterton. Where did you get it?
Google is not always your friend... sometimes you have to read a book. :wink:
-
I was unable to find that quote that you attributed to Chesterton. Where did you get it?
Google is not always your friend... sometimes you have to read a book. :wink:
So which book?If you cannot provide me with the name of the book then I think it's safe to assume you simply made a mistake. If that is the case, then you were not climbing your little tree with much care were you? The irony is delicious: an uneducated man posting a quote meant to teach the importance of carefulness getting the quote wrong--out of carelessness. Priceless.
-
I was unable to find that quote that you attributed to Chesterton. Where did you get it?
Google is not always your friend... sometimes you have to read a book. :wink:
So which book?If you cannot provide me with the name of the book then I think it's safe to assume you simply made a mistake. If that is the case, then you were not climbing your little tree with much care were you? The irony is delicious: an uneducated man posting a quote meant to teach the importance of carefulness getting the quote wrong--out of carelessness. Priceless.
You tell me... your the "educated" one.
-
I was unable to find that quote that you attributed to Chesterton. Where did you get it?
Google is not always your friend... sometimes you have to read a book. :wink:
So which book?If you cannot provide me with the name of the book then I think it's safe to assume you simply made a mistake. If that is the case, then you were not climbing your little tree with much care were you? The irony is delicious: an uneducated man posting a quote meant to teach the importance of carefulness getting the quote wrong--out of carelessness. Priceless.
You are as annoying as a boil on my ass.
-
Back to the topic of the thread, they say this guy was a closet queer. He visited the club a couple times, interacted with people, and used an app to communicate with queers.
His dad was also a Mohamedan. Looking only superficially at this, it's possible that he was just gathering info about how to carry out this attack. I mean, it seems like the most likely. The mdeia spinning him off as a closet queer is suspect to me.
It seems to me that the description of him being a closet queer is not too well received in the MSM. And the reason I think that is the case, is that male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs have vile and repulsive fights with each other, being inclined to the most depraved vices. And this is an embarrassment to fag sympathizers, so they don't want it to be center-stage material.
-
[...] they say this guy was a closet queer. [....]  His dad was also a Mohamedan.
It seems to me that the description of him being a closet queer is not too well received in the MSM. [....]  And this is an embarrassment to fag sympathizers, so they don't want it to be center-stage material.
Ummm, sometimes truth is inconvenient?  Especially considering Saul Alinsky's rule that "radicals" must never let a crisis go to waste. The "gαys" were the victims--thus per progressive/SJW dogma, ennobled by their victimhood; better yet, the victims of conservative religious hatred. That theme became unexpectedly difficult to promote or market when evidence accuмulated that the presumably "gαy"-hating Islamic terrorist was actually one of the people he's presumed to hate.
The event of this past week evoked an exposé of the sodomite Muslim combination, on the blog of motu-proprio-Catholic Ann Barnhardt- : on the blog of motu-proprio-Catholic Ann Barnhardt
- :
Jihadist Was A Fag!  Also, Water Wet!  Sun Rises in East!
Ready to listen now? Ready to grapple with the hideous reality of the situation?  Because I’m ready to explain the whole islam and fαɢɢօtry thing, if you’re ready to listen. [....]  As I suspected from the very, very beginning, and alluded to in the “When Bad People Get Murdered By Other Bad People...” post- , Orlando Jihad Boy was a stone-cold fag.
How did I know? What were my clues?  Well, he was a musloid. So that’s numero uno. Second, he was Afghani. So, the assumption is that [....][##]
The last sentence in the quote is incomplete, so that CathInfo readers who are unprepared to consider the necessary presentation of unpleasant ideas ("hideous reality") will not be directly confronted by them in the quote.
-------
Note *: Note *: Barnhardt is living an "interesting life" in this decade, analogous to the "interesting times" of the Chinese curse. Many years earlier, she earned a degree from Kansas State U. in "Animal Husbandry (beef-cattle production) with an emphasis in Agricultural Economics". The latter is relevant to CathInfo, because I need to warn readers that she writes with the um, saltiness, of a cattleman, altho' she attained financial success with the eponymous sole-proprietor "Capital Management" business she built. She was a convert to whatever facsimile of "Catholicism" people received via Novus Ordo RCIA in 2007; only later did she find Latin Masses, albeit according to Summorum Pontificuм, and settled into those. She's not shy about provoking Muslims, notably in her viral video in 2011, in which she confidently burned a Quran after bookmarking it with raw bacon. A substantial amount of that confidence resulted from her skill with firearms.
Note #: Sun., June 12, 2016. Presumably her wording "Pitting the musloids against the sodomites (but I repeat myself...)" <http://www.barnhardt.biz/2016/06/12/when-bad-people-get-murdered-by-other-bad-people-it-doesnt-make-them-good-it-makes-them-dead/>.
Note ##: Tue., June 14, 2016. <http://www.barnhardt.biz/2016/06/14/jihadist-was-a-fag-also-water-wet-sun-rises-in-east/>.
-
realmccoy - the situation is "fluid". And, they are writing this stuff. Many people are saying that this is another fαℓѕє fℓαg. In which case, it was probably a hoax as well. And, I agree with them. There was a lot of fake sniffles with zero tears by the victims being interviewed. I haven't invested enough time investigating it, but I think that the ones I saw were acting. One is in fact by profession an actor. It is that main hispanic looking guy with a goatee beard. I saw three to four interviewed victims.
As far as writing this stuff goes. It was also "hispanic night" at that gαy club. So, the whole script is there: homophobic muslim killing minorities, gαys, and trannies with AR15 in the name of ISIS during an election year. They made it up. I don't think anyone died. There is no footage of the ambulances rushing all of those people to the hospital. There is no civilian video inside or outside of the club. And, there are no tears. Tthe victims climax in pleading for gun control and banning the ar15. They are not fooling me.
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
:roll-laugh1: :facepalm:
-
Disney Donates $1 Million To Orlando Shooting Victims
http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/disney-donates-dollar1-million-to-orlando-shooting-victims/ar-AAh3cCh?ocid=spartandhp
Why am I not surprised? :facepalm: More sodomite propaganda.
I doubt it that devil -run Disney would donate anything if the victims had been Christians.
Disney is trying to cover it's rear after the whole Disney World incident. I doubt they would actually donate money to promote sodomy, when they can put it in their movies for free. Which they actually did. Couple of lesbos in their new childrens film.
:heretic: :heretic: :heretic: :heretic: :heretic: :heretic: :heretic: :heretic: :heretic:
-
Civilians do not need an AR-15. At all.
Whether we "need" it or not is irrelevant. It's called the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of RIGHTS.
Clear hypocrisy among Traditional Catholics, as usual.
First Amendment: Seen as promoting an anti-Catholic government through ideas condemned by past popes.
Second Amendment: Seen as a higher dogma in the Trad Catholic purview than belief in the Trinity.
Don't be a Protestant, boy, and stop cherrypicking - it makes you look terrible.
Since the Catholic church has refrained from providing a Catholic Nation we can flock to I'll stick in America. No one is claiming the second amendment is higher than the Trinity or any other nonsense of the sort. An armed population gives you the means to fight tyranny or invasion. It's a standing army without the upkeep.
Personally I think Fully automatic weapons should be legal as well. Mass shooters aren't the ones dropping 1000$ plus on an AR-15. Most of the mass shootings I have heard of are carried out using a cheap, illegally obtained handgun.
-
the real question is whether you like NASCAR. If you like that, you probably like guns, you don't like science, you believe in conspiracy theories because liberals don't, and you hate liberals. If liberals believed in cօռspιʀαcιҽs, you would not believe in them. If liberals denied global warming, nascar people would accept global warming. A juvenile, adolescent mentality explains the thinking of certain types of conservatives. They are also extremely jealous of educated people, absolutely hate them. Unfortunately, they also vote. Wisely, the roman catholic church is a hierarchy, because otherwise it would be driven into the ground by the lowest common asshole.
While this may be true for a great deal of Conservatives, I sincerely doubt that is the case here. It is quite obvious why allowing the civilian populations to posses firearms is a all around good idea.
-
if we can have ar 15's why not let us have m16s with a triburst. or maybe K's. The K is more reliable than the m-16 but either would be better than the very limited AR 15, which is not good enough for citizens if they are fighting the military for their survival, which could be the case some day. Course you open that door then you have to admit grenades, and all sorts of ordnance to level the playing field.
didnt that V tech killer use nothing but handguns? I don't think he had a rifle.
You sure are light on English, syntax, and grammar for such an arrogant little puke.
you see, that's just it. I AM educated so I don't need to compensate for any feelings of inferiority that nascar people have. They compensate for very painful feelings of inadequacy by trying to do what they THINK educated people do. So for example, fastidiousness in grammar use and punctuation on an internet forum is something they imagine is required. Now educated people use correct grammar when they need to, for example in writing important letter or essays, or writing in formal settings. This internet forum is not a formal setting so a person without status insecurities would simply use an informal style, as they do in conversation. However, if you are a nascar person, you are too insecure to do this. I feel pity for you that sweat so hard over grammar(something obviously very difficult for you) in such an informal setting all because you lack academic credentials. Sux being you though. While you were doing stupid shit in high school, I was actually studying.
Speaking of high school behaviors, are you smoking something? Last time I checked this thread was about the closet queer Muslim and why AR-15s should be accessible to the public.
Plus you are talking about how everyone else is trying to compensate for something yet here you are citing your high school years. Guess what? No one cares.
-
" Especially considering Saul Alinsky's rule that "radicals" must never let a crisis go to waste. The "gαys" were the victims--thus per progressive/SJW dogma, ennobled by their victimhood; better yet, the victims of conservative religious hatred. That theme became unexpectedly difficult to promote or market when evidence accuмulated that the presumably "gαy"-hating Islamic terrorist was actually one of the people he's presumed to hate. "
Sorry I didn't get the quote mechanism right on that one.
Very good statement Alligator. You guys are not going to like this, but I think the Alinsky method was at work in the Brock Turner "sɛҳuąƖ assault" case, where Brock was convicted of assaulting a known party animal slut and drunk. The whole scene was a drunken orgy, and she was there dressed like the slut she is, stayed at the party, drank herself nearly insensate, then went off with this kid. She simply doesn't remember anything from that night because she's a black out lush. She was certainly not concerned with protecting her sɛҳuąƖ virtue. That train left the station long ago. The media portrayed her as some kind of heroine, as if she were Dido in the Aeneid. Your reference to Alinsky reminded me vividly of that recent case.
-
I see it as this now: have your guns if you're not a complete freak, but for crying out loud, know what you're getting into. They should only be in the hands of responsible people, which is 99.9999999% of the human population.
These mass shooting perpetrators are people who slip through the cracks, sadly.
-
Disney Donates $1 Million To Orlando Shooting Victims
Disney is trying to cover it's rear after the whole Disney World [gator?] incident. I doubt they would actually donate money to promote sodomy, when they can put it in their movies for free. Which they actually did.
An laughably  ignorant  mistaken opinion. In fact, Disney is easily the most sodomist-friendly employer in Central Florida. The corporation was proudly public about being an early adopter of health care benefits that cover (ahem) nonworking same-sex "partners".
I take it that you've never heard the 4½-decades-old - local joke about Disney World:
How many straight male employees does it take to screw in a light-bulb at Disney?
Both of 'em.
It's funny to residents of Central Florida--maybe only if they're unafflicted with "political correctness"--because of the obvious inference that presents a fundamental truth, albeit by overstatement. But it's one that's drawn from observations & conclusions shared over decades by many people here.
I strongly suspect that outta-the-closet sodomites are profitable for Disney--maybe very profitable: The notorious "Orlando gαy Days" originated as a preannounced single week in June featuring officially unofficial (wink, wink! nudge, nudge!) gatherings focused on--but not limited to--attending the theme parks at Disney World. Early on, there must've been fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the corporate executive suites about how much "gαy Days" would damage what was then a more convincing "family-friendly" Disney image: "What!? Corporate h.q. endorse these events? Oh, noooooo!"  But Walt has been dead for a half-year short of a half century - ; now I wouldn't be surprised at all if I were to learn that the current execs are much more concerned about preventing a plausible decline in sodomite-tourist revenue from "gαy Days", than maintaining the moral approval from their decades of traditional family-tourist customers.
-------
Note *: Founder Walter Elias "Walt" Disney lived long enough to announce his plans for the project, but died Dec. 15, 1966.
Note #: Disney World opened, under the control of Walt's former partner in the business that long ago was called Disney Bros.: his avaricious brother Roy Disney, on Oct. 1, 1971: Now only a trifle more than 3 months short of 45 years.
-
Disney Donates $1 Million To Orlando Shooting Victims
More sodomite propaganda.
I doubt it that devil-run Disney would donate anything if the victims had been Christians.
Only to whatever GLBT&c. claim to be "Christian", who are necessarily of the cafeteria persuasion that rejects Lv. 18:22 & 20:13, 1 Cor. 6:9--10, 1 Tm. 1:10, Rom. 1:24--32.
But probably not at all to genuine Christian victims in the Near East in the 21st century, who've been slaughtered or evicted from centuries-old Christian communities that somehow had previously survived Islamic episodes of genocide
Examining a list of 80 years of animated feature films made by Walt Disney Studios &c.[##], I can find none that I could identify as having a "Christian" theme (perhaps the Arthurian Sword in the Stone (1963) would be closest). But there was the plainly Arab-themed Aladdin (1992)- . Except that its plot, based on "Aladdin and the Magic Lamp", popularly considered Arabic culture, was actually part of a mixture from Persian, Indian--and maybe other--folk tales translated into Arabic, and expanded by adding more folk tales in Arabic.
-------
Note +: The practical centennial of the Armenian genocide by the initially-Ottoman Turks to advance their "Panturkic" goals sought by ethnic cleansing, was last year: Apr. 24, 2015. How much did the American public--never mind CathInfo readers--hear or see about that last year?
Note #: Aladdin: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aladdin_%281992_Disney_film%29#Controversies>.
Note ##: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Disney_animated_features>.
-
How many teenagers are posting on this thread?
-
FM 96.5: 1 of 2 local news-talk radio stations in metro Orlando, has been reporting for a few hours (more or less) since sunset, and citing 1 of the Hispanic media networks (Telemundo?), that the Muslim terrorist who killed 49 people at "The hottest gαy bar in Orlando" during "gαy Days" did so as an act of revenge against a Hispanic "lover" (no, I sure as Hades do not wish to visualize it) who afterwards admitted to--or boasted of--being HIV/AIDS positive. Has modern medical science made such an infection anything less than a practical death sentence? 
-
If he truly wanted to do something about it, he could wait until the Hispanic dies of AIDS, of which HIV is just the end-stage progression of. It all happens very quick.