Author Topic: Mark my words - Ruth Bader Ginsburg is dead - truth will come out eventually  (Read 6019 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17783
  • Reputation: +9964/-4466
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2
  • I MAY have the means to find out for sure.  I know someone who works on the same floor as her personal office.  Will get back if I learn anything.

    Fascinating.  But I doubt this person is privy to the truth that Ginsburg is dead.  Probably also being fed the public story.  Else he or she might be found Arkancided.

    Offline Seraphina

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +471/-97
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fascinating.  But I doubt this person is privy to the truth that Ginsburg is dead.  Probably also being fed the public story.  Else he or she might be found Arkancided.
    No, she doesn't buy into MSM at all.  But she has seen her, doesn't know her personally.  If I see my friend, I can ask if there have been any recent sightings.  She's not in government.  Her work takes her to the building from time to time.


    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2748
    • Reputation: +980/-1244
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!4
  • Wouldn't a Supreme Court Justice dying be REALLY big, blow-up news? 

    I have a very clear memory of finding out when Antonin Scalia had died, because for obvious reasons, it was the only story of that whole week. 
    Tío Samuel, ven pa 'aca

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22997
    • Reputation: +20138/-243
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's really hard to say what's going to happen, but the rosy picture of white hats victorious and America living happily ever after seems inconsistent with Our Lady's warnings and the reality of the defiantly sinful cesspool America (as well as the rest of the world) has become. I really think we're headed for a Chastisement. I wish we weren't, and I'd be delighted to learn that Hillary and Obama were incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay right now, but I'd have to see it to believe it. As you say, we shall see.

    You go boy -- SLAY that straw man! Too bad that's not my argument, or anyone else's. Who in this thread said anything about America living happily ever after?

    As a well-grounded Catholic raised in Tradition, I had the same thoughts myself. I wasn't inclined to believe in this Plan (in other words, I wasn't inclined to have hope) but:

    1. God has seemed to be quite patient with us. The Chastisement is a long time coming. It could have happened years ago. In fact, WW3 has been literally postponed several times including quite recently. Most of us would soil ourselves if we knew how many times we were minutes away from global thermonuclear war and the end of all modern conveniences. All thanks to God's mercy in giving us more time. Which leads to my next point...

    2. I'm not necessarily hoping for a SOLUTION -- just a RESPITE. The respite offered by Trump and the Q Patriots might be short -- a few years, a year, etc. But I'll take it!
    Seriously, if you had the choice between WW3 on March 1, 2019 or WW3 on March 15, 2019 wouldn't you choose the latter? Don't give me that "what difference does it make" nonsense. I for one am not the type to despair, be passive, or sit there and do nothing. If all I can get is a week, then I'll take it!

    3. Trump and the good guys could ultimately fail -- the Deep State could prevail after all, and then we're without hope of a human solution OR respite. Just sit and wait for the Chastisement at that point.

    But even if Trump and his group fail, then I would still be "right" for purposes of this thread. The only discussion is the reality of the Plan or is it all a complicated game/ruse to trick even more people into a new 3 party system. (Trump has enemies among both Republicans and Democrats, keep in mind). Also
    keep in mind that many in the Deep State have already resigned, been fired, or worse -- the downfall of McCain for example was quite curious. Was he executed?

    Can you really call a person naive for buying in when their actions are so convincing -- damaging the Deep State in this case? If they're going to be so convincing, then I can't help but be deceived -- and even if it turned out that I was deceived, no one could ever claim I was being naive.

    If a drug dealer hired a new underling, and that underling shot and killed 10 of the drug dealer's rivals, would the drug dealer ever be "naive" for trusting him even if it turned out later that the new underling was an undercover cop? I mean, this undercover cop just killed 10 of his rivals! Cops aren't supposed to behave that way. So the drug dealer might end up being deceived if the undercover agent was earnest enough (if he had a completely free hand to violate the law, for example), but no one could ever call him naive!

    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline josefamenendez

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 636
    • Reputation: +382/-32
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ariel Sharon was kept alive on a ventilator for ,what, 10 years? They can probably do at least the same for Ginsburg . Without an absolute death they may ascribe her to a "remote" position on the SCOTUS to get past 2020 or 2024, avoid a Trump pro-life conservative appointee and replace her then.
     It was important to the deep state to let everyone know Scalia was dead to ensure a liberal SCOTUS pick ASAP- luckily Obama was a lame duck and somehow that was avoided by the republican Senate.


    Offline Judith 15 Ten

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 130
    • Reputation: +57/-252
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ariel Sharon was kept alive on a ventilator for ,what, 10 years? They can probably do at least the same for Ginsburg . Without an absolute death they may ascribe her to a "remote" position on the SCOTUS to get past 2020 or 2024, avoid a Trump pro-life conservative appointee and replace her then.
     It was important to the deep state to let everyone know Scalia was dead to ensure a liberal SCOTUS pick ASAP- luckily Obama was a lame duck and somehow that was avoided by the republican Senate.

    She has to be physically and mentally capable of doing her job at the SC, otherwise, she can legally be replaced. The libs have no recourse to keep her on the SC.

    The question is how long can they keep her corpse (metaphorical or literal) in hiding before her Justice position is required for duty.
    Who is she that cometh forth as the morning rising, fair as the moon, bright as the sun, terrible as an army set in array? ~ Canticle of Canticles 6:9

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17783
    • Reputation: +9964/-4466
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!3
  • She has to be physically and mentally capable of doing her job at the SC, otherwise, she can legally be replaced. The libs have no recourse to keep her on the SC.

    The question is how long can they keep her corpse (metaphorical or literal) in hiding before her Justice position is required for duty.

    I think that's why they'll keep her out of the public eye ... even if she's alive.  They don't want her incapacity to become public knowledge.

    Offline josefamenendez

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 636
    • Reputation: +382/-32
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • She has to be physically and mentally capable of doing her job at the SC, otherwise, she can legally be replaced. The libs have no recourse to keep her on the SC.
    They will just lie about it like they do everything else, and act insulted that you even questioned them.
    RBG could have a cadre of liberal lawyers writing her opinions under her name. Proof of life? Who would ever challenge that? The Congress? :laugh2:


    Offline MiserereMeiDeus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 475
    • Reputation: +426/-2
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You go boy -- SLAY that straw man! Too bad that's not my argument, or anyone else's. Who in this thread said anything about America living happily ever after?

    As a well-grounded Catholic raised in Tradition, I had the same thoughts myself. I wasn't inclined to believe in this Plan (in other words, I wasn't inclined to have hope) but:

    1. God has seemed to be quite patient with us. The Chastisement is a long time coming. It could have happened years ago. In fact, WW3 has been literally postponed several times including quite recently. Most of us would soil ourselves if we knew how many times we were minutes away from global thermonuclear war and the end of all modern conveniences. All thanks to God's mercy in giving us more time. Which leads to my next point...

    2. I'm not necessarily hoping for a SOLUTION -- just a RESPITE. The respite offered by Trump and the Q Patriots might be short -- a few years, a year, etc. But I'll take it!
    Seriously, if you had the choice between WW3 on March 1, 2019 or WW3 on March 15, 2019 wouldn't you choose the latter? Don't give me that "what difference does it make" nonsense. I for one am not the type to despair, be passive, or sit there and do nothing. If all I can get is a week, then I'll take it!

    3. Trump and the good guys could ultimately fail -- the Deep State could prevail after all, and then we're without hope of a human solution OR respite. Just sit and wait for the Chastisement at that point.

    But even if Trump and his group fail, then I would still be "right" for purposes of this thread. The only discussion is the reality of the Plan or is it all a complicated game/ruse to trick even more people into a new 3 party system. (Trump has enemies among both Republicans and Democrats, keep in mind). Also
    keep in mind that many in the Deep State have already resigned, been fired, or worse -- the downfall of McCain for example was quite curious. Was he executed?

    Can you really call a person naive for buying in when their actions are so convincing -- damaging the Deep State in this case? If they're going to be so convincing, then I can't help but be deceived -- and even if it turned out that I was deceived, no one could ever claim I was being naive.

    If a drug dealer hired a new underling, and that underling shot and killed 10 of the drug dealer's rivals, would the drug dealer ever be "naive" for trusting him even if it turned out later that the new underling was an undercover cop? I mean, this undercover cop just killed 10 of his rivals! Cops aren't supposed to behave that way. So the drug dealer might end up being deceived if the undercover agent was earnest enough (if he had a completely free hand to violate the law, for example), but no one could ever call him naive!
    Of course a respite is to be preferred to an immediate chastisement. 

    If a drug dealer's underling claimed to have shot and killed 10 of the drug dealer's rivals, but there were no witnesses, no bodies, and the rivals' customers weren't looking for new connections, but the drug dealer believed the underling's claims nevertheless, might not the drug dealer be naive?
    "Jesus was the fruit of Mary, as Elizabeth expressed it: 'Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb.' Whoever wishes for the fruit, must go to the tree; whoever wishes for Jesus must go to Mary; and he who finds Mary, also certain

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2748
    • Reputation: +980/-1244
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!7
  • Back on the Court and as the fates would have it -- not dead.

    Why are we spreading misinformation about people to the left of us? It makes conservatives look atrocious, especially because, as I said, an active SCOTUS judge dying is a big deal. They have graphics prepared for her death because they likely have graphics in place for many peoples' deaths. Any president, the current pontiff, the Queen. Not uncommon in journalism at all.

    Tío Samuel, ven pa 'aca

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17783
    • Reputation: +9964/-4466
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!3
  • Why are we spreading misinformation about people to the left of us? It makes conservatives look atrocious ...

    Oh, give it a rest with this sanctimonious nonsense already, and get off your high horse.  Nobody was spreading misinformation.  Nobody claimed to have proof that she was dead.  This was obviously an exercise in SPECULATION.  People are allowed to speculate about government conspiracies and coverups.  That's how they are exposed and brought to light.  Sometimes people misfire, and the speculation is off mark, but that's because the real information is kept close to the vest by the conspirators.  It's the nature of this game.  But sometimes people hit the mark, such as with 9/11, and everything there began with speculation.  Then people started digging deeper and deeper into the available evidence, to the point that it's the 9/11 conspiracy is a certainty.

    Nevertheless, no one has produced any proven live pictures or videos of Ginsburg's actual return.  She refused to speak with anyone.  Speculation about her condition could have been ended quickly with a video of her appearing live to someone.  So the absence of proof of life leads to speculation that she was dead.  And the speculation should always continue, because the wicked who run this world do nothing but lie and deceive.


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22997
    • Reputation: +20138/-243
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Oh, give it a rest with this sanctimonious nonsense already, and get off your high horse.  Nobody was spreading misinformation.  Nobody claimed to have proof that she was dead.  This was obviously an exercise in SPECULATION.  People are allowed to speculate about government conspiracies and coverups.  That's how they are exposed and brought to light.  Sometimes people misfire, and the speculation is off mark, but that's because the real information is kept close to the vest by the conspirators.  It's the nature of this game.  But sometimes people hit the mark, such as with 9/11, and everything there began with speculation.  Then people started digging deeper and deeper into the available evidence, to the point that it's the 9/11 conspiracy is a certainty.

    Nevertheless, no one has produced any proven live pictures or videos of Ginsburg's actual return.  She refused to speak with anyone.  Speculation about her condition could have been ended quickly with a video of her appearing live to someone.  So the absence of proof of life leads to speculation that she was dead.  And the speculation should always continue, because the wicked who run this world do nothing but lie and deceive.

    You said it!

    And why did some news outlets use a stock photo of RBG and pass it off as current? It's only thanks to Anons (followers of the Q movement) that the photo was even exposed as old. Catching someone in a lie like that certainly warrants suspicion and mistrust.
    When someone mysteriously disappears for over 2 months, with only the left-wing media to insist they are alive, you better believe I'm going to speculate!

    Better to be wrong for a good reason (e.g., you were paying attention, thinking logically, etc.), than accidentally right (correct, but for the wrong reason, like "I trusted the mainstream media")
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2748
    • Reputation: +980/-1244
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • There will likely still be a SCOTUS vacancy before the next election, methinks. She is 85 years old and not in good health at all. Kennedy was 82 when he retired. There's no use for her to wait until a Democrat is in the WH to retire because that won't be for a long time.
    Tío Samuel, ven pa 'aca

    Offline josefamenendez

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 636
    • Reputation: +382/-32
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!2
  • I think it's an educated hypothesis that RBG might very well be dead. I don't think it's a conspiracy-just common deduction.
    She has had cancer 3 times. She is 85 years old.
    This time she fell and broke her ribs, and cancer tumors were discovered in her lung on xray. She had to have a LOBECTOMY- removal of a large lobe of the lung. She just didn't have the tumors removed. That is very intense surgery and recovery- chest tubes and all.
    We were never given any info what type of cancer this was ( was the lung her primary site, or was it metastatic from her prior pancreatic cancer? This would make quite a difference in her prognosis)
    Did the lung cancer metastasize? Did she have more radiation or chemo? Crickets....
    The last time I remember seeing RBG she barely looked conscious. I think it was at the Kavanaugh confirmation. Her head was resting on her chest, and the lights were definitely not on for Ruthie.I wanted someone to put a mirror under her nose to see if she was breathing. She looked like she weighed 75 lbs if that. These are very poor signs for any type of realistic"recovery", and even less likely, returning to work.
    If alive, the woman must be in severe pain and in a critical state. I would assume she is highly medicated and not totally lucid, if conscious at all.

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2748
    • Reputation: +980/-1244
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Back on the Court and as the fates would have it -- not dead.

    Why are we spreading misinformation about people to the left of us? It makes conservatives look atrocious, especially because, as I said, an active SCOTUS judge dying is a big deal. They have graphics prepared for her death because they likely have graphics in place for many peoples' deaths. Any president, the current pontiff, the Queen. Not uncommon in journalism at all.
    Seeing the ratio, I'd like to retract my previous statement.
    Tío Samuel, ven pa 'aca

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16