Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Unclear why you'd use NBC News as your serious evidence.I found the relevant article. No surprise that NBC News sensationalizes a rather weak article.I'll do a deeper review, but my preliminary read finds that the "meta-analysis" makes a great show talking about THC as a CB1 agonist, but both pure THC and whole plant MJ stimulate all the endocannabinoid receptors (though in greatly varying degrees), some of which counterbalance CB1 effects. Then throughout the paper the authors mention "CB1 agonist," but do not make clear whether they used a pharmaceutical or the plant or both. I have already mentioned that MJ patients consistently report inferior benefit from pharmaceutical monotherapies.The study also confesses the "heterogeneity" of the subjects involved, so admit that the subjects and their dosages were so diverse that numerous confounding factors (race, age of use, concurrent alcohol or other substances, etc.) undercut their admittedly "low" Confidence Intervals.It's interesting, but weak. I'll do a deeper review.
I should also mention that:• people die from aspirin, but that doesn't stop us from using it medically• the meta-analysis confined itself to chronic useSo,• even if (BIG "if") the article is on target, "low" risk with chronic use may be overcome by huge benefit• even if (BIG "if") chronic use has low risk, acute ("recreational") use may even be risk-free.I'll add this—MJ is more studied than any drug in the pharmacy and still questions remain, so we have a choice:make practices in accord with the preponderance of the best available evidenceORas the rabies faction here, completely ignore the evidence.
It's kind of bleeding into manichean territory where some things in God's creation can be inherently evil...
It's not inherently evil, any more than arsensic or digitalis are inherently evil. Both are natural substances, and poisonous. But they can be used for good, in the right situation. But who can doubt that arsenic, a natural substance, has been used for ill-purposes? Just because something is natural, it doesn't mean it's always good. Pot can cause serious side-effects, which will be downplayed or denied by pothead activists. Oh well.
What is the purpose of smoking marijuana for recreation, confusing the mind?
Your problem is you see sin under every stone. You always assume the worst case.
1. Define recreation.2. Define the type of MJ you're talking about.What's the purpose of ice cream, getting fat?What's the purpose of a living room couch, slothfulness?What's the purpose of a birthday cake, prideful celebrations?What's the purpose of a dishwashing machine, laziness?What's the purpose of a nice wristwatch, vanity?EtcEtcEtc
LT, if you stick to one topic, we might get somewhere.
All of these examples are dangerous occasions of sin or physical harm. Whether something is a sin or not isn't the sole determinant of whether it is wise to do. Nature never forgives, we have a fallen nature.
A dangerous/proximate occasion to sin = a sin. Smoking MJ could be a proximate occasion to sin, or not, just like alcohol. Depends on the person/circuмstance.Your problem is you can't accept the idea of "it depends", which is the basis for moral theology. You're looking for a 'yes or no'. That's not reality.
Mark 79, you are truly rotten. Let the vaccination start with you. No justification for your response to LT-except that you don't like the response.In your case, I support mandatory vaccination.
I see an occasion of sin.…