You do not overtly claim to be smarter. But you claim that your studies put an end to all debate. No one is more intelligent than you are on the subject, isn't that correct?
Are you dyslexic? Or a habitual liar? Importantly those are not "my" studies, they are studies in which several hundred physicians and researchers participated—the work of hundreds over decades. If you want to impugn the dozens of studies I have cited, impugning me does not undercut even one of those studies. To make your case, you need to offer counter-evidence.
Quote verbatim and link precisely where I "claim that ['my'] studies put an end to all debate."
I have repeatedly called for substantive counter-evidence from you and the other anti-MJ zealots.
If the "debate was over," I wouldn't ask for counter-evidence. Evidence made me change my opinion the first time. Stronger counter-evidence could prompt me once again to revise my opinion.
So far, that counter-evidence (
'scuuze me for laughing again
) consists of gratuitous assertions, a farcical video, and…[drum roll]… you, Meg, professing that you know the true intent of medical patients. You cannot read their minds, hearts, and souls. You are an ill-willed fraud.
Besides my lengthy and detailed review of the literature,
I have spoken with hundreds of medical MJ patients. Each has suffered for years, even decades, and they are thankful and blessed to have some relief in this life. You are wicked to impugn them.
Your "not overtly" dodge infers that you imagine that you can read my "covert" purpose. In other words, you persist in imagining that you can read my heart, mind, and soul.
Your presumption of such a charism is laughable and likely damaging in your home.If you insist on making personal attacks, don't expect that I will not make such honest observations.
Topic: Marijuana use sinful for Catholics? (Read 59814 times)