-
.
This is Mike Wallace as a young man, including a Phillip Morris endorsement!
.
The founder of Planned Parenthood had a Catholic mother and an atheist father, with 10 siblings.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsrOPDdbTzM
.
A short excerpt of this interview is contained in the GOSNELL thread (https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/gosnell-go-see-it-before-it's-too-late/msg633081/#msg633081), which began in the General Discussion forum.
.
ChloeXlover
Published on Dec 9, 2012
VERY REVEALING Margaret Sanger Interview
http://www.schismatic-home-aloner.com/ (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?redir_token=gspxFHSnn-WSMSxc8N24we8RN2Z8MTU0MTMwODk3MkAxNTQxMjIyNTcy&v=HsrOPDdbTzM&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schismatic-home-aloner.com%2F&event=video_description)
http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1 (http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1)
.
.
Some of the 10,321 Comments:
.
.
.
NollaGirl504 2 years ago
Had to come check out Hillary Clinton's hero, whom she stated has her in awe. This woman was an evil wench who came up with a way to exterminate minorities, mostly black babies.
1.5K <----------[This means 1,500 viewers liked this Comment]
View 278 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-6ncZdDNFuJ8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/FogQss9smCY/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSkDYWl6g5Rc5eCAFlEIGDg)
Iahel Cathartes Aura 3 months ago (edited)
I'm white, but I call Margaret Sanger a white piece of birdsh!t. I hate jail/prison, but she should've been left there to rot, for life.
There are many caring, up front, honest & healthy ways to promote & provide good birth control. Without bigotry & human extermination!!
What a disgusting piece of twisted propaganda this broadcast was. And I'm old enough to remember this type of TV programming. Mind control programming is what this is! Entirely shameless, profoundly dishonest & overt evil.
Show less
243
View 28 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-vd93MF37AU8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/UrYlWeme6N8/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdo0R6x80JzY7S8_ikZSPjQ)
Young Tang 2 months ago
I just like how Mike Wallace advertises Phillip Morris cigarettes.
17
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-ShW_cIaOqj4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/WJ0rE0sdjhk/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/user/mggz71)
Iwillsucceed4sure 3 months ago
This is Killery Clinton’s Biggest idol! This woman was so evil.
51
View 3 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-xqU5-9QDJ14/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/ZqnQw0jD9NA/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/user/trompetayritmo)
T'CHALLA 2 months ago
And she was a liberal DEMONCRAT. #walkaway #knowthetruth
109
View 6 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-jLQwxPGTRhk/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/eXQAJxTvveE/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/user/jmajesty79)
Jerry Christson 1 year ago
Phillip Morris! if I hear that name one more time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
338
View 46 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-o7JHR8067CY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/9nZzk2K7_5w/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClpkQzZRPOtD3yy-21TXLLQ)
jennifer lessard 3 months ago
Big difference between birth control and abortion - just saying.
125
View 29 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-L_7VD8Nrd8M/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/uHiBWUDmL1Y/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/user/mytuber81)
mytuber81 3 months ago
Something to think about....if you’re on the left and are any race other than white remember this the next time you find yourself going to a planned parenthood for anything; Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood not just to kill the unborn, but to primarily kill black and non-white children. Know that you are walking into a place that was designed so that you would not exist. This fact is still empirically evident today being that there are more Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in Black inner city neighborhoods than anywhere else. A black child in those areas statistically has a greater chance of being aborted than being born. Think about that the next time you want to vote for liberal leftist policies.
Show less
67
View 6 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-qi2RuAKG7TM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/JIp9GoE092Y/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXPXiZNKxbEGiZdrtJDYpBQ)
A Klo 3 months ago
Her most outrageous statement was saying the greatest sin is bringing a child into the world. Sums up her philosophy pretty well.
121
View 35 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-hffXxKDWeMI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/IjgqZe6noEY/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg2w5QR9HITsrLUERlPUpbw)
anne mott 3 months ago
she is very proud of her undoubtedly "non sick" and pure white grandchildren. She was an occultist who wanted to kill non white and non "normal" babies. Don't be fooled -- the people she was a part of are still with us today. They want to decrease the population of the earth and they want a nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr and a one world government. That's why they are so hateful toward the current president. It's because he wants separate countries, such as the USA. These people are in the governments and the UN. It is coming.
Show less
51
View 4 replies
(https://yt3.ggpht.com/-ecpQHGGsnmM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/tgGHSHvHOj4/s48-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtrRQGTyVM0XycPh4cXO2Kg)
Brown Joshua 3 months ago (edited)
She killed more black babies than slavery. Black women who follow her beliefs are dumb. She resembles the wicked witch from the west. She had a wicked heart. This could be Hillary Clinton's mother. I can see the resemblance. Burn in hell.
82
View 27 replies
-
Whenever I sniff anything phony I search for the Jєω connection:
Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion, Jean H. Baker 2012
A dry, detailed but engaging tale of a fascinating woman whose passion, drive and determination almost single-handedly led to the liberation of women from the burdens, disease, death and poverty of endless childbirth and large families. Born in Corning, New York, the sixth of eleven children to Irish immigrants, she early demonstrated her independence and drive in seeking education and trained as a nurse. Marrying a crypto-Jєω, William Sanger, at 21, she bore three children and was a strict Socialist before finding her life and work at the age of 30. Influenced by Mabel Dodge and Emma Goldman in Greenwich Village but interrupted by a decade of child rearing in Hastings-on-Hudson, she returned to New York City to begin decades of trying to provide women with control over their own bodies as well as address overpopulation. She endured arrest and harassment for her clinics and education efforts due to the Comstock Law and traveled extensively abroad for international conferences, lectures, and fund-raising. Her efforts eventually resulted in two major accomplishments—the oral contraceptive and Griswold vs. Connecticut giving married women the right to privacy in 1965. A feisty, egotistic non-collaborative woman, she was the necessary impetus in these critical events. Married twice, she lived in Tucson until her death in 1966 at 86 years of age. Planned Parenthood is the organization that she founded in 1942 and continues her work today.
Similarities to today’s battles over gαy marriage and abortion—inappropriate role of the Catholic Church; change accomplished via the courts, not legislatures. People: Pearl Buck, Clarence Gamble, HMS, Juliet Rablee—Cornish, New Hampshire.
--https://epsteinreads.com/margaret-sanger-a-life-of-passion-jean-h-baker-1531/
Garbage gentiles, if she was a gentile, are always under the spell of the Jєω. She was a psy-op, groomed by Jєωs. I notice that she wanted to eradicate Jєωs, or so she claimed. Pretty funny considering she was married to one and her major influences were Jєωs. Total fraud, as are all non-Jєωs who are Judaized. Noahide garbage.
-
The Church's worst destroyers are always Catholics. No Jєω could have carried this off. The ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan knows this, and so they cultivate the Catholics to destroy.
-
The Church's worst destroyers are always Catholics. No Jєω could have carried this off. The ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan knows this, and so they cultivate the Catholics to destroy.
I guess it was a group of Catholics who crucified Our Lord too. Jєωs could carry off whatever God permits them to. They're enlisted in Satan's counter-Church and actively working to destroy it ... although even they know they'll lose in the end because they cannot defeat God. Yes, the Jєωs could have had no power had it not been for lax Catholics who let them get their way.
-
.
I managed to watch this video several times over two days.
.
The thing that strikes me is her facial expressions and the way she reacts to questions from Mike Wallace.
.
If you pay close attention, you can see her say things without using words.
.
Her abiding hatred of the Catholic Church stands out, loud and clear: to her, the Church is the enemy of all mankind!
.
Consequently, the answer to the question, "What could have been her incentive that drove her to devoting her life to this agenda?"
.
Answer: Margaret Sanger's hatred of the Church was the motive, and she attacked the Church with her feminist activism.
.
She had secondary agendas too, such as abiding racism (white supremacy and hatred of minorities).
.
Under the auspices of compassion for humanity, she promoted genocide directed at certain people she despised, IOW ethnic cleansing!
.
Her attitude toward non-whites was indistinguishable from that of Adolf Hitler, Charles Darwin and the KKK.
-
Sanger was NOT after black people-- this is Mythology. Talk show host Larry Elder has covered her letter to Dr Lionel where she assures him this is NOT her intention. :cheers:
Sick of hearing how PP sets up their clinics 'near' black barrios... :jester:
-
Sanger was NOT after black people-- this is Mythology. Talk show host Larry Elder has covered her letter to Dr Lionel where she assures him this is NOT her intention. :cheers:
Oh, she most certainly was, he later denials notwithstanding. She was an open eugenicist and received an award from Hitler for her work. And she considered black people inferior. So the implication is clear.
Major: Eugenics (we should promote the best genes) through abortion.
Minor: Black people have inferior genes (qualities)
Conclusion: We should reduce the number of black genes among the human race.
-
If Sanger was after nigerians, why is their population booming( at least doubled) in last 50 years in America? Have you ever heard of welfare mothers who get more $ for each new child? :confused:
It is birthrate of Europeans that is way down...
-
.
Sanger was NOT after black people-- this is Mythology.
.
.
Correct. That Sanger was not out to have blacks killed is a myth.
.
The second video above has recorded calls of an actor pretending to make large donations to Planned Parenthood, and their replies.
.
He asks if he can donate for the abortion of BLACK BABIES ONLY and be assured his funds will not go for White baby abortions.
.
They reply the same in every case, that yes, his donation can be set aside to only pay for the abortions of Black children.
.
They don't even bother to say "fetuses."
.
And they have no problem with the donor saying he believes that the world's population of Blacks must be reduced.
.
This is because that is the founding principle of Margaret Sanger, who set up PP, and HER WORK CONTINUES.
.
-
Minority Americans and abortion
http://www.all.org/issues/ab17a.htm
Minority preborn children are being aborted at more than twice the rate of white preborns (in 1988, 57.3 per 1000 women for nonwhites, compared to 21.2 per 1000 women for whites). (Abortion Factbook, 1992 Edition, The Alan Guttmacher Institute).
According to 1990 statistics minority women constituted only about 26% of the female population (age 15-44) in the U.S., but they underwent approximately 36% of the abortions. (U.S. Census Bureau, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Dec. 18, 1992, Centers for Disease Control)
Minorities make up only 20.7% of the population in the state of New Jersey, yet 55.8% of the abortions in this state took the lives of minority babies. In Maryland 29% of the population is minority but 49.3% of the abortions are minority. (Computation of statistics from State Yellow Book, 1993, and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Dec. 18, 1992, Centers for Disease Control)
In 1988, 38.9% of minority pregnancies ended in abortion while only 25% of White pregnancies end in abortion. (Abortion Factbook, 1992 Edition, The Alan Guttmacher Institute)
The number of minority babies killed by abortion from 1973 to 1991 corresponded to approximately 21% of the total minority population in 1991. (Computation of statistics from U.S. Census Bureau, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Dec. 18, 1992, Centers for Disease Control; and Abortion Factbook, 1992 Edition, The Alan Guttmacher Institute.)
-
Abortion: The robbing of a heritage
By Rev. Johnny Hunter
Life Education and Resource Network
Abortion is racism in its ugliest form. Because of some very suave planning by abortion supporters and providers, abortionists have eliminated more African American children than the KKK ever lynched. This is one truth that is very disturbing. Think about it. From 1973 to 1992, abortionists have snuffed out the lives of over nine million African American children before their first birthday. Over nine million beautiful black children were prevented from ever having the opportunity to become artists, musicians, doctors, teachers, lawyers, judges, taxi drivers, ambulance drivers, nurses, secretaries, senators, representatives, salesmen, sales clerks, computer programmers, analysts, managers, waitresses, waiters, tellers, leaders, followers, ordinary people, extraordinary people, parents, grandparents, and ancestors. They were robbed of the most essential of all rights--the right to life. They were robbed of their opportunities, and those of us who remain are robbed of their contributions to humanity.
When liberal racists defend abortion as a way to help blacks, I challenge them to show me the bodies of the dead African American children the abortionists have helped.
When a plantation Negro says he supports abortion because he cares about the sisters, mothers and daughters, he is a hypocrite of the lowest order. To deny the next generation of brothers and sisters the right to exist is the ultimate self-destructing mechanism in the African American community.
When two out of every three minority babies are aborted, it doesn't take a mathematical genius to understand the effect this will have on the minority race in the United States of America.
I find it dangerous the way abortion is promoted today. In the July 1992 issue of Life magazine, you will read an attempt by white media to be objective. It amazes me that objectivity means printing and showing both sides of abortion, which kills babies, but avoids showing the victims the effect of violence on the abortion table.
I am glad the media are not being objective about hard drugs. If they covered it like abortion, they would have to let the drug dealers get equal time to show the good side of the business (high salaries for teens) but avoid showing victims of overdose and the effect of violence in the drug world.
In the article titled "The Great Divide," a young black woman getting an abortion is pictured twice and quoted several times. The black man, who is a pro-life leader and supports the right to life for all children, was only pictured once and never quoted. Also, two young white women are both comforting the black woman while she is getting an abortion. What the reader does not know is that the white woman holding the hand of the black woman treats black women who attempt to offer help to their sisters before they enter a clinic in a much different way. She curses and body-checks them.
I suspect that the editors of Life magazine made a calculated decision with total disregard for the racist implications of this "objective" article. Of course they almost showed Tia, who according to a pathologist was a victim of an induced abortion. However, to be objective, they did refer to the child as a fetus and mentioned a county coroner's opinion that the fetus was a stillborn. They did not mention that the reputable medical sources believed the child was a child of color. Was Life magazine supporting racism and annihilation of the black race? I believe so. Was it intentional? For some on their staff, no; for others, yes; although they will not admit it. The most liberal white (person), while supporting abortion, does not want to be exposed for encouraging abortion of black children.
The saddest crisis of all is the ignorance and indifference displayed by prominent black people and black magazines. The September 1992 issue of Ebony magazine contains a full-page advertisement favoring abortion, produced by Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. The ad smacks of the racist overtones of Margaret Sanger's "Negro Project." Margaret Sanger, who founded Planned Parenthood, implemented the "Negro Project" in 1939 to eliminate those she called "human weeds." Her recommendation to the steering committee was, "let's attempt to let the colored run it."
From her grave, this prejudiced woman is still using ignorant colored (people) to keep the "Negro Project" in operation.
The men featured in the ad, entitled "African American Men for Choice," are totally uninformed or indifferent to the fate of the millions of African American children who will be painfully destroyed because African American women respected their opinion. These are some of the dumbest smart men on earth.
Please examine a few of the lines in this ad. The title says, "African American Men for Choice," which means they have believed the great lie. The great lie being the one where Planned Parenthood changed the question to one concerning a woman's reproductive rights instead of concerning a baby safely snuggled in his/her mother's womb. The ad's first statement is "Today, we are taking a stand side by side with women to guard their most fundamental right. The right to choose."
This is the great abominable lie. The most fundamental right every human being has is life. If a child is not allowed to live, all other rights become moot. This is what bothers me most about so-called social leaders. There are leaders who fight for better health care, better housing, better job opportunities, better education and safer playgrounds. All these things, including the safe playgrounds mean nothing to dead African American babies. An aborted baby needs no health care. An aborted child needs no place to live. The dead baby will never have a career. You cannot educate an aborted child, which is sad, hearing them say, "A mind is a terrible thing to waste." The African American Men for Choice believe it is O.K. to waste a mind and a body as long as the woman agrees. My eleven-year-old son called them "The African American Men for Death"!
Ebony should know better, since many who would have been readers are now dead! They died at the hands of abortionists.
The legacy and heritage we are leaving are the most important treasure we can give our children. As African Americans, it is our responsibility to leave a legacy to the next generation, one upon which they may build a better life for themselves. Many great men and women have left us a heritage, but much of our heritage was robbed by slave owners. Two hundred years ago our African American heritage was robbed by a group of elitist individuals who intentionally kept us ignorant concerning the devastating effect of slavery. Today, our heritage is being robbed by elitist individuals who have intentionally kept us ignorant concerning the devastating effect of abortion on our race. They are robbing us to profit from the deaths of our sons and daughters.
The time has come for people of all races, religions, creeds and nations to stand up on behalf of the next generation of children. It is time to reclaim what is left of a broken legacy of enduring love and strength through faith in God. It is time to no longer use excuses of poverty. Who knows whether or not this is the child who will bring his family out of poverty.
It is time to no longer use the excuse of having this child later. No man and woman can ever conceive the same child twice.
It is time to no longer use the excuse of a more convenient time, after the promotion. Many first sons who should have been the recipients of their parents' heritage and wealth were robbed by an untimely death. It is time to insist that no child ever face discrimination because of race and/or place or residence. It is time that African American men and women insist that their children and their children's neighbors no longer be denied the inalienable right to life and the opportunity to appreciate their heritage. There is an old African proverb which says, "No one knows whose womb holds the chief." Have they killed the chief? I hope not, but I do know that many of the chief's people have been destroyed in a war directed at them in their most defenseless moments.
-
.
Correct. That Sanger was not out to have blacks killed is a myth.
.
.
Sorry but I no comprende :confused:
-
Sorry but I no comprende :confused:
.
Incorrect Spanish. Should say, "Yo no intiendo."
No comprende translates: "he does not comprehend."
.
.
.
If A MIND IS A TERRIBLE THING TO WASTE,
what do you call the MURDER OF BABIES BEFORE THEY HAVE A CHANCE TO LIVE?
.
.
.
The myth is as follows: "SANGER was not out to have Black babies killed."
That is a myth. Sanger was assuredly out to kill Blacks as fast as possible, and babies were an easy target.
.
It's a myth because Sanger was all about exterminating the inferior race (in her opinion). She called Blacks "human weeds."
.
Read this:
.
The saddest crisis of all is the ignorance and indifference displayed by prominent black people and black magazines. The September 1992 issue of Ebony magazine contains a full-page advertisement favoring abortion, produced by Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. The ad smacks of the racist overtones of Margaret Sanger's "Negro Project."
Margaret Sanger, who founded Planned Parenthood, implemented the "Negro Project" in 1939 to eliminate those she called "human weeds." Her recommendation to the steering committee was, "let's attempt to let the colored run it."
From her grave, this prejudiced woman is still using ignorant colored (people) to keep the "Negro Project" in operation.
The men featured in the ad, entitled "African American Men for Choice," are totally uninformed or indifferent to the fate of the millions of African American children who will be painfully destroyed because African American women respected their opinion. These are some of the dumbest smart men on earth.
Please examine a few of the lines in this ad. The title says, "African American Men for Choice," which means they have believed the great lie. The great lie being the one where Planned Parenthood changed the question to one concerning a woman's reproductive rights instead of concerning a baby safely snuggled in his/her mother's womb. The ad's first statement is:
"Today, we are taking a stand side by side with women to guard their most fundamental right. The right to choose."
This is the great abominable lie. The most fundamental right every human being has is life.
If a child is not allowed to live, all other rights become moot. This is what bothers me most about so-called social leaders. There are leaders who fight for better health care, better housing, better job opportunities, better education and safer playgrounds. All these things, including the safe playgrounds mean nothing to dead African American babies.
An aborted baby needs no health care.
An aborted child needs no place to live.
The dead baby will never have a career.
You cannot educate an aborted child, which is sad, hearing them say, "A mind is a terrible thing to waste."
The African American Men for Choice believe it is O.K. to waste a mind and a body as long as the woman agrees.
My eleven-year-old son called them "The African American Men for Death"!
-
.
Quote from: roscoe on Yesterday at 01:51:51 PM (https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/margaret-sanger-interviewed-by-mike-wallace/msg633163/#msg633163)
Sanger was NOT after black people-- this is Mythology. Talk show host Larry Elder has covered her letter to Dr Lionel where she assures him this is NOT her intention. (https://www.cathinfo.com/Smileys/classic/cheers.gif)
Oh, she most certainly was, her later denials notwithstanding. She was an open eugenicist and received an award from Hitler for her work. And she considered black people inferior. So the implication is clear.
Major: Eugenics (we should promote the best genes) through abortion.
Minor: Black people have inferior genes (qualities)
Conclusion: We should reduce the number of black genes among the human race.
.
When you say, "...her later denials notwithstanding," roscoe doesn't know what that means.
.
Just for the record, this goes to show how a logic demonstration does absolutely no good when the reader doesn't comprehend logic.
.
Sanger later DENIED she intended to exterminate Blacks, but as you can see in the Wallace interview, she regularly contradicted herself.
She denied having said things later when admitting the truth was inconvenient.
For her, REALITY IS IN THE MIND (meaning she was a Modernist) therefore, whatever feels good at the moment is for her the reality.
.
Several posts later, this was the response to your explanation, Ladislaus:
.
Quote from roscoe:
Quote from: Neil Obstat on Yesterday at 07:53:33 PM (https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/margaret-sanger-interviewed-by-mike-wallace/msg633183/#msg633183)
.
Quote from: roscoe on Yesterday at 01:51:51 PM (https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/margaret-sanger-interviewed-by-mike-wallace/msg633163/#msg633163)
.
Sanger was NOT after black people <----- this is Mythology.
.
Correct. That Sanger was not out to have blacks killed is a myth.
.
Sorry but I no comprende (https://www.cathinfo.com/Smileys/classic/confused1.gif)
-
If Sanger was after nigerians, why is their population booming( at least doubled) in last 50 years in America? Have you ever heard of welfare mothers who get more $ for each new child? :confused:
It is birthrate of Europeans that is way down...
.
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Flouderwithcrowder.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F08%2FMargaretSanger-Link2.jpg&sp=ec40187e995d6e23941d6c1dee638752)
.
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maxresistance.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2FMargaret-Sanger2-1764x700.jpg&sp=fe12e26c3c69d97dcb2377696e928ea3)
.
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fcultureshiftforlife.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F04%2Fmargaret-sanger-hero.png%3Fresize%3D900%252C516%26amp%3Bssl%3D1&sp=67243dfd41bb0eb5749a23b257fd9b8b)
.
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fi0.wp.com%2Fmoralmatters.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F07%2FMargaretSangerQuoteRe.SegmentsOfPopulationmargaret-sanger-Jєωslatinos-human-weeds.jpg&sp=46a76aaced427d790cdfd8fb3d72c568)
.
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.azquotes.com%2Fvangogh-image-quotes%2F70%2F1%2FQuotation-Margaret-Sanger-How-are-we-to-breed-a-race-of-human-thoroughbreds-70-1-0115.jpg&sp=dd96f573266732933235295828a6ccfc)
.
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eurweb.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F04%2Fmargaret.png&sp=3d245a7bc29c3344a034341f6df65671)
-
If Sanger was after nigerians, why is their population booming( at least doubled) in last 50 years in America? Have you ever heard of welfare mothers who get more $ for each new child? :confused:
It is birthrate of Europeans that is way down...
Ignoramus!
Nigeria - Crude birth rate
38.9(per 1,000 people)
in 2016
per 1,000 people in 2016.
In 2016, birth rate for Nigeria was 38.9 per 1,000 people.
Birth rate of Nigeria fell gradually from 45.9 per 1,000 people in 1967 to 38.9
https://knoema.com/atlas/Nigeria/Birth-rate
The birthrate of Europeans is way down because generally children in Europe are not valued by Europeans. They prefer to focus on material possessions.
-
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maxresistance.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2FMargaret-Sanger2-1764x700.jpg&sp=fe12e26c3c69d97dcb2377696e928ea3)
In its full context, this quote comes across a little differently than it does on its own.
Sanger promoted abortion and contraception, clear evils. We don't need to skew her quotes to show that, and we shouldn't be playing loose with the truth.
-
Sanger promoted abortion and contraception, clear evils.
Not alone, but as part of a "eugenics" program. Then you take the lists of people she identified as inferior races, including Black people, and the logic is inescapable. Add to this her infamous "Negro Project" and the fact that she concentrated her efforts on opening birth control clinics in Black areas, and there's no escaping the charge.
-
This is why Pius XII's reference to permitting NFP for "eugenics" reasons was so incredibly scandalous.
-
Not alone, but as part of a "eugenics" program. Then you take the lists of people she identified as inferior races, including Black people, and the logic is inescapable. Add to this her infamous "Negro Project" and the fact that she concentrated her efforts on opening birth control clinics in Black areas, and there's no escaping the charge.
It seems like making distinctions among evils, but her "eugenics" views were somewhat complicated, and not necessarily identical to nαzι eugenics.
The quote I'm discussing was made in the context of the "Negro Project", I think. The full quote is: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
I know some people take this to mean she wanted to hide what she really believed, but it can also be taken as she foresaw a false allegation and tried to take actions to avoid it, by hiring black ministers to be intermediaries with the community. The latter is, I think, the mainstream interpretation, so it's a tough sell to insist that it absolutely must mean she was hiding what she really believed.
-
It seems like making distinctions among evils, but her "eugenics" views were somewhat complicated, and not necessarily identical to nαzι eugenics.
The quote I'm discussing was made in the context of the "Negro Project", I think. The full quote is: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
I know some people take this to mean she wanted to hide what she really believed, but it can also be taken as she foresaw a false allegation and tried to take actions to avoid it, by hiring black ministers to be intermediaries with the community. The latter is, I think, the mainstream interpretation, so it's a tough sell to insist that it absolutely must mean she was hiding what she really believed.
No, there were other quotes about the Negro project. You're obsessed with that one quote in particular, and the case against Sanger does not rest on that one quotation. Sanger's eugenics was similar enough to Hitler's to warrant Hitler giving her an award.
You need to stop trying to defend Sanger. You're like all these Modernists who try to curry favor by acting like you're "fair and balanced" ... unlike all of Sanger's other critics.
-
No, there were other quotes about the Negro project. You're obsessed with that one quote in particular, and the case against Sanger does not rest on that one quotation. Sanger's eugenics was similar enough to Hitler's to warrant Hitler giving her an award.
You need to stop trying to defend Sanger. You're like all these Modernists who try to curry favor by acting like you're "fair and balanced" ... unlike all of Sanger's other critics.
The first thing I care about is truth. I am not "trying to defend Sanger", and paring down that one quote to make it sound like something else is dishonest.
If there are "other quotes", then USE THEM. We shouldn't mangle quotes just to make a case easier, or dismiss lies just because we're fighting on the side of the angels.
-
If Sanger's intent was to kill nigerians in America, it sure didn't work.... :fryingpan:
-
If Sanger's intent was to kill nigerians in America, it sure didn't work.... :fryingpan:
.
This might come as a shock to you, but most Negros have no connection with Nigeria.
Sanger's Negro Project was directed at people with very dark skin, regardless of their origin. :(
.
Could be Haiti or the Dominican Republic or Puerto Rico. Could be the Congo or South Africa or Gabon or Cameroon.
Could be the Gold Coast, or Algeria, or Mozambique, or Zimbabwe, or Liberia, or Senegal, or Chad, or Tanzania, or Angola, or Botswana, or Kenya, or you name it.
.
And as for whether it was effective, try imagining what their population would have been today WITHOUT Sanger's eugenics agenda in action.
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/2lqaaf.jpg)
.
Don't think so?
.
Margaret Sanger thought so. She and her ideology founded Planned Parenthood. This is a direct quote from her:
.
(https://s15-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fcultureshiftforlife.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F04%2Fmargaret-sanger-hero.png%3Fresize%3D900%252C516%26amp%3Bssl%3D1&sp=67243dfd41bb0eb5749a23b257fd9b8b)
-
Discussions like this invariably fail to take into consideration the crucial context of the racial-political climate Sanger was operating in, and usually the whole thing devolves depressingly into the modern neocon gambit of attempting to smear the left with the left's own invented modern evil of "racism." Every time I hear the familiar D'Souzan mantra "The Liberals are the Real Racists!" I can hear its inevitable sequel "The Liberals are the Real Homophobes / Transphobes!" reverberating from a decade or two into the future.
As noted earlier in the thread, Margaret Sanger was a shiksa frontwoman for the Jєωιѕн NWO depopulation program which, now as ever, has Christendom (Europe and its outposts) as its main target. Sanger's promises to eradicate the Negro race, therefore, don't strike me as springing from any genuine wellspring of anti-black bigotry on her part, but rather as a sales pitch to a white audience made so desperate by the disastrous fallout of the cινιℓ ωαr and Reconstruction and the whole fool's errand of attempting to integrate a huge population of Africans into a fundamentally Western European society, that they were willing to listen to anyone offering a solution... even if it was a monstrous solution.
President James Garfield once stated that he had "a strong feeling of repugnance when I think of the negro being made our political equal and I would be glad if they could be colonized, sent to heaven, or got rid of in any decent way." This quotation succinctly sums up the desperation engendered by the problem of the emancipated and enfranchised negro. By the time Planned Parenthood was founded in 1916 things had only gotten worse. Less than a decade earlier, in 1909, the NAACP was founded. The Jєωs had already begun their ongoing program of militarizing the unassimilable negro element as proxy warriors against the white American majority. The uniquely Jєωιѕн dictum, made famous by Rahm Emanuel, "Never let a good crisis go to waste," perfectly describes what the Jєωs were doing during America's burgeoning racial crisis and, as per usual, they controlled both sides to ensure an outcome of maximum benefit to themselves. The NAACP was the stick; Planned Parenthood was the carrot. So many were seduced by Sanger's poisonous promise to get rid of the negro problem, even though it was in a decidedly indecent way.
Anyway, it's no surprise that the nation that had, in 1913, just handed its entire economy over to a cartel of (((International Bankers))) was unable to spot Jєωιѕн trickery at work in the exacerbation of, and proposed solutions to, its very real (and still unresolved) racial crisis.
-
.
This might come as a shock to you, but most Negros have no connection with Nigeria.
Sanger's Negro Project was directed at people with very dark skin, regardless of their origin. :(
.
Could be Haiti or the Dominican Republic or Puerto Rico. Could be the Congo or South Africa or Gabon or Cameroon.
Could be the Gold Coast, or Algeria, or Mozambique, or Zimbabwe, or Liberia, or Senegal, or Chad, or Tanzania, or Angola, or Botswana, or Kenya, or you name it.
.
And as for whether it was effective, try imagining what their population would have been today WITHOUT Sanger's eugenics agenda in action.
The above post is the best evidence yet that the Roll Laughs( as well as MJ & Wine) Emoticons be restored ASAP.... :fryingpan:
-
BTNYC hits the nail on the head.
-
This is on Drudge today
https://france24.com/en/20181109-baby-boom-nations-bust-others-study
:cheers:
-
Here in Phoenix, there is one, only one book of the autobiography of Margaret Sanger. It is not on the library shelf. You must know what you are asking for and you are put on a list.
From my understandings, Margaret had "The Race Betterment League". When war with Hitler was about, Margaret was told to change the name, "Race Betterment League", and not only that, she was advised to put a man in charge. So, we get Planned Parenthood. It was thought that in this way the eugenics could hide with the so called birth control people and who would know different.
-
Here in Phoenix, there is one, only one book of the autobiography of Margaret Sanger. It is not on the library shelf. You must know what you are asking for and you are put on a list.
From my understandings, Margaret had "The Race Betterment League". When war with Hitler was about, Margaret was told to change the name, "Race Betterment League", and not only that, she was advised to put a man in charge. So, we get Planned Parenthood. It was thought that in this way the eugenics could hide with the so called birth control people and who would know different.
.
Are you trying to say that in the greater Phoenix area, there is only one copy of the atuobiography of Sanger in the public library system?
And that they have removed it from the library catalog, so a library patron can't find it there like most of the other books?
And since it is in great demand, you have to ask to reserve your place on the waiting list, to wait your turn to borrow the book?
.
If you really want a particular book, you can go to another city and get a free library card so you can borrow books from their system.
But you probably will need to physically show up at the brick-and-mortar library to pick up your book and to return it.
I'm not absolutely sure about that -- there could be a service that can mail your book to you and receive it back from you by mail.
The point is, if you really want to read a copy of Sanger's book, you could go to other libraries besides the Phoenix one.
The LA City system is utterly huge. with dozens of locations and probably millions of books, all available by request from any branch.
.
Here in Los Angeles, there is a LA City library system, and an LA County library system. A resident can have a card in each if he wants to.
They don't cross check for library cards.
Furthermore, every other city nearby has their own library system, and a resident can get a card in each city.
AFAIK you only have to show that you're a resident of the USA.
I had a friend whose address was New York City and he could get a library card in the LA City system.
Alhambra
Pasadena
San Fernando (has both LA County and S.F. City libraries)
Santa Monica
Santa Clarita (recently changed from LA County Library to Santa Clarita city)
Arcadia
Whittier
Pico Rivera
Pomona
Riverside
San Bernardino
Industry
Rosemead
San Gabriel
... and many more ...
-
https://www.lifenews.com/2015/10/20/smithsonian-puts-racist-planned-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger-in-civil-rights-exhibit/ (https://www.lifenews.com/2015/10/20/smithsonian-puts-racist-planned-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger-in-civil-rights-exhibit/)
Smithsonian Puts Racist Planned Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger in Civil Rights Exhibit
Ryan Bomberger Oct 20, 2015 | 11:25AM Washington, DC
So-called “progressives” love moving forward with their reconstructed versions of history. The taxpayer-funded Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery is supposed to be a place that reveres history, not revises it. That hasn’t stopped the institution from presenting to the public a false presentation of the founder of Planned Parenthood (https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/inhumane), Margaret Sanger.
(https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PHOTO-Struggle-For-Justice.jpg) (https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PHOTO-Struggle-For-Justice.jpg)
The bust, prominently and ironically displayed in the NPG’s “Struggle For Justice” exhibit, was provided by the late Cordelia Scaife May. She was a very wealthy population control activist who “supported conservation and Planned Parenthood among other causes” according to her obituary in the Pittsburg Post Gazette (https://www.post-gazette.com/news/obituaries/2005/01/27/Obituary-Cordelia-Scaife-May-Reclusive-Mellon-heiress-known-for-her-generosity/stories/200501270185). May founded the Laurel Foundation to promote the protection of animal and the rejection of human life. Upon her death, May bequeathed $400 million (almost half her fortune) to the Colcom Foundation (https://colcomfdn.org/major-grants/), which currently pours millions into pro-abortion, anti-immigration, population control grantees such as Californians for Population Stabilization, Negative Population Growth, Population Media Center, and Progressives for Immigration Reform. The Colcom Foundation also funded Samuel Francis during May’s lifetime. As a Board Member and writer for the racist Council of Concerned Citizens; he wrote the organization’s Statement of Principles (https://conservative-headlines.com/introduction/statement-of-principles/), which, in part, declare: “We also oppose all efforts to mix the races of mankind.”
The parallels between May and Sanger are scary. Both were incredibly wealthy. Both were deeply anti-immigrant. Both despised large swaths of humanity and devoted their lives to their elimination through population control. Both lived lonely lives and died as alcoholics. I guess it’s quite fitting that the NPG accepted the gift of Sanger’s bust from someone exactly like her.
May’s affinity for Sanger’s depraved, anti-human worldview was verified by
(https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PHOTO-Sanger-Bust.jpg) (https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PHOTO-Sanger-Bust.jpg)
her brother who wrote in another obituary (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pittsburgh-philanthropist-cordelia-scaife-may-dies-at-76-54120407.html): “Cordy’s support of the Laurel Foundation came about because of her interest in conservation and population control. She was introduced to Margaret Sanger, who was the founder of the Planned Parenthood Federation, by our grandmother, Mary Magee Scaife.”
It’s no surprise that the Laurel Foundation funds (https://laurelfdn.org/grants/category/public-society-benefit/) the radically pro-abortion Women’s Law Project which if fighting to force taxpayers to pay for abortions through Medicaid. Medicaid’s composition (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2014/113.pdf) is the following: 11.9% of the US white population (under 65 years of age) is on Medicaid while 31.3% of the black population, 32% of the Native American/Alaskan population, and 29.5% of the Hispanic population are dependent upon Medicaid services. Notice any disparity? The Women’s Law Project, in their current Laurel Foundation-funded effort to repeal the Hyde Amendment entitled Removing Barriers to Medicaid-Funded Abortion (https://www.womenslawproject.org/brochures/RemovingBarriers.pdf), claimed: “Lack of access to Medicaid-funded abortions endangers low-income women’s health and the well-being of their families.”
The public lacks access to the truth, thanks to the Smithsonian.
Nowhere on the NPG display does it mention that Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood (https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/inhumane), the nation’s largest abortion and baby-parts-trafficking chain. Nowhere does it state that in the city where she first planted her birth control clinics, more black babies (https://www.toomanyaborted.com) are aborted than born alive (1,180 aborted for every 1,000 born alive). Planned Parenthood calls this “reproductive justice” (https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/ferguson/).
SIGN THE PETITION! Congress Must De-Fund Planned Parenthood Immediately (https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/congress-must-de-fund-planned-parenthood-immediately.html)
Apparently, progressives have a completely different understanding of what justice actually means.
In response to Congressional Republicans (https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/14/members-congress-margaret-sanger-bust-must-removed-smithsonian/)’ and STAND’s (https://standamerica.us/pp-press-conference/) (coalition of black pastors and Life advocates of varying backgrounds) insistence of the removal of Sanger from the “Struggle for Justice”, the NPG’s responded with this poorly articulated press release (https://www.npg.si.edu/docs/NPGsanger.pdf): “It was chartered not to be a hall of fame, but to collect and display portraits of individuals who represent the full spectrum of the American experience—the admirable and inspiring personalities, as well as others whose lives were complicated and complex. We are both a history museum and an art museum, requiring that we see the past clearly and objectively.”
(https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PHOTO-Display-Summary.jpg) (https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PHOTO-Display-Summary.jpg)
Let’s first note that the “full spectrum” NPG touts does not, in any way, include any religious rights. All other “rights” are on full display in the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit, including (of course) “gαy rights”, but apparently Americans have never fought for religious rights.
Secondly, Sanger’s life was one rooted in brokenness (https://www.theradiancefoundation.org/a-tale-of-two-mothers/) that promoted further brokenness. Her hatred of those she considered “unfit” wasn’t complicated or complex; it was clear and despicable.
Thirdly, the supposed requirement that NPG see clearly and objectively would mean Sanger’s bust would be put in a “Struggle for Injustice” exhibit. And her description would be less innocuous than the current misrepresentation which merely states that “during her campaign, Sanger became associated with the eugenics movement—which promoted, among other practices, the forced sterilizations of those deemed mentally unfit and for a time was endorsed by many of the era’s prominent thinkers.”
Nice revisionism Smithsonian. With that logic, wasn’t Hitler just one of the prominent “thinkers” of his time, too? In our country, the nation’s “prominent” thinkers endorsed slavery. Yet, it was denounced by the more principled and humane thinkers who didn’t give excuses or lame justifications for the dehumanization of millions of human beings. Sanger (https://www.toomanyaborted.com/sanger) didn’t become “associated” with the eugenics movement; she led it. She wasn’t just a member of the American Eugenics Society; she thrust the racist and elitist pseudoscience into the limelight like none other. She advocated for the forced sterilizations of not just the mentally “unfit”, but of the poor, of those pregnant outside of marriage, of the incarcerated, and of those she deemed “feeble-minded” (which today, quite honestly, would include most of Congress).
The National Portrait Gallery claims they are only honoring her birth control efforts. “Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defective.” These were the words of Margaret Sanger from her book Women and the New Race (https://www.bartleby.com/1013/18.html) (Chapter 18).
Why bother with actual history? The Smithsonian obviously isn’t as it proudly sugarcoats a broken woman’s destructive propaganda that wasn’t about the elevation of humanity, but the elimination of it.
(https://lifenews-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/margaretsanger14.png) (https://lifenews-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/margaretsanger14.png)
-
There is NO SUCH THING as a 'racist'.... :confused:
-
There is NO SUCH THING as a 'racist'.... :confused:
If racism were defined as "the universal trait in humans to have racial preferences" then I could accept that there's such a thing as racism. But if it were defined in this way everyone would qualify as a racist, so it couldn't be used by hypocritical hustlers as a cudgel against certain groups and individuals.
-
If racism were defined as "the universal trait in humans to have racial preferences" then I could accept that there's such a thing as racism. But if it were defined in this way everyone would qualify as a racist, so it couldn't be used by hypocritical hustlers as a cudgel against certain groups and individuals.
Exactly right.
It's a Marxist, ergo, Jєωιѕн, scarlet letter - an invented secular heresy used to divide and conquer, and to silence opposition to Marxist / Jєωιѕн machinations.
Racial prejudices are absolutely universal, wherever one race lives in close proximity to another. And, as they are a species of very quick discernment of the likelihood of outcomes in a given interaction with members of that other group, they are directed toward our own self-preservation, which is a universal right and duty. They are, therefore, necessary and good. Might those prejudices impel a person of a rash disposition to commit sins against charity? Of course, they might. But so might any other good trait - even piety can, in a person so disposed to it, turn into bitter zeal. So do we blame the prejudice? No more than we should blame the piety.
It should be obvious to anyone who considers the situation honestly that the cause of these problems is having two or more starkly different racial / cultural groups living in close proximity to one another. That's the unnatural condition that needs to be amended, not the acts and attitudes of tribal self-preservation that that unnatural condition naturally engenders. That's also what makes the left's constant bleating about the glories of "diversity" so particularly galling. The whole reason for humanity's diversity of physical and racial types is the fact that Almighty God placed us into diverse lands and environments, giving each group attributes especially suited to those environments, and dividing us from one another by natural barriers. The orgy of multiculturalism and miscegenation which the Jєωs have foisted onto the western world is nothing less than a recipe for the destruction of that diversity, with all of our particular physical and mental uniqueness being bred out of us, all to bring about Kalergi's "Eurasian-Negroid Race of the Future," the perfect population of deracinated, generic "goy" slaves for our Jєωιѕн masters.
By our uncritical acceptance of "racism" as the real, objective moral evil the Marxists claim it to be, to whatever degree that we do it, we help pave the way for that antichrist utopia.
-
.
Good find, klasG4e (https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/margaret-sanger-interviewed-by-mike-wallace/msg633845/#msg633845)!
-
Neil: To your questions, this was the way it was about 20 years ago. Things can change. I was told the autobiography of Margaret Sanger was in the Tempe library and if you lived in Peoria, Az you would pick up the book in Phoenix library.
-
If racism were defined as "the universal trait in humans to have racial preferences" then I could accept that there's such a thing as racism. But if it were defined in this way everyone would qualify as a racist, so it couldn't be used by hypocritical hustlers as a cudgel against certain groups and individuals.
Thanks for reply but you are missing my point. There is also NO SUCH THING as a 'racist'...
If someone can show a Church authority that condemns, forbids, canonises, beatlfies etc etc any person for either being a 'racist' or subscribing to any philosophy known as 'racism' then I will believe there is such a thing.
IOW-- I have never seen any Church Authority that even mentions these 2 things. I have seen the terms race and racial but have never encountered the terms racist or racism anywhere in my studies of Church history or docuмents. :cheers:
What some other authority says is not relevant to moi...
-
Ignoramus!
https://knoema.com/atlas/Nigeria/Birth-rate
The birthrate of Europeans is way down because generally children in Europe are not valued by Europeans. They prefer to focus on material possessions.
You are completely missing my point....
-
WILL SOME PLS RESTORE QUOTE FUNCTION THE WAY AT WORKED PREV. THE ABOVE POST SHOULD SHOW A HISTORY OF REPLIES AND IS ONLY SHOWING THE MOST RECENT REPLY. :cussing:
-
http://www.realnews247.com/fr_fahey_on_anti-semitism.htm#_ftn40 (http://www.realnews247.com/fr_fahey_on_anti-semitism.htm#_ftn40)
Fr. Denis Fahey Teaches:
On the Charge
of Anti-Semitism in the Our Time
On account of the confusion of mind prevalent amongst Catholics concerning the question of Anti-Semitism, a few words must be said about it before concluding this Preface.
In the excellent review of my book, The Kingship of Christ and Organized Naturalism, which appeared in the Jesuit magazine, La Civilta Cattolica (Rome), in March, 1947, the reviewer laid special stress on the distinction which I have been making in all my books. He wrote as follows: “The author wants a clear distinction to be made between hatred of the Jєωιѕн nation, which is Anti-Semitism, and opposition to Jєωιѕн and Masonic Naturalism. This opposition on the part of Catholics must be mainly positive by acknowledging, not only individually but socially, the Rights of the supernatural Kingship of Christ and His Church, and by striving politically to get these Rights acknowledged by States and in public life. For this indispensable undertaking… the active and effective union of Catholics… is absolutely necessary.”
Space does not allow of lengthy quotations from Papal docuмents to show that, on the one hand, the Sovereign Pontiffs insist that Catholics must stand unflinchingly for the Integral Rights of Christ the King, as contained in the Papal Encyclicals, while on the other hand, keeping their minds and hearts free from hatred of Our Lord’s own nation according to the flesh. On the one hand, they must battle for the Rights of Christ the King and the Supernatural Organisation of Society, as laid down in the Encyclical, Quas Primas, unequivocally proclaiming that the rejection of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the True Messias, by His own nation, and the unyielding opposition of that nation to Him, are a fundamental source of disorder and conflict in the world. On the other hand, as members of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Catholics should neither hate the members of the nation in which, through our Blessed Mother, the Lily of Israel, the Second Person to the Blessed Trinity assumed human nature, nor deny them their legitimate rights as persons. The supernatural elevation of mind and heart and the unshrinking fortitude that are required from members of Christ in our day can be maintained only with the aid of Him who wept over Jerusalem’s rejection of order. It will inevitably mean suffering for Christ’s faithful members as the power of the anti-supernatural Forces in the world increases. Even in the midst of their suffering, however, Christ’s members must bear in mind that there will be a glorious triumph for Christ the King when, as St. Paul tells us in his Epistle to the Romans (XI, II-33), there will be a sincere return on the part of the Jєωιѕн nation to the Mystical Body of the True Messias.[39] (http://www.realnews247.com/fr_fahey_on_anti-semitism.htm#_ftn39)
Two reasons can be assigned to the fact that Our Lord’s faithful members will often be betrayed by those who should be on the side of Christ the King. Firstly, many Catholic writers speak of Papal condemnations of Anti-Semitism without explaining the meaning of the term, and never even allude to the docuмents which insist on the Rights of Our Divine Lord, Head of the Mystical Body, Priest and King. Thus, very many are completely ignorant of the duty incuмbent on all Catholics of standing positively for Our Lord’s Reign in society in opposition to Jєωιѕн Naturalism. The result is that numbers of Catholics are so ignorant of Catholic doctrine that they hurl the accusation of Anti-Semitism against those who are battling for the Rights of Christ the King, thus effectively aiding the enemies of Our Divine Lord. Secondly, many Catholic writers copy unquestioningly what they read in the naturalistic or anti-Supernatural Press and do not distinguish between Anti-Semitism in the correct Catholic sense, as explained above, and “Anti-Semitism” as the Jєωs understand it.
For the Jєωs, “Anti-Semitism” is anything that is in opposition to the naturalistic Messianic domination of their nation over all the others. Quite logically, the leaders of the Jєωιѕн nation hold that to stand for the Rights of Christ the King is to be “Anti-Semitic.”[40] (http://www.realnews247.com/fr_fahey_on_anti-semitism.htm#_ftn40)
The term “Anti-Semitism,” with all its smear connections in the minds of the unthinking, is being extended to include any form of opposition to the Jєωιѕн nation’s naturalistic aims and any exposure of the methods they adopt to achieve these aims.
“In our time more than ever before ,” said the saintly Pius X at the Beatification of Joan of Arc (Dec. 13, 1908), “the greatest asset of the evil-disposed is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigour of Satan’s reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics. Oh! If I might ask the Divine Redeemer, as the Prophet Zachary did in spirit: What are those wounds in the midst of Thy hands? the answer would not be doubtful. With these I was wounded in the house of them that loved Me. I was wounded by My friends, who did nothing to defend Me, and who on every occasion, made themselves the accomplices of My adversaries. And this reproach can be levelled at the weak and timid Catholics of all countries.”
DENIS FAHEY, C.S.S.p.
Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. June 16, 1950
____________________________________________
For the booklet from which this quotation came, click here. (http://www.realnews247.com/fr_fahey_best_introductions.htm) (The quote above is the last passage in the booklet, right before the footnotes.)
Fr. Denis Fahey lived in Ireland from 1883-1954. Fr. Charles Coughlin, the famous Radio Priest of the 1930s, relied heavily on Fr. Fahey's books and research.