You're too smart to take the msm at face value.  They are all Jєω owned.  You know that. So what's the agenda with these stories?

Well, somebody's paying for these mega-budget productions. This one looks like it was directed by Ridley Scott, right down to the "Gladiator" style cinematography and slow-motion.

It looked very realistic, I'll say that much. Much better than the bold-faced fakery of the "Jihadi John" bloodless "beheading" videos.

In my opinion, ISIS is probably a joint venture of Israel, the United States and Saudi Arabia (and probably Great Britain too). The role the US played in their formation is not even remotely a secret. The US armed and funded Islamists in Syria against the moderate Assad regime. Remember the "Arab Spring?" That was the ISIS beta version.

Mossad's connection is (obviously) more well-hidden, but can be deduced from the fact that ISIS, while very efficient at killing Christians and other Mohammedans, never seem to get around to doing any harm to Israel (their putative greatest foe), and also from the obvious benefits Israel stands to gain by having a Frankensteinian monster like ISIS wreaking utter havoc so close to the borders of Iran.

But even that smokescreen is starting to dissipate:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/GNuOmcwbtZE[/youtube]

Yes BTNYC, it has nothing to do with Islam, the religion of peace.

Yes BTNYC, it has nothing to do with Islam, the religion of peace.

Aren't your arms tired from buidling, destroying, and rebuilding so many strawmen?

Where did I say it has "nothing to do with Islam?"

Nowhere. In fact, I specifically said:

In my opinion, ISIS is probably a joint venture of Israel, the United States and Saudi Arabia (and probably Great Britain too). The role the US played in their formation is not even remotely a secret. The US armed and funded Islamists in Syria against the moderate Assad regime. Remember the "Arab Spring?" That was the ISIS beta version.

The whole history of 20th and 21st Century Mohammedan fanatacism has been the story of a dormant, pacified race of savages roused, inflamed and provoked by the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, both openly and overtly (e.g. the illegal, immoral and ungodly foundation of the state of Israel and its subsequent theft of Arab territories) and by proxy and covertly (via the imperialistic wars of Israel's puppet America and the incessant meddling of its CIA in soverign foreign nations, not to mention the usuries and war profiteering of the international bankers, the continued support, protection and coddling of the oil rich Saudis who directly fund Whabiism and Islamic terrorism, and the liberalizing of immigration laws in Europe in the US which has flooded the Christian West with Mohammedan invaders).

Al Qaeda was created - and even named - by the CIA ("The Base" referring to the CIA's database of Mujahadeen fighters). And America's (and Israel's) involvement with ISIS is so poorly concealed it would take some seriously heavy imbibement of neocon Kool Aid to attempt to deny or ignore it. I mean, have you watched any of the "Jihadi John" "beheading" videos? Multiple slashes across the throat with no blood? Fading to black without showing any gore? Is ISIS worried about getting an "R" rating from the MPAA? Or are they just sensitive souls who don't want all that much terrorising in their terrorism?

The new video, as I said, is much more convincing looking. But the absurdly over-produced quality, complete with Matrix-style slow-to-fast cinematography and a ridiculous amount of (potentially conveniently seam-hiding) edits and cuts, and the fact that this was yet another "discovery" of SITE INtelligence, all paint a picture of extreme fishiness. Maybe Rita Katz finally realized that any sequel worth its salt has to substantially up the effects budget.

And "religion of peace" is a phrase that's never been in my lexicon. Give credit for that gem where it's due - Zionist neocon darling George nWo Bush.
 

Well, somebody's paying for these mega-budget productions. This one looks like it was directed by Ridley Scott, right down to the "Gladiator" style cinematography and slow-motion.

It looked very realistic, I'll say that much. Much better than the bold-faced fakery of the "Jihadi John" bloodless "beheading" videos.

Does the link in the OP contain the actual video of the burning?

All i saw in the OP link were pictures and i got bored scrolling down. I found the video somewhere else.

I don't know about you but that burning looks odd.

Do you think it's for real?

Some interesting analyses here:

https://willyloman.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/the-muath-al-kaseasbeh-immolation-video-im-ready-for-my-close-up/

https://willyloman.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/the-muath-al-kaseasbeh-immolation-video-just-for-reference-fire-special-effects/

Have you ever considered that the video looks flashy and professional because ISIS has a large contingent of tech-savvy, western-educated Jihadist scuмbags in it's ranks? Come on man. Every Islamist atrocity is a "fαℓѕє fℓαg" according to some people. How is this not Islamophilia? How is it not being an apologist for Islam? I'm beginning to wonder if these people even believe that ISIS have been killing Christians. Maybe that's just propaganda cooked up by da Jєωs, too? Maybe the Mossad death squads are actually responsible?