Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Malleus Maleficarum and commentary  (Read 9565 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Himagain

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +38/-0
  • Gender: Male
Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
« on: August 24, 2014, 10:51:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • THE MALLEUS MALEFICARUM
    of Heinrich Kramer and James Sprenger
    Unabridged online republication of the 1928 edition. Introduction to the 1948 edition is also included.
    Translation, notes, and two introductions by Montague Summers. A Bull of Innocent VIII.

    (For the actual Malleus text, and additional commentary, see the .pdf link at the bottom of this post.)

    Introduction to the HTML online edition by "Wicasta Lovelace" which clarifies her purpose in resurrecting this ancient text:
    The Malleus Maleficarum (The Witch Hammer), first
    published in 1486, is arguably one of the most infamous
    books ever written, due primarily to its position and regard
    during the Middle Ages. It served as a guidebook for
    Inquisitors during the Inquisition, and was designed to aid
    them in the identification, prosecution, and dispatching of
    Witches. It set forth, as well, many of the modern
    misconceptions and fears concerning witches and the
    influence of witchcraft. The questions, definitions, and
    accusations it set forth in regard to witches, which were
    reinforced by its use during the Inquisition, came to be
    widely regarded as irrefutable truth. Those beliefs are held
    even today by a majority of Christians in regard to
    practitioners of the modern “revived” religion of
    Witchcraft, or Wicca. And while the Malleus itself is
    largely unknown in modern times, its effects have proved
    long lasting.
    At the time of the writing of The Malleus
    Maleficarum, there were many voices within the Christian
    community (scholars and theologians) who doubted the
    existence of witches and largely regarded such belief as mere superstition. The authors of the
    Malleus addressed those voices in no uncertain terms, stating: “Whether the Belief that there are
    such Beings as Witches is so Essential a Part of the Catholic Faith that Obstinacy to maintain the
    Opposite Opinion manifestly savours of Heresy.” The immediate, and lasting, popularity of the
    Malleus essentially silenced those voices. It made very real the threat of one being branded a
    heretic, simply by virtue of one's questioning of the existence of witches and, thus, the validity of
    the Inquisition. It set into the general Christian consciousness, for all time, a belief in the existence
    of witches as a real and valid threat to the Christian world. It is a belief which is held to this day.
    It must be noted that during the Inquisition, few, if any, real, verifiable, witches were ever
    discovered or tried. Often the very accusation was enough to see one branded a witch, tried by the
    Inquisitors' Court, and burned alive at the stake. Estimates of the death toll during the Inquisition
    worldwide range from 600,000 to as high as 9,000,000 (over its 250 year long course); either is a
    chilling number when one realizes that nearly all of the accused were women, and consisted
    primarily of outcasts and other suspicious persons. Old women. Midwives. Jєωs. Poets. Gypsies.
    Anyone who did not fit within the contemporary view of pieous Christians were suspect, and
    easily branded "Witch". Usually to devastating effect.
    It must also be noted that the crime of Witchcraft was not the only crime of which one could
    be accused during the Inquisition. By questioning any part of Catholic belief, one could be branded
    a heretic. Scientists were branded heretics by virtue of repudiating certain tenets of Christian belief
    (most notably Galileo, whose theories on the nature of planets and gravitational fields was initially
    branded heretical). Writers who challenged the Church were arrested for heresy (sometimes
    formerly accepted writers whose works had become unpopular). Anyone who questioned the
    validity of any part of Catholic belief did so at their own risk. The Malleus Maleficarum played an
    important role in bringing such Canonical law into being, as often the charge of heresy carried
    along with it suspicions of witchcraft.
    It must be remembered that the Malleus is a work of its time. Science had only just begun to
    make any real advances. At that time nearly any unexplainable illness or malady would often be
    attributed to magic, and thus the activity of witches. It was a way for ordinary people to make
    sense of the world around them. The Malleus drew upon those beliefs, and, by its very existence,
    reinforced them and brought them into the codified belief system of the Catholic Church. In many
    ways, it could be said that it helped to validate the Inquisition itself.
    While the Malleus itself cannot be blamed for the Inquisition or the horrors inflicted upon
    mankind by the Inquisitors, it certainly played an important role. Thus has it been said that The
    Malleus Maleficarum is one of the most blood-soaked works in human history, in that its very
    existence reinforced and validated Catholic beliefs which led to the prosecution, torture, and
    murder, of tens of thousands of innocent people.
    The lasting effect of the Malleus upon the world can only be measured in the lives of the
    hundreds of thousands of men, women, and even children, who suffered, and died, at the hands of
    the Inquisitors during the Inquisition. At the height of its popularity, The Malleus Maleficarum
    was surpassed in public notoriety only by The Bible. Its effects were even felt in the New World,
    where the last gasp of the Inquisition was felt in the English settlements in America (most notably
    in Salem, Massachusetts during the Salem Witch Trials).
    It is beyond the scope of this article to adequately examine the role of the Malleus in world
    history, or its lasting effects. At the very least, The Malleus Maleficarum (The Witch Hammer)
    offers to us an intriguing glimpse into the Medieval mind, and perhaps gives us a taste of what it
    might have been like to have lived in those times.
    - Wicasta Lovelace





    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #1 on: August 24, 2014, 03:48:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The number of "victims" of the Inquisitions has been greatly exaggerated in the above article:

    Quote
    Beginning in the 19th century, historians have gradually compiled statistics drawn from the surviving court records, from which estimates have been calculated by adjusting the recorded number of convictions by the average rate of docuмent loss for each time period. García Cárcel estimates that the total number of people put on trial by inquisitorial courts throughout their history was approximately 150,000, of which about 3,000 were executed - about two percent of the number of people put on trial. Gustav Henningsen and Jaime Contreras studied the records of the Spanish Inquisition, which list 44,674 cases of which 826 resulted in executions in person and 778 in effigy (i.e. a straw dummy was burned in place of the person).[39] William Monter estimated there were 1000 executions between 1530–1630 and 250 between 1630–1730.[40] Jean-Pierre Dedieu studied the records of Toledo's tribunal, which put 12,000 people on trial.[41] For the period prior to 1530, Henry Kamen estimated there were about 2,000 executions in all of Spain's tribunals.[42]


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition#Statistics

    I would request that Matthew remove the above post.


    Offline Himagain

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 58
    • Reputation: +38/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #2 on: August 24, 2014, 04:02:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    The number of "victims" of the Inquisitions has been greatly exaggerated in the above article:

    Quote
    Beginning in the 19th century, historians have gradually compiled statistics drawn from the surviving court records, from which estimates have been calculated by adjusting the recorded number of convictions by the average rate of docuмent loss for each time period. García Cárcel estimates that the total number of people put on trial by inquisitorial courts throughout their history was approximately 150,000, of which about 3,000 were executed - about two percent of the number of people put on trial. Gustav Henningsen and Jaime Contreras studied the records of the Spanish Inquisition, which list 44,674 cases of which 826 resulted in executions in person and 778 in effigy (i.e. a straw dummy was burned in place of the person).[39] William Monter estimated there were 1000 executions between 1530–1630 and 250 between 1630–1730.[40] Jean-Pierre Dedieu studied the records of Toledo's tribunal, which put 12,000 people on trial.[41] For the period prior to 1530, Henry Kamen estimated there were about 2,000 executions in all of Spain's tribunals.[42]


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition#Statistics

    I would request that Matthew remove the above post.


    Jehanne,
    There are a lot more problems that "the number of victims", but the info I posted above composed by one "Wicasta Lovelace" is not intended as an advocacy of the position or "facts" written therein.  
    Malleus is currently (or at least recently has been) propagated most prominently by Wicca and the like.  They disseminate the info as propaganda by which they declare the church as superstitious, backward, and dangerous to free thinking people.  
    This Malleus was transcribed, by hand, by one such Wicca.  I think that it behooves Catholics to be aware of this docuмent, it's original uses, it's place in Catholic history, and it's current uses.  
    Therefore, I think the info in the original post should be preserved, but understood for what it is.  

    Hopefully, further subsequent discussion can occur on an appropriate thread(s) under General Discussion or something.  

    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #3 on: August 24, 2014, 04:13:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • At one time, I was in possession of Demonology by Montague Summers (another authoritative read on the topic)
    Omnes pro Christo

    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #4 on: August 24, 2014, 04:19:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Himagain
    Quote from: Jehanne
    The number of "victims" of the Inquisitions has been greatly exaggerated in the above article:

    Quote
    Beginning in the 19th century, historians have gradually compiled statistics drawn from the surviving court records, from which estimates have been calculated by adjusting the recorded number of convictions by the average rate of docuмent loss for each time period. García Cárcel estimates that the total number of people put on trial by inquisitorial courts throughout their history was approximately 150,000, of which about 3,000 were executed - about two percent of the number of people put on trial. Gustav Henningsen and Jaime Contreras studied the records of the Spanish Inquisition, which list 44,674 cases of which 826 resulted in executions in person and 778 in effigy (i.e. a straw dummy was burned in place of the person).[39] William Monter estimated there were 1000 executions between 1530–1630 and 250 between 1630–1730.[40] Jean-Pierre Dedieu studied the records of Toledo's tribunal, which put 12,000 people on trial.[41] For the period prior to 1530, Henry Kamen estimated there were about 2,000 executions in all of Spain's tribunals.[42]


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition#Statistics

    I would request that Matthew remove the above post.


    Jehanne,
    There are a lot more problems that "the number of victims", but the info I posted above composed by one "Wicasta Lovelace" is not intended as an advocacy of the position or "facts" written therein.  
    Malleus is currently (or at least recently has been) propagated most prominently by Wicca and the like.  They disseminate the info as propaganda by which they declare the church as superstitious, backward, and dangerous to free thinking people.  
    This Malleus was transcribed, by hand, by one such Wicca.  I think that it behooves Catholics to be aware of this docuмent, it's original uses, it's place in Catholic history, and it's current uses.  
    Therefore, I think the info in the original post should be preserved, but understood for what it is.  

    Hopefully, further subsequent discussion can occur on an appropriate thread(s) under General Discussion or something.  


    Witches exist in that there are individuals who, in fact, claim to be witches (or, for men, warlocks).


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27089/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #5 on: August 24, 2014, 05:19:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This seems to be the much-needed discussion thread.

    To have a pure, "no discussion" version, please post the text/pdf in the library.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline cantatedomino

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1019
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #6 on: August 24, 2014, 05:52:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 1. Wicasta is a male.

    2. Has anyone here actually read the Malleus?

    3. Is it suitable for lay people to read?

    Offline cantatedomino

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1019
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #7 on: August 24, 2014, 06:05:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Himagain
    I think that it behooves Catholics to be aware of this docuмent, it's original uses, it's place in Catholic history, and it's current uses.  
    Therefore, I think the info in the original post should be preserved, but understood for what it is.  

    Hopefully, further subsequent discussion can occur on an appropriate thread(s) under General Discussion or something.  


    Yes, I agree.

    I am thinking about reading it but don't want to wade into something not fit for my soul and state in life.

    I read most of question one and my mind is on fire with thoughts about how this explains much of what we see in the world today.

    For example, in question 1 we find this little gem of a proposition:

    Malleus:
    Quote
    Whoever believes that any creature can be changed for the better or the worse, or transformed into another kind or likeness, except by the Creator of all things, is worse than a pagan and a heretic. And so when they report such things are done by witches it is not Catholic, but plainly heretical, to maintain this opinion. http://www.malleusmaleficarum.org/question-i/


    Now what is the essential principle of evolution if not that creatures can be transformed, transmuted, transpeciated - changed into another kind or likeness - by some cause other than Almighty God?

    Evolution is a principle of diabolism.

    It is the tyrannically imposed, hotly defended, and absolutely entrenched modernist/satanist worldview, even of self-nominated "Bible-believing Christians."

    Evolution is a false religious belief, coming from an occult miasma that believes (falsely) in transmutation of created kinds.

    The transhumanism movement is, by this barometer, entirely pagan, entirely luciferian, entirely antichrist.


    Offline cantatedomino

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1019
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #8 on: August 24, 2014, 06:09:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Another interesting aspect of the above quote, and many other statements contained in Question 1, is how readily the inquisitors boldly state that if you do or believe such and such, you aint Catholic - you be a heretic.

    Dissimulous diplomacy and limp-wristed political correctness in qualifying the enemies of Christ were not yet in vogue, or so it seems.


    Offline cantatedomino

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1019
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #9 on: August 24, 2014, 06:11:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Based on the above quote, if you believe in evolution, you are worse than a pagan and a heretic.

    And that is most certainly the truth because, if you believe in evolution, you are both unnatural and a blasphemer.

    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #10 on: August 24, 2014, 07:37:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: cantatedomino


    2. Has anyone here actually read the Malleus?

    3. Is it suitable for lay people to read?


    2. Yes.
    3. It was interesting, in some ways, but not really applicable to our times.
    Demonology, the other book I mentioned on this topic was more to my liking.
    Omnes pro Christo


    Offline JohnAnthonyMarie

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1297
    • Reputation: +603/-63
    • Gender: Male
      • TraditionalCatholic.net
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #11 on: August 24, 2014, 08:48:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If, as some might content, the true Sacrifice of the Mass was reduced in frequency, by location and Rite, then, as a natural consequence, the forces of evil, which prey on the Sacred Body and Blood of our Lord, the Christ Jesus, present in the Holy Sacrament of the Mass, for their nefarious purposes, would also be drawn to these locations.

    Stated again, if the True Sacrifice of the Mass is reduced to a handful of physical locations, then as a consequence, the agents of evil which require the Sacred Host for their sacrilegious purposes will also be forced to these locations.

    Think about it.

    I know, first hand, that this is occurring.
    Omnes pro Christo

    Offline Columba

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 552
    • Reputation: +729/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #12 on: August 24, 2014, 10:32:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You have previously noticed that Wicasta's site http://www.malleusmaleficarum.org is back up. Thanks for pointing that out.

    Quote from: cantatedomino
    1. Wicasta is a male.

    2. Has anyone here actually read the Malleus?

    3. Is it suitable for lay people to read?

    I have read the Malleus and found it to be quite an eye-opener but it can be difficult to understand. I will post more on this later.

    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #13 on: August 25, 2014, 11:38:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    n 1490, only three years after it was published, the Catholic Church condemned the Malleus Maleficarum as false. In 1538 the Spanish Inquisition cautioned its members not to believe everything the Malleus Maleficarum said, even when it presented apparently firm evidence.[42]


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malleus_Maleficarum

    Offline Columba

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 552
    • Reputation: +729/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Malleus Maleficarum and commentary
    « Reply #14 on: August 25, 2014, 12:35:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    Quote
    n 1490, only three years after it was published, the Catholic Church condemned the Malleus Maleficarum as false. In 1538 the Spanish Inquisition cautioned its members not to believe everything the Malleus Maleficarum said, even when it presented apparently firm evidence.[42]


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malleus_Maleficarum

    Satanists who control the media endeavor to cover their tracks. By what docuмent did "the Catholic Church" condemn the Malleus in 1490?

    "The Spanish Inquisition" did not have any members. All members of the Catholic Church supported and cooperated with the Inquisition. By what docuмent did the Catholic Church in Spain condemn the Malleus in 1538?