Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Litany of Garrulous Karolus - reasons why he should not be canonized  (Read 963 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18177
  • Reputation: +8276/-692
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Donachie lit a fire under me and it didn't belong on the Confirmation Name Thread




    Quote from: Donachie
    Quote from: Neil Obstat


    Then along comes JPII -- I'm not qualified to write that chapter.   In short, it
    seems to me that the world is in for some serious problems if JPII ever gets
    canonized.  I would say "he cannot be canonized," but such strange things
    have been going on lately.  I think that if JPII is canonized, the bounds of
    God's limits will have been overstepped.  



    Garrulous Karolus the Koran Kisser, marked with his sign of "faith" by Voodoo and the Buddha at Assisi and instructed like a boy by Castro.

    That may be harsh, but Vatican II is harsh. "Liberalism" is a deceptively harsh disorder, a "diabolical disorientation" as it were.


    OOooo.  We could explore various degrees of 'harshness.'
    And they won't be indistinguishable from the harshness of the Novordien
    revolutionaries.

    It seems to me that your word, "faith" could be reasonably replaced by "filth"
    because it was COW DUNG that the India Hindu priestess rubbed on JPII's
    forehead.  If he didn't want to have people say that he was "marked with the
    sign of filth," then he shouldn't have had that woman smear filth on his head.

    Facts is facts.  So it was done, so let it be written, so let it be said!

    Garrulous Karolus  ------------------  TRUE.
    The Koran Kisser   -------------------  TRUE.
    Marked with the sign of filth  ------- TRUE.
    Worshiper of man -------------------- TRUE.
    Phenomenologist --------------------  TRUE.
    Refused to consecrate Russia ------ TRUE.
    Imposter of indifferentism ---------- TRUE.
    Denier of Sacred Tradition ---------- TRUE.
    Enemy of the Truth of God ---------- TRUE.
    Friend of liberalism ------------------- TRUE.
    Countenancer of heresy ------------ TRUE.
    Tolerator of malignancy ------------- TRUE.
    Panderer of false charity ------------ TRUE.
    Advocate of paganism --------------- TRUE.
    Promoter of pantheism -------------- TRUE.
    Spreader satan's smoke ------------- TRUE.
    Corrupter of Sacred Scripture ------ TRUE.

    And the litany is just getting started.  
    I don't want to be too harsh, you know.  
    A few topics remain untouched here.


    If enough volunteers would pace to and fro chanting the LITANY, on the steps
    outside the hall where they dare to deliberate over his canonization, do ya think
    it would make any difference?


    The only appropriate T-shirt with his image on it would show him wearing a
    MILLSTONE NECKLACE, HANGING ON IRONS.  It would have been "better for
    him,"
    at least he might be compelled thereby to repent before it was too late.

    Hey- maybe that could be a new FASHION item?  





    I'd laugh but it isn't funny.  





    42 And whosoever shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me;
    it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he
    were cast into the sea (Mk. ix. 42)





    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Litany of Garrulous Karolus - reasons why he should not be canonized
    « Reply #1 on: February 25, 2013, 11:02:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's funny because everything about Paul VI is so rancid that it's all right in front of people's faces.  

    But with JP II, he did have charisma but when you review his actions, well, what else is there to say?

    He took the name of John after John XXIII and the name of Paul after Paul VI.  


    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Litany of Garrulous Karolus - reasons why he should not be canonized
    « Reply #2 on: February 25, 2013, 11:09:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • JP II's theology was pure syncretism enthroned.

    I'd like to read his books but I don't want to pay a penny for them.

    You can go to the Vatican website and read his encyclicals (but many are still only in latin).  

    Someone could read the opening paragraphs of JP II's encyclical on the rosary and see how humanistic and modernistic in mentality it is.  The rosary is treated as something that makes us feel good about ourselves.  

    Then, go to Leo XIII's encyclical on the Holy Rosary.

    You can't help but notice the difference.

    Isn't it true too that Leo XIII thought of Islam as idol worship or idolatry and JPII said that Islam and Catholicism worship the same God?  Well, if that's true, one of them is wrong.

    Offline Pelly

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 637
    • Reputation: +118/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Litany of Garrulous Karolus - reasons why he should not be canonized
    « Reply #3 on: February 25, 2013, 01:04:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And don't forget those liturgical abuses.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Litany of Garrulous Karolus - reasons why he should not be canonized
    « Reply #4 on: September 04, 2013, 10:01:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    Now that the so-called canonization of JPII the InGrate is seeming to
    advance by leaps and bounds, maybe it's not too late to develop this
    idea of The Litany (see OP)?

    Does anyone have ideas on additional Litany titles?

    Note:  
    This is the kind of thing that the Devil's Advocate would have raised
    against his cause for canonization ---- is it any wonder then that
    one of his goals was to eliminate the office of the Devil's Advocate?  
    And, since he did just that, this 'elimination' (euphemism intended!) is
    now arguably the primary reason that his own canonization and those
    of his contemporaries will be eventually declared null and void.



    Exponent of Liturgical abuses
    Defender of the heresy of indifferentism
    Defender of the heresy of religious liberty
    Defender of the heresy of false collegiality
    Defender of the heresy of evolution
    Defender of the heresy of Galileo
    Protector of Sodomites in the Church
    False friend of Fatima
    Conspicuous admirer of clowns
    Obsessed with worldliness
    Surreptitious friend of Freemasons in the Vatican
    Enemy of the office of the Devil's Advocate
    He who paved the way for his own false canonization
    He who left a precedent for his successors to follow
    He who infallibly ignored the request of Our Lady of Fatima
    He who seemed to invoke papal infallibility but in fact did not
    He who effectively mocked papal infallibility with his silence
    He who was negligent as Roman Pontiff
    He who made the revolution of Paul VI appealing to the ignorant
    He who seduced the ignorant to think ignorance is commendable
    He who gave a new, false image to ignorance
    He who purchased the invincibility of ignorance with his blood
    He whose blood ran cold in his own veins
    He who advanced the cause of the Antichrist
    He who advocated the rise of the One World Religion



    [Added to the earlier items from the OP]:

    Garrulous Karolus
    The Koran Kisser  
    Marked with the sign of filth  
    Worshiper of man
    Phenomenologist
    Refused to consecrate Russia
    Imposter of indifferentism
    Denier of Sacred Tradition
    Enemy of the Truth of God
    Friend of Liberalism
    Friend of Communists and the errors of Russia
    Countenancer of heresy
    Tolerator of malignancy
    Panderer of false charity
    Advocate of paganism
    Promoter of pantheism
    Spreader satan's smoke
    Corrupter of Sacred Scripture
    Agent of the wiles and snares of the devil


    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Litany of Garrulous Karolus - reasons why he should not be canonized
    « Reply #5 on: September 04, 2013, 12:01:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You're off to a good start with JPII's litany.  

    Other entries will come to you (or others) in time!