“[…] once you factor in the ~$140,000 I spent paying my contractors and collaborators for the game, you begin to see that maybe it wasn’t, financially speaking, worth it. I guess I will have to wait a bit longer to buy that Juicero.
“Joking aside — that’s dismal. And terrifying. At the end of the day it’s astounding that a game that got this much attention from the press, that won awards, that had an all-star cast of writers and performers, that had a bizarre celebrity guest appearance(!) failed this hard. It scares me.”

Johnnemann @johnnemann

Gators have been digging up past tweets where I said nasty things about GG and saying "this is why I'll never buy your game!"
Motherfucker, you won't buy my game because its content and creation are the antithesis of everything you stand for. In fact, I forbid you from buying it.

7:22 PM - Apr 4, 2018

• 
  1,075
• 
  250 people are talking about this

In the post-mortem, Nordhagen patted himself on the back for hiring a “fantastic crew of incredibly talented writers from a wide variety of diverse backgrounds,” failing to note that none of them were ideologically diverse. He noted that prior to its release, the game received a lot of attention from the press, and its presence at conventions and awards groups (including a nomination at the Independent Games Festival) put it on the path for commercial success.
The game featured the writing of VICE Waypoint editor-in-chief Austin Walker, who infamously refused to allow his publication to cover Kingdom Come: Deliverance over ideological concerns.
On Walker’s publication, Waypoint, its writers expressed their opposition to the conservative views of Kingdom Come’s creator, Daniel Vávra, who supported the GamerGate movement  for ethics in games journalism and shared viewpoints expressed by MILO. As DANGEROUS previously reported, sales of Kingdom Come are soaring despite the media boycott.

So...it's not the game itself that is necessarily "liberal" but the writers of the game's storyline that are liberal?

Of course the storyline is part of the game, but none of the posts give any description of the storyline which would make me think of this as a "liberal" game.  The last post from Matthew says that the writers are liberals and talks about a publication that refused to talk about a game because the creator of that game has "conservative views".

I confess that I don't play any of these storyline video games so, perhaps, whether a game is conservative or liberal is determined by the political views of the creators and it really doesn't matter what's in the game.  I'm just trying to understand what makes this game a "liberal game" and that information, if anyone knows, has not been explained yet.

Actually, you still haven't answered my question.  You're saying that's what you think the screen shots look like.  I'm seeing a character smoking a cigarette and that's no longer considered a liberal ideal.  
I remember watching people play a game in which they were a car thief and all you did was steal and hijack cars, run from the police, and run over people and wreck the cars--then you got out and hijacked another car.  I thought it was rather stupid, but that was a game in which the character (i.e., the player) was an anarchist.  No one complained that this was a "liberal game".
I'm asking what actually makes this game a "liberal game".  Other than the title being pretty hipster-ish, I haven't seen anything that makes the game itself "liberal".

i wil just axsept yer gess wy its thot too bee a libral game sinse nobodie heer reely seems too nose,